Notes
Unless otherwise noted, all references are to this book.
Some 10 years ago, Sheets-Johnstone published another collection of essays, aptly entitled The Primacy of Movement (Sheets-Johnstone 1999).
Somewhat surprisingly, perhaps, Sheets-Johnstone is not a fan of Merleau-Ponty. Among other things, he is charged with failing to examine the experience of movement and as a consequence missing “its dynamic kinetic structure” (p. 263).
See Bennett and Hacker (2003) for a very similar critique of a range of prominent cognitive neuroscientists.
I should mention that this is another term Sheets-Johnstone dislikes because of the emphasis it places on linguistic abilities. Infants are not properly called “prelinguistic”; rather, “the acquisition of verbal language is post-kinetic” (p. 225).
This is my term, not Sheets-Johnstone’s. She speaks of a “phenomenological hermeneutics” that can be applied to paleoanthropology (p. 93).
References
Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference. Translated by A. Bass. London: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1954). Was heisst Denken? Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Overgaard, S. Movement is our mother tongue. Phenom Cogn Sci 10, 139–143 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9179-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9179-6