Abstract
Background Clinicians prescribe high-cost medicines for rare diseases and nonapproved indications when conventional therapies have failed. Objective To examine the use of non-formulary high-cost medicines at an Australian public hospital. Methods Retrospective audit of individual patient use applications for nonformulary medicines costing more than $5000 AUD per year at a large tertiary referral hospital in Adelaide, South Australia over a 12-month study period from January 2015 to December 2015. Main outcome measures Total cost of non-formulary high-cost medicines, medication class, indications for use, level of supporting evidence and proposed monitoring outcomes. Results Eighty-seven individual patient use applications were examined. All except one were approved, at a total cost of $1,339,203 AUD. The most common drug classes were anti-CD20 (n = 33, 38%), combined antiretrovirals (n = 10, 11%) and TNF-alpha antagonists (n = 10, 11%). There were 56 indications for these medicines with the majority being inflammatory conditions (n = 52, 60%), followed by infections (n = 14, 16%) and malignancies (n = 14, 16%). Of the first-time individual patient use applications (n = 63), there were 25 applications (40%) that provided a case series as supporting evidence. Approximately half of new individual patient use applications (n = 32) proposed an objective monitoring outcome, but few (n = 13, 21%) contained sufficient information to allow a third party to determine efficacy of the medication. Conclusions Non-formulary high-cost medicines are being used for a broad range of indications based largely on low levels of evidence. Prospective definition of an adequate response to treatment and reporting of these outcomes is required to improve the evidence-base and to aid decision-making for subsequent treatment courses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Victorian Therapeutic Advisory Group VicTAG. Hospital price and resource allocation review: good practice model for controlling medicines costs in hospitals. Melbourne: Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group; 2004.
Australian Government Department of Health. PBS Frequently Asked Questions. 2019. http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/general/faq. Accessed Apr 2019.
Tan EL, Day RO, Brien JE. Drug and therapeutics committees — are they fulfilling their potential to improve the quality use of medicines? Int J Pharm Pract. 2003;11(3):175–81.
Council of Australian Therapeutic Advisory Groups. Guiding principles for the quality use of off-label medicines. 2013. http://www.catag.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/OKA9963-CATAG-Rethinking-Medicines-Decision-Making-final1.pdf. Accessed May 2018.
Department of Health. Quality Use of Medicines (QUM). 2011. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/nmp-quality.htm. Accessed Mar 2019.
Gallego G, Melocco T, Taylor S, Brien J. Impact of high-cost drugs for individual patient use. J Pharm Pract Res. 2004;34:100–3.
Lu CY, Williams K, Day R, March L, Sansom L, Bertouch J. Access to high cost drugs in Australia. BMJ. 2004;329(7463):415–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7463.415.
Parliament of Australia. Growth in expenditure on high cost drugs in Australia. 2015. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1415/ExpendCostDrugs. Accessed Mar 2019.
Schumock GT, Li EC, Wiest MD, Suda KJ, Stubbings J, Matusiak LM, et al. National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2017. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017;74(15):1158–73. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170164.
SA Health. South Australian Medicines Formulary. 2017. http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/medicinesformulary. Accessed May 2018.
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. 2019. https://www.tga.gov.au/artg. Accessed Mar 2019.
National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for guideline developers. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra. 2009. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/developers/nhmrc_levels_grades_evidence_120423.pdf. Accessed May 2018.
Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis–oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238–44.
Danes I, Agusti A, Vallano A, Alerany C, Martinez J, Bosch JA, et al. Outcomes of off-label drug uses in hospitals: a multicentric prospective study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(11):1385–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-014-1746-2.
Danes I, Agusti A, Vallano A, Martinez J, Alerany C, Ferrer A, et al. Available evidence and outcome of off-label use of rituximab in clinical practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(9):1689–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1518-4.
Chay J, Donovan P, Cummins L, Kubler P, Pillans P. Experience with low-dose rituximab in off-label indications at two tertiary hospitals. Intern Med J. 2013;43(8):871–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12207.
Le Jeunne C, Billon N, Dandon A, participants of round table NdoGX, Berdai D, Adgibi Y et al. Off-label prescriptions: how to identify them, frame them, announce them and monitor them in practice? Therapie. 2013;68(4):225–39. https://doi.org/10.2515/therapie/2013041.
Australian Government Department of Health. Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra 2016.
Australian Government Department of Health. Public Summary Document (PSD) November 2014 PBAC Meeting. 2014. http://www.pbs.gov.au/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/psd/2014-11/files/dolutegravir-lamivudine-abacavir-psd-11-2014.pdf. Accessed May 2018.
Green JA, Chawla AK, Fong PA. Evaluating a restrictive formulary system by assessing nonformulary-drug requests. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985;42(7):1537–41.
Zhao S, Nair JR, Moots RJ. Biosimilars: from extrapolation into off label use. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(44):6746–51. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666171129193258.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Joshua Inglis, Gillian Caughey and Sepehr Shakib declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B: Complete list of indications for non-formulary high-cost medicines
Indication | Applications for use (N) |
---|---|
Human immunodeficiency virus | 10 (11%) |
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis | 4 (5%) |
Myasthenia gravis | 3 (3%) |
Membranous glomerulonephritis | 3 (3%) |
Systemic lupus erythematosus | 3 (3%) |
Hidradenitis suppurativa | 3 (3%) |
Thyroid cancer | 2 (2%) |
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura | 2 (2%) |
Sarcoidosis | 2 (2%) |
Pyoderma grangrenosum | 2 (2%) |
Myelodysplastic syndrome | 2 (2%) |
Idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura | 2 (2%) |
Graft-versus-host disease | 2 (2%) |
Gout | 2 (2%) |
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy | 2 (2%) |
Breast cancer | 2 (2%) |
Acute myeloid leukaemia | 2 (2%) |
Systemic sclerosis | 1 (1%) |
Peripheral neuropathy | 1 (1%) |
Pemphigus vulgaris | 1 (1%) |
Osteosarcoma | 1 (1%) |
Neurosarcoid | 1 (1%) |
Nephrotic syndrome | 1 (1%) |
Multiple sclerosis | 1 (1%) |
Mucormycosis | 1 (1%) |
Melanoma | 1 (1%) |
Malignant otitis exterma | 1 (1%) |
Inflammatory myositis | 1 (1%) |
IgM paraproteinemic polyneuropathy | 1 (1%) |
Idiopathic inflammatory myelopathy | 1 (1%) |
Hyperparathyroidism | 1 (1%) |
Hereditary angioedema | 1 (1%) |
Hepatitis B virus | 1 (1%) |
Haemophilia A | 1 (1%) |
Haemolytic anaemia | 1 (1%) |
Deep vein thrombosis | 1 (1%) |
Chronic myeloid leukaemia | 1 (1%) |
Castleman disease | 1 (1%) |
Blau syndrome | 1 (1%) |
Bechet’s disease | 1 (1%) |
Autoimmune-mediated necrotising myopathy | 1 (1%) |
Autoimmune encephalitis | 1 (1%) |
Autoimmune autonomic neuropathy | 1 (1%) |
Aspergullus fumigatus | 1 (1%) |
Antibody-mediated rejection | 1 (1%) |
Angiodysplasia | 1 (1%) |
Amylodosis | 1 (1%) |
Essential thrombocytosis | 1 (1%) |
Chronic idiopathic urticaria | 1 (1%) |
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia | 1 (1%) |
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder | 1 (1%) |
Cystic fibrosis | 1 (1%) |
Grave’s orbitopathy | 1 (1%) |
Bronchiectasis | 1 (1%) |
Antibody-mediated rejection | 1 (1%) |
Hodgkin’s lymphoma | 1 (1%) |
Appendix C: NHMRC evidence hierarchy
Level | Intervention |
---|---|
I | A systematic review of level II studies |
II | A randomised controlled trial |
III-1 | A pseudorandomised controlled trial |
III-2 | Comparative study with concurrent control |
Non-randomised, experimental trial | |
Cohort study | |
Case–control study | |
Interrupted time series with a control group | |
III-3 | Comparative study without concurrent controls |
Historical control study | |
Two or more single arm study | |
Interrupted time series without a parallel control group | |
IV | Case series with either post-test or pre-test/post-test outcomes |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inglis, J.M., Caughey, G.E. & Shakib, S. Use of non-formulary high-cost medicines in an Australian public hospital. Int J Clin Pharm 41, 920–931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00853-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00853-z