Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of non-formulary high-cost medicines in an Australian public hospital

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Clinicians prescribe high-cost medicines for rare diseases and nonapproved indications when conventional therapies have failed. Objective To examine the use of non-formulary high-cost medicines at an Australian public hospital. Methods Retrospective audit of individual patient use applications for nonformulary medicines costing more than $5000 AUD per year at a large tertiary referral hospital in Adelaide, South Australia over a 12-month study period from January 2015 to December 2015. Main outcome measures Total cost of non-formulary high-cost medicines, medication class, indications for use, level of supporting evidence and proposed monitoring outcomes. Results Eighty-seven individual patient use applications were examined. All except one were approved, at a total cost of $1,339,203 AUD. The most common drug classes were anti-CD20 (n = 33, 38%), combined antiretrovirals (n = 10, 11%) and TNF-alpha antagonists (n = 10, 11%). There were 56 indications for these medicines with the majority being inflammatory conditions (n = 52, 60%), followed by infections (n = 14, 16%) and malignancies (n = 14, 16%). Of the first-time individual patient use applications (n = 63), there were 25 applications (40%) that provided a case series as supporting evidence. Approximately half of new individual patient use applications (n = 32) proposed an objective monitoring outcome, but few (n = 13, 21%) contained sufficient information to allow a third party to determine efficacy of the medication. Conclusions Non-formulary high-cost medicines are being used for a broad range of indications based largely on low levels of evidence. Prospective definition of an adequate response to treatment and reporting of these outcomes is required to improve the evidence-base and to aid decision-making for subsequent treatment courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Victorian Therapeutic Advisory Group VicTAG. Hospital price and resource allocation review: good practice model for controlling medicines costs in hospitals. Melbourne: Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Government Department of Health. PBS Frequently Asked Questions. 2019. http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/general/faq. Accessed Apr 2019.

  3. Tan EL, Day RO, Brien JE. Drug and therapeutics committees — are they fulfilling their potential to improve the quality use of medicines? Int J Pharm Pract. 2003;11(3):175–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Council of Australian Therapeutic Advisory Groups. Guiding principles for the quality use of off-label medicines. 2013. http://www.catag.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/OKA9963-CATAG-Rethinking-Medicines-Decision-Making-final1.pdf. Accessed May 2018.

  5. Department of Health. Quality Use of Medicines (QUM). 2011. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/nmp-quality.htm. Accessed Mar 2019.

  6. Gallego G, Melocco T, Taylor S, Brien J. Impact of high-cost drugs for individual patient use. J Pharm Pract Res. 2004;34:100–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu CY, Williams K, Day R, March L, Sansom L, Bertouch J. Access to high cost drugs in Australia. BMJ. 2004;329(7463):415–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7463.415.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Parliament of Australia. Growth in expenditure on high cost drugs in Australia. 2015. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1415/ExpendCostDrugs. Accessed Mar 2019.

  9. Schumock GT, Li EC, Wiest MD, Suda KJ, Stubbings J, Matusiak LM, et al. National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2017. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017;74(15):1158–73. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SA Health. South Australian Medicines Formulary. 2017. http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/medicinesformulary. Accessed May 2018.

  11. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. 2019. https://www.tga.gov.au/artg. Accessed Mar 2019.

  12. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for guideline developers. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra. 2009. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/developers/nhmrc_levels_grades_evidence_120423.pdf. Accessed May 2018.

  13. Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis–oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157(4):238–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Danes I, Agusti A, Vallano A, Alerany C, Martinez J, Bosch JA, et al. Outcomes of off-label drug uses in hospitals: a multicentric prospective study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70(11):1385–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-014-1746-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Danes I, Agusti A, Vallano A, Martinez J, Alerany C, Ferrer A, et al. Available evidence and outcome of off-label use of rituximab in clinical practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(9):1689–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-013-1518-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chay J, Donovan P, Cummins L, Kubler P, Pillans P. Experience with low-dose rituximab in off-label indications at two tertiary hospitals. Intern Med J. 2013;43(8):871–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Le Jeunne C, Billon N, Dandon A, participants of round table NdoGX, Berdai D, Adgibi Y et al. Off-label prescriptions: how to identify them, frame them, announce them and monitor them in practice? Therapie. 2013;68(4):225–39. https://doi.org/10.2515/therapie/2013041.

  18. Australian Government Department of Health. Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Canberra 2016.

  19. Australian Government Department of Health. Public Summary Document (PSD) November 2014 PBAC Meeting. 2014. http://www.pbs.gov.au/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/psd/2014-11/files/dolutegravir-lamivudine-abacavir-psd-11-2014.pdf. Accessed May 2018.

  20. Green JA, Chawla AK, Fong PA. Evaluating a restrictive formulary system by assessing nonformulary-drug requests. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985;42(7):1537–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao S, Nair JR, Moots RJ. Biosimilars: from extrapolation into off label use. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(44):6746–51. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666171129193258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua M. Inglis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Joshua Inglis, Gillian Caughey and Sepehr Shakib declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d

Appendix B: Complete list of indications for non-formulary high-cost medicines

Indication

Applications for use (N)

Human immunodeficiency virus

10 (11%)

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

4 (5%)

Myasthenia gravis

3 (3%)

Membranous glomerulonephritis

3 (3%)

Systemic lupus erythematosus

3 (3%)

Hidradenitis suppurativa

3 (3%)

Thyroid cancer

2 (2%)

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

2 (2%)

Sarcoidosis

2 (2%)

Pyoderma grangrenosum

2 (2%)

Myelodysplastic syndrome

2 (2%)

Idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura

2 (2%)

Graft-versus-host disease

2 (2%)

Gout

2 (2%)

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

2 (2%)

Breast cancer

2 (2%)

Acute myeloid leukaemia

2 (2%)

Systemic sclerosis

1 (1%)

Peripheral neuropathy

1 (1%)

Pemphigus vulgaris

1 (1%)

Osteosarcoma

1 (1%)

Neurosarcoid

1 (1%)

Nephrotic syndrome

1 (1%)

Multiple sclerosis

1 (1%)

Mucormycosis

1 (1%)

Melanoma

1 (1%)

Malignant otitis exterma

1 (1%)

Inflammatory myositis

1 (1%)

IgM paraproteinemic polyneuropathy

1 (1%)

Idiopathic inflammatory myelopathy

1 (1%)

Hyperparathyroidism

1 (1%)

Hereditary angioedema

1 (1%)

Hepatitis B virus

1 (1%)

Haemophilia A

1 (1%)

Haemolytic anaemia

1 (1%)

Deep vein thrombosis

1 (1%)

Chronic myeloid leukaemia

1 (1%)

Castleman disease

1 (1%)

Blau syndrome

1 (1%)

Bechet’s disease

1 (1%)

Autoimmune-mediated necrotising myopathy

1 (1%)

Autoimmune encephalitis

1 (1%)

Autoimmune autonomic neuropathy

1 (1%)

Aspergullus fumigatus

1 (1%)

Antibody-mediated rejection

1 (1%)

Angiodysplasia

1 (1%)

Amylodosis

1 (1%)

Essential thrombocytosis

1 (1%)

Chronic idiopathic urticaria

1 (1%)

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

1 (1%)

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

1 (1%)

Cystic fibrosis

1 (1%)

Grave’s orbitopathy

1 (1%)

Bronchiectasis

1 (1%)

Antibody-mediated rejection

1 (1%)

Hodgkin’s lymphoma

1 (1%)

Appendix C: NHMRC evidence hierarchy

Level

Intervention

I

A systematic review of level II studies

II

A randomised controlled trial

III-1

A pseudorandomised controlled trial

III-2

Comparative study with concurrent control

 Non-randomised, experimental trial

 Cohort study

 Case–control study

 Interrupted time series with a control group

III-3

Comparative study without concurrent controls

 Historical control study

 Two or more single arm study

 Interrupted time series without a parallel control group

IV

Case series with either post-test or pre-test/post-test outcomes

  1. NHMRC National health and medical research council

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inglis, J.M., Caughey, G.E. & Shakib, S. Use of non-formulary high-cost medicines in an Australian public hospital. Int J Clin Pharm 41, 920–931 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00853-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00853-z

Keywords

Navigation