Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Finite Element Modeling of Powder Compaction: Mini-Tablets in Comparison with Conventionally Sized Tablets

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Mini-tablets are considered a promising solid dosage form in the pharmaceutical industry due to advantages such as dosing accuracy, efficiency as a drug delivery system, and alleged improvement in mechanical properties. Nevertheless, only a few experimental studies are available in the literature regarding this topic and technical aspects, such as punch’s shape and size effect on the stress and density distribution in the compact mini-tablets, are still not fully investigated.

Objectives

In this paper, the influence of powder properties and process parameters, such as punch shape and size, on the evolution of mechanical properties during the tableting process and the potential occurrence of tablet defects are investigated using the mechanistic modeling approach, Finite Element Method (FEM).

Methods

The numerical simulation cases consist of four different die sizes, mini-tablets of 2 mm, and 3 mm, and conventionally sized tablets of 8 mm and 11.28 mm. Each tablet size is simulated using four distinctive excipients, Avicel® PH-102, Kollidon® VA64, Pearlitol® 100SD, and Supertab® 11SD, and two different punch geometries, a flat-face punch, and a bevel edge punch.

Results

The model predictions in terms of stress and density distribution at different stages of the compaction process indicate similar behavior in terms of density and stress distribution profiles between the conventionally sized tablets and mini-tablets for a particular excipient.

Conclusions

Based on tablet size, small localized differences are noted (e.g., low-density regions, high shear bands, and heterogeneous density profiles), suggesting a possible risk of tableting defects for conventionally sized tablets compared to mini-tablets. Furthermore, it is observed that bevel-edged tablets could facilitate the formation of cracks, leading to possible capping failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abaqus I. 2006. Abaqus theory manual version 6.6-1: Abaqus.

  2. Adams MJ, McKeown R. Micromechanical analyses of the pressure-volume relationship for powders under confined uniaxial compression. Powder Technol 1996;88(2):155–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad J, Noor MJM, Jais MIF, Rahman ASA, Senin SF, Ibrahim A, Hadi BA. Mathematical models for stress-strain curve prediction-a. AIP Conference Proceedings vol 20005; 2020.

  4. Aleksovski A, Dreu R, Gǎperlin M, Planiňek O. Mini-tablets: a contemporary system for oral drug delivery in targeted patient groups. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2014;12(1):65–84. ISSN 17447593. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2014.951633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baroutaji A , Lenihan S, Bryan K. Combination of finite element 397 method and drucker-prager cap material model for simulation of pharma398 ceutical tableting process: Kombination der finite-elemente-methode mit dem drucker-prager cap materialmodel zur simulation von pharmazeutis400 chen tablettierungsprozessen. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 2017;48(11):1133–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cunningham J, LaMarche K, Zavaliangos A. Modeling of powder compaction with the drucker-prager cap model. Predictive modeling of pharmaceutical unit operations, pp 205–227. Elsevier Inc. ISBN 9780081001806. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100154-7.00008-9; 2017.

  7. Denny PJ. Compaction equations: a comparison of the heckel and kawakita equations. Powder Technol 2002;127(2):162–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhondt J, Bertels J, Kumar A, Van Hauwermeiren D, Ryckaert A, Van Snick B, Klingeleers D, Vervaet C, De Beer T. 2022. A multivariate formulation and process development platform for direct compression, Vol. 623.

  9. Eiliazadeh B, Briscoe BJ, Sheng Y, Pitt K. Investigating density distributions for tablets of different geometry during the compaction of pharmaceuticals. Part Sci Technol 2003;21(4):303–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garner S, Ruiz E, Strong J, Zavaliangos A. Mechanisms of crack formation in die compacted powders during unloading and ejection: An experimental and modeling comparison between standard straight and tapered dies. Powder Technol 2014;264:114–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Giannis K , Schilde C, Finke JH, Kwade A. Modeling of high-density compaction of pharmaceutical tablets using multi-contact discrete element method. Pharmaceutics 2021;13(12):2194. ISSN 19994923. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS13122194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gou D, Li Y, An X, Yang R. DEM modelling of particle fragmentation during compaction of particles. Powder Technol 2022;398:117073. ISSN 0032-5910. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POWTEC.2021.117073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Han LH, Elliott JA, Bentham AC, Mills A, Amidon GE, hancock BC. A modified drucker-prager cap model for die compaction simulation of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Solids Struct 2008;45(10): 3088–3106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961; 221(4):671–675.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadiri MS, Michrafy A. The effect of punch’s shape on die compaction of pharmaceutical powders. Powder technol 2013;239:467–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawakita K, Lüdde K-H. Some considerations on powder compression equations. Powder technol 1971;4(2):61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kokott M, Lura A, Breitkreutz J , Wiedey R. Evaluation of two novel co-processed excipients for direct compression of orodispersible tablets and mini-tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2021;168:122–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krok A, Peciar M, Fekete R. Numerical investigation into the influence of the punch shape on the mechanical behavior of pharmaceutical powders during compaction. Particuology 2014;16:116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krok A, Wu CY. Finite element modeling of powder compaction. Engineering crystallography: from molecule to crystal to functional form, pp 451–462. Springer; 2017.

  20. Lura A, Tardy G, Kleinebudde P, Breitkreutz J. Tableting of mini-tablets in comparison with conventionally sized tablets: a comparison of tableting properties and tablet dimensions. Int J Pharm: X 2020;2:100061.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazel V, Diarra H, Tchoreloff P. Effect of friction between powder and tooling on the die-wall pressure evolution during tableting: experimental and numerical results for flat and concave punches. Int J Pharm 2019;554:116–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Meynard J, Amado-Becker F, Tchoreloff P, Mazel V. On the complexity of predicting tablet capping. Int J Pharm 2022;623:121949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandey P, Bharadwaj R, Chen X. 2017. Modeling of drug product manufacturing processes in the pharmaceutical industry.Predictive Modeling of Pharmaceutical Unit Operations, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100154-7.00001-6.

  24. Partheniadis I, Terzi V, Nikolakakis I. Finite element analysis and modeling in pharmaceutical tableting. Pharmaceutics 2022;14(3):673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. 2006. Compression physics in the formulation development of tablets. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst, vol 23(1).

  26. Pich CH, Moest T. Magensaftresistent ü,berzogene zylindrische pankreatin-mikrotabletten. EU Patent EP 0 1989;166(315):B1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Helwany S. 2007. Applied soil mechanics with abaqus applications.

  28. Shang C, Sinka IC, Pan J. Constitutive model calibration for powder compaction using instrumented die testing. Exp Mech 2012;52(7):903–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sinka IC, Burch SF, Tweed JH, Cunningham JC. Measurement of density variations in tablets using x-ray computed tomography. Int J Pharm 2004;271(1–2):215–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinka IC, Cunningham JC, Zavaliangos A. Analysis of tablet compaction. ii. finite element analysis of density distributions in convex tablets. J. Pharm Sci 2004;93(8):2040–2053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Walker EE. The properties of powders. part vi. the compressibility of powders. Trans Farad Soc 1923;19(July):73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu C-Y, Hancock BC, Mills A, Bentham AC, Best SM, Elliott JA. Numerical and experimental investigation of capping mechanisms during pharmaceutical tablet compaction. Powder Technol 2008;181 (2):121–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu C-Y, Ruddy OM, Bentham AC, Hancock BC, Best SM, Elliott JA. Modelling the mechanical behaviour of pharmaceutical powders during compaction. Powder Technol 2005;152(1-3):107–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this research from the BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds Universiteit Gent, Research Fund Ghent University) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pharmaceutical Engineering Research Group (PharmaEng), Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Luz Nadiezda Naranjo Gómez & Ashish Kumar

  2. Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Process Analytical Technology (LPPAT), Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Luz Nadiezda Naranjo Gómez & Thomas De Beer

Authors
  1. Luz Nadiezda Naranjo Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas De Beer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashish Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naranjo Gómez, L.N., De Beer, T. & Kumar, A. Finite Element Modeling of Powder Compaction: Mini-Tablets in Comparison with Conventionally Sized Tablets. Pharm Res 39, 2109–2118 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03389-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-022-03389-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation