Abstract
Purpose
Transdermal reverse iontophoresis offers a noninvasive tool for clinical and therapeutic monitoring of drugs and endogenous molecules. This study investigated the viability of reverse iontophoresis as an alternative technique to blood sampling for the monitoring of gabapentin.
Methods
Ex vivo studies assessed the influence of polarity, applied current (0.064–0.32 mA) and subdermal concentration (0.5–20 μg/mL) on the recovery of gabapentin. These experiments were carried out in vertical Franz diffusion cell for a period of 3 h using rat skin. In vivo experiments examined the versatility of this method to extract gabapentin from the subdermal region following intravenous administration of gabapentin (30 mg/kg) in rat model.
Results
Preliminary studies demonstrate that greater amount of gabapentin was extracted in the cathodal chamber due to the contribution of electroosmosis. Increasing the current intensity significantly enhances the extraction flux (P < 0.005) and shown linear relation (r2 = 0.84) between the applied electrical dose (mA*h) and the amount of gabapentin recovered (μg). Indeed, transdermal iontophoresis of gabapentin was found to be concentration dependent in the range studied (0.5–20 μg/mL), which includes clinically relevant level. Further, a linear relationship was established between the iontophoretically recovered gabapentin 3 h flux values and the subdermal concentrations studied. The linear correlation with good regression value (r2 = 0.92) observed in the in vivo studies infers that the drug in the plasma is proportionally extracted through the skin and potentially represents the subdermal drug concentrations.
Conclusions
Given the promising results, this study concludes that the transdermal reverse iontophoresis technique could be a promising alternative for the noninvasive monitoring of gabapentin.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jacoby A, Snape D, Baker GA. Epilepsy and social identity: the stigma of a chronic neurological disorder. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(3):171–8.
WHO, World Health Organization Epilepsy: Key facts. Available at: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs999/en Accessed June 3, 2014.
Goldenberg MM. Overview of drugs used for epilepsy and seizures: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;35(7):392–415.
French JA, Gazzola DM. New generation antiepileptic drugs: what do they offer in terms of improved tolerability and safety? Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2011;2(4):141–58.
McLean MJ, Gidal BE. Gabapentin dosing in the treatment of epilepsy. Clin Ther. 2003;25(5):1382–406.
Al-Bachari S, Pulman J, Hutton JL, Marson AG. Gabapentin add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD001415.
Rose MA, Kam PC. Gabapentin: pharmacology and its use in pain management. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(5):451–62.
Johannessen SI, Tomson T. Pharmacokinetic variability of newer antiepileptic drugs: when is monitoring needed? Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45:1061–75.
Krasowski MD. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer anti-epilepsy medications. Pharmaceuticals. 2010;3:1909–35.
Sivenius J, Kälviäinen R, Ylinen A, Riekkinen P. Double-blind study of Gabapentin in the treatment of partial seizures. Epilepsia. 1991;32(4):539–42.
Johannessen SI, Battino D, Berry DJ, Bialer M, Krämer G, Tomson T, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer antiepileptic drugs. Ther Drug Monit. 2003;25:347–63.
Patsalos PN, Berry DJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs by use of saliva. Ther Drug Monit. 2013;35(1):4–29.
Tribut O, Bentué-Ferrer D. Verdier MC; therapeutic drug monitoring of gabapentin. Therapie. 2010;65(1):57–60.
Nair AB, Goel A, Prakash S, Kumar A. Therapeutic drug monitoring by reverse iontophoresis. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2012;3:207–13.
Berry DJ, Beran RG, Plunkeft MJ, Clarke LA, Hung WT. The absorption of gabapentin following high dose escalation. Seizure. 2003;12(1):28–36.
Nixon S, Sieg A, Delgado-Charro MB, Guy RH. Reverse iontophoresis of L-lactate: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96(12):3457–65.
Sieg A, Jeanneret F, Fathi M, Hochstrasser D, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL, et al. Extraction of amino acids by reverse iontophoresis in vivo. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(1):226–31.
Paulley Y, Delgado-Charro MB, White KAJ. Modelling formation of a drug reservoir in the stratum corneum and its impact on drug monitoring using reverse iontophoresis. Comput Math Method M. 2010;11:353–68.
Wang CY, Maibach HI. Why minimally invasive skin sampling techniques? a bright scientific future. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2011;30:1–6.
Leboulanger B, Guy RH, Delgado CMB. Reverse iontophoresis for noninvasive transdermal monitoring. Physiol Meas. 2004;25:R35–50.
Zhu Z, Neirinck L. High-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of gabapentin in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002;779(2):307–12.
Anroop B, Ghosh B, Parcha V, Kumar A, Khanam J. Synthesis and comparative skin permeability of atenolol and propranolol esters. J Drug Del Sci Tech. 2005;15(2):187–90.
Nair AB, Vaka SR, Gupta S, Repka MA, Murthy SN. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a hydrogel-based prototype transdermal patch system of alfuzosin hydrochloride. Pharm Dev Technol. 2012;17:158–63.
Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008;22(3):659–61.
Nair AB, Singh K, Al-Dhubiab BE, Attimarad M, Harsha S, Alhaider IA. Skin uptake and clearance of ciclopirox following topical application. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2013;34:540–9.
Anroop B, Ghosh B, Parcha V, Khanam J. Transdermal delivery of atenolol: effect of prodrugs and iontophoresis. Curr Drug Deliv. 2009;6:280–90.
Sieg A, Wascotte V. Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of iontophoresis. J Drug Target. 2009;17(9):690–700.
Kong VK, Irwin MG. Gabapentin: a multimodal perioperative drug? Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(6):775–86.
Sieg A, Guy RH, Delgado-Charro MB. Electroosmosis in transdermal iontophoresis: implications for noninvasive and calibration-free glucose monitoring. Biophys J. 2004;87(5):3344–50.
Leboulanger B, Fathi M, Guy RH, Delgado-Charro MB. Reverse iontophoresis as a noninvasive tool for lithium monitoring and pharmacokinetic profiling. Pharm Res. 2004;21(7):1214–22.
Lopez RF, Bentley MV, Delgado-Charro MB, Guy RH. Iontophoretic delivery of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA): effect of pH. Pharm Res. 2001;18(3):311–5.
Leboulanger B, Aubry JM, Bondolfi G, Guy RH, Delgado-Charro MB. Lithium monitoring by reverse iontophoresis in vivo. Clin Chem. 2004;50(11):2091–100.
Johannessen Landmark C, Johannessen SI, Tomson T. Host factors affecting antiepileptic drug delivery-pharmacokinetic variability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(10):896–910.
Nair A, Reddy C, Jacob S. Delivery of a classical antihypertensive agent through the skin by chemical enhancers and iontophoresis. Skin Res Technol. 2009;15:187–94.
Acknowledgment and Disclosures
The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Faisal University for funding this research project No. 140069.
Declaration of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nair, A.B., Kumria, R., Al-Dhubiab, B.E. et al. Noninvasive Sampling of Gabapentin by Reverse Iontophoresis. Pharm Res 32, 1417–1424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1546-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-014-1546-5