Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Relevance of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry as an Analytical Method in Microdose Clinical Studies

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To investigate the potency of LC-MS/MS by means of sensitivity and the applicability for cassette dosing in microdose clinical trials.

Methods

Thirty one top-selling 31 drugs were spiked to human plasma, extracted, and analyzed by LC–MS/MS.

Results

The lower limits of quantification for each drug varied from 0.08 to 50 pg/mL, and were lower than one eighth of the assumed maximum plasma concentration at microdose in all drugs except for losartan, indicating the high performance in acquisition of full pharmacokinetic profiles at microdose. We also succeeded in simultaneous analysis of multiple compounds, assuming a situation of cassette dosing in which multiple drug candidates would be administrated simultaneously.

Conclusions

Together with the features of LC–MS/MS, such as immediate verification, the utilization of non-radiolabeled drugs and no special facilities, we suppose that LC–MS/MS analysis would be widely applicable in conducting microdose clinical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AMS:

accelerator mass spectrometry

CmaxClin :

Cmax in clinical PK study

CmaxMD :

Cmax in microdose study

CV:

coefficient of variation

DoseClin :

dose in clinical PK study

DoseMD :

dose in microdose study

EMEA:

European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products

EUMAPP:

European Union Microdose AMS Partnership Programme

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

HILIC:

hydrophilic interaction chromatography

IS:

internal standard

LC–MS/MS:

liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

LLE:

liquid-liquid extraction

LLOQ:

lower limit of quantification

MHLW:

Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare

MRM:

multiple reaction monitoring

ODS:

octadecylsilyl

PET:

positron emission tomography

PK:

pharmacokinetic

QC:

quality control

RE:

relative error

SPE:

solid-phase extraction

REFERENCES

  1. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). Position paper on the nonclinical safety studies to support clinical trials with a single microdose. CPMP/SWP2599/0.; 28 January 2003.

  2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry, investigators, and reviewers exploratory IND studies.; January 2006.

  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Japan. Guidance on microdose clinical trial (Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau Notification No. 0603001).; 2008.

  4. Gilbert J, Henske P, Singh A. Rebuilding big pharma’s business model. Windhover’s In Vivo. Bus Med Rep. 2003;21:73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frank R, Hargreaves R. Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:566–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Suter L, Babiss LE, Wheeldon EB. Toxicogenomics in predictive toxicology in drug development. Chem Biol. 2004;11:161–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamane N, Tozuka Z, Sugiyama Y, Tanimoto T, Yamazaki A, Kumagai Y. Microdose clinical trial: quantitative determination of fexofenadine in human plasma using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2007;858:118–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamane N, Takami T, Tozuka Z, Sugiyama Y, Yamazaki A, Kumagai Y. Microdose clinical trial: quantitative determination of nicardipine and prediction of metabolites in human plasma. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24:391–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lappin G, Garner RC. Big physics, small doses: the use of AMS and PET in human microdosing of development drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;7:233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lappin G, Garner RC. A review of human phase 0 (microdosing) clinical trials following the US food and drug administration exploratory investigational new drug studies guidance. Int J Pharm Med. 2006;20(3):159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu LS, Lapko VN, Lee JW, Basir YJ, Kafonekm C, Kafonekm C, et al. A general approach for the quantitative analysis of biophosphonates in human serum and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectr. 2006;20:3421–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim CU, Lew W, Williams MA, Liu H, Zhang L, Swaminathan S, et al. Influenza neuraminidase inhibitors possessing a novel hydrophobic interaction in the enzyme active site: design, synthesis, and structural analysis of carbocyclic sialic acid analogues with potent anti-influenza activity. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:681–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamatsugu K, Kamijo S, Suto Y, Kanai M, Shibasaki M. A concise synthesis of Tamiflu: third generation route via the Diels-Alder reaction and the Curtius rearrangement. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007;48:1403–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu Y, Wen H, Li W, Chi Y, Zhang Z. Determination of donepezil hydrochloraide (E2020) in plasma by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and its application to pharmacokinetic studies in healthy, young, chinese subjects. J Chromatogr Sci. 2004;42:234–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang AY, Sun L, Musson DG, Zhao JJ. Application of a novel ultra-low elution volume 96-well solid-phase extraction method to the LC/MS/MS determination of simvastatin and simvastatin acid in human plasma. J Pharm Biomed. 2005;38:521–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Posner J, Bye A, Dean K, Peck AW, Whiteman PD. The disposition of bupropion and its metabolites in healthy male volunteers after single and multiple doses. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1985;29:97–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohtawa M, Uchiyama N, Saito Y, Suzuki A, Tanno C, Nakaya N, et al. Phase I study of MK-733, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase II: pharmacokinetics of MK-733 in healthy subjects after single and multiple oral administration. J Clin Ther Med. 1989;5(6):1123–40.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakashima M, Kanamaru M, Uematsu T, Takayama K, Kamei K. Phase I study of MK-954, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist—results of single oral administration. Jap J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;26:671–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Japan. Guidelines for Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Products (Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau Notification No.1124004).; 2006.

  20. Lappin G, Kuhnz W, Jochemsen R, Kneer J, Chaudhary A, Oosterhuis B, et al. Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: experience with 5 drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006;80:203–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. European Union Microdose AMS Partnership Programme (EUMAPP). Outcomes from EUMAPP—A study comparing in vitro, in silico, microdose and pharmacological dose pharmacokinetics – 2009.

  22. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry, bioanalytical method validation.; May 2001.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Naoe Yamane is an employee of JCL Bioassay Corporation, Hyogo, Japan. We thank Drs. M. Shibasaki, M. Kanai, and K. Yamatsugu of the Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of Tokyo, Japan, for donating the gift of oseltamivir phosphate. We also thank to Dr. T. Tanimoto of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Mukogawa Women’s University, Japan, for sharing the reagents with us, and T. Hakui and M. Nishimura of GL Science Inc. for technical support of SPE methods. This work was performed as part of “Innovative Strategies for Drug Development Using Microdosing Clinical Studies,” financed by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO). A part of this work has been presented at the 23rd JSSX (The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics) Annual Meeting “Study on practical application for liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry for determination of drug concentration in human plasma in microdose study.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichi Sugiyama.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 393 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamane, N., Tozuka, Z., Kusama, M. et al. Clinical Relevance of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry as an Analytical Method in Microdose Clinical Studies. Pharm Res 28, 1963–1972 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0423-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-011-0423-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation