Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The long road—how evolving institutional governance mechanisms are changing the face of quality in Portuguese higher education

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While a lot has been written regarding the changing management and governance arrangements in higher education, less is known about how this progression relates to quality in higher education. The purpose of this article is to describe the context of governance in Portuguese higher education institutions and how institutional governance arrangements impact on quality and quality assurance mechanisms of higher education. The study is based on four institutional cases studies, comprising two universities and two polytechnic institutions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior managers, middle managers, academics and students from Arts and Engineering, and documentary analysis was undertaken. The main findings show that national and institutional features of governance and management may influence the implementation of quality policy and procedures, and indeed quality improvement. The different institutional actors seem to be aware of the dynamic nature of the equilibrium between positive and negative impacts and recognise the need for checks and balances in the governance and management structures of higher education institutions, especially between collegial and managerial facets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaral, A., & Magalhães, A. (2001). On markets, autonomy and regulation the Janus Head revisited. Higher Education Policy, 14(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Jones, G. A., & Karseth, B. (Eds.). (2003). Governing higher education: national perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Tavares, O., & Santos, C. (2011). Higher education reform in Portugal: an historical and comparative perspective of the new legal framework for public universities. Paper presented at the Third RESUP international conference, Paris, 27-29 January 2011.

  • Bauer, M., & Kogan, M. (1997). Evaluation systems in the UK and Sweden: successes and difficulties. European Journal of Education, 32(2), 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen Communiqué. (2005). The European higher education area—achieving the goals. Bergen: Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Kogan, M. (2007). Organisation and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D., & Merrien, F.-X. (Eds.). (1999). Towards a new model of governance for universities? London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHEPS. (2007). The extent and impact of higher education governance reform across Europe. Final report to the Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission (Vol. 1). Enschede: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2008). Comparing higher education governance systems in four European countries. In N. C. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 35–54). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. D., & Beerkens, M. (2013). Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: lessons learned about professional, market and government regulation of academic quality. Higher Education, 65(3), 341–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2006). Quality assurance of higher education in Portugal: an assessment of the existing system and recommendations for a future system. Helsinki: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA. (2009). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2009). The governance of higher education systems: a public management perspective. In C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), University governance: western European comparative perspectives (pp. 1–19). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2000). Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M., & Amaral, A. (Eds.). (2005). Reform and change in higher education: analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2010). Using faculty evaluation to improve teaching quality: a longitudinal case study of higher education in Southeast Asia. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(4), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, I. M., Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2009). Four basic dilemmas in university governance reform. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(3), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukkola, T., & Zhang, T. (2010). Examining quality culture: Part 1—quality assurance processes in higher education institutions. Brussels: European University Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Sousa, S., & Ribeiro, F. (2012a). How is European governance configuring the EHEA? European Journal of Higher Education, 2(2–3), 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Sousa, S., Ribeiro, F., & Amaral, A. (2012b). Governance and institutional autonomy: governing and governance in Portuguese higher education. Higher Education Policy, forthcoming.

  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Sousa, S., Ribeiro, F., & Santiago, R. (2012c). Creating a Common Grammar for Higher Education Governance. Higher Education, forthcoming.

  • Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in western Europe, 1986–1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1/2), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1998). The evaluative state reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2008). From guardian to overseer: trends in institutional autonomy. In A. Amaral (Ed.), Políticas do ensino superior: quatro temas em debate (pp. 45–70). Lisboa: Conselho Nacional de Educação.

  • OECD. (2007). Reviews of national policies for education: tertiary education in Portugal. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1992). Governance: models. In B. R. Clark & G. R. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopaedia of higher education (pp. 1376–1384). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). Quality assurance in Europe and the US: professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43(3), 355–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., & Amaral, A. (2012). Is there a bridge between quality and quality assurance? In B. Stensaker, J. Välimaa, & C. S. Sarrico (Eds.), Managing reform in universities: the dynamics of culture, identity and organisational change (pp. 114–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M. J., & Sarrico, C. S. (2012). Quality, evaluation and accreditation: from steering, through compliance, on to enhancement and innovation? In A. Amaral & G. R. Neave (Eds.), Higher education in Portugal 1974–2009. A nation, a generation (pp. 249–264). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B., & Tapper, T. (2002). The politics of governance in higher education: the case of quality assurance. Political Studies, 48(1), 66–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B. (1997). From accountability to opportunity: the role of quality assessments in Norway. Quality in Higher Education, 3(3), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., Langfeldt, L., & Westerheijden, D. (2010). The Impact of the European standards and guidelines in agency evaluations. European Journal of Education, 45(4), 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). An in-depth study on the impact of external quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was supported by the Lifelong Learning Programme, Education and Culture DG, European Commission (grant number CZ-KA1-2010-4663-511491). We would like to thank research assistants Cristina Sin, Maria J. Manatos and Isabel Machado for their help with the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cláudia S. Sarrico.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarrico, C.S., Veiga, A. & Amaral, A. The long road—how evolving institutional governance mechanisms are changing the face of quality in Portuguese higher education. Educ Asse Eval Acc 25, 375–391 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9174-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9174-x

Keywords

Navigation