Skip to main content
Log in

Single comments or average ratings: which elements of RateMyProfessors.com™ shape university students’ judgments and course choice intentions?

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use and abuse of course and lecturer rating websites such as RateMyProfessors.com™ is a highly relevant topic for universities’ evaluation and assessment policies and practice. However, only a few studies have paid attention to the actual influence of teaching evaluation websites on the students themselves—that is, their perceptions of a certain course and their course choice intention at university. Findings point to the fact that positive comments on the website about professors improve students’ evaluations. However, professor evaluation websites contain two types of information: single student comments and average ratings. Research on exemplification effects has shown that single cases often have a stronger influence on recipients than more valid base rate information. We test this assumption in an experiment (n = 126) using a professor evaluation website stimulus. Results show that single comments strongly influence opinions and course choice intentions but that they are moderated by the valence of the average rating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The terms “rating” and “evaluation” have been subject to a discussion about the degree of interpretation that differentiates both of these constructs (see Otto et al. 2008). As we do not focus on the accuracy of websites like RateMyProfessors.com™, we keep the discussion in mind but have decided to use both terms interchangeably.

References

  • Babad, E., Darley, J. M., & Kaplowitz, H. (1999). Developmental aspects in students’ course selection. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 48, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44(3), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleske-Rechek, A., & Fritsch, A. (2011). Student consensus on RateMyProfessors.com. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 16(18). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=16&n=18. Accessed 5 July 2012.

  • Bleske-Rechek, A., & Michels, K. (2010). RateMyProfessors.com: testing assumptions about student use and misuse. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(5). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=5. Accessed 5 July 2012.

  • Brown, M. J., Baillie, M., & Fraser, S. (2011). Rating RateMyProfessors.com: a comparison of online and official student evaluations of teaching. College Teaching, 57(2), 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T., & Kornfield, I. (2007). RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(6). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=6. Accessed 5 July 2012.

  • Davison, E., & Price, J. (2009). How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qingmei, Q., & Wahl, S. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors and attitudes toward learning course content. Communication Education, 56(3), 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A., Edwards, C., Shaver, C., & Oaks, M. (2009). Computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on RateMyProfessors.com: expectancy effects on student cognitive and behavioral learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 368–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, J., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2004). Web-based student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felton, J., Koper, P. T., Mitchell, J., & Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: student evaluations of professors on RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freng, S., & Webber, D. (2009). Turning up the heat on online teaching evaluations: does ‘hotness’ matter? Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 189–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., Bigman, C. A., Leader, A. E., Lerman, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2012). Narrative health communication and behavior change: the influence of exemplars in the news on intention to quit smoking. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindred, J., & Mohammed, S. N. (2005). “He will crush you like an academic ninja!”: exploring teacher ratings on Ratemyprofessors.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00257.x.

  • Kowai-Bell, N., Guadagno, R. E., Little, T., Preiss, N., & Hensley, R. (2011). Rate my expectations: how online evaluations of professors impact students’ perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1862–1867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefevere, J., de Swert, K., & Walgrave, S. (2012). Effects of popular exemplars in television news. Communication Research, 39(1), 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legg, A. M., & Wilson, J. H. (2012). RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, G. W., Higgins, E., & Nardoni, N. N. (2012). Just a harmless website?: an experimental examination of RateMyProfessors.com’s effect on student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 987–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, P., & Rinke, E. M. (2012). Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of published opinion polls. In C. Holtz-Bacha & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Opinion polls and the media: reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 225–245). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, J., Sanford, D. A., & Ross, D. N. (2008). Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaeli, S., & Raban, D. R. (2005). Information sharing online: a research challenge. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1/2), 62–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmers, H. H. (1927). The purdue rating scale for instructors. Educational Administration and Supervision, 6, 399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, L., & Kunda, K. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: she’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1329–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonntag, M. E., Bassett, J. F., & Snyder, T. (2009). An empirical test of the validity of student evaluations of teaching made on ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 499–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, T. (2008). On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com. The Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.-B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: the influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Scherr.

Additional information

All authors are assistant researchers at the Institute for Communication Studies and Media Research at LMU Munich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scherr, S., Müller, P. & Fast, V. Single comments or average ratings: which elements of RateMyProfessors.com™ shape university students’ judgments and course choice intentions?. Educ Asse Eval Acc 25, 131–141 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9164-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9164-z

Keywords

Navigation