Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Roles of assessment in secondary education: Participant perspectives

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance pressure at both the institutional and individual level of secondary education has been identified as a pressure that is acknowledged all over Europe and raises questions about the extent to which agents in lower and upper secondary education interpret assessment in terms of either control or learning, or perhaps both. Drawing on empirical findings from two case studies in Denmark, the article focuses on the social roles of educational evaluation and assessment, and discusses the ways in which the local level interpretations of policy demands influence teaching and learning in secondary education. To enable an analysis of the understanding of different agents in the field, the article combines important sociological thinking with the basic distinction between assessment of programmes and assessment of individuals. Presuming that assessment practices bear the traces of the social structure that they both express and reproduce, the aim of this paper is to interrogate how the agents view and interpret such practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This study is part of a post doctoral project by Annette Rasmussen on a social perspective on educational assessment.

  2. The study of this department is part of a Ph.D. project by Nanna Friche on evaluation and assessment practices within vocational education and training in Denmark, conducted from 2007 to 2010.

References

  • Allerup, P., Andersen, H. L., Dolin, J., Korp, H., Larsen, M. S., Nordenbo, S. E., et al. (2009). Pædagogisk brug af test. Et systematisk review. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsforlag & Dansk Clearinghouse for Uddannelsesforskning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1980). La Lutte des Classes. In R. Bocock, P. Hamilton, K. Thompson, & A. Waters (Eds.), An Introduction to Sociology. Glasgow: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. (1985). Language, structure and reproduction. An introduction to the sociology of Basil Bernstein. London: Methuen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

  • Borgnakke, K. (2008). Evalueringens spændingsfelter. Aarhus: KLIM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990 (1977)). Reproduction. In Education, society and culture. London: SAGE Publications.

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge Polity Press.

  • Broadfoot, P. (2007). An introduction to assessment. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot, P. M. (1996). Education, assessment and society. A sociological analysis. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (1994). Noises from the darkroom: the Science and mystery of the mind. London: Aquarian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cort, P. (2005). Quality assurance and development in the Danish IVET system. The Danish Institute for Educational Training of Vocational Teachers, March 2005.

  • Cort, P. (2008). The Danish approach to quality—in vocational Education and training (2nd ed.). Denmark: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practice on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Kostner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analysis review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleton, S. J. (1984). School examinations—some sociological issues. In P. Broadfoot (Ed.), Selection, certification and control. Lewes: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, A. (2000). Educational assessment and testing: Social practice and social product. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002 (1975)). Overvågning og straf. Fængslets fødsel. Frederiksberg: DET lille FORLAG.

  • Foucault, M. (1985). The care for the self. The history of sexuality, vol.3, Penguin.

  • Harlen, W., Broadfoot, P., Gipps, C., & Nuttal, D. (1992). Assessment and the improvement of education. The Curriculum Journal, 3(3), 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up. What educational testing really tells us. Harvard University Press.

  • Korp, H. (2006). Lika chancer i gymnasiet? En studie om betyg, nationella prov och social reproduktion. Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences, no. 24.

  • Jones, K., Cunchillos, C., Hatcher, R., Hirrt, N., Innes, R., Johsua, S., & Klausenitzer, J. (2008). Schooling in Western Europe. The new order and its adversaries. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Madsen, U. A. (2003). Etnografisk forskning i det pædagogiske praksisfelt. In B. Tufte, J. Kampmann, & M. Hassel (Eds.), Børnekultur—et begreb i bevægelse. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2006). A culture of evaluation in Danish schools. Denmark: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). A world-class education system. Part of the publication ‘Denmark’s strategy for lifelong learning’. Denmark: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, D. (1986). Conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical review of the literature. In E. R. House (Ed.), New directions in educational evaluation. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: a new framework for assessment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & Hattam, R. (2004). ‘Dropping out’, drifting off, being excluded. Becoming somebody without school. Peter Lang.

  • Torrance, H. (1997, reprint 2003). Assessment, accountability, and standards: Using assessment to control the reform of schooling. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, A. Stuart Wells (Eds.) Education. culture, economy, society. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Harlen, W. (2006). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning. SAGE.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a post doc grant by the Danish Research Council for Independent Research, Social Sciences (autumn 2006). In addition, we would like to thank our colleagues at the Centre for Education Policy Research for their encouragement and fruitful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Annette Rasmussen or Nanna Friche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rasmussen, A., Friche, N. Roles of assessment in secondary education: Participant perspectives . Educ Asse Eval Acc 23, 113–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9113-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9113-z

Keywords

Navigation