Abstract
Twenty female and 23 male professors at a liberal arts college participated along with their 803 undergraduate students in a questionnaire study of the effects of professor gender, student gender, and divisional affiliation on student ratings of professors and professor self-ratings. Students rated their professors on 26 questions tapping five teaching factors as well as overall teaching effectiveness. Professors rated themselves on the same questions as well as on nine exploratory ones. On student ratings, there were main effects for both professor gender (female professors were rated higher than male professors on the two interpersonal factors) and division (natural science courses were rated lowest on most factors). These patterns were qualified by significant interactions between professor gender and division. Although professor self-ratings varied by division, there were few significant correlations between professor self-ratings and students' ratings. Implications for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (1999). Assessing the role of gender in college students' evaluations of faculty. Communication Education 48, 193–210.
Basow, S. A. (1995). Student evaluations of college professors: when gender matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 656–665.
Basow, S. A. (2000). Best and worst professors: gender patterns in student choices. Sex Roles 43, 407–417.
Basow, S. A., & Silberg, N. T. (1987). Student evaluations of college professors: are female and male professors rated differently? Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 308–314.
Bennett, S. K (1982). Student perceptions of and expectations for male and female instructors: evidence relating to the question of gender bias in teaching evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 170–179.
Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist 58, 1019–1027.
Burns-Glover, A. L., & Veith, D. J. (1995). Revisiting gender and teaching evaluations: sex still males a difference. Gender in the Workplace 10, 69–80.
Cataldi, E. F., Fahimi, M., & Bradburn, E. M. (2005). 2004 national study of postsecondary faculty (NSOPF: 04) report on faculty and instructional staff in Fall 2003. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005172.
Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000). Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Higher Education 71, 17–33.
D'Apollonia, S., & Abrami, P. C. (1997). Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist 52, 1198–1208.
Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (Neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education 30, 137–194.
Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students views of male and female college teachers: Part II—evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education 34, 151–211.
Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist 52, 1209–1217.
Hancock, G. R., Shannon, D. M., & Trentham, L. L. (1993). Student and teacher gender in ratings of university faculty: results from five colleges of study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 6, 235–248.
Hildebrand, M., & Wilson, R. (1970). Effective University Teaching and its Evaluation. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
Kierstead, D., D'Agostino, P. D., & Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: bias in students' ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 342–344.
Leventhal, L., Perry, R., & Abrami, P. (1977). Effects of lecturer quality and student perception of lecturer's experience on teaching ratings and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 360–374.
Marsh, H. W. (1982). Validity of students' evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 264–279.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. American Psychologist 52, 1187–1197.
Moore, A., Masterson, J.T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Communication Education 45, 29–39.
Santhanam, E. & Hicks, O. (2002). Disciplinary, gender and course year influences on student perceptions of teaching: explorations and implications. Teaching in Higher Education 7, 17–31.
Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: she's fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1329–1342.
Statham, A., Richardson, L., & Cook, J. A. (1991). Gender and University Teaching. Albany, New York: State University of New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Appreciation goes to Laura Capotosto and Julie Phelan for their research assistance.
Suzanne Montgomery is now at Widener Law School, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Appendices
Appendix
Additional Questions:
Please answer the following questions about this particular class by circling the appropriate answer.
-
1.
How much time do you spend preparing for a class period?
Less than 1 h 1h 2–3 h 4–6 8 h or more
-
2.
Do you think you spend as much time/less time or more than your colleagues at your rank?
Much less lessthe same more much more
-
3.
How organized would you say your classes are?
Not organized somewhat organized neutral organized very organized
-
4.
What percentage of a typical class do you spend on lecture?
Less than 20% 20–39% 40–59% 60–79% 80% or more
-
5.
What percentage of a typical class do you spend on discussion?
Less than 20% 20–39% 40–59% 60–79% 80% or more
-
6.
What percentage of a typical class do you spend on student presentations and small group work?
Less than 20% 20–39% 40–59% 60–79% >80% or more
-
7.
Part of the teaching role involves seeing students outside of class in your office. About how many students come to your office each week?
0–1 1–2 3–4 5–6 7 or more
-
8.
How many hours per week on average are you available to students outside of class?
Less than 1 h 1–2 h 3–4 5–6 h more than 6 h
-
9.
How important is class participation?
Very unimportant Somewhat unimportant Neither important nor unimportant Important Very Important
Note: adapted from Gender and University Teaching (pp. 172–176) by Statham et al. 1991, Albany: State University of New York Press. Copyright 1991 by State University of New York.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basow, S.A., Montgomery, S. Student Ratings and Professor Self-Ratings of College Teaching: Effects of Gender and Divisional Affiliation. J Pers Eval Educ 18, 91–106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9001-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-006-9001-8