Skip to main content
Log in

Fever and Fervor: The Seductions, Dynamics, and Travails of War Discourse

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the seductions, dynamics, and consequences of war discourse from psychoanalytic and theological perspectives. Following a brief definition and description of war discourse, I argue that war discourse and the narratives of exceptionalism manifest an existential insecurity that keeps people captive to the seductions of this type of discourse. Relying on psychoanalytic concepts, I contend that war discourse functions as a transformational object, transforming shared existential anxiety and insecurity into hostility and aggression. This existential anxiety results, in part, from an unstable, idealized identity that is rooted in a paranoid-schizoid mode of organizing experience and maintained by rationalization, moralization, projection, and denial. From a theological perspective, I argue that war discourse signifies the presence of idolatry and totalizing faith.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In his exploration of mourning and melancholia, Freud (1917) used the phrase “The shadow of the object falls upon the ego” (p. 249).

  2. http://www.afa.org/media/enolagay/chrono.asp (accessed 3 April 2007)

References

  • Air Force Association. (1995). The Enola Gay and the Smithsonian chronology of the controversy including key documents. Retrieved 3 April 2007, from http://www.afa.org/media/enolagay/chrono.asp.

  • Bacevich, A. (2002). American empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (2010). Hopes and prospects. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R. (1975). The mind’s fate: Ways of seeing psychoanalysis and psychiatry. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, R. (2002). Manifest Destiny adapted for the 1990s’ war discourse: Mission and destiny intertwined. Sociology of Religion, 63, 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R. (1996). Imperial encounters. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, E. (1990). Good and evil: Interpreting a human condition. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, E. (1996). Deep symbols: Their postmodern effacement and reclamation. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, N. (2004). Colossus: The rise and fall of the American Empire. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, H. (1969). Self-deception. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia. Standard Edition, 14, 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullbright, J. W. (1966). The arrogance of power. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhagen, D. (2009). Worse than war. Philadelphia, PA: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, C. (2002). War is a force that gives us meaning. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (2004). A terrible love of war. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2004). Sorrows of empire. New York: Owl Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2010). Dismantling the empire. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (2002). The anarchy of empire in the making of U.S. culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Kinzer, S. (2006). Overthrow: America’s century of regime change from Hawaii to Iraq. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1949a). Contributions to psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1949b). The psychoanalysis of children. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovel, J. (1970). White racism: A psychohistory. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. (1993). The protean self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, E., & Hanauer, N. (2007). The true patriot. Seattle, WA: Sasquatch Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, G. (1990). The American “empire.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, W. (1992). Ignatius of Loyola: The psychology of a saint. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moïsi, D. (2010). The geopolitics of emotion. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, M. (2005). The discourse of war after 9/11. Language and Literature, 14, 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1938). Beyond tragedy. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1941). The meaning of revelation. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1942). War as the judgment of God. Christian Century, 59, 630–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1943). War as crucifixion. Christian Century, 60, 512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1952). The irony of American history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. (1989). Faith on earth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. (1986). The matrix of the mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1949). The war commentaries. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryn, C. (2003). America the virtuous. London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 38, 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic Theology. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, T. (1999). The conquest of America: The question of the other. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (1998). The twentieth century. New York: HarperPerennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (2003). A people’s history of the United States. New York: HarperPerennial.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan LaMothe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaMothe, R. Fever and Fervor: The Seductions, Dynamics, and Travails of War Discourse. Pastoral Psychol 61, 319–332 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0431-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0431-6

Keywords

Navigation