Skip to main content
Log in

Mourning the Religious Self: An Experience of Multiplicity, Loss, and Religious Melancholia

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The loss of religion is not one thing to all people, nor even one thing to one person. This article asks the question, “when we are talking about the loss of religion, who is mourning what?” The author considers what the loss of religion looks like if we view the self as abiding in both multiplicity and melancholia, and claims that the loss of religion requires a reconfiguration of the inner landscape of centrality and marginality. A clinical example illustrates how one patient’s “loss of faith” calls her to a complex mourning process that includes confronting many personal losses and their relation to her transgendered self.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The reader will note that throughout this reflection, I use the term “we,” the collective personal pronoun rather than utilizing the more traditional impersonal voice of scholarly writing. Although I often tend to do this as a matter of style, preferring what I consider a more inclusive personal voice, in this essay the use is particularly deliberate. It refers to the header quote by Judith Butler (2004)—that on many levels at once, loss makes a “we,” if a tenuous one, of us all.

  2. It is important to acknowledge that the analyst is included in this negotiation of loss—the analyst, too, is losing some part of herself as the patient leaves, and the analyst, too, is irrevocably changed by the intimate encounter with the patient. In clinical work, we are constantly confronted with the melancholic structure of our own subjectivity, as our patients inevitably leave us and we deal with the “interminability” of analysis from the other side. The interminability of analysis is an ongoing lesson in melancholy.

  3. Some readers might wonder why, if Bobbie feels herself to be internally male, I refer to her with feminine pronouns. In her sense of being “neither this nor that,” Bobbie has chosen this way to refer to herself most of the time, and so I honor her preference here.

References

  • Brickman, C. (2008). The persistence of the past: Framing symbolic loss and religious studies in the context of race. In W. B. Parsons, D. Jonte-Pace, & S. Henking (Eds.), Mourning religion (pp. 44–62). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1995). Melancholy gender—refused identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 5, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cataldo, L. (2008). Multiple selves, multiple gods? Functional polytheism and the postmodern religious patient. Pastoral Psychology, 57(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-White, P. (2007). Many voices: Pastoral psychotherapy in relational and theological perspective. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-White, P. (2008). Interrogating integration, dissenting dis-integration: Multiplicity as a positive metaphor in therapy and theology. Pastoral Psychology, 57(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M. (1998). The multiple aspects of multiplicity: Symposium on clinical choices in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1917[1915]). Mourning and melancholia. The standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud. (vol. 14, pp. 237–258). London: Hogarth.

  • Homans, P. (1989). The ability to mourn: Disillusionment and the social orgins of psychoanalysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, P. (2008). Symbolic loss and the recreation of meaning. In W. B. Parsons, D. Jonte-Pace, & S. Henking (Eds.), Mourning religion (pp. 13–43). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonte-Pace, D. (2008). Melancholia and religion in French feminist theory. In W.B. Parsons, D. Jonte-Pace, & S. Henking (Eds.). Mourning Religion (pp. 81-94). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, W. B., Jonte-Pace, D., & Henking, S. (Eds). (2008). Mourning religion. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork, E. (2008). Mourning modern ethics on the couch. In W. B. Parsons, D. Jonte-Pace, & S. Henking (Eds.), Mourning religion (pp. 124–140). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa M. Cataldo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cataldo, L.M. Mourning the Religious Self: An Experience of Multiplicity, Loss, and Religious Melancholia. Pastoral Psychol 59, 355–364 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0222-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0222-x

Keywords

Navigation