Skip to main content
Log in

Orders on Multisets and Discrete Cones

  • Published:
Order Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study additive representability of orders on multisets (of size k drawn from a set of size n) which satisfy the condition of independence of equal submultisets (IES) introduced by Sertel and Slinko (Ranking committees, words or multisets. Nota di Laboro 50.2002. Center of Operation Research and Economics. The Fundazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, 2002, Econ. Theory 30(2):265–287, 2007). Here we take a geometric view of those orders, and relate them to certain combinatorial objects which we call discrete cones. Following Fishburn (J. Math. Psychol., 40:64–77, 1996) and Conder and Slinko (J. Math. Psychol., 48(6):425–431, 2004), we define functions f(n,k) and g(n,k) which measure the maximal possible deviation of an arbitrary order satisfying the IES and an arbitrary almost representable order satisfying the IES, respectively, from a representable order. We prove that g(n,k) = n − 1 whenever n ≥ 3 and (n, k) ≠ (5, 2). In the exceptional case, g(5,2) = 3. We also prove that g(n,k) ≤ f(n,k) ≤ n and establish that for small n and k the functions g(n,k) and f(n,k) coincide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosma, W., Cannon, J., Playoust, C.: The Magma algebra system I: the user language. J. Symb. Comput. 24, 235–265 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Conder, M., Slinko, A.: A counterexample to Fishburn’s conjecture on finite linear qualitative probability. J. Math. Psychol. 48(6), 425–431 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Danilov, V.I.: Aggregation of dichotomic preferences. Math. Soc. Sci. 13, 49–58 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dershowitz, N.: Termination of rewriting. In: Proc. First Internat. Conf. on Rewriting Techniques and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 202, pp. 180–224. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Finnetti, B.: Sul significato soggetivo della probabilità. Fundam. Math. 17, 298–329 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fishburn, P.C.: Finite linear qualitative probability. J. Math. Psychol. 40, 64–77 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fishburn, P.C.: Failure of cancellation conditions for additive linear orders. J. Comb. Des. 5, 353–365 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Herstein, I.N., Milnor J.: An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica 23, 291–297 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Katzner, W.D.: Static Demand Theory. MacMillan, London (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Koopmans, T.C.: Representation of preference orderings with independent components of consumption and representation of preference orderings over time. In: McGuire, C.B., Radner, R. (eds.) Decision and Organization, pp. 57–100. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kraft, C.H., Pratt, J.W., Seidenberg, A.: Intuitive probability on finite sets. Ann. Math. Stat. 30, 408–419 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundations of Measurement, vol. 1. Academic (1971)

  13. Marshak, J.: Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica 18, 111–141 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, U.: A geometric approach to multiset ordering. Theor. Comp. Sci. 67, 37–54 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Regoli, G.: Comparative probability orderings. In: Imprecise Probabilities Project. Documentation. http://www.sipta.org/documentation/comparative_prob/regoli.pdf (2006). Cited 19 Sept 2006

  16. Robbiano, L.: Term orderings on the polynomial ring. In: EUROCAL’85, Linz, vol. 2. Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., vol. 204, pp. 513–517. Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sertel, M.R., Kalaycıoğlu, E.: Toward the Design of a New Electoral Method for Turkey (in Turkish). Tüsiad, Istanbul (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sertel, M., Slinko, A.: Ranking Committees, Words or Multisets. Nota di Laboro 50.2002. Center of Operation Research and Economics. The Fundazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sertel, M., Slinko, A.: Ranking committees, income streams or multisets. Econ. Theory 30(2), 265–287 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanley, R.P.: Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press (1997)

  22. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Section 3 and Appendix. Princeton University Press (1947)

  23. Wakker, P.P.: Additive Representations of Preferences. Kluwer (1989)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkadii Slinko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conder, M., Marshall, S. & Slinko, A. Orders on Multisets and Discrete Cones. Order 24, 277–296 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11083-007-9073-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11083-007-9073-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

Navigation