Abstract
The evolution to 5G millimeter wave (mmWave) is opening doors to many novel applications and services by leveraging the higher carrier frequency of 24 GHz and beyond. 5G mmWave promises to deliver extreme bandwidth, ultra-low latency, faster data speeds and responsiveness – thereby facilitating broadband connectivity to densely populated areas. Nevertheless, millimeter waves suffer from significant path loss, imposing severe range constraints. Beamforming is a promising technique to alleviate this impediment. Integrated photonics is sophisticated technology to realize cost-effective, compact, and power-efficient beamformers. In this paper, we propose photonically controlled continuously tunable single side coupled racetrack resonator based 1 × 8 broadband beamformer on CMOS-compatible silicon-on-insulator platform. A beam steering angle of 31.001˚ is achieved for 28 GHz mmWave wave signal. The proposed beamformer can provide maximum continuously tunable true time delay of 125 ps for delay bandwidth of 32.46 GHz. Therefore, the beam scanning range of 0–90° can be attained by properly tuning the coupling coefficient and resonance frequency of the racetrack resonator based delay element.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data related to this article are included in this manuscript.
References
Akbar, F., Mortazawi, A.: Scalable Phased Array Architectures with a Reduced Number of Tunable Phase Shifters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.Microw. Theory Tech. 65, 3428–3434 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2017.2657509
Ali, A., Islam, R.: Path loss models for outdoor environment — with a focus on rain attenuation impact on short-range millimeter-wave links. ePrime – Adv. Elect.r Eng. Electron. Energy. 3, 100106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2023.100106
Brimont, A., Hu, X., Cueff, S., Romeo, P.R., Girons, G., Saint Griol, A., Zanzi, A., Sanchis, P., Orobtchouk, R.: Low-loss and compact silicon rib waveguide bends. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 28, 299–302 (2016)
Caucheteur, C., Mussot, A., Bette, S., Kudlinski, A., Douay, M., Louvergneaux, E., Mégret, P., Taki, M., Gonzảlez-Herrảez, M.: All-fiber tunable optical delay line. Opt. Express 18, 3093 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.18.003093
Choo, G., Member, S., Madsen, C.K., Member, S.: Automatic monitor-based tuning of an RF silicon photonic 1X4 asymmetric binary tree true-time-delay beamforming network. J. Light. Technol. 36, 5263–5275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2873199
Chrostowski, L., Hochberg, M.: Silicon photonics design. Cambridge University Press (2015)
Chu, T., Hashemi, H., Member, S.: True-time-delay-based multi-beam arrays. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 61, 3072–3082 (2013)
Chung, C.J., Xu, X., Wang, G., Pan, Z., Chen, R.T.: On-chip optical true time delay lines featuring one-dimensional fishbone photonic crystal waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5006188
Farahat, A.E., Hussein, K.F.A.: Dual-band (28/38 GHz) wideband MIMO antenna for 5G mobile applications. IEEE Access. 10, 32213–32223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3160724
Gao, X., Huang, S., Wei, Y., Gao, C., Zhou, J., Zhang, H., Gu, W.: A high-resolution compact optical true-time delay beamformer using fiber Bragg grating and highly dispersive fiber. Opt. Fiber Technol.Fiber Technol. 20, 478–482 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2014.05.015
Han, Y., Shi, S., Jin, R., Wang, Y., Qiu, Q.: Integrated waveguide true time delay beamforming system based on an SOI platform for 28 GHz millimeter-wave communication. Appl. Opt. 59, 7770 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.397202
Hong, S., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Xie, Y., Dai, D.: Ultralow-loss compact silicon photonic waveguide spirals and delay lines. Photon. Res. 10, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1364/prj.437726
Hu, G., Cui, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Tian, D., Yun, B., Zhang, R.: Optical beamformer based on diffraction order multiplexing (dom) of an arrayed waveguide grating. J. Light. Technol. 37, 2898–2904 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2019.2904710
Katti, R., Prince, S.: A survey on role of photonic technologies in 5G communication systems. Photonic Netw. Commun. 38, 185–205 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-019-00856-w
Kumari, S., Prince, S.: Photonic beamforming incorporating ring resonator based on silicon-on-insulator waveguide technology. SILICON 14(14), 8869–8879 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01684-w
Marpaung, D., Yao, J., Capmany, J.: Integrated microwave photonics. Nat. Photon 13, 80–90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0310-5
Mashanovich, G.Z.: Electronics and photonics united. Nature 556, 316–318 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04443-3
Paul, B., Sertel, K., Nahar, N.K.: Photonic beamforming for 5G and beyond: a review of true time delay devices enabling ultra-wideband beamforming for mmwave communications. IEEE Access. 10, 75513–75526 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3188992
Salahdine, F., Han, T., Zhang, N.: 5G, 6G, and beyond: recent advances and future challenges. Ann. Des Telecommun. Telecommun. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-022-00938-3
Sancho, J., Bourderionnet, J., Lloret, J., Combrié, S., Gasulla, I., Xavier, S., Sales, S., Colman, P., Lehoucq, G., Dolfi, D., Capmany, J., De Rossi, A.: Integrable microwave filter based on a photonic crystal delay line. Nat. Commun.Commun. 3, 1075 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2092
Song, Q.Q., Hu, Z.F., Chen, K.X.: Scalable and reconfigurable true time delay line based on an ultra-low-loss silica waveguide. Appl. Opt. 57, 4434 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.004434
Soothar, P., Wang, H., Dayo, Z.A., Quan, Y.: A new CPW-fed semicircular inverted triangular shaped antenna based on mixed-alternate approach for 5g millimeter-wave wireless applications. Micromachines. 4(1), 220 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010220
Sun, H., Lu, L., Liu, Y., Ni, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, L.: Broadband 1 × 8 optical beamforming network based on anti-resonant microring delay lines. J. Light. Technol. 40, 6919–6928 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2022.3175768
Vidal, B., Mengual, T., Ibáñez-López, C., Martí, J.: Photonic beamformer with true time delay and phase control for large antenna arrays. Conf. Proc. - Lasers Electro-Optics Soc. Annu. Meet. 412–413 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOS.2006.279175
Wang, X., Zhou, L., Li, R., Xie, J., Lu, L., Wu, K., Chen, J.: Continuously tunable ultra-thin silicon waveguide optical delay line. Optica. 4, 507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000507
Xia, F., Sekaric, L., Vlasov, Y.A.: Mode conversion losses in silicon-on-insulator photonic wire based racetrack resonators. Opt. Exp. 14, 3872–3886 (2006)
Ye, X., Zhang, F., Pan, S.: Optical true time delay unit for multi-beamforming. Opt. Exp. 23, 10002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.010002
Yu, A., Zou, W., Li, S., Chen, J.: A multi-channel multi-bit programmable photonic beamformer based on cascaded DWDM. IEEE Photon. J. 6, 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2344007
Zhang, F., Dong, J., Zhu, Y., Gao, X., Zhang, X.: Integrated optical true time delay network based on grating-assisted contradirectional couplers for phased array antennas. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 26, 1–7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2020.2983579
Zheng, P., Xu, X., Lin, D., Liu, P., Hu, G., Yun, B., Cui, Y.: A wideband 1×4 optical beam-forming chip based on switchable optical delay lines for Ka-band phased array. Opt. Commun.Commun. 488, 126842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.126842
Zhu, C., Lu, L., Shan, W., Xu, W., Zhou, G., Zhou, L., Chen, J.: Silicon integrated microwave photonic beamformer. Optica. 7, 1162 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.391521
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank SRMIST and DST-FIST project for tool support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SK: Design, analysis, writing and editing—original draft preparation. SP: Supervision, conceptualization, methodology, manuscript review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the content of this article.
Consent for publication
The authors agree to publish this article.
Consent for participate
The authors agree to participate in the publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Mathematical analysis of proposed photonic beamformer
Appendix: Mathematical analysis of proposed photonic beamformer
The electric field at the through port of directional coupler1 (DC1) is given by
where \(E_{in}\) is input electric field, \(\beta_{1}^{e}\) and \(\beta_{1}^{o}\) are propagation constants of even and odd normal modes of DC1, respectively, and \(\Delta n_{1} = n_{eff}^{e1} - n_{eff}^{o1}\) is index difference between the even and odd supermodes of DC1.
The electric field at the output of RTR4 of Stage 1 can be expressed as
where \(\theta_{cp}\) is phase delay due to coupling region, \(\theta_{t}\) is phase delay due to optical path length of RTR, \(\theta_{a}\) is phase delay due to waveguide segment between two cascaded RTR, coupling coefficient \(t_{i} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{i}^{2} } ,\,i = 1\,{\text{to}}\,4\) represents RTR and \(*\) denotes complex conjugate.
The electric field at the through port of directional coupler2 (DC2) is given by
where \(\beta_{2}^{e}\) and \(\beta_{2}^{o}\) are propagation constant of even and odd normal modes of DC2, respectively, and \(\Delta n_{2} = n_{eff}^{e2} - n_{eff}^{o2}\) is index difference between the even and odd supermodes of DC2.
The electric field at the output of RTR6 of Stage 2 can be expressed as
where \(t_{5} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{5}^{2} }\) and \(t_{6} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{6}^{2} }\) are coupling coefficients of RTR5 and RTR6, respectively.
Substituting Eqs. (20) and (21) in Eq. (22), we get
where \(X_{2} = X_{1} \left( {1 - \gamma t_{5}^{ * } e^{{j\theta_{cp} }} e^{{j\theta_{t} }} } \right)\left( {1 - \gamma t_{6}^{ * } e^{{j\theta_{cp} }} e^{{j\theta_{t} }} } \right),\,Y_{1} = E_{t}^{DC1} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{2}^{e} + \beta_{2}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} \sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{2} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)\).
The electric field at the through port of directional coupler4 (DC4) is given by
where \(\beta_{4}^{e}\) and \(\beta_{4}^{o}\) are propagation constants of even and odd normal modes of DC4, respectively, and \(\Delta n_{4} = n_{eff}^{e4} - n_{eff}^{o4}\) is index difference between the even and odd supermodes of DC4.
The electric field at the output of Path 7 can be expressed as
where \(t_{9} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{9}^{2} }\) is coupling coefficient of RTR9.
Substituting Eqs. (23) and (24) in Eq. (25), we get
where \(Z_{1} = t_{1} t_{2} t_{3} t_{4} t_{9} \left( {t_{5} + t_{6} + t_{5} t_{6} } \right) + t_{4} t_{5} t_{6} t_{9} \left( {t_{1} t_{2} + t_{1} t_{3} + t_{2} t_{3} } \right) + t_{1} t_{2} t_{3} t_{5} t_{6} \left( {t_{4} + t_{9} } \right)\)
The electric field at the cross port of directional coupler4 (DC4) is given by
The electric field at the output of Path 6 can be expressed as
where \(L^{S3}\) is the length of straight waveguide employed in stage 3 and \(\alpha_{prop}\) is waveguide attenuation coefficient.
The electric field at the cross port of directional coupler2 (DC2) is given by
The electric field at the through port of directional coupler5 (DC5) is given by
where \(\beta_{5}^{e}\) and \(\beta_{5}^{o}\) are propagation constants of even and odd normal modes of DC5, respectively, \(\Delta n_{5} = n_{eff}^{e5} - n_{eff}^{o5}\) is index difference between the even and odd supermodes of DC5, \(L^{S2}\) is the length of straight waveguide employed in stage 2.
The electric field at the output of Path5 can be expressed as
where \(t_{10} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{10}^{2} }\) is coupling coefficient of RTR10.
Substituting Eqs. (20) and (31) in Eq. (32), we obtain
where \(Y_{3} = E_{t}^{DC1} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{2}^{e} + \beta_{2}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{5}^{e} + \beta_{5}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} \cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{2} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)\sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{5} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)e^{{j\beta^{s} L^{S2} }} e^{{ - \alpha_{prop} L^{S2} }} ,\)
The electric field at the output of Path4 can be expressed as
The electric field at the cross port of directional coupler1 (DC1) is given by
The electric field at the through port of directional coupler3 (DC3) is given by
where \(L^{S1}\) is the length of straight waveguide employed in stage 1.
The electric field at the output of RTR8 of Stage 2 can be expressed as
where \(t_{7} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{7}^{2} }\) and \(t_{8} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{8}^{2} }\) are coupling coefficients of RTR7 and RTR8, respectively.
The electric field at the through port of directional coupler6 (DC6) is given by
where \(\beta_{6}^{e}\) and \(\beta_{6}^{o}\) are propagation constants of even and odd normal modes of DC6, respectively, and \(\Delta n_{6} = n_{eff}^{e6} - n_{eff}^{o6}\) is index difference between the even and odd supermodes of DC6.
The electric field at the output of Path3 can be expressed as
where \(t_{11} = \sqrt {1 - \kappa_{11}^{2} }\) is coupling coefficient of RTR11.
Upon substitutions and simplifications of Eqs. (35), (36), (37) and (38) in Eq. (39), we get
where \(Y_{4} = E_{t}^{DC1} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{3}^{e} + \beta_{3}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{6}^{e} + \beta_{6}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} \sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{3} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)\sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{6} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)e^{{j\beta^{s} L^{S1} }} e^{{ - \alpha_{prop} L^{S1} }} ,\)
The electric field at the output of Path2 can be expressed as
where \(Y_{5} = E_{t}^{DC1} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{3}^{e} + \beta_{3}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{6}^{e} + \beta_{6}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} \sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{3} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)\sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{6} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)e^{{j\beta^{s} \left( {L^{S1} + L^{S3} } \right)}} e^{{ - \alpha_{prop} \left( {L^{S1} + L^{S3} } \right)}}\)
The electric field at the output of Path1 can be expressed as
where \(Y_{6} = E_{t}^{DC1} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{3}^{e} + \beta_{3}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} e^{{j\left( {\frac{{\beta_{7}^{e} + \beta_{7}^{o} }}{2}} \right)L_{c} }} \cos \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{3} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)\sin \left( {\frac{{\pi \Delta n_{7} L_{c} }}{\lambda }} \right)e^{{j\beta^{s} \left( {L^{S1} + L^{S3} } \right)}} e^{{ - \alpha_{prop} \left( {L^{S1} + L^{S3} } \right)}}\)
The electric field at the output of Path0 can be expressed as
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumari, S., Prince, S. Photonic integrated cmos-compatible true time delay based broadband beamformer. Opt Quant Electron 55, 1198 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05492-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05492-3