Abstract
A less-complex and efficient time-hysteresis switching algorithm assisted hybrid free-space optics (FSO)/millimeter wave (mm)-radio frequency (RF) system is presented in the paper. A time-hysteresis switching algorithm is utilized for link transient for selection of FSO or RF links. For improving the long-haul communication efficiency and coverage a selective decode-and-forward relay scheme is blended with hybrid FSO/RF system along with maximal-ratio-combining (MRC) for signal reconstruction at the receiver end. However, the pointing errors due to misalign apertures and building sway, which have the potential to suppress the benefits of the relay assisted hybrid system. The impact of pointing errors and path loss attenuation are modeled with Gamma–Gamma distribution and generalised Nakagami-m is used to model the RF channel fading. The exact closed-form expressions of average symbol-error-rate (ASER) and outage-probability (OP) have been derived for the performance evaluation of the proposed system with and without pointing errors. We also present an asymptotic-analysis of the ASER and outage with lower computational-complexity for the proposed system and obtain the diversity order. To achieve target ASER value for the proposed switching scheme, the optimum-threshold signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) value has been obtained numerically in this work. The derived theoretical outcomes have been validated with Monte-Carlo simulation. In addition, we present comparative results of ASER and OP performance for proposed system with Gamma–Gamma and generalised Málaga distribution under various adverse weather conditions. It is observed that the proposed hybrid FSO/RF system outperforms a cooperative single FSO system as well as single-hop hybrid FSO/RF system on account of diversity as well as switching technique benefits. The presented hybrid FSO/RF system achieves ASER of 10–7 in the lower SNR regimes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Anees, S., Bhatnagar, M.R.: Performance of an amplify-and-forward dual-hop asymmetric RF–FSO communication system. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 7(2), 124–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.7.000124
Anees, S., Meerur, P., Bhatnagar, M.R.: Performance analysis of a DF based dual hop mixed RF-FSO system with a direct RF link. In: IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), pp. 1332–1336. https://doi.org/10.1109/GlobalSIP.2015.7418415
Awwad, O., Al-Fuqaha, A., Khan, B., Brahim, G.B.: Topology control schema for better QoS in hybrid RF/FSO mesh networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 60(5), 1398–1406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2012.12.110069
Bag, B., Das, A., Ansari, I.S., Prokes, A., Bose, C., Chandra, A.: Performance analysis of hybrid FSO systems using FSO/RF-FSO link adaptation. IEEE Photonics J. 10(3), 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2018.2837356
Balti, E., Guizani, M.: Mixed RF/FSO cooperative relaying systems with co-channel interference. IEEE Trans. Commun. 66(9), 4014–4027 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2818697
Bhatnagar, M.R.: Average BER analysis of differential modulation in DF cooperative communication system over gamma–gamma fading FSO links. IEEE Commun. Lett. 16(8), 1228–1231 (2012a). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2012.052112.120670
Bhatnagar, M.R.: Performance analysis of decode-and- forward relaying in gamma–gamma fading channels. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 24(7), 545–547 (2012b). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2011.2176330
Bhatnagar, M.R.: A one bit feedback based beamforming scheme for FSO MISO system over gamma–gamma fading. IEEE Trans. Commun. 63(4), 1306–1318 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2391178
Bhatnagar, M.R., Ghassemlooy, Z.: Performance analysis of Gamma–Gamma fading FSO MIMO links with pointing errors. J. Lightwave Technol. 34(9), 2158–2169 (2016). https://opg.optica.org/jlt/abstract.cfm?URI=jlt-34-9-2158
Chatzidiamantis, N.D., Karagiannidis, G.K., Kriezis, E.E., Matthaiou, M.: Diversity combining in hybrid RF/FSO systems with PSK modulation. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1–6. Art. no 5962684 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/icc.2011.5962684
Djordjevic, G.T., Petkovic, M.I., Cvetkovic, A.M., Karagiannidis, G.K.: Mixed RF/FSO relaying with outdated channel state information. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 33(9), 1935–1948 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/jsac.2015.2433055
Douik, A., Dahrouj, H., Al-Naffouri, T.Y., Alouini, M.S.: Hybrid radio/free-space optical design for next generation backhaul systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 64(6), 2563–2577 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2557789
Eunju, L., Park, J., Han, D., Yoon, G.: Performance analysis of the asymmetric dual-hop relay transmission with mixed RF/FSO Links. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 23(21), 1642–1644 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2011.2166063
Farid, A.A., Hramilovic, S.: Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errros. J. Lightwave Technol. 25(7), 1702–1710 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2007.899174
Ge, X., Tu, S., Mao, G., Wang, C.X., Han, T.: 5G Ultra-dense cellular networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 23(1), 72–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2016.7422408
Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M.: Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th edn. Academic press, San Diego (2007)
He, B., Schober, R.: Bit-Interleaved coded modulation for hybrid RF/FSO systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 57(12), 3753–3763 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2009.12.080396
Ho, T.H.: Pointing, acquisition, and tracking systems for free-space optical communication links. Ph.D. dissertation (2007)
Kim, I., Korevaar, E.J.: Availability of free space optics (FSO) and hybrid FSO/RF systems. In: Proceedings of SPIE—the International Society for Optical Engineering 4530, Denver, CO, USA, pp. 84–95 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.449800
Laneman, J.N., Tse, D.N.C., Wornell, G.W.: Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 50(12), 3062–3080 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2004.838089
Makki, B., Svensson, T., Brandt-Pearce, M., Alouini, M.S.: On the performance of millimeter wave-based RF-FSO Multi-hop and mesh networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 16(12), 7746–7759 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2017.2753225
Mathematica Edition: Version 13, Champaign, Illinois: Wolfram Research, Inc., 2021. https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica.
Nadeem, F., Geiger, B.C., Leitgeb, E., Muhammad, S., Loeschnig, M., Kandus, G.: Comparison of link selection algorithms for free space optics/radio frequency hybrid network. IET Commun. 5(18), 2751–2759 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2009.0469
Najafi, M., Jamali, V., Schober, R.: Optimal relay selection for the parallel hybrid RF/FSO relay channel: non-buffer-aided and buffer-aided designs. IEEE Trans. Commun. 65(7), 2794–2810 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2017.2686868
Ng, E.W., Geller, M.: A table of integrals of the error functions. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. B Math. Sci. 73B(1), 1–20 (1969). https://nvlpubs.nist.gov › nistpubs › jres
Ninos, M.P., Mukherjee, P., Psomas, C., Krikidis, I.: Dual-hop full-duplex DF relay channel with parallel hybrid RF/FSO links. In: IEEE Global Communications Conference, Madrid, Spain, pp. 1–6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOBECOM46510.2021.9685939
Pham, A.T., Trinh, P.V., Mai, V.V., Dang, N.T., Truong, C.T.: Hybrid free-space optics/millimeter-wave architecture for 5G cellular backhaul networks. In: Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC), pp. 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/OECC.2015.7340269
Prudnikov, A., Brychkov, Y., Marichev, O.: Integrals and Series, Volume 3: More Special Functions. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1999)
Rakia, T., Yang, H.C., Alouini, M.S., Gebali, F.: Outage analysis of practical FSO/RF hybrid system with adaptive combining. IEEE Commun. Lett. 19(8), 1366–1369 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2015.2443771
Roach, K.: Meijer-G function representations. In: Proceeding ACM International Conf. Symbolic Algebra Computer, pp. 205–211 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/258726.258784
Roumelas, G.D., Nistazakis, H.E., Leitgeb, E., Ivanov, H.D., Volos, C.K., Tombras, G.S.: Serially DF relayed hybrid FSO/MMW links with Weibull fading, M-turbulence and pointing errors. Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 216, 1645 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164531
Samimi, H., Uysal, M.: End-to-end performance of mixed RF/FSO transmission systems. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 5(11), 1139–1144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.5.001139
Sharma, B.L., Abiodun, R.F.A.: A new generating function for a generalized function of two variables. Proc. Am. Mathe. Soc. 53(1), 69 (1975). https://doi.org/10.2307/2040017
Sharma, S., Madhukumar, A.S., Swaminathan, R.: Switching-based cooperative decode-and-forward relaying for hybrid FSO/RF networks. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 11(6), 267–281 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.11.000267
Sharma, S., Madhukumar, A.S., Ramabadran, S.: Switching-based hybrid FSO/RF transmission for DF relaying system. In: IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377157
Shi, W., Kang, K., Wang, Z., Liu, W.: Performance analysis of hybrid SIMO-RF/FSO communication system with fixed gain AF relay. Curr. Opt. Photonics Opt. Soc. Korea 3(5), 365–373 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3807/COPP.2019.3.5.365
Singh, D.K., Tiwari, B.B.: ASER performance analysis of decision threshold-based hybrid FSO/RF turbulent link. In: Proceedings of Trends in Electronics and Health Informatics. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 376. Springer, Singapore (2022a). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8826-3_54
Singh, D. K., Tiwari, B. B.: Performance Optimization of FSO link via Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces (IRS). In: 2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT), Bangalore, India, 1-9, (2022b). https://doi.org/10.1109/GCAT55367.2022.9971990
Singhal, N., Bansal, A., Kumar, A.: Performance evaluation of DF based asymmetric SIMO-RF/FSO system with misalignment errors. IET Commun. 11(14), 2244–2252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2017.0439
The Wolfram Functions Site [Online]. Available: http://functions.wolfram.com/Besse1-TypeFunctions/Besse1K/06/ShowAll (2022).
Touati, A., Abdaoui, A., Touati, F., Uysal, M., Bouallegue, A.: On the effects of combined atmospheric fading and misalignment on the hybrid FSO/RF transmission. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 8(10), 715–725 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.8.000715
Trinh, P.V., Thang, T.C., Pham, A.T.: Mixed mmWave RF/FSO relaying systems over generalized fading channels with pointing errors. IEEE Photonics J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2016.2644964
Usman, M., Yang, H.C., Alouini, M.S.: Practical switching-based hybrid FSO/RF transmission and its performance analysis. IEEE Photonics J. 6(5) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2352629
Zhang, W., Hranilovic, S., Shi, C.: Soft-switching hybrid FSO/RF links using short-length raptor codes: design and implementation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 27(9), 1698–1708 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2009.091219
Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, L., Ai, B., Alouini, M.S.: On the performance of dual-hop systems over mixed FSO/mm-wave fading channels. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 1, 477–489 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2020.2987927
Acknowledgements
The authors are very much thankful to Dr. R. Swaminathan (Senior Member IEEE) Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore for his valuable guidance and help.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Deepak Kumar Singh—Mathematical modeling, simulation, analysis, figure preparation and paper writing.
Prof. B B Tiwari—Research idea, conceptualization, paper writing and review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We believe these findings will be of interest to the readers of your journal. We declare that this manuscript is original and novel. It has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A: Average SER of the FSO link
We derive the ASER of the FSO link through the Eq. (38) in this post script section. The term \({B}_{MRC}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be represented as
where \({B}_{MRC}^{fso}\) is the ASER of FSO link given as
Hence the ASER of the FSO link for the outage time i.e. \({\gamma }_{MRC}^{fso}< {\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\), is expressed as
From Eqs. (A2) and (A3), all phrase mentioned in Eq. (38) can be solved, and the term \({B}_{i, j}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) from Eq. (38), where \(i\,\epsilon\,\left\{S-D, S-R\right\}\) and \(\epsilon \left\{S-R,S-D\right\}\), has been solved from Eq. (A1). Putting Eqs. (10), (11), and (33) in Eq. (A2) and utilizing Equation (07.34.21.0013.01) of Anees and Bhatnagar (2015), \({B}_{i, j}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
For the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{i, j}^{{fso}^{PE}}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
where \(\ell_{1}^{j}\), \(\varOmega_{i}\), \({\mathcal{L}}_{1,g}\), \(\varOmega_{g,n}^{i}\), and \({\upupsilon }_{j}\) as well as \(\varLambda_{3,g,n}^{i}\), \(\varLambda_{4,g,n}^{j,i}\), \({\mathcal{N}}_{6,g,n}^{j,i}\) and \({\mathcal{N}}_{7,g,n}^{j,i}\) have been mentioned in Table 1 and Table
4, respectively. By putting Eqs. (10), (11), and (34) in Eq. (A3) and utilizing Equation (07.34.21.0084.01) of Anees and Bhatnagar (2015), the exact equation for \({B}_{i, j}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is given as
For the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{i, j}^{{fso}_{out}^{PE}}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
where \({\mathcal{T}}_{3,g,n }^{{i, n_{4} }}\), \(\varLambda_{5,g,n}^{{i, n_{4} }}\), \(\varLambda_{6,g,n}^{{i,j,n_{4} }}\), \(q_{l,n}^{j}\), \({\mathcal{M}}_{g,n }^{j}\), \({\mathcal{N}}_{1lg}^{j,i,n}\) and \({\mathcal{N}}_{2lg}^{j,i,n}\) have been mentioned in Table 4. In Eq. (38), the term, \({B}_{C}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) has been solved from Eq. (A1). Now Putting Eqs. (28) and (33) in Eq. (A2) as well as utilizing Equation (07.34.21.0013.01) from Anees and Bhatnagar (2015), the term \({B}_{C}^{fso}\) is expressed as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{C}^{{fso}_{out}^{PE}}\left({\gamma }_{th}\right)\) can be expressed as
where \({\mu }_{g,n}^{j}\) has been mentioned in Table 1. Putting Eq. (28) in Eq. (A3) and similarly from Eq. (A5), the exact equation for the term \({B}_{C}^{{fso}_{out}}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is expressed as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{C}^{{fso}_{out}^{PE}}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
where \(\varLambda_{7,g,n}^{S - D}\), \(\varLambda_{8,g,n}^{R - D,S - D}\), \({\mathcal{N}}_{3,l,R - D,g}^{S - D,n}\), \({\mathcal{N}}_{4,l,R - D,g}^{S - D,n}\), \({\mathcal{N}}_{5,l,R - D,g}^{S - D,n}\), and \({\mathcal{N}}_{6,l,R - D,g}^{S - D,n}\) has been mentioned in Table 4. The CDF of \({\gamma }_{j}^{fso}\) is obtained from Equation (07.34.21.0084.01) of Mathematica Edition (2021) and expressed as
The term \({B}_{C, S-R}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) in Eq. (28) has been solved using Eq. (A1). By putting Eqs. (11), (28), and (30) in Eq. (A3) and using Equation (9.301) of Douik et al. (2016) to expand the Meijer G-functions as well as the integral has been solved from the help of Equation (4.1.11) of Ho (2007) and Ng and Geller (1969). Thus we find the generalised Meijer G-function of two-variables using (Singh and Tiwari 2022a) and (Sharma and Abiodun (1975)). The exact expression of \({B}_{C, S-R}^{fso}\) is expressed as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{C, S-R}^{{fso}^{PE}}\) can be expressed as
By putting Eqs. (11), (28), and (34) in Eq. (A3), and use of Equation (9.301) of Douik et al. (2016) in expansion of the Meijer G-functions, and the integral has been calculated using Equation (3.191.1) of Douik et al. (2016). Thus we find the generalised Meijer G-function of two variables and the exact final equation for \({B}_{C, S-R}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is represented as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{C, S-R}^{{fso}^{PE}}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
The term \({\mathcal{N}}_{7,l,g}^{j,n}\) is mentioned in Table 4. From Eq. (38), the term \({B}_{S-R, C}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is calculated from Eq. (A1) and putting Eqs. (10), (25), and (30) in Eq. (A2) as well as similar approach as in Eq. (A8) has been utilized, then the final exact expression of \({B}_{S-R, C}^{fso}\) is represented as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{S-R, C}^{{fso}^{PE}}\) can be expressed as
By putting Eqs. (10), (25), and (34) in Eq. (A3), and solving rest expressions from similar approach as in Eq. (A9), the exact final equation of \({B}_{S-R, C}^{fso}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is represented as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{S-R, C}^{{fso}^{PE}}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
Appendix B: Aser of the MM-RF link
From Eq. (38), the terms are express to derive the ASER for the RF link. To derive Eq. (38) the functions are expressed as
From Eq. (18) of Sharma et al. (2019) and utilize Equations (2.33.10 & 11) of Douik et al. (2016), the above equation has been solved using integration by parts and the upper incomplete gamma-function \(\Gamma \left( { \cdot , \cdot } \right)\) from Equation (8.350.2) of Douik et al. (2016). Hence
By putting Eqs. (19), (20), and (32) into Eq. (38) and solving the term \({B}_{j,i}^{RF}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{RF}\right),\) where \(j\,\epsilon\,\left\{S-D,S-R\right\}\) and \(i\,\epsilon\,\left\{S-R, S-D\right\}\), the Eq. (B2) has been solved by MATHEMATICA. From Eq. (B1) and utilizing Equation (8.352.6) of Douik et al. (2016), the \({B}_{j,i}^{RF}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{RF}\right)\) is represented as
where the term \(\Psi_{j,i} \triangleq \Psi_{j} + \Psi_{i}\). Putting Eqs. (31) and (32) in Eq. (38) and utilizing Eqs. (B1) and (B2), the term \({B}_{C}^{RF}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{RF}\right)\) is expressed as
Putting Eqs. (31) and (20) in Eq. (38) as well as utilizing Equations (B1), (B2) and (8.352.6) of Touati et al. (2016). We solve the term \({B}_{C,S-R}^{RF}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{RF}\right)\), represented as
Putting Eqs. (26), (19) in Eq. (38) and utilizing Eqs. (B1), (B2) as well as (8.352.6) of Touati et al. (2016), the term \({B}_{S-R, C}^{RF}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{RF}\right)\) is represented as
Appendix C: Asymptotic aser analysis of FSO link
In this postscript, we derive the asymptotic-SER analysis of blended FSO/RF system and express all the terms of Eq. (51). With the help of Equation (07.34.06.0040.01) of Anees and Bhatnagar (2015) and Eqs. (9) and (11), the outcome expression along with Eq. (33) has been putted in Eq. (51) and remaining part of integrand has been solved utilizing Equation (07.34.21.0085.01) of Anees and Bhatnagar (2015). The resultant closed-form equation of the term \({B}_{j,i}^{{fso}^{\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\), where \(j\,\epsilon\,\left\{S-R,S-D\right\}\) as well as \(i\,\epsilon\,\left\{S-D,S-R\right\}\) is represented as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{j,i}^{{fso}^{PE\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
where \(\mathrm{J}_{1,k}^{i}\) is mentioned in Table 2, and \(\mathrm{J}_{4,{k}_{3}}^{j}, \mathrm{J}_{{x}_{1,{k}_{3},k}}\) as well as \({x}_{1,{k}_{3},k}\) in Table
5.
Differentiating Eq. (25) with respect to \(\gamma\) to re-calculate the term \({f}_{{\gamma }_{C}^{fso}}\left(\gamma \right)\), we find the equations for the terms \({B}_{C}^{{fso}^{\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) and \({B}_{C, S-R}^{{fso}^{\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({f}_{{\gamma }_{C}^{{fso}^{PE}}}\left(\gamma \right)\) can be expressed as
Similarly, following the similar approach as for Eq. (C1), the final closed form representation of \({B}_{C}^{{fso}^{\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{C}^{{fso}^{PE \infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
From Eq. (C3), the terms \(\mathrm{J}_{2,k}^{S-D}\) and \(\mathrm{J}_{3,{n}_{1}k}^{R-D}\) have been mentioned in Table 2, as well as \(\mathrm{J}_{5,{n}_{1}k}^{R-D}\), \(\mathrm{J}_{6,k}^{S-D}\), \(\mathrm{J}_{{x}_{2,{n}_{1},k}}\), and \({x}_{2,{n}_{1},k}\) have been mentioned in Table 5. From the similar approach as for Eq. (C1), a closed-form expression for the term \({B}_{C,S-R}^{{fso}^{\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is given as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{C,S-R}^{{fso}^{PE \infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
From Eq. (C4), the terms \(\mathrm{J}_{{x}_{3,{n}_{1},k}}\) and \({x}_{3,{n}_{1},k}\) have been mentioned in Table 5. Hence, with similar approach followed as for Eq. (C4), the final closed-form expression for \({B}_{S-R,C}^{{fso}^{\infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) is given as
Similarly, for the case of pointing errors the term \({B}_{S-R,C}^{{fso}^{PE \infty }}\left({\gamma }_{th}^{fso}\right)\) can be expressed as
From Eq. (C5), the terms \(\mathrm{J}_{{x}_{4,{n}_{1},k,{k}_{3}}}\) and \({x}_{4,{n}_{1},k,{k}_{3}}\) have been mentioned in Table 5.
Appendix D: Power series representation
From (Roach 1997), the Eq. (16) can be expressed the Meijer G function in terms of simple hypergeometric functions. The probability distribution function \({f}_{{\gamma }_{j}^{fso}}\left(\gamma \right)\) is represented in terms of a regularized generalised hypergeometric function from Equation (07.32.02.0001.01) of Mathematica Edition (2021) as
where \(p{\widetilde{\mathrm{F}}}_{\mathrm{q}}\left({\mathrm{a}}_{1,\dots ..,}{\mathrm{a}}_{\mathrm{p}};{\mathrm{b}}_{1,\dots .,}{\mathrm{b}}_{\mathrm{q}};\mathrm{z}\right)\) represents a regularized generalised hypergeometric-function, \({\mathrm{\aleph }}_{1}^{\mathrm{j}}\), \({\mathrm{\aleph }}_{2}^{\mathrm{j}}\), and \({\mathrm{\aleph }}_{3}^{\mathrm{j}}\) have been mentioned in Table 1. The regularized hypergeometric function is represented as
where \({\left({\mathrm{a}}_{\mathrm{j}}\right)}_{\mathrm{n}}\) reprsesents the Pochhammer symol from Equation (06.10.02.0001.01) of Mathematica Edition (2021). Hence, the PDF of instantaneous SNR of FSO channel using power series terms is expressed as
where \({\mathcal{M}}_{{{\text{g}},{\text{n}}}}^{{\text{j}}}\) and \({\upgamma }^{{\mho_{{{\text{g}},{\text{n}}}}^{{\text{j}}} - 1}}\) have been metioned in Table 1. It is observed that the power series in (D3) contains summation terms with only exponents of \(\gamma\). Therefore, it is simple to calculate an integral containing the proposed series representation as compared to a Meijer-G function based representation in Eq. (16).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, D.K., Tiwari, B.B. Performance investigation of dual-hop relaying for hybrid FSO/RF system based on optimum threshold SNR. Opt Quant Electron 55, 455 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-04606-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-04606-1