Skip to main content
Log in

Can We Still Lean Against the Wind?

Asset Price Volatility and Optimal Policy Mix in an Overlapping Generations Model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an overlapping generations model without financial frictions, Gali (Am Econ Rev 104(3):721–752, 2014) observed that a ‘leaning against the wind’ monetary policy is likely to aggravate the fluctuations in the bubble. He found that optimal monetary policy in such an economy must strike a balance between stabilization of the bubble and stabilization of aggregate demand. This paper extends Gali (Am Econ Rev 104(3):721–752, 2014)’s model by introducing various financial frictions in the bubbly economy with a Samuelson 2-period overlapping agents and examine how ‘leaning against the wind’ macro-prudential policies like capital adequacy affect the size and volatility of bubble, inflation and aggregate demand. While the results of the model with financial frictions vindicate Gali (Am Econ Rev 104(3):721–752, 2014) that a leaning against the wind monetary policy generates a larger volatility in the bubble than a policy of benign neglect, the paper finds that minimisation of bubble volatility requires an active macro-prudential policy. It is also observed that stronger interest rate response of monetary policy to the bubble necessitates a stronger macroprudential response possibly to absorb the excess volatility generated by the monetary policy. However, the paper also finds that tightening macroprudential policy parameter beyond a threshold value may encourage banks to take more risks and increase credit supply, aggravating the bubble in the process. With respect to macroprudential policy, there is no conflict between stabilization of current aggregate demand and stabilization of future aggregate demand and both call for a strong macroprudential response, at least until the macroprudential parameter attains the threshold value, although the conflict between the two objectives persists with respect to monetary policy as in Gali (Am Econ Rev 104(3):721–752, 2014). Empirical verification of the provisioning cost channel through structural vector autoregression confirm that a positive provisions shock can contract asset bubbles by restricting credit, output and a delayed marginal response of interest rate spreads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a review of literature on macroprudential policy, please see Galati and Moessner (2011).

  2. Baseline settings assume m = 1.2, B = 0.001, \(var(\hat {b}_{t})= 0.01\), σ ε = 0.01.

References

  • Agenor P, Zilberman R (2015) Loan-Loss Provisioning rules, procyclicality and financial volatility. J Bank Financ 61:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen F, Gale D (2000) Asset price bubbles and monetary policy. In: Sveridges-riksbank-stockholm school of economics conference, 16–17 June 2000

  • Angeloni I, Faia E (2009) A tale of two policies: prudential regulations and monetary policy with fragile banks. Mimeo

  • Angklomkliew S, George J, Packer F (2009) Issues and developments in loan loss provisioning - the case of Asia. December 2009, BIS Quarterly Review

  • Bailliu J, Meh C, Zhang Y (2015) Macroprudential rules and monetary policy when financial frictions matter. Econ Model 50:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke B, Gertler M (2000) Monetary policy and asset price volatility. February 2000, NBER Working Paper 7559

  • Berger AN, Hannan TH (1991) The rigidity of prices: evidence from the banking industry. Am Econ Rev 81:938–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Udell G (1992) Some evidence on the empirical significance of credit rationing. J Polit Econ 100:1047–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke BS, Gertler M (1999) Monetary policy and asset price volatility. New challenges for monetary policy, a symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas, pp 77–128

  • Bianchi J, Mendoza E (2015) Phases of global liquidity, fundamental news and design of macroprudential policy. July 2015, BIS Working Paper No. 505

  • Blose L (2001) Information asymmetry, capital adequacy and market reaction to loan loss provisioning announcements in the banking industry. Q Rev Econ Finance 41:239–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo MD, Jeanne O (2002) Monetary policy and asset prices: does benign neglect make sense, IMF working paper, WP/02/225

  • Borio C, Lowe P (2002) Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: exploring the nexus. BIS Working Paper No. 114

  • Borio C, Zhu H (2008) Capital regulation, risk taking and monetary policy: a missing link in transmission mechanism. BIS Working Paper No. 268

  • Bouvatier V, Lepetit L (2012a) Effects of loan loss provisions on growth in bank lending: some international comparisons. Int Econ 132:91–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouvatier V, Lepetit L (2012b) Provisioning rules and bank lending: a theoretical model. J Financ Stab 8:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman R, Williams C (2012) Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning and discipline of bank’s Risk-Taking. J Account Econ 54:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier M, Schnabel I (2016) Bubbles and central banks: historical perspectives. Central Bank at a Crossroad: what can we learn from history? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlstrom C, Fuerst T (1997) Agency costs, net worth and business fluctuations: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Am Econ Rev 87:893–910

    Google Scholar 

  • Case K, Shiller R (1989) The efficiency of the market for single family homes. Am Econ Rev 79(1):125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Cechetti S, Kohler M (2012) When capital adequacy and interest rate policy are substitutes (and when they are not). BIS Working Paper No. 379

  • Christiano L, Eichenbaum M, Evans C (1998) Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what extent? NBER Working Paper No. 6400

  • Collard F, Dellas H, Diba B, Loisel O (2012) Optimal monetary and prudential policies. Centre De Recherche en Economie et Statistique, Working Paper No. 2012–34

  • Crockett A (1998) Introduction: in asset prices and monetary policy: four views. Center for Economic and Policy Research

  • Crowe C, Arricia GD, Igan D, Rabanal P (2011) How to deal with real estate booms: lessons from country experiences, IMF working paper WP/11/91

  • Davis P, Karim D (2010) Macroprudential regulation: the missing policy pillar. Natl Inst Econ Rev 211:R3–R16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docking D, Hirschey M, Jones E (1997) Information and contagion effects of bank loan-loss reserve announcements. J Financ Econ 43:291–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faia E, Monacelli T (2007) Optimal interest rate rules, asset prices and credit frictions. J Econ Dyn Control 31:3228–3254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhi E, Tirole J (2009) Collective moral hazard, maturity mismatch and systemic bailouts. NBER Working Paper No. 15138

  • Filardo AJ (2001) Should monetary policy respond to asset price bubbles? some experimental results. July 2001, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

  • Fry R, Pagan A (2011) Sign restrictions in structural vector autoregressions - a critical review. J Econ Lit 49(4):938–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galati G, Moessner R (2011) Macroprudential policy - a literature review. BIS Working Paper No. 337

  • Gali J (2014) Monetary policy and rational asset price bubbles. Am Econ Rev 104(3):721–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gali J, Gambetti L (2015) The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles, some evidence. Am Econ J Macroecon 7(1):233–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelain P, Lansing K, Natvik J (2015) Leaning against the credit cycle. Norges Bank Working Papers 4

  • Gilchrist S, Leahy VJ (2002) Monetary policy and asset prices. J Monet Econ 49:75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart C, Hoffman B (2000a) Asset prices and conduct of monetary policy. Royal Economic Society, 2000

  • Goodhart C, Hoffman B (2000b) Do asset prices help predict consumer price inflation, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=242532

  • Greenwood-Nimmo M, Tarassow A (2016) Monetary shocks, macroprudential shocks and financial stability. Econ Model 56:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorda O, Schularick M, Taylor AM (2015) Leveraged bubbles. J Monet Econ 76:S1–S20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan P, Rabanal P, and Scott A (2009) Macroeconomic patterns and monetary policy in the run-up to the asset price busts, IMF working paper, WP/09/252

  • Kanagaretnam K, Lobo G, Yang D (2005) Determinants of signalling by banks through loan-loss provisions. J Bus Res 58:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaki N, Moore J (1997) Credit cycles. J Polit Econ 105(2):211–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota N (2009) Bursting bubbles: consequences and cures. Paper Presented at Macroeconomic and Policy Challenges Following Financial Meltdown Hosted by IMF

  • Laeven L, Majnoni G (2003) Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: too much, too late?. J Financ Intermed 12:173–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loisely O, Pommeretz A, Portierx F (2009) Monetary policy and herd behaviour in new-tech investment. Mimeo, Bank of France

  • Madrid A (2012) A robust model of bubbles with multidimensional uncertainty. Econometrica 80:1245–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrid A, Lansing K (2016) Credit-fuelled bubbles. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper Series

  • Martin A, Ventura J (2012) Economic growth and bubbles. Am Econ Rev 102(6):3033–3058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Ventura J (2014) Managing credit bubbles. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 19960

  • Mendicino C, Punzi M (2014) House prices, capital inflows and macroprudential policy. J Bank Financ 49:337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao A, Wang J (2011) Bubbles and credit constraints, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1779485 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1779485

  • Miao A, Wang J, Zhou J (2015) Asset bubbles, collateral and policy analysis. J Monet Econ 76:S57–S70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky H (1977) A theory of systemic fragility. In: Altman E, Sametz A (eds) Financial crises. Wiley, New York

  • Paoli D, Paustian M (2013) Coordinating monetary and macroprudential policies. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 653

  • Pool S, Haan L, Jacobs J (2014) Loan loss provisioning, bank credit and real economy. DNB Working Paper No. 445

  • Rigobon R, Sack B (2003) Measuring the reaction of monetary policy to the stock market. Q J Econ 118(2):639–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quint D, Rabanal P (2013) Monetary and macroprudential policy in an estimated DSGE model of euro area. IMF Working Paper, WP/13/209

  • Samuelson P (1958) An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social coontrivance of money. J Polit Econ 66:467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi S, Jou J, Tripe D (2014) Can interest rates really control house prices? Effectiveness and implications for macroprudential policy. J Bank Financ 47:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin H (2008) Risk and liquidity in a system context. J Financ Intermed 17:315–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiratsuka S (2001) Asset prices, financial stability and monetary policy based on Japan’s experience of the asset price bubble. BIS Papers chapters. In: Bank for International Settlements (ed) Marrying the macro- and micro-prudential dimensions of financial stability, vol 1, pp 261–284. Bank for International Settlements

  • Suh H (2014) Dichotomy between macroprudential policy and monetary policy on credit and inflation. Econ Lett 122(2):144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J (1985) Asset bubbles and overlapping generations. Econometrica 53 (6):1499–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yvrard L, Seegmuller T (2015) Rational bubbles and macroeconomic fluctuations: the (de-)stabilizing role of monetary policy. Math Soc Sci 75:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman R, Tayler W (2015) Financial shocks loan loss provisions and macroeconomic stability. Working Paper, Lancaster University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Indrani Manna.

Additional information

The views expressed in the paper are personal and not of the Reserve Bank of India. The author would like to thank the anonymous referees, the editor-in-chief and the guest editor for their helpful comments.

Technical Appendix

Technical Appendix

Fig. 5
figure 5

Policies vs welfare losses

Fig. 6
figure 6

Optimal bubble coefficient - monetary policy

Fig. 7
figure 7

Pure monetary policy shock

Fig. 8
figure 8

Pure provisions shock

Fig. 9
figure 9

Provisions shock with standard Taylor rule

Fig. 10
figure 10

Provisions shock with augmented Taylor rule

Fig. 11
figure 11

Provisions shock - independant policy making

Fig. 12
figure 12

Provisions shock - recursive identification with spread

Fig. 13
figure 13

Provisions shock - recursive identification with credit

Fig. 14
figure 14

Non-recursive identification

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manna, I. Can We Still Lean Against the Wind?. Open Econ Rev 29, 223–259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-018-9480-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-018-9480-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation