Baldwin, E. (2018). Exploring how institutional arrangements shape stakeholder influence on policy decisions: A comparative analysis in the energy sector. Public Administration Review, 79, 1–10.
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2018). Why congressional capacity is not enough. In The state of congressional capacity conference New America. Washington D.C.
Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Google Scholar
Berkhout, J., Hanegraaff, M., & Braun, C. (2017). Is the EU different? Comparing the diversity of national and EU-level systems of interest organisations. West European Politics, 40(5), 1109–1131.
Google Scholar
Bernhagen, P., Beyers, J., Braun, C., Fink-Hafner, D., Heylen, F., Maloney, W. A., et al. (2016). INTEREURO survey: Activities and strategies of European interest groups: A snapshot from the INTEREURO survey. Stuttgart.
Beyers, J., Donas, T., & Fraussen, B. (2015). No place like home? Explaining venue selection of regional offices in Brussels. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.977335.
Article
Google Scholar
Beyers, J., Dür, A., Marshall, D., & Wonka, A. (2014). Policy-centred sampling in interest group research: Lessons from the INTEREURO project. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 3, 160–173.
Google Scholar
Beyers, J., Dür, A., & Wonka, A. (2018). The political salience of EU policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(11), 1726–1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1337213.
Article
Google Scholar
Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance, 28(1), 95–112.
Google Scholar
Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558.
Google Scholar
Birnbaum, S., Bodin, Ö., & Sandström, A. (2015). Tracing the sources of legitimacy: The impact of deliberation in participatory natural resource management. Policy Sciences, 48(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9230-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Bunea, A. (2017). Designing stakeholder consultations: Reinforcing or alleviating bias in the European Union system of governance? European Journal of Political Research, 56(1), 46–69.
Google Scholar
Burby, R. J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976292.
Article
Google Scholar
Coen, D. (2009). Business lobbying in the European Union. In D. Coen & J. Richardson (Eds.), Lobbying the European Union: Institutions, actors and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Coen, D., & Katsaitis, A. (2018). Between cheap talk and epistocracy: The logic of interest group access in the European Parliament’s committee hearings. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12406.
Article
Google Scholar
Craft, J., & Halligan, J. (2017). Assessing 30 years of Westminster policy advisory system experience. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 47–62.
Google Scholar
De Bruycker, I., Berkhout, J., & Hanegraaff, M. (2019). The paradox of collective action: Linking interest aggregation and interest articulation in EU legislative lobbying. Governance, 32(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12373.
Article
Google Scholar
Eising, R. (2007). The access of business interests to EU institutions: Towards élite pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 384–403.
Google Scholar
European Commission. (2001). European Governance: A white paper. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission. (2017a). Better regulation “Toolbox”. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission. (2017b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Completing the Better Regulation Agenda: better solutions for better results, SWD (2017) 675 final. Brussels.
European Union. (2012). Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Brussels: Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012 P. 0001 - 0390.
Feldman, M. S., & Quick, K. S. (2009). Generating resources and energizing frameworks through inclusive public management. International Public Management Journal, 12(2), 137–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490902873408.
Article
Google Scholar
Fraussen, B., Beyers, J., & Donas, T. (2015). The expanding core and varying degrees of insiderness: Institutionalised interest group access to advisory councils. Political Studies, 63(3), 569–588.
Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 66–75.
Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2008). Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics, 31(4), 725–750.
Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2011). Access of experts: Information and EU decision-making. West European Politics, 34(1), 48–70.
Google Scholar
Gray, V., Lowery, D., Fellowes, M., & Mcatee, A. (2004). Public opinion, public policy, and organized interests in the American States. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700306.
Article
Google Scholar
Halpin, D. R., & Thomas, H. F. (2012). Evaluating the breadth of policy engagement by organized interests. Public Administration, 90(3), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02005.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, M., & Berkhout, J. (2018). More business as usual? Explaining business bias across issues and institutions in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1492006.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, M., Beyers, J., & Braun, C. (2011). Open the door to more of the same? The development of interest group representation at the WTO. World Trade Review, 10(04), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745611000310.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, M., Beyers, J., & De Bruycker, I. (2016). Balancing inside and outside lobbying: The political strategies of lobbyists at global diplomatic conferences. European Journal of Political Research, 55(3), 568–588.
Google Scholar
Hendriks, C. M., & Lees-Marshment, J. (2019). Political leaders and public engagement: The hidden world of informal Elite-Citizen interaction. Political Studies, 67(3), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718791370.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 11(1), 33–46.
Google Scholar
Judge, A., & Thomson, R. (2019). The responsiveness of legislative actors to stakeholders’ demands in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(5), 676–695.
Google Scholar
Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45–83.
Google Scholar
Klüver, H., Braun, C., & Beyers, J. (2015). Legislative lobbying in context: towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(4), 447–461.
Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Lowery, D., Baumgartner, F. R., Berkhout, J., Berry, J. M., Halpin, D. R., Hojnacki, M., et al. (2015). Images of an unbiased system. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1212–1231.
Google Scholar
Lundberg, E., & Hysing, E. (2016). The value of participation: Exploring the role of public consultations from the vantage point of interest groups. Scandinavian Political Studies, 39(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12056.
Article
Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1999). The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425284.
Article
Google Scholar
Murdoch, Z., & Trondal, J. (2013). Contracted government: Unveiling the European Commission’s contracted staff. West European Politics, 36(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.742734.
Article
Google Scholar
Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “Public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02544.x.
Article
Google Scholar
OECD. (2012). Recommendation of the Council on regulatory policy and governance. Paris: OECD.
Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. H., Halpin, D., & Rasmussen, A. (2015). Who gives evidence to parliamentary committees? A comparative investigation of parliamentary committees and their constituencies. Journal of Legislative Studies, 21(3), 408–427.
Google Scholar
Quittkat, C. (2011). The European Commission’s online consultations: A success story? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(3), 653–674.
Google Scholar
Quittkat, C., & Finke, B. (2008). The EU Commission consultation regime. In B. Kohler-Koch, D. De Bièvre, & W. A. Maloney (Eds.), Opening EU-governance to civil society: Gains and challenges (pp. 183–222). Mannheim: University of Mannheim.
Google Scholar
Quittkat, C., & Kotzian, P. (2011). Lobbying via consultation—Territorial and functional interests in the Commission’s consultation regime. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 401–418.
Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., & Carroll, B. J. (2014). Determinants of upper-class dominance in the heavenly Chorus: Lessons from European Union online consultations. British Journal of Political Science, 44(02), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000750.
Article
Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Carroll, B. J., & Lowery, D. (2014). Representatives of the public? Public opinion and interest group activity. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 250–268.
Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., & Gross, V. (2015). Biased access? Exploring selection to advisory committees. European Political Science Review, 7(3), 343–372.
Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., & Toshkov, D. (2013). The effect of stakeholder involvement on legislative duration: Consultation of external actors and legislative duration in the European Union. European Union Politics, 14, 366–387.
Google Scholar
Rodrigo, D., & Amo, P. A. (2006). Background document on public consultation. Paris: OECD.
Google Scholar
Røed, M., & Wøien Hansen, V. (2018). Explaining participation bias in the European Commission’s online consultations: The Struggle for policy gain without too much pain. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(6), 1446–1461. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12754.
Article
Google Scholar
Sirianni, C. (2009). Investing in democracy: Engaging citizens in collaborative governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Google Scholar
Van Ballaert, B. (2017). The European Commission’s use of consultation during policy formulation: The effects of policy characteristics. European Union Politics, 18(3), 406–423.
Google Scholar
van den Berg, C. F. (2017). Dynamics in the Dutch policy advisory system: Externalization, politicization and the legacy of pillarization. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 63–84.
Google Scholar
Yackee, S. W. (2015). Participant voice in the bureaucratic policymaking process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu007.
Article
Google Scholar
Yackee, J. W., & Yackee, S. W. (2006). A bias towards business? Assessing interest group influence on the U.S. bureaucracy. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2508.2006.00375.X.
Article
Google Scholar