6, P. (2004). Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,
14(1), 103–138.
6, P. (2005). Joined-up government in the west beyond Britain: A provisional assessment. In V. Bogdanor (Ed.), Joined-up government (pp. 43–106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adelle, C., Jordan, A., & Benson, D. (2015). The role of policy networks in the coordination of the European Union’s economic and environmental interests: The case of EU mercury policy. Journal of European Integration,
37(4), 471–489.
Article
Google Scholar
Adelle, C., Pallemaerts, M., & Chiavari, J. (2009). Climate change and energy security in Europe: Policy integration and its limits. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
Google Scholar
Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of Déjà Vu? Environmental Policy and Governance,
23(1), 1–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (2012). Dismantling public policy: Preferences, strategies, and effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C. (2012). Understanding policy dismantling: An analytical framework. In M. W. Bauer, A. Jordan, C. Green-Pedersen, & A. Héritier (Eds.), Dismantling public policy: Preferences, strategies, and effects (pp. 30–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Biesbroek, G. R., Termeer, C. A. M., Klostermann, J. M., & Kabat, P. (2013). Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,
19(7), 1011–1032.
Article
Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V. (2005). Joined-up government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Bolleyer, N. (2011). The influence of political parties on policy coordination. Governance,
24(3), 469–494.
Article
Google Scholar
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Book
Google Scholar
Braun, D. (2008). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy,
35(4), 227–239.
Article
Google Scholar
Briassoulis, H. (2004). Policy integration for complex policy problems: What, why and how. In Paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies - Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin.
Briassoulis, H. (2011). Governing desertification in Mediterranean Europe: The challenge of environmental policy integration in multi-level governance contexts. Land Degradation and Development,
22(3), 313–325.
Article
Google Scholar
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review,
66, 44–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, G. R. (2015). Policy integration in the EU governance of food security: do actions speak louder than words? In Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Public Policy, 1–4 July 2015, Milan.
Candel, J. J. L., Breeman, G. E., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2015). The European Commission’s ability to deal with wicked problems: an in-depth case study of the governance of food security. Journal of European Public Policy,. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1068836.
Google Scholar
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review,
67(6), 1059–1066.
Article
Google Scholar
de la Porte, C. (2002). Is the open method of coordination appropriate for organising activities at European level in sensitive policy areas? European Law Journal,
8, 38–58.
Article
Google Scholar
Dowd, A.-M., et al. (2014). The role of networks in transforming Australian agriculture. Nature Climate Change, 4(7), 558–563.
Article
Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology-the ‘issue-attention cycle. The Public Interest,
28, 38–50.
Google Scholar
Drimie, S., & Ruysenaar, S. (2010). The integrated food security strategy of South Africa: An institutional analysis. Agrekon,
49(3), 316–337.
Article
Google Scholar
Dupont, C., & Oberthür, S. (2012). Insufficient climate policy integration in EU energy policy: the importance of the long-term perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Research,
8(2), 228–247.
Google Scholar
Dupuis, J., & Biesbroek, R. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environmental Change,
23(6), 1476–1487.
Article
Google Scholar
EEA. (2005). Environmental policy integration in Europe: State of play and an evaluation framework-EEA Technical Report 2/2005. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
Google Scholar
Feiock, R. C. (2013). The institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal,
41(3), 397–425.
Article
Google Scholar
Geerlings, H., & Stead, D. (2003). The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transport Policy,
10(3), 187–196.
Article
Google Scholar
Gieve, J., & Provost, C. (2012). Ideas and coordination in policymaking: The financial crisis of 2007–2009. Governance,
25(1), 61–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., Grabovsky, P., & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law & Policy,
21(1), 49–76.
Article
Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics,
25(3), 275–296.
Article
Google Scholar
Halligan, J., Buick, F., & O’Flynn, J. (2011). Experiments with joined-up, horizontal and whole-of-government in Anglophone countries. In A. Massey (Ed.), International handbook on civil service systems (pp. 74–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar
Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2012). Linking agenda setting to coordination structures: Bureaucratic politics inside the European Commission. Journal of European Integration,
35(4), 425–441.
Article
Google Scholar
Hogan, J., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice: Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Book
Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Book
Google Scholar
Hoppe, R. (2010). The governance of problems: Puzzling, powering and participation. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Google Scholar
Hovik, S., & Hanssen, G. S. (2015). The impact of network management and complexity on multi-level coordination. Public Administration,
93(2), 506–523.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration,
43(4), 412–431.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences,
42(1), 73–89.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2014). Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Global Environmental Change,
29, 395–403.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2006). Convergence and divergence in ‘New Governance’ arrangements: Evidence from European integrated natural resource strategies. Journal of Public Policy,
26(2), 167–189.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’. Policy and Society,
26(4), 1–18.
Article
Google Scholar
Hustedt, T., & Seyfried, M. (2015). Co-ordination across internal organizational boundaries: how the EU Commission co-ordinates climate policies. Journal of European Public Policy,. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1074605:1-18.
Google Scholar
Jack, S. L. (2005). The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: A qualitative analysis*. Journal of Management Studies,
42(6), 1233–1259.
Article
Google Scholar
Jacob, K., & Volkery, A. (2004). Institutions and instruments for government self-regulation: Environmental policy integration in a cross-country perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,
6(3), 291–309.
Article
Google Scholar
Jacob, K., Volkery, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Instruments for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD countries. In A. Jordan & A. Lenschow (Eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 24–48). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond subsystems: Policy regimes and governance. Policy Studies Journal,
38(2), 303–327.
Article
Google Scholar
Jones, C. O., & Strahan, R. (1985). The effect of energy politics on congressional and executive organization in the 1970s. Legislative Studies Quarterly,
10(2), 151–179.
Article
Google Scholar
Jordan, G., & Halpin, D. (2006). The political costs of policy coherence: Constructing a rural policy for Scotland. Journal of Public Policy,
26(1), 21–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Policy paper environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance,
20(3), 147–158.
Article
Google Scholar
Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The coordination of the European Union: Exploring the capacities of networked governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Karré, P. M., van der Steen, M., & van Twist, M. (2013). Joined-up government in The Netherlands: Experiences with program ministries. International Journal of Public Administration,
36(1), 63–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal,
10(1), 9–33.
Article
Google Scholar
Kettl, D. F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review,
66, 10–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Lafferty, W., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics,
12(3), 1–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Lau, R. R., & Schlesinger, M. (2005). Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology,
26(1), 77–114.
Article
Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009). Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar
Massey, E., & Huitema, D. (2013). The emergence of climate change adaptation as a policy field: The case of England. Regional Environmental Change,
13(2), 341–352.
Article
Google Scholar
May, P. J., Sapotichne, J., & Workman, S. (2006). Policy coherence and policy domains. Policy Studies Journal,
34(3), 381–403.
Article
Google Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
McNamara, M. (2012). Starting to untangle the web of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration: A framework for public managers. International Journal of Public Administration,
35(6), 389–401.
Article
Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (2007). National sustainable development strategies: Features, challenges and reflexivity. European Environment,
17(3), 152–163.
Article
Google Scholar
Metcalfe, L. (1994). International policy co-ordination and public management reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences,
60(2), 271–290.
Article
Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P., & Kivimaa, P. (2007). Evaluating policy integration: The case of policies for environmentally friendlier technological innovations. Evaluation,
13(1), 68–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Mickwitz, P., et al. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. Helsinki: Partnership for European Environmental Research.
Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., & Nilsson, L. J. (2005). Towards climate policy integration in the EU: Evolving dilemmas and opportunities. Climate Policy, 5(3), 363–376.
Article
Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., & Persson, A. (2008). Sweden. In A. Jordan & A. Lenschow (Eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? (pp. 24–46). Cheltenham: Elgar.
Google Scholar
Nilsson, M., et al. (2012). Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance,
22(6), 395–423.
Article
Google Scholar
Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. M. (2010). The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy,
1(2), 1–32.
Article
Google Scholar
OECD. (2013). Better policies for development—In focus: Policy coherence for development and global food security. Paris: OECD.
Google Scholar
OECD. (2014). Better policies for development 2014: Policy coherence and illicit financial flows. Paris: OECD.
Google Scholar
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review,
15(2), 203–223.
Google Scholar
Pallemaerts, M., et al. (2006). Drowning in process? The implementation of the EU’s 6th environmental action programme report for the European Environmental Bureau’, London: IEEP. Available at http://www.ieep.eu/assets/671/FinalReport6EAP.pdf.
Pelkonen, A., Teräväinen, T., & Waltari, S.-T. (2008). Assessing policy coordination capacity: Higher education, science, and technology policies in Finland. Science and Public Policy,
35(4), 241–252.
Article
Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2005). Pittsburgh: Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh.
Peters, B. G., & Hogwood, B. W. (1985). In search of the issue-attention cycle. The Journal of Politics,
47(1), 238–253.
Article
Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics,
45(4), 595–628.
Article
Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review,
94(2), 251–267.
Article
Google Scholar
Princen, S. (2009). Agenda-setting in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Book
Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M., Dente, B., & Dossi, S. (2012) Recasting institutionalism: Institutional analysis and public policy. European Political Science,
11(4), 537–550.
Article
Google Scholar
Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society,
28(2), 99–109.
Article
Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1991). Policy networks and sub-central government. In G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies and networks (pp. 203–214). London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences,
4(2), 155–169.
Article
Google Scholar
Roggeband, C., & Verloo, M. (2007). Dutch women are liberated, migrant women are a problem: The evolution of policy frames on gender and migration in the Netherlands, 1995–2005. Social Policy & Administration,
41(3), 271–288.
Article
Google Scholar
Ross, A., & Dovers, S. (2008). Making the harder yards: Environmental policy integration in Australia. Australian Journal of Public Administration,
67(3), 245–260.
Article
Google Scholar
Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance,
24(4), 233–246.
Article
Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A. (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168.
Article
Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. S. (1993). Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics,
6(1), 27–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Stead, D. (2008). Institutional aspects of integrating transport, environment and health policies. Transport Policy,
15(3), 139–148.
Article
Google Scholar
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2009). Barriers to new modes of horizontal governance. Public Management Review,
11(3), 299–316.
Article
Google Scholar
Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A. R. P. J., Breeman, G. E., & Stiller, S. J. (2015). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society,
47(6), 680–710.
Article
Google Scholar
Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2013) Coordinating and integrating cross-sectoral policies: A theoretical approach. In Paper presented at the 7th ECPR General Conference, Bordeaux.
Underdal, A. (1980). Integrated marine policy: What? Why? How? Marine Policy,
4(3), 159–169.
Article
Google Scholar
Varone, F., Nahrath, S., Aubin, D., & Gerber, J.-D. (2013). Functional regulatory spaces. Policy Sciences,
46(4), 311–333.
Article
Google Scholar
Verloo, M. (2005). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe: A critical frame analysis approach. Greek Review of Social Research,
117, 11–34.
Google Scholar
WEF. (2015). Global risks 2015, 10th Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Google Scholar
Wilson, C. A. (2000). Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy,
20(3), 247–274.
Article
Google Scholar
World Bank. (2006). EU-8 administrative capacity in the new member states: The limits of innovation?. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Zafonte, M., & Sabatier, P. (1998). Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics,
10(4), 473–505.
Article
Google Scholar
Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 65–92). Boulder: Westview Press.
Google Scholar