Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear dynamic characteristics of a vibrator–ground system considering surface topography

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlinear interaction between the vibrator and ground is important for the vibrator–ground system which is related to structural design, diagnosis and prognosis of the vibrator. Thus, it is necessary to model the vibrator–ground interaction system reasonably and study its dynamic response. In this paper, a nonlinear dynamic model of the vibrator–ground system with consideration of surface topographies is developed and the correlation of surface roughness to the soil–baseplate interaction characteristics is revealed. The developed model is verified by comparing simulation results with field tests. Based on this model, some useful nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the vibrator are analyzed: (a) the baseplate vibration behaviors; (b) the contact uniformity; (c) the ground force. Moreover, a parametric analysis is conducted and the influences of several system parameters are discussed in details. The results indicate that the surface topography has great influence on the vibrator–ground interaction and further, affects the dynamic response of the vibrator. This research can provide references for the operation and optimization of the vibrator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  1. Frappa, M., Molinier, C.: Shallow seismic reflection in a mine gallery. Eng. Geol. 33, 201–208 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yunhuo, Z., Yunyue, E.L., Taeseo, K.: A modified seismic reflection approach for engineering geology investigation in fractured rock zone. Eng. Geol. 1, 105592 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wei, Z., Phillips, T.F., Hall, M.A.: Fundamental discussions on seismic vibrators. Geophysics 75, 13–25 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lebedev, A., Beresnev, I.: Radiation from flexural vibrations of the baseplate and their effect on the accuracy of travel time measurements. Geophys. Prospect. 53, 543–555 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castanet, A., Lavergne, M.: Vibrator controlling system. U.S. Patent 1965:3208550

  6. Sallas, J.J.: Seismic vibrator control and the downgoing P-wave. Geophysics 49, 732–740 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baeten, G., Ziolkowski, A.: The Vibroseis Source. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen, K.P., Johnson, M.L., & May, J.S.: High fidelity vibratory seismic (HFVS) method for acquiring seismic data: 68th Annual InternationalMeeting, SEG, ExpandedAbstracts, 140–143 (1998).

  9. Saragiotis, C., Scholtz, P., Bagaini, C.: On the accuracy of the ground force estimated in vibroseis acquisition. Geophys. Prospect. 58, 69–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagarajappa, N., Wilkinson, D.: Source measurement effect on high fidelity vibratory seismic separation. Geophys. Prospect. 2010(58), 55–68 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beresnev, I., Nikolaev, A.: Experimental investigations of nonlinear seismic effects. Phys. Earth Planet. In. 50, 83–87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dimitriu, P.P.: Preliminary results of vibrator-aided experiments in non-linear seismology conducted at Uetze, FRG. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 63, 172–180 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, J., Huang, Z.Q., Li, G.: Dynamic characteristics analysis of a seismic vibratorground coupling system. Shock. Vib. 2017, 1–12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, G., Huang, Z.Q., Lian, Z.H., et al.: A model for the vibrator–ground coupling vibration and the dynamic responses under excitation of sweep signal. Adv. Struct. Eng. 22(8), 1855–1866 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lebedev, A.V., Beresnev, I.A.: Nonlinear distortion of signals radiated by vibroseis sources. Geophys 69, 968–977 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lebedev, A.V., Beresnev, I.A., Vermeer, P.L.: Model parameters of the nonlinear stiffness of the vibrator-ground contact determined by inversion of vibrator accelerometer data. Geophysics 71, 25 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noorlandt, R., Drijkoningen, G.: On the mechanical vibrator-earth contact geometry and its dynamics. Geophys 81, 37–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, Z., Peng, X., Li, G.: Response of a two-degree-of-freedom vibration system with rough contact interfaces. Shock. Vib. 2019, 1691582 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mandelbrot, B.B.: How long is the coast of Britain? Science 156, 636–638 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mandelbrot, B.B.: The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman, New York (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Ausloos, M., Berman, D.H.: A multivariate Weierstrass-Mandelbrot function. Proc. R Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 400, 331–350 (1985)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Yan, W., Komvopoulos, K.: Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces. J. Sppl. Phys. 84, 3617–3624 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tian, X., Bhushan, B.: A numerical three-dimensional model for the contact of rougher surfaces by variational priciple. J. Tribol. 118, 33–42 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boussinesq, J.: Applications des potentiels à l’ étude de l’ équilibre et mouvement des solids elastiques. Gauthier-Villard (1885).

  25. Love, A.E.H.: The stress produced in a semi-infinite soild by pressure on part of the boundary. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Char. 228, 377–420 (1929)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao, H., Shao, Y., Brennan, M.J.: On the contact stiffness and nonlinear vibration of an elastic body with a rough surface in contact with a rigid flat surface. Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid 49, 321–328 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Whitman, R.V., Richart Jr, F.E.: Design precedures for dynamically loaded foundations. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE 93, 169–193 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lysmer, J., Richart, F.E.: Dynamic response to Footings to vertical loading. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE 92, 65–91 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lebedev, A.V., Sutin, A.M.: Excitation of seismic waves by an underwater sound projector. Acoust. Phys. 29, 503–528 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Peng, X., Huang, Z., Hao, L.: Modeling of nonlinear interaction and its effects on the dynamics of a vibrator-ground system. Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 132, 106064 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and all anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42202348) and the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2023NSFSC0769).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xun Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Solution of the nonlinear damping

The internal damping at the interfaces is considered as a constant value \(c_{i}\), and the value of the damping ratio \(\zeta_{i} = {{c_{i} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{c_{i} } {2\sqrt {m_{2} n_{1} k_{1} z_{s}^{{n_{1} - 1}} } }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2\sqrt {m_{2} n_{1} k_{1} z_{s}^{{n_{1} - 1}} } }}\) is in the range of 0.01 to 0.1. For circular contact area, the radiation damping can be expressed as \(c = {{3.4r^{2} \sqrt {{{E\rho } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E\rho } {2(1 + \nu )}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2(1 + \nu )}}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{3.4r^{2} \sqrt {{{E\rho } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E\rho } {2(1 + \nu )}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2(1 + \nu )}}} } {(1 - \nu )}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {(1 - \nu )}}\), where \(r\) is the radius of the circular loading area, E and \(\nu\) are, respectively, the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the soil, \(\rho\) is the mass density of the soil. In this study, the contact domain is discretized by square elements, the equivalent radius of the load area can be obtained by \(r = 0.55\sqrt {s_{b} }\), where \(s_{b} { = 2}a \times 2b\) is the area of a square element. Hence, the radiation damping of the whole contact domain can be obtained by

$$ c_{r} = \int_{\Omega } {\frac{{0.85s_{b} \sqrt {{{E\rho } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E\rho } {2\left( {1 + \nu } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {2\left( {1 + \nu } \right)}}} }}{{\left( {1 - \nu } \right)}}} dn_{k} $$
(A.1)

where nk is the contact point.

Appendix B: Equations of the baseplate motion

The kinetic equation of the baseplate on the rough earth under harmonic excitation is given by

$$ m_{2} \ddot{z}_{2} + \left( {c_{2} \left( {z_{s} + z_{2} } \right)^{{n_{2} }} { + }c_{i} } \right)\dot{z}_{2} + k\left( {z_{s} + z_{2} } \right)^{{n_{1} }} - F_{t} = A\sin \left( {\omega t} \right) $$
(B.1)

where \(\omega\) is the frequency.

It needs to mention that Eq. (B.1) is only valid when the two contact surfaces are in contact with each other, i.e., when \(z_{2} \ge z_{s}\). By using the following non-dimensional variables, the equation can be transformed into normalized form, which are given by

$$ x_{2} = \frac{{z_{2} }}{{z_{s} }}, \, \Omega = \frac{\omega }{{\omega_{s} }}, \, \tau = \frac{{\omega_{s} }}{t}, \, \zeta_{r} = \frac{{c_{2} z_{s}^{{n_{2} }} }}{{2m_{2} \omega_{s} }}, \, Y = {F \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {F {F_{t} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {F_{t} }} $$
(B.2)

where the static deflection given by \(z_{s} = \left( {{{F_{t} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{F_{t} } k}} \right. \kern-0pt} k}} \right)^{{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {n_{1} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {n_{1} }}}}\), \(\omega_{s} = \sqrt {{{kn_{1} z_{s}^{{n_{1} - 1}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{kn_{1} z_{s}^{{n_{1} - 1}} } {m_{2} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {m_{2} }}}\) is the undamped natural frequency at static equilibrium position. The dimensionless equation is subsequently obtained by

$$ \ddot{x}_{2} + 2\left[ {\zeta_{r} \left( {x_{2} + 1} \right)^{{n_{2} }} + \zeta_{i} } \right]\dot{x}_{2} + \frac{1}{{n_{1} }}\left[ {\left( {x_{2} + 1} \right)^{{n_{1} }} - 1} \right] = \frac{Y}{{n_{1} }}\sin \left( {\Omega \tau } \right) $$
(B.3)

The solution of Eq. (B.1) is difficult to resolved directly, so the appropriate solution can be obtained when the expressions \(\left( {x_{2} + 1} \right)^{{n_{1} }}\) and \(\left( {x_{2} + 1} \right)^{{n_{2} }}\) are expanded into a third-order Taylor series expansion, and then, the equation is reduced as

$$ \ddot{x}_{2} + 2\left[ {\zeta_{r} \left( {1 + n_{2} x_{2} + a_{1} x_{2}^{2} + a_{3} x_{2}^{3} } \right) + \zeta_{i} } \right]\dot{x}_{2} + x_{2} + b_{1} x_{2}^{2} + b_{2} x_{2}^{3} = \frac{Y}{{n_{1} }}\sin \left( {\Omega \tau } \right) $$
(B.4)

where \(a_{1} = \frac{{n_{2} \left( {n_{2} - 1} \right)}}{2}\), \(a_{2} = \frac{{n_{2} \left( {n_{2} - 1} \right)\left( {n{}_{2} - 2} \right)}}{6}\), \(b_{1} = \frac{{n_{1} - 1}}{2}\), \(b_{2} = \frac{{\left( {n_{1} - 1} \right)\left( {n_{2} - 2} \right)}}{6}\).

To obtain the undamped free vibration of the baseplate, the damping terms in Eq. (B.3) are set as null. The approximate analytical expression for natural frequency of the baseplate-ground system is solved using multiple scales method. For the initial condition of \(x_{2} (0) = x_{20}\), \(\dot{x}_{2} (0) = 0\), the nondimensional natural frequency \(\Omega_{n}\) is written as

$$ \Omega_{n} = 1 + \left( {\frac{{9b_{2} - 10b_{1}^{2} }}{24}} \right)\left( {1 + \frac{{b_{1} }}{3}x_{20} } \right)^{2} x_{20}^{2} $$
(B.5)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, X., Hao, L. Nonlinear dynamic characteristics of a vibrator–ground system considering surface topography. Nonlinear Dyn 111, 14763–14782 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08613-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08613-5

Keywords

Navigation