Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling car-following behavior in heterogeneous traffic mixing human-driven, automated and connected vehicles: considering multitype vehicle interactions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a car-following model is put forth to explain the car-following behavior of HDVs (human-driven vehicles), AVs (autonomous vehicles) and CAVs (connected and automated vehicles) in mixed traffic. Based on the IDM (intelligent-driver model) and molecular dynamic theory, the model includes the velocity of surrounding vehicles along with the difference of velocity and the headway between each pair of vehicles. The drivers’ sensitivity to the deceleration of the nearest front vehicle was considered in HDV car-following modeling and the influences of various kinds of nearest front and rear vehicles were distinguished in the CAV model. Based on the information obtained from the real road test mixed with HDVs, AVs and CAVs, the optimum value of the model parameters was obtained and the accuracy of model was verified with simulation. The results show that the simulation for HDVs’, AVs’ and CAVs’ car-following behavior under the proposed model is more accurate than that for the IDM, ACC (adaptive cruise control) model and CACC (cooperative adaptive cruise control) model. The model can be applied to car-following simulations of HDVs, AVs and CAVs in mixed traffic, in the model the tools and concepts of nonlinear dynamics especially molecular dynamic theory is applied which can benefit road traffic vehicle interaction analysis. In addition, this study provides valuable suggestions and guidance for effectively guiding AVs and CAVs to follow vehicles and improving the stability of car-following behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Brackstone, M., McDonald, M.: Car-following: a historical review. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic. Psychol. Behav. 2(4), 181–196 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, L.J., Tian, C., Sun, D.H., Liu, W.N.: A new car-following model with consideration of anticipation driving behavior. Nonlinear Dyn. 70(2), 1205–1211 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, P., Yu, G., Wu, X., Wang, Y.: Linear and nonlinear stability analysis of an extended car-following model considering pedestrians on adjacent lane. Nonlinear Dyn. 88(1), 777–789 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, S., Tang, J., Xin, Q.: Relative velocity difference model for the car-following theory. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(3), 1415–1428 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, L.C.: Nonlinear dynamics of autonomous vehicles with limits on acceleration. Physi. A. 405, 128–139 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bansal, P., Kockelman, K.M.: Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 95, 49–63 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Y., Zhao, M., Sun, D., Dong, C.: An extended continuum mixed traffic model. Nonlinear Dyn. 103(2), 1891–1909 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, W.X., Zhang, H.M.: Analysis of mixed traffic flow with human-driving and autonomous cars based on car-following model. Physica A. 496, 274–285 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, S., Yu, B., Wu, M.: Mvcm car-following model for connected vehicles and simulation-based traffic analysis in mixed traffic flow. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 99, 1–8 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orosz, G.: Connected automated vehicle design among human-driven vehicles. IFAC Pap. Online. 51(34), 403–406 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuang, H., Lu, F.H., Yang, F.L., Peng, G.H., Li, X.L.: An extended car-following model incorporating the effects of driver’s memory and mean expected velocity field in ITS environment. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 32(07), 2150095 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, J., Zheng, Z., Sun, J.: Stability analysis methods and their applicability to car-following models in conventional and connected environments. Transp. Res. B Meth. 109, 212–237 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuang, H., Wang, M.T., Lu, F.H., Bai, K.Z., Li, X.L.: An extended car-following model considering multi-anticipative average velocity effect under V2V environment. Phys. A. 527, 121268 (2019)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, J., Xu, K., Li, G., Li, S., Wang, T.: Dynamics of traffic flow affected by the future motion of multiple preceding vehicles under vehicle-connected environment: Modeling and stabilization. Phys. A. 565, 125538 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, Y., Sun, D., Liu, W., Zhang, M., Zhao, M., Liao, X., Tang, L.: Modeling and simulation for microscopic traffic flow based on multiple headway, velocity and acceleration difference. Nonlinear Dyn. 66(1), 15–28 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zong, F., Wang, M., Tang, M., Li, X., Zeng, M.: An improved intelligent driver model considering the information of multiple front and rear vehicles. IEEE Access. 9, 66241–66252 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuang, H., Xu, Z.P., Li, X.L., Lo, S.M.: An extended car-following model accounting for the average headway effect in intelligent transportation system. Phys. A. 471, 778–787 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao, J., Ma, M., Liang, S., Ma, G.: The non-lane-discipline-based car-following model considering forward and backward vehicle information under connected environment. Nonlinear Dyn. 107(3), 2787–2801 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ngoduy, D.: Analytical studies on the instabilities of heterogeneous intelligent traffic flow. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 18(10), 2699–2706 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Herman, R., Montroll, E.W., Potts, R.B., Rothery, R.W.: Traffic dynamics: analysis of stability in car following. Oper. Res. 7(1), 86–106 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Barrachina, X., Conejero, J.A.: Devaney Chaos and Distributional Chaos in the, pp. 1–11. Solution of Certain Partial Differential Equations, Abstract and Applied Analysis (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E. 62(2), 1805 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Talebpour, A., Mahmassani, H.S.: Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Trans. Res. C. Emer. 71, 143–163 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barrachina, X., Conejero, J.A., Murillo-Arcila, M., Seoane-Sepúlveda, J.B.: Distributional chaos for the Forward and Backward Control traffic model. Linear Algebra. Appl. 479, 202–215 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, S., Tang, J., Xin, Q.: Relative velocity difference model for the car-following theory. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(3), 1415–1428 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, H., Qin, Y., Wang, W., Chen, J.: Stability of CACC-manual heterogeneous vehicular flow with partial CACC performance degrading. Transp. B. 7(1), 788–813 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yao, Z., Hu, R., Jiang, Y., Xu, T.: Stability and safety evaluation of mixed traffic flow with connected automated vehicles on expressways. J. Safety Res. 75, 262–274 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Milanés, V., Shladover, S.E.: Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data. Transp. Res. C Emer. 48, 285–300 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang, R., Wu, Q., Zhu, Z.: Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. Phys. Rev. E. 64(1), 017101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., Helbing, D.: Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance. Transp. Res. C Emer. 16(6), 668–683 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ntousakis, I.A., Nikolos, I.K., Papageorgiou, M.: On microscopic modelling of adaptive cruise control system. Transp. Res. Procedia. 6, 111–127 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Arem, B., Van Driel, C.J.: The impact of cooperative adaptive cruise control on traffic-flow characteristics. IEEE T Intell. Transp. 7(4), 429–436 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zong, F., Wang, M., Tang, J., Zeng, M.: Modeling AVs & RVs’ car-following behavior by considering impacts of multiple surrounding vehicles and driving characteristics. Phys. A. 589, 126625 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Guang-Han, P.: Stabilisation analysis of multiple car-following model in traffic flow. Chinese Phys. B. 589, 126625 (2010)

  35. Kresse, G., Hafner, J.: Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B. 47(1), 558 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jia, Y., Qu, D., Han, L., Lin, L., Hong, J.: Research on car-following model based on molecular dynamics. Adv. Mech. Eng. 13(2), 1687814021993003 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, X. F., Guo, T., Qu, D. Y., Hao, J.: Analysis on traffic flow stability based on molecular following behavior, J. Highway Transp. Res. Dev. 30(5) (2013)

  38. Guo, T., Qu, D.Y., Wang, H.P., Hao, J., Yang, W.S., Hao, J.: Stability of the local analysis of the traffic flow based on the molecular-following behavior. J. Qingdao Technol. Univ. 34(05), 87–91 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, M.: Molecule dynamics simulation on gas flow in microchannels, Master Dissertation, Xidian University (2005)

  40. Zong, F., Shi, R., Liu, Y.X., Ren, Y.Y., Zheng, X.L.: Construction of risk field and optimization of driving behaviors for signalized intersections. China J. Highway Transp. 35(10), 244–253 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yao, Z., Hu, R., Wang, Y., Jiang, Y., Ran, B., Chen, Y.: Stability analysis and the fundamental diagram for mixed connected automated and human-driven vehicles. Phys. A. 533, 121931 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Ward, J. A.: Heterogeneity, lane-changing and instability in traffic: a mathematical approach, page numbers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol (2009)

  43. Turner, R., Walton, S., Duke, R.: A case study on the application of the Nyquist stability criterion as applied to interconnected loads and sources on grids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 60(7), 2740–2749 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the NSFC of China under Grant U1864206.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziyu Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

The authors declare that they comply with ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Z., Ding, H. Modeling car-following behavior in heterogeneous traffic mixing human-driven, automated and connected vehicles: considering multitype vehicle interactions. Nonlinear Dyn 111, 11115–11134 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08377-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08377-y

Keywords

Navigation