Abstract
In this study, a dynamic analysis method for flexible multibody systems using Reissner–Mindlin shells was developed, and an edge center-based strain smoothing mixed interpolation of tensorial components (MITC) method that described the deformation of flexible shells was presented. Three primary achievements were completed. First, a new dynamics equation for Reissner–Mindlin shells based on the floating frame of reference formulation was modeled, in which the coupling of the bending and membrane deformations with rigid motion was considered comprehensively. Second, an edge center-based strain smoothing (ECSS) method that effectively improved the membrane and bending behavior for MITC3 elements was proposed. Third, the ECSS method was designed to construct a linear strain field within an element to ensure the strain consistency at the junction center of the element, resulting in a smoother stress field. The superior performance of the proposed method was verified by convergence analyses, and its advantages for flexible multibody dynamics analyses were also highlighted numerically.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- \(O - xyz\) :
-
The inertial coordinate system
- \(\overline{O}^{I} - \overline{x}^{I} \overline{y}^{I} \overline{z}^{I}\) :
-
The floating coordinate system
- \(e - \hat{x}\hat{y}\hat{z}\) :
-
The local coordinate system of element \(e\)
- \({\mathbf{r}}_{{P_{f} }}\), \({\dot{\mathbf{r}}}_{{P_{f} }}\) and \({\ddot{\mathbf{r}}}_{{P_{f} }}\) :
-
The spatial position, velocity, and acceleration of point \(P_{f}\)
- \({\mathbf{R}}^{I}\) :
-
The translational displacement of \(\overline{O}^{I} - \overline{x}^{I} \overline{y}^{I} \overline{z}^{I}\) with respect to \(O - xyz\)
- \({{\varvec{\uptheta}}}^{I}\), \({{\varvec{\upomega}}}^{I}\) and \({{\varvec{\upvarepsilon}}}^{I}\) :
-
The rotational displacement, angular velocity and angular acceleration of \(\overline{O}^{I} - \overline{x}^{I} \overline{y}^{I} \overline{z}^{I}\) with respect to \(O - xyz\)
- \({\mathbf{A}}^{I}\) :
-
The coordinate transformation matrix between two coordinate systems
- \({\overline{\mathbf{u}}}_{f}\) :
-
Deformation displacement in \(\overline{O}^{I} - \overline{x}^{I} \overline{y}^{I} \overline{z}^{I}\)
- \({\hat{\mathbf{u}}}_{f}\) :
-
Deformation displacement in \(e - \hat{x}\hat{y}\hat{z}\)
- \({\overline{\mathbf{q}}}_{f}\) :
-
The global nodal displacement vector
- \({\mathbf{N}}^{e}\) :
-
Element shape function matrix
- \({{\varvec{\tilde \varepsilon }}}_{{\text{m}}}\), \({{\varvec{\tilde \varepsilon }}}_{{\text{b}}}\) and \({{\varvec{\upvarepsilon}}}_{{\text{s}}}\) :
-
Respectively corresponding to the smoothed membrane strain, smoothed bending strain, and shear strain
- \({\tilde{\mathbf{B}}}_{{\text{m}}}^{e}\), \({\tilde{\mathbf{B}}}_{{\text{b}}}^{e}\) and \({\mathbf{B}}_{{\text{s}}}^{e}\) :
-
Respectively corresponding to the smoothed membrane strain matrix, smoothed bending strain matrix, and shear strain with MITC
- \({\mathbf{M}}^{I}\) and \({\mathbf{K}}^{I}\) :
-
Mass matrix and stiffness matrix
- \({\mathbf{Q}}_{{\text{l}}}^{I}\) and \({\mathbf{Q}}_{{\text{v}}}^{I}\) :
-
External load vector and velocity coupling vector
References
Timoshenko, S.: Theory of Plates and Shells. McGraw-Hill, New York (1964)
Calladine, C.R.: Theory of Shell Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)
Kirchhoff, G.: Uber das Gleichgewicht und die Bewegung einer elastichen Scheibe. J. Reine Angew. Math. 40, 51–88 (1850)
Reissner, E.: The effect of transverse shear deformation on the bending of elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech. 12(3), 69–76 (1945)
Mindlin, R.D.: Influence of rotatory inertia and shear in flexural motions of isotropic elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech. 18(1), 31–38 (1951)
Tessler, A., Hughes, T.J.R.: A three-node Mindlin plate element with improved transverse shear. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 50, 71–101 (1985)
Tang, J.S., Qian, L.F., Chen, G.S.: A smoothed GFEM based on taylor expansion and constrained mls for analysis of Reissner–Mindlin plate. Int. J. Comput. Methods (2021). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876221500481
You, B., Yu, X., Liang, D., et al.: Numerical and experimental investigation on dynamics of deployable space telescope experiencing deployment and attitude adjustment motions coupled with laminated composite shell. Mech. Based Des. Struct. Mach. 50(1), 268–287 (2022)
Torabi, J., Niiranen, J., Ansari, R.: Nonlinear finite element analysis within strain gradient elasticity: Reissner–Mindlin plate theory versus three-dimensional theory. Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids 87, 104221 (2021)
Ye, X., Zhang, S.Y., Zhang, Z.M.: A locking-free weak Galerkin finite element method for Reissner–Mindlin plate on polygonal meshes. Comput. Math. Appl. 80, 906–916 (2020)
Dwivedy, S.K., Eberhard, P.: Dynamic analysis of flexible manipulators, a literature review. Mech. Mach. Theory 41(7), 749–777 (2006)
He, G.P., Lu, Z.: Nonlinear dynamic analysis of planar flexible underactuated manipulators. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 18(1), 78–82 (2005)
Winfry, R.C.: Elastic link mechanism dynamics. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 93, 268–272 (1971)
Winfry, R.C.: Dynamics analysis of elastic link mechanisms by reduction of coordinates. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 94, 577–582 (1972)
Agrawal, O.P., Shabana, A.A.: Application of deformable-body mean axis to flexible multibody system dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 56(2), 217–245 (1986)
Shabana, A.A.: Flexible multibody dynamics: review of past and recent developments. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 1(2), 189–222 (1997)
Reissner, E.: On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: The plane problem. J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP) 23, 795–804 (1972)
Simo, J.C.: A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 49, 55–70 (1985)
Simo, J.C., Vu-Quoc, L.: A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: computational aspects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 58, 79–116 (1986)
Shabana, A.A.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Otsuka, K., Makihara, K., Sugiyama, H.: Recent advances in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation: literature review from 2012 to 2020. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 17(8), 080803 (2022)
Chen, Y.Z., Guo, X., Zhang, D.G., et al.: A novel radial point interpolation method for thin plates in the frame of absolute nodal coordinate formulation. J. Sound Vib. 469, 115132 (2020)
Betsch, P., Sänger, N.: On the use of geometrically exact shells in a conserving framework for flexible multibody dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 189, 1609–1630 (2009)
Santarpia, E., Testa, C., Demasi, L., et al.: A hierarchical generalized formulation for the large-displacement dynamic analysis of rotating plates. Comput. Mech. 68, 1325–1347 (2021)
Wang, T.: Two new triangular thin plate/shell elements based on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Nonlinear Dyn. 99(4), 2707–2725 (2020)
Vaziri Sereshk, M., Salimi, M.: Comparison of finite element method based on nodal displacement and absolute nodal coordinate formulation (ANCF) in thin shell analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 27(8), 1185–1198 (2011)
Pappalardo, C.M., Zhang, Z., Shabana, A.A.: Use of independent volume parameters in the development of new large displacement ANCF triangular plate/shell elements. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(4), 2171–2202 (2018)
Liang, G.M., Huang, Y.B., Li, H.Y., et al.: L1-norm based dynamic analysis of flexible multibody system modeled with trimmed isogeometry. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 394, 114760 (2022)
Cammarata, A., Sinatra, R., Maddìo, P.D.: Interface reduction in flexible multibody systems using the Floating Frame of Reference Formulation. J. Sound Vib. 523, 116720 (2022)
Cammarata, A.: Global flexible modes for the model reduction of planar mechanisms using the finite-element floating frame of reference formulation. J. Sound Vib. 489, 115668 (2020)
Cammarata, A., Pappalardo, C.M.: On the use of component mode synthesis methods for the model reduction of flexible multibody systems within the floating frame of reference formulation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 142, 106745 (2020)
Pugh, E.D., Hinton, E., Zienkiewicz, O.C.: A study of triangular plate bending element with reduced integration. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 12, 1059–1078 (1978)
Kim, J.H., Kim, Y.H.: Three-node macro triangular shell element based on the assumed natural trains. Comput. Mech. 29, 441–458 (2002)
Cardoso, R.P.R., Yoon, J.W., Mahardika, M., et al.: Enhanced assumed strain (EAS) and assumed natural strain (ANS) methods for one-point quadrature solid-shell elements. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 75, 156–187 (2008)
Bletzinger, K.U., Bischoff, M., Ramm, E.: A unified approach for shear-locking-free triangular and rectangular shell finite elements. Comput. Struct. 75, 321–334 (2000)
Li, S., Zhang, J., Cui, X.: Nonlinear dynamic analysis of shell structures by the formulation based on a discrete shear gap. Acta Mech. 230(10), 3571–3591 (2019)
Yang, G., Hu, D., Han, X., et al.: An extended edge-based smoothed discrete shear gap method for free vibration analysis of cracked Reissner–Mindlin plate. Appl. Math. Model. 51, 477–504 (2017)
Bathe, K.J., Dvorkin, E.N.: A formulation of general shell elements—the use of mixed interpolation of tensorial components. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 22(3), 697–722 (1986)
Lee, Y., Lee, P.S., Bathe, K.J.: The MITC3+ shell element and its performance. Comput. Struct. 138, 12–23 (2014)
Ko, Y., Lee, P.S., Bathe, K.J.: The MITC4+ shell element and its performance. Comput. Struct. 169, 57–68 (2016)
Chen, J.S., Wu, C.T., Yoon, S., et al.: A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 50(2), 435–466 (2001)
Liu, G.R., Nguyen-Thoi, T.: Smoothed Finite Element Methods. CRC Press, London (2010)
Liu, G.R., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Nguyen-Xuan, H., et al.: A node-based smoothed finite element method (NS-FEM) for upper bound solutions to solid mechanics problems. Comput. Struct. 87, 14–26 (2009)
Nguyen-Thoi, T., Liu, G.R., Nguyen-Xuan, H.: Additional properties of the node-based smoothed finite element method (NS-FEM) for solid mechanics problems. Int. J. Comput. Methods 6, 633–666 (2009)
Liu, G.R., Nguyen, T.T., Lam, K.Y.: An edge-based smoothed finite element method (ES-FEM) for static, free and forced vibration analyses of solids. J. Sound Vib. 320(4), 1100–1130 (2009)
Nguyen-Xuan, H., Rabczuk, T., Nguyen-Thanh, N., et al.: A node-based smoothed finite element method with stabilized discrete shear gap technique for analysis of Reissner–Mindlin plates. Comput. Methods 46, 679–701 (2010)
Nguyen-Hoang, S., Nguyen-Hoang, P., Natarajan, S., et al.: A combined scheme of edge-based and node-based smoothed finite element methods for Reissner–Mindlin flat shells. Eng. Comput. 32, 267–284 (2016)
Chau-Dinh, T., Nguyen-Duy, Q., Nguyen-Xuan, H.: Improvement on MITC3 plate finite element using edge-based strain smoothing enhancement for plate analysis. Acta Mech. 228, 2141–2163 (2017)
Lee, C., Lee, P.S.: A new strain smoothing method for triangular and tetrahedral finite elements. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 341, 939–955 (2018)
Lee, C., Lee, P.S.: The strain-smoothed MITC3+ shell finite element. Comput. Struct. 223, 106096 (2019)
Lee, C., Lee, D.H., Lee, P.S.: The strain-smoothed MITC3+ shell element in nonlinear analysis. Comput. Struct. 265, 106768 (2022)
Tang, J.S., Chen, G.S., Ge, Y.: An edge center-based strain-smoothing triangular and tetrahedral element for analysis of elasticity. Eur. J. Mech./A Solids 95, 104606 (2022)
Chen, G.S., Chen, L.M., Tang, J.S.: An edge center based strain-smoothing element with discrete shear gap for the analysis of Reissner–Mindlin shell. Thin-Walled Struct. 175, 109140 (2022)
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11472137) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 309181A8801 and 30919011204).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. J-ST and G-SC performed formula derivation, numerical calculation, and data collection. J-ST and YL performed data analyses. The first draft of the manuscript was written by J-ST. YL, L-FQ and L-MC commented on and revised the previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
1.1 Integral of the element mass matrix
After the structure is discretized, the symmetrical mass matrix can be expressed as follows:
where \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}}^{I}\) represents the element mass matrix, which is symmetric. It can be decomposed into the following block matrices, which represent the rigid translation, rigid rotation, flexible deformation and the coupling among them, respectively.
Based on the formula of \({\mathbf{L}}^{I} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\mathbf{I}} & { - {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }} } & {{\mathbf{A}}^{I} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} {\overline{\mathbf{S}}}} \\ \end{array} } \right]\) derived in Sect. 2, the formula of each block matrix in \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}}^{I}\) is presented in detail below.
(1) \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}RR}^{I} = \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\mathbf{I}}{\text{d}}\Omega^{I} } = m_{\mathrm{e}}^{I} {\mathbf{I}}\)where \(m_{\mathrm{e}}^{I} = \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\text{d}}\Omega^{I} }\) denotes the element mass.
(2) \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}R\theta }^{I} = - \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }} {\text{d}}\Omega^{I} }\).
Considering Eq. (24):
where \(h^{I}\) is the element thickness.
(3) \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}Rf}^{I} = - \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\mathbf{A}}^{I} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} {\overline{\mathbf{S}}}{\text{d}}\Omega^{I} }\).
Considering Eq. (16):
(4) \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}\theta \theta }^{I} = \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }}^{T} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }} {\text{d}}\Omega^{I} } = - \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }} {\text{d}}\Omega^{I} }\).
Considering Eq. (24):
(5) \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{e}\theta f}^{I} = - \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }}^{{\text{T}}} {\mathbf{A}}^{I} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} {\overline{\mathbf{S}}}{\text{d}}} \Omega^{I} = \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} {\tilde{\mathbf{r}}}_{{\overline{O}^{I} P_{f} }} {\mathbf{A}}^{I} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} {\overline{\mathbf{S}}}{\text{d}}\Omega^{I} }\).
Similarly:
(6) \({\mathbf{M}}_{\mathrm{eff}}^{I} = \int_{{\Omega_{e}^{I} }} {\rho^{I} \left( {{\mathbf{A}}^{I} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} {\overline{\mathbf{S}}}} \right)^{{\text{T}}} \left( {{\mathbf{A}}^{I} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} {\overline{\mathbf{S}}}} \right){\text{d}}\Omega^{I} }\).
Since \(\left( {{\mathbf{A}}^{I} } \right)^{{\text{T}}} {\mathbf{A}}^{I} = \left( {{{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} } \right)^{{\text{T}}} {{\varvec{\uplambda}}}^{e} = {\mathbf{I}}\):
1.2 Integral of the element velocity coupling vector
The specific expression for \({\mathbf{Q}}_{\mathrm{v}}^{I}\) can be similarly decomposed:
Similarly, consider Eqs. (16), (24) and (25) to integrate the above vectors:
Appendix B
By solving the generalized eigenvalue equation \(\omega^{2} {\mathbf{M}}_{ff}^{I} {\mathbf{\varphi }}^{I} = {\mathbf{K}}_{ff}^{I} {\mathbf{\varphi }}^{I}\), the modal shape \({\mathbf{\varphi }}_{j}^{I}\) corresponding to the \(j{{{\text{th}}}}\) natural frequency of flexible body \(I\) can be obtained. The physical coordinates \({\overline{\mathbf{q}}}_{f}^{I}\) can be converted to the modal space by selecting the first M-order modes:
where \({\mathbf{p}}^{I}\) indicates the modal coordinates, and \({\mathbf{V}}_{M} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {{\mathbf{\varphi }}_{1}^{I} } & {{\mathbf{\varphi }}_{2}^{I} } & \cdots & {{\mathbf{\varphi }}_{M}^{I} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\) consists of the first M-order modes.
In general, the employed modal order M is far less than the DOFs of the discrete flexible body. Therefore, the original governing equation Eq. (87) can be reduced to the following equation:
where \({\tilde{\mathbf{M}}}_{Rf}^{I} = {\mathbf{M}}_{Rf}^{I} {\mathbf{V}}_{M}\), \({\tilde{\mathbf{M}}}_{\theta f}^{I} = {\mathbf{M}}_{\theta f}^{I} {\mathbf{V}}_{M}\), \({\tilde{\mathbf{M}}}_{ff}^{I} = {\mathbf{V}}_{M}^{{\text{T}}} {\mathbf{M}}_{ff}^{I} {\mathbf{V}}_{M}\), \({\tilde{\mathbf{K}}}_{ff}^{I} = {\mathbf{V}}_{M}^{{\text{T}}} {\mathbf{K}}_{ff}^{I} {\mathbf{V}}_{M}\), \({\tilde{\mathbf{Q}}}_{f}^{I} = {\mathbf{V}}_{M}^{{\text{T}}} {\mathbf{Q}}_{f}^{I}\).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, JS., Qian, LF., Chen, LM. et al. Flexible multibody dynamic analysis of shells with an edge center-based strain smoothing MITC method. Nonlinear Dyn 111, 3253–3277 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07992-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07992-5