Abstract
We investigate a model for anaerobic digestion, a process used to produce biogas. The model, introduced in Weedermann et al. (J Biol Dyn 7:59–85, 2013), consists of differential equations describing the interactions of microbial populations involved in three main stages of anaerobic digestion: acidogenesis, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis. We show that this model predicts that an increased yield in biogas can be achieved in regions where operating parameters push the system into a bistable state. In some regions of bistability, biogas production occurs at only one of the steady states while in others both steady states result in biogas production with one state being more productive than the other. We demonstrate which operating parameters and state variables have the most significant impact on system performance. Surprisingly, the optimal biogas production does not always occur at a steady state where all classes of microorganisms coexist.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batstone, D., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyhuzhnyi, S., Pavlosthathis, S., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W., Siegrist, H., Vavilin, V.: Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). IWA Publishing, London (2002)
Benyahia, B., Sari, T., Cherki, B., Harmand, J.: Bifurcation and stability analysis of a two-step model for monitoring anaerobic digestion processes. J. Process Control 22, 1008–1019 (2012)
Bernard, O., Hadj-Sadok, Z., Dochain, D., Genovesi, A., Steyer, J.P.: Dynamic model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 75, 440–447 (2001)
Bornhöft, A., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., Sundmacher, K.: Steady-state analysis of the anaerobic digestion model no. 1 (ADM1). Nonlinear Dyn. 73, 535–549 (2013)
Bryers, J.: Structured modeling of anaerobic digestion of biomass particulates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27, 638–649 (1985)
Butler, G., Wolkowicz, G.S.K.: A mathematical model of the chemostat with a general class of functions describing nutrient uptake. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 45, 138–151 (1985)
Costello, D., Greenfield, P., Lee, P.: Dynamic modelling of a single-stage high-rate anaerobic reactor—I. Model derivation. Water Res. 25, 847–858 (1991)
Hajji, M., Mazenc, F., Harmand, J.: A mathematical study of syntrophic relationship of a model of anaerobic digestion process. Math. Biosci. Eng. 7, 641–656 (2010)
Haldane, J.: Enzymes. Longmans Green, London (1930)
Hess, J., Bernard, O.: Design and study of a risk management criterion for an unstable wastewater treatment process. J. Process Control 18, 71–79 (2008)
Hoh, C., Cord-Ruwisch, R.: A practical kinetic model that considers endproduct inhibition in anaerobic digestion processes by including the equilibrium constant. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 51, 597–604 (1996)
Holling, C.: The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the european pine sawfly. Can. Entomol. 91, 293–320 (1959)
Holling, C.: Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398 (1959)
Jeyaseelan, S.: A simple mathematical model for anaerobic digestion process. Water Sci. Technol. 35, 185–191 (1997)
Kleinstreuer, C., Poweigha, T.: Dynamic simulator for anaerobic digestion process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 24, 1941–1951 (1982)
Kreikenbohm, R., Bohl, E.: A mathematical model of syntrophic cocultures in the chemostat. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 38, 131–140 (1986)
Lokshina, L., Vavilin, V., Kettunen, R., Rintala, J., Holliger, C., Nozhevnikova, A.: Evaluation of kinetic coefficients using integrated monod and haldane models for low-temperature acetoclastic methanogenesis. Water Res. 35, 2913–2922 (2001)
Lyberatos, G., Skiadas, I.: Modelling of anaerobic digestion—a review. Global Nest J. 1, 63–76 (1999)
Moletta, R., Verrier, D., Albagnac, G.: Dynamic modelling of anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 20, 427–434 (1986)
Mosey, F.: Mathematical modelling of the anaerobic digestion process: regulatory mechanisms for the formation of short-chain volatile acids from glucose. Water Sci. Technol. 15, 209–232 (1983)
Powell, G.: Equalisation of specific growth rates for syntrophic associations in batch culture. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 34B, 97–100 (1984)
Powell, G.: Stable coexistence of syntrophic associations in continuous culture. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 35B, 46–50 (1985)
Sari, T., El Hajji, M., Harmand, J.: The mathematical analysis of a syntrophic relationship between two microbial species in a chemostat. Math. Biosci. Eng. 9, 627–645 (2012)
Shen, S., Premier, G.C., Guwy, A., Dinsdale, R.: Bifurcation and stability analysis of an anaerobic digestions model. Nonlinear Dyn. 48, 391–408 (2007)
Siegrist, H., Renggli, D., Gager, W.: Mathematical modelling of anaerobic mesophilic sewage sludge treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 27, 25–36 (1993)
Smith, H., Waltman, P.: The Theory of the Chemostat: Dynamics of Microbial Competition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Sötermann, S., Ristow, N., Wentzel, M., Ekama, G.: A steady-state model for anaerobic digestion of sewage sludges. Water SA 31, 511–527 (2005)
Weedermann, M.: Analysis of a model for the effects of an external toxin on anaerobic digestion. Math. Biosci. Eng. 9, 447–461 (2012)
Weedermann, M., Seo, G., Wolkowicz, G.S.K.: Mathematical model of anaerobic digestion in a chemostat: effects of syntrophy and inhibition. J. Biol. Dyn. 7, 59–85 (2013)
Wett, B., Schön, M.A., Phothilangka, P., Wackerle, F., Insam, H.: Model-based design of an agricultural biogas plant: application of anaerobic digestion model no. 1 for an improved four chamber scheme. Water Sci. Technol. 55, 21–28 (2007)
Wolkowicz, G.S.K., Lu, Z.: Global dynamics of a mathematical model of competition in the chemostat: general response function and differential death rates. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52, 222–233 (1992)
Acknowledgments
The research of Gail S. K. Wolkowicz was partially supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant. The research of Marion Weedermann was supported in part by a grant from Dominican University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Parameter values used for simulations
All of the bifurcation diagrams and numerical simulations in this paper were completed for the two different sets of parameter values given in Tables 5 and 6. Both sets were derived from the ADM1 model, [1]. The first set corresponds to standard values listed in [1] for mesophilic high rate digesters. The second set corresponds to an ADM1-based simulation of a specific installation described in [30]. In [1], all concentrations are given in units of \({\text {kg COD m}}^{-3}\), which is equivalent to \({\text {g COD/L}} \).
The growth of bacteria \(X_{{\text {substrate}}}\) in [1] is generally given by expressions of the form
In our model, \(Y_{\alpha } k_{m,\alpha } = m_{\alpha }\) with \(\alpha , \beta \in \{S, V, A, H\}\), see also Table 4. Following the derivation of system (2) in our model, \(c_{\alpha } = Y_{\alpha }\) in relationship to the corresponding bacteria group \(\alpha \), and \(\gamma _{\alpha , \beta }\) corresponds to
in ADM1.
The microbial death rates were set to \(d_s = d_v = d_a = d_h = 0.02\).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weedermann, M., Wolkowicz, G.S.K. & Sasara, J. Optimal biogas production in a model for anaerobic digestion. Nonlinear Dyn 81, 1097–1112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2051-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2051-z