Skip to main content
Log in

Fractional kinetics under external forcing

Chemotherapy of cancer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractional tumor development is considered in the framework of one-dimensional continuous time random walks (CTRW) in the presence of chemotherapy. The chemotherapy influence on the CTRW is studied by observations of both stationary solutions due to proliferation and fractional evolution in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As shown in Ref. [4], the migration–proliferation dichotomy (also known as Go or Grow mechanisms) does not exist for an ensemble of cancer cells that is supported by experimental data. As admitted in Ref. [4] “As a matter of fact, in one single cell, cytokinesis and migration are separated temporally; but on the level of a cell population - and this is the case of tumors - cell migration and proliferation occurs simultaneously.” Obviously, for the CTRW consideration that accounts the dynamics of the entire population at the individual particle level, the dynamics of one single cell with the migration proliferation dichotomy is the most important.

  2. Indeed, taking into account that \(D_C^{\alpha }\) can be expressed by the Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives \(D_{RL}^{\alpha }\) as \(D_C^{\alpha }=D_{RL}^{\alpha -1}D_{RL}^{1}\) and \(D_{RL}^{1-\alpha }D_{RL}^{\alpha -1}=1\), we rewrite FFPE with the corresponding proliferation and chemotherapy condition in the form of Eq. (18).

References

  1. Hanahan, D., Weinberg, R.A.: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giese, A., et al.: Dichotomy of astrocytoma migration and proliferation. Int. J. Cancer 67, 275 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giese, A., et al.: Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 1624 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garay, T., et al.: Cell migration or cytokinesis and proliferation? Revisiting the go or grow hypothesis in cancer cells in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. (2013). doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.08.018

  5. Jerby, L., et al.: Metabolic associations of reduced proliferation and oxidative stress in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Res. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2215

  6. Khain, E., Sander, L.M.: Dynamics and pattern formation in invasive tumor growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 188103 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hatzikirou, H., Basanta, D., Simon, M., Schaller, K., Deutsch, A.: “Go or Grow”: the key to the emergence of invasion in tumour progression? Math. Med. Biol. 29, 49 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Chauviere, A., Prziosi, L., Byrne, H.: A model of cell migration within the extracellular matrix based on a phenotypic switching mechanism. Math. Med. Biol. 27, 255 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolobov, A.V., Gubernov, V.V., Polezhaev, A.A.: Autowaves in the model of infiltrative tumour growth with migration–proliferation dichotomy. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 6, 27 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fedotov, S., Iomin, A., Ryashko, L.: Non-Markovian models for migration–proliferation dichotomy of cancer cells: anomalous switching and spreading rate. Phys. Rev. E 84, 061131 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iomin, A.: Toy model of fractional transport of cancer cells due to self-entrapping. Phys. Rev. E 73, 061918 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Montroll, E.W., Shlesinger, M.F.: The wonderful world of random walks. In: Lebowitz, J., Montroll, E.W. (eds.) Studies in Statistical Mechanics, vol. 11. Noth-Holland, Amsterdam (1984)

  13. Metzler, R., Klafter, J.: The Random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Stern, J.I., Raizer, J.J.: Chemotherapy in the Treatment of malignant gliomas. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 6, 755–767 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Baleanu, D., Diethelm, K., Scalas, E., Trujillo, J.: Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods, Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos. World Scientific, Singapore (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, Y.: Basic Theory of Fractional Differential Equations. World Scientific, Singapore (2014)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Fedotov, S., Iomin, A.: Probabilistic approach to a proliferation and migration dichotomy in tumor cell invasion. Phys. Rev. E 77, 031911 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray, J.D.: Mathematical Biology. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrovskii, S.V., Li, B.-L.: Exactly Solvable Models of Biological Invasion. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Tracqui, P., et al.: A mathematical model of glioma growth: the effect of chemotherapy on spatio-temporal growth. Cell Prolif. 28, 17 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Swanson, K.R., Alvord Jr, E.C., Murray, J.D.: Quantifying efficacy of chemotherapy of brain tumors (gliomas) with homogeneous and heterogeneous drug delivery. Acta Biotheor. 50, 223 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Janke, E., Emde, F., Lösh, F.: Tables of Higher Functions. McGraw-Hill, New York (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bagchi, B.K.: Supersymmetry in quantum and classical mechanics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Glauber, R.G.: Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field. Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Louisell, W.H.: Radiation and noise in quantum electronics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mainardi, F.: Fractional relaxation-oscillation and fractional diffusion-wave phenomena. Chaos Solitons fractals 7, 1461 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Minniti, G., et al.: Chemotherapy for glioblastoma: current treatment and future perspectives for cytotoxic and targeted agents. Anticancer Res. 29, 5171 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blinkov, S.M., Gleser, I.I.: The Human Brain in Figures and Tables: A Quantitative Handbook. Basic Books Inc., Plenum Press, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Usher, J.R.: Some mathematical models for cancer chemotherapy. Comput. Math. Appl. 28, 73 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (ISF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Iomin.

Appendices

Appendix A: Fractional integro-differentiation

A basic introduction to fractional calculus can be found, e.g., in Ref. [1517]. Fractional integration of the order of \(\alpha \) is defined by the operator

$$\begin{aligned} {}_aI_t^{\alpha }f(t)=\frac{1}{\varGamma (\alpha )} \int \limits _a^tf(\tau )(t-\tau )^{\alpha -1}d\tau , ~~(\alpha >0)\, .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(41)

There is no constraint on the limit \(a\). In our consideration, \(a=0\) since this is a natural limit for the time. A fractional derivative is defined as an inverse operator to \({}_aI_t^{\alpha }\equiv I_t^{\alpha }\) as \(\frac{d^{\alpha }}{dt^{\alpha }}=I_t^{-\alpha }=D_t^{\alpha }\), correspondingly \( I_t^{\alpha }=\frac{d^{-\alpha }}{dt^{-\alpha }} =D_t^{-\alpha }\). It’s explicit form is convolution

$$\begin{aligned} D_t^{\alpha }=\frac{1}{\varGamma (-\alpha )}\int \limits _0^t \frac{f(\tau )}{(t-\tau )^{\alpha +1}}d\tau \, . \end{aligned}$$
(42)

For arbitrary \(\alpha >0\) this integral is, in general, divergent. As a regularization of the divergent integral, the following two alternative definitions for \(D_t^{\alpha } \) exist [27]

$$\begin{aligned}&{}_{RL}D_{(0,t)}^{\alpha }f(t)\equiv D_{RL}^{\alpha }f(t)= D^nI^{n-\alpha }f(t) \nonumber \\&\quad =\frac{1}{\varGamma (n-\alpha )}\frac{d^n}{dt^n}\int \limits _0^t \frac{f(\tau )d\tau }{(t-\tau )^{\alpha +1-n}} \, ,\nonumber \\\end{aligned}$$
(43)
$$\begin{aligned}&D_C^{\alpha }f(t)= I^{n-\alpha }D^nf(t) \nonumber \\&\quad =\frac{1}{\varGamma (n-\alpha )}\int \limits _0^t \frac{f^{(n)d\tau }(\tau )}{(t-\tau )^{\alpha +1-n}} \, , \end{aligned}$$
(44)

where \( n-1<\alpha <n,~~n=1,2,\dots \). Eq. (43) is the Riemann–Liouville derivative, while Eq. (44) is the fractional derivative in the Caputo form [15, 27]. Performing integration by part in Eq. (43) and then applying Leibniz’s rule for the derivative of an integral and repeating this procedure \(n\) times, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} D_{RL}^{\alpha }f(t)=D_C^{\alpha }f(t)+\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}f^{(k)}(0^+) \frac{t^{k-\alpha }}{\varGamma (k-\alpha +1)} \, .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(45)

The Laplace transform can be obtained for Eq. (44). If \(\hat{L}f(t)=\tilde{f}(s)\), then

$$\begin{aligned} \hat{L}[D_C^{\alpha }f(t)]=s^{\alpha }\tilde{f}(s)- \sum _{k=0}^{n-1}f^{(k)}(0^+)s^{\alpha -1-k}\, . \end{aligned}$$
(46)

The following fractional derivatives are helpful for the present analysis

$$\begin{aligned} D_{RL}^{\alpha }[1]=\frac{t^{-\alpha }}{\varGamma (1-\alpha )}\, , ~~ D_C^{\alpha }[1]=0\, . \end{aligned}$$
(47)

We also note that

$$\begin{aligned} D_{RL}^{\alpha }t^{\beta }=\frac{t^{\beta -\alpha }\varGamma (\beta +1)}{\varGamma (\beta +1-\alpha )}\, , \end{aligned}$$
(48)

where \(\beta >-1\) and \(\alpha >0\). The fractional derivative from an exponential function can be simply calculated as well by virtue of the Mittag–Leffler function (see e.g., [15]):

$$\begin{aligned} E_{\gamma ,\delta }(z)=\sum _{k=0}^{\infty } \frac{z^k}{\varGamma (\gamma k+\delta )} \, . \end{aligned}$$
(49)

Therefore, we have the following expression

$$\begin{aligned} D_{RL}^{\alpha }e^{\lambda t}=t^{\alpha }E_{1,1-\alpha }(\lambda t)\, . \end{aligned}$$
(50)

Appendix B: Chemotherapy

One should recognize that Eq. (5) generalizes a standard chemotherapy scheme, based on experimental data and suggested in the framework of the linear reaction–diffusion equation [21, 22]

$$\begin{aligned} \text{ rate } \text{ of } \text{ change } \text{ of } \text{ cells } =\left\{ \begin{array}{l} \text{ motility } \text{ of } \text{ cells } \\ +\, \text{ net } \text{ proliferation }\\ -\, \text{ chemotherapy } \end{array}\right\} \, . \end{aligned}$$
(51)

These scheme follows the seminal result obtained by analyzing a recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma, treated by chemotherapy [21]. New chemotherapeutic strategies are represented by the combination of multi-targeted drugs with cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy in order to overcome tumor resistance [28]. One accounts also heterogeneous drug delivery due to complicated vascular structure (in particular, in brain [29]) that leads to the chemotherapy term to be a complicated function of time, space, and the cancer cell concentration \(G(P)=G(t,x,P)\), see also [30].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iomin, A. Fractional kinetics under external forcing. Nonlinear Dyn 80, 1853–1860 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1561-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1561-4

Keywords

Navigation