Abstract
At high operational speeds, the train system becomes very sensitive to parameter variations of components. Therefore, it is imperative to incorporate more accurate component models in the vehicle dynamics studies. This study addresses a more subtle and comprehensive non-linear parametric model of a high-speed rail hydraulic yaw damper. A new concept of a hydraulic yaw damper model is suggested, in which the small mounting clearance, the series stiffness, and the viscous damping are built in. The series stiffness is the tandem result of the dynamic oil stiffness, the rubber attachment stiffness, and the mounting seat stiffness. A dynamic oil property model is established and coupled to the entire modelling process, in which the density, the dynamic viscosity, the volumetric elastic modulus, and the stiffness of the oil are all changeable in terms of the instantaneous working pressure, the oil temperature, and the entrapped air ratio of the oil. The dynamic flow loss and the valve system dynamics are also incorporated. Experiments validated that the established non-linear parametric model is accurate and robust in predicting the damping characteristics within an extremely wide speed range. The validated damper model was then successfully applied to a thorough parameter sensitivity analysis and damping nature prediction under practical, in-service conditions. The established damper model couples all the main influential factors that are not or are insufficiently considered in normal-speed problems; thus, it will be more accurate and appropriate for furthering high-speed problem studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Ae (m2):
-
equivalent action area on the valve seat
- B (N s/m):
-
viscous damping coefficient of the piston-and-rod assembly
- C (N s/m):
-
damping coefficient
- C d :
-
discharge coefficient
- Ce (N s/m):
-
effective damping coefficient
- D (m):
-
piston diameter
- E r :
-
set-pressure deviation rate of the relief valve
- F (N):
-
damping force at a typical stroke speed
- F(t), Fr(t) (N):
-
nominal and initial instantaneous damping force
- H, Hp (m):
-
height of the inner tube and the piston
- K (N/m):
-
spring stiffness of the relief valve
- Ke (N/m):
-
series stiffness of the damper
- Kleak (m3 Pa−1 s−1):
-
pressure leakage coefficient
- Koil (N/m):
-
dynamic oil stiffness
- Kq (Pa−1 s−1):
-
flow coefficient of the relief valve
- Krubber (N/m):
-
rubber attachment stiffness
- Kseat (N/m):
-
mounting seat stiffness
- L (m):
-
piston seal width
- Lgap (m):
-
accumulated clearance at the ends of the damper
- Lt (m):
-
piston sweep distance
- P, P0 (Pa):
-
instantaneous and the reference working pressure
- Pb (Pa):
-
instantaneous back pressure
- Pb0 (Pa):
-
back pressure when piston is in the neutral position
- Pt (Pa):
-
set pressure of the relief valve
- Q (m3/s):
-
instantaneous flow
- Qleak (m3/s):
-
pressure leakage flow
- Qloss (m3/s):
-
total flow loss
- Qvalve (m3/s):
-
flow forced through the complete valve system
- T, T0 (°C ):
-
instantaneous and the reference oil temperature
- Vgas,0 (m3):
-
enclosed air volume when piston is in the neutral position
- Voil (m3):
-
instantaneous oil volume in the pressure chamber
- X0 (m):
-
initial length reduction of the relief valve spring
- d (m):
-
piston rod diameter
- d1, d3 (m):
-
constant orifice diameters
- f (Hz):
-
excitation frequency
- fc (N):
-
sliding friction force of the rod
- h (m):
-
opening height of the valve rod
- i :
-
index number
- l (m):
-
rod seal width
- m (kg):
-
mass of the piston-and-rod assembly
- moil (kg):
-
mass of the oil in the pressure chamber
- r1, r2 (m):
-
inner and outer radius of the inner tube port restriction
- rn, rw (m):
-
inner and outer radius of the seal land on the valve seat
- v (m/s):
-
typical stroke speed
- x(t), xr(t) (m):
-
nominal and actual instantaneous displacement
- αP (Pa−1):
-
oil viscosity-pressure coefficient
- αT (°C−1):
-
oil volumetric thermal expansion coefficient
- β (Pa−1):
-
oil compressibility coefficient
- βe (Pa):
-
instantaneous oil elastic modulus
- βe0 (Pa):
-
pure oil elastic modulus at T 0
- δ (m):
-
seal or restriction clearance
- ε :
-
entrapped air ratio of the oil
- λ :
-
oil viscosity-temperature coefficient
- μ (Pa s):
-
instantaneous oil dynamic viscosity
- μ0 (Pa s):
-
oil dynamic viscosity at P 0 and T 0
- ρ (kg/m3):
-
instantaneous oil density
- ρ0 (kg/m3):
-
oil density at P 0 and T 0
References
Miyamoto, M., Suda, Y.: Recent research and development on advanced technologies of high-speed railways in Japan. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 40(1–3), 55–99 (2003)
European Standard: Railway Applications—Suspension Components—Hydraulic Dampers, CEN EN 13802 (2004)
Wrang, M.: Instability phenomena of a passenger coach, caused by internal yaw damper flexibility. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 33, 406–417 (1999)
Wang, W.L.: Design theory and practices on an adjustable linear hydraulic damper for high-speed railway vehicles. Ph.D. thesis, Zhejiang University (2001)
Eyres, R.D., Champneys, A.R., Lieven, N.A.J.: Modelling and dynamics response of a damper with relief valve. Nonlinear Dyn. 40(2), 119–147 (2005)
Wang, W.L., Xu, G.X.: Fluid formulea for damping changeability conceptual design of railway semi-active hydraulic dampers. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 44(7), 809–819 (2009)
Simms, A., Crolla, D.: The influence of damper properties on vehicle dynamic behavior. SAE Paper: 2002–01–0319 (2002)
Alexander, L., Swenja, L.: A thermo-mechanically coupled model for automotive shock absorbers: Theory, experiments and vehicle simulations on test tracks. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 37(4), 241–261 (2002)
Richard, V.K., Wang, C.G., Qian, L.X., Liu, J.Z., Ye, G.H.: A new shock absorber model for use in vehicle dynamics studies. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 43(9), 613–631 (2005)
Shieh, N.C., Lin, C.L., Lin, Y.C., Liang, K.Z.: Optimal design for passive suspension of a light rail vehicle using constrained multi-objective evolutionary search. J. Sound Vib. 285(1–2), 407–424 (2005)
He, Y.P., Mcphee, J.: Multidisciplinary optimization of multi-body systems with application to the design of rail vehicles. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 14(2), 111–135 (2005)
Kowalski, D., Rao, M.D., Blough, J., Gruenberg, S.: Dynamic testing of shock absorbers under non-sinusoidal conditions. IMechE, Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 216(5), 373–384 (2002)
Schiehlen, W., Hu, B.: Spectral simulation and shock absorber identification. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 38(2), 161–171 (2003)
Calvo, J.A., López-Boada, B., San Román, J.L., Gauchía, A.: Influence of a shock absorber model on vehicle dynamic simulation. IMechE, Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 223(2), 189–202 (2009)
Richard, V.K.: A new numerical damper model based on the magic formula with an application in railway vehicle dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, Beijing JiaoTong University (2005)
Weigel, M., Mack, W., Riepl, A.: Nonparametric shock absorber modelling based on standard test data. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 38(6), 415–432 (2002)
Witters, M., Swevers, J.: Black-box identification of a continuously variable semi-active damper. In: Proceeding of the IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control, pp. 19–24, Texas, San Antonio (2008)
Codecà, F., Savaresi, S.M., Spelta, C., Montiglio, M., Ieluzzi, M.: Identification of an electro-hydraulic controllable shock absorber using black-block non-linear models. In: Proceeding of the IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control, pp. 462–467, Texas, San Antonio (2008)
Yang, G.Z., Wang, F.T.: Hydraulic Dampers for Railway Rolling Stock. China Railway Publishing House, Beijing (2003)
Dixon, J.C.: The Shock Absorber Handbook. Wiley, New York (2007)
George, E.T.: Handbook of Hydraulic Fluid Technology. Marcel Dekker, New York (2000)
Alonso, M., Comas, Á.: Thermal model of a twin-tube cavitating shock absorber. IMechE, Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 222(11), 1955–1964 (2008)
Alonso, M., Comas, Á.: Modelling a twin tube cavitating shock absorber. IMechE, Part D: J. Automob. Eng. 220(8), 1031–1040 (2006)
Ramos, J.C., Rivas, A., Biera, J., Sacramento, G., Sala, J.A.: Development of a thermal model for automotive twin-tube shock absorbers. Appl. Therm. Eng. 25(11–12), 1836–1853 (2005)
Stefaan, W.D.: Simulation tools, modelling and identification, for an automotive shock absorber in the context of vehicle dynamics. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 33(6), 261–285 (2000)
Wang, W.L., Yang, X.J., Xu, G.X.: Computer package for the optimal design and simulation of railway hydraulic dampers. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science, Wuhan, China, pp. 578–582 (2009)
Rabie, M.G.: Fluid Power Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York (2009)
Javier, L., Jorge, B., José, A.S.: Modelling of friction phenomena in sliding conditions in suspension shock absorbers. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 46(suppl), 751–764 (2008)
Wang, W.L., Xia, X.F., Xu, G.X.: A Dynamic fluid property model for the engineering design of hydraulic dampers. Key Eng. Mater. 450, 35–38 (2011)
Fujimoto, H., Miyamoto, M.: Lateral vibration and its decreasing measure of a Shinkansen train. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 25(suppl), 188–199 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W.L., Huang, Y., Yang, X.J. et al. Non-linear parametric modelling of a high-speed rail hydraulic yaw damper with series clearance and stiffness. Nonlinear Dyn 65, 13–34 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9871-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9871-7