Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of stochastic nonlinear dynamic response of rock-fill dams with uncertain material parameters for non-stationary random seismic excitation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of uncertain material parameters on the stochastic, dynamic response of a rock-fill dam-foundation system subjected to non-stationary random excitation. The uncertain material parameter of particular interest is the shear modulus, developed from a lognormal distribution model. The stochastic seismic response model of the dam-foundation system, with uncertain material parameters and subjected to random loads is the result of a Monte Carlo simulation method. The nonlinear behavior model arises from an equivalent linear method, which considers the nonlinear variation of soil shear modulus and soil damping as a function of shear strain. Specification of the non-stationary stochastic process arises from a simulation method, which generates artificial earthquake accelerograms obtained from the product of a deterministic function of time and a stationary process. The artificial earthquake ground acceleration records reflect the characteristics of soft, medium and firm soil types. Comparison of the numerical results from these approaches provides stochasticity in earthquake seismic excitation and randomness in material parameter (shear modulus) cases. Further, the results indicate that both these cases generally influence the nonlinear dynamic response of rock-fill dams to a non-stationary seismic excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wieland, M., Guimond, R., Malla, S.: Uncertainties in seismic analysis of concrete and embankment dams. In: 73rd Annual Meeting of ICOLD, Paper No: 015-S1, May 1–6, Tehran, Iran (2005)

  2. Hacıefendioğlu, K., Başağa, H.B., Bayraktar, A.: Nonlinear analysis of rock-fill dams to non-stationary excitation by the stochastic Wilson-θ method. Appl. Math. Comput. 194(2), 333–345 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, A.L., Kramer, S.L., Arduino, P.: Estimation of uncertainty in geotechnical properties for performance-based earthquake engineering. PEER Report 2002/16 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center College of Engineering University of California, Berkeley, December (2002)

  4. Righettli, G., Harrop-Williams, K.: Finite element analysis of random soil media. J. Geotech. Eng. 104(1), 59–75 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh, C.H., Rahman, M.S.: Stochastic finite element methods for the seismic response of soils. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 22(10), 819–850 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahman, M.S., Yeh, C.H.: Variability of seismic response of soils using stochastic finite element method. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 18(3), 229–245 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin, S., Lutes, L.D., Sarkani, S.: Response variability for a structure with soil-structure interactions and uncertain soil properties. Probab. Eng. Mech. 15(2), 175–183 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lutes, L.D., Sarkani, S., Jin, S.: Response variability of an SSI system with uncertain structural and soil properties. Eng. Struct. 22(6), 605–620 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nour, A., Laouami, N., Tabbouche, B.: Seismic behavior of heterogeneous soil profile via stochastic finite element analysis In: Ansal, A. (ed.) Proceeding of the 15th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Lessons Learned from Recent Strong Earthquakes, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering Satellite Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 173–176 (2001)

  10. Manolis, G.D.: Stochastic soil dynamics. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 22(1), 3–15 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghiocel, D.M., Ghanem, R.G.: Stochastic finite-element analysis of seismic soil-structure interaction. J. Eng. Mech. 128(1), 66–77 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nour, A., Slimani, A., Laouami, N., Afra, H.: Finite element model for the probabilistic seismic response of heterogeneous soil profile. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 23(5), 331–348 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Charmpis, D.C., Lagaros, N.D., Papadrakakis, M.: Vulnerability assessment and design optimization of structures with uncertain material properties and earthquake loading. In: 5th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics, Limassol, 29 June–1 July (2005)

  14. Ang, A., Tang, W.H.: Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning Design, vol. II. Wiley, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vanmarcke, E., Shinozuka, M., Nakagiri, S., Schuëller, G.I., Grigoriu, M.: Random fields and stochastic finite elements. Struct. Saf. 3(3), 143–166 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bolotin, V.V.: Statistical theory of the aseismic design of structures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, vol. 2, pp. 1365–1374 (1960)

  17. Jennings, P.C., Housner, G.W., Tsai, N.C.: Simulated earthquake motions for design purposes. In: Proc. 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, vol. 1, pp. 145–160 (1969)

  18. Amin, M., Ang, A.H.S.: A non-stationary stochastic model of earthquake motion. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 94(2), 559–583 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murakami, M., Penzien, J.: Nonlinear response spectra for probabilistic seismic design and damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures. Report No. EERC/75-38, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1973)

  20. Ruiz, P., Penzien, J.: Probabilistic study of the behavior of structures during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Report No: EERC 69-3, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1969)

  21. Kanai, K.: Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo 35, 307–325 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tajimi, H.: A statistical method for determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. In: Proc. 2nd World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan, pp. 781–797 (1960)

  23. Clough, R.W., Penzien, J.: Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Der Kiureghian, A., Neuenhofer, A.: A response spectrum method for multiple-support seismic excitations. Report No. UCB/EERC-91/08, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1991)

  25. Idriss, I.M.: QUAD4-A computer program for evaluating the seismic response of soil structures by variable damping finite element procedures. Report No. EERC/73-16, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1973)

  26. Hudson, M., Idriss, I.M., Beikae, M.: User’s manual for QUAD4M: A computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures and incorporating a compliant base. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA (2003)

  27. Hart, G.C., Wong, K.: Structural Dynamic for Structural Engineers. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M., Keifer, F.W.: Characteristics of rock motions during earthquakes. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 95(5), 1199–1218 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iwan, W.D.: On a class of models for the yielding behavior of continuous and composite systems. J. Appl. Mech. 34, 612–617 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M., Tokimatsu, K.: Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. J. Geotech. Eng. 112(11), 1016–1032 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M.: Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report No. EERC/70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA (1970)

  32. Sun, J.I., Golesorkh, R., Seed, H.B.: Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils. Report No, UCB/EERC-88/15, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 42 pp. (1988)

  33. Idriss, I.M.: Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes. In: Proceedings Memorial Symposium to Honor Professor Harry Bolton Seed, Berkeley, CA, vol. II, May (1990)

  34. Haciefendioglu, K.: Transient stochastic analysis of nonlinear response of earth and rock-fill dams to spatially varying ground motion. Struct. Eng. Mech. 22(6), 647–664 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemal Hacıefendioğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hacıefendioğlu, K., Bayraktar, A. & Başağa, H.B. Estimation of stochastic nonlinear dynamic response of rock-fill dams with uncertain material parameters for non-stationary random seismic excitation. Nonlinear Dyn 61, 43–55 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9630-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-009-9630-9

Navigation