Abstract
Landslides are one of the most common natural hazards and cause major socioeconomic impacts worldwide. Identifying the locations of the active or inactive landslides before development may play a major role in identifying areas of high risk. Traditional methods for inventorying landslides involve field surveying and interpretation of photogrammetric data. The advent of recent remote sensing technologies has expedited this process, and as a result, several computer-based algorithms used to identify the locations of past landslides have been proposed. Computer-based analyses provide significant advantages over traditional methods; however, a majority of these computer-based analyses require the user to define the properties of the landslide prior to the search and require supervision and quality assurance. The purpose of this study is to present a simple, new methodology that can be implemented with readily available tools and datasets without the need to supervise the analysis after the parameters regarding landslide morphology are defined for that region. This methodology is referred to as automated landslide detection model (ALDM). Three areas with LiDAR bare earth digital elevation models (DEMs) have been used to test the ALDM, each consisting of a varying range of mapped landslide features. The ALDM results were compared against data obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources and landslides that were determined visually from the hillshade map of the study area. The results demonstrate that the ALDM method was able to accurately capture both the landslides and non-landslides in all of the areas evaluated with accuracies of 70% and 92%, respectively. Additionally, the study showed that the proposed ALDM method could be implemented in different regions where landslides of different shapes and sizes could be detected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
(adapted from Delano and Wilshusen 1999)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M et al (2007) Identification and mapping of recent rainfall-induced landslides using elevation data collected by airborne Lidar. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:637–650. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-637-2007
Barlow J, Martin Y, Franklin SE (2003) Detecting translational landslide scars using segmentation of Landsat ETM+ and DEM data in the northern Cascade Mountains, British Columbia. Can J Remote Sens 29:510–517. https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-018
Bolstad P (2016) GIS fundamentals: A first text on geographic information systems. Press Minnesota, Eider
Booth AM, Roering JJ, Perron JT (2009) Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon. Geomorphology 109:132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.027
Borghuis AM, Chang K, Lee HY (2007) Comparison between automated and manual mapping of typhoon-triggered landslides from SPOT-5 imagery. Int J Remote Sens 28:1843–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600935638
Brunsden D (1993) Mass movement; the research frontier and beyond: a geomorphological approach. Geomorphology 7:85–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-555X(93)90013-R
Burrough PA, McDonnell R, McDonnell RA, Lloyd CD (2015) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press
Colombo A, Lanteri L, Ramasco M, Troisi C (2005) Systematic GIS-based landslide inventory as the first step for effective landslide-hazard management. Landslides 2:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0025-9
Delano HL, Wilshusen JP (1999) Landslide susceptibility in the Williamsport 1-by 2-degree quadrangle. Pennsylvania Geological Survey, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Dikau R (1999) The recognition of landslides. In: Casale R, Margottini C (eds) Floods and landslides: integrated risk assessment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 39–44
Glenn NF, Streutker DR, Chadwick DJ et al (2006) Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity. Geomorphology 73:131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.07.006
Guo R, Pandit SM (1998) Automatic threshold selection based on histogram modes and a discriminant criterion. Mach Vis Appl 10:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001380050083
Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M et al (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth-Sci Rev 112:42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001
Haneberg WC, Cole WF, Kasali G (2009) High-resolution lidar-based landslide hazard mapping and modeling, UCSF Parnassus Campus, San Francisco, USA. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:263–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0204-3
Haralick RM, Shapiro LG (1992) Computer and robot vision. Addison-wesley Reading, Boston
Haugerud RA (2014) Preliminary interpretation of pre-2014 landslide deposits in the vicinity of Oso, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
Highland LM, Godt JW, Howell DG, Savage WZ (1998) El Nino 1997-98; damaging landslides in the San Francisco Bay area. U.S. Geological Survey
Kasai M, Ikeda M, Asahina T, Fujisawa K (2009) LiDAR-derived DEM evaluation of deep-seated landslides in a steep and rocky region of Japan. Geomorphology 113:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.004
Kittler J, Illingworth J, Föglein J (1985) Threshold selection based on a simple image statistic. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 30:125–147
Knevels R, Petschko H, Leopold P, Brenning A (2019) Geographic object-based image analysis for automated landslide detection using open source GIS software. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8:551. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8120551
Legorreta Paulín G, Bursik M, Hubp JL et al (2014) A GIS method for landslide inventory and susceptibility mapping in the Río El Estado watershed, Pico de Orizaba volcano, México. Nat Hazards 71:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0911-8
Leshchinsky BA, Olsen MJ, Tanyu BF (2015) Contour connection method for automated identification and classification of landslide deposits. Comput Geosci 74:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.10.007
Li X, Cheng X, Chen W et al (2015) Identification of Forested Landslides Using LiDar Data, Object-based Image Analysis, and Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sens 7:9705–9726. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70809705
Malik J, Belongie S, Leung T, Shi J (2001) Contour and texture analysis for image segmentation. Int J Comput Vis 43:7–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011174803800
McKean J, Roering J (2004) Objective landslide detection and surface morphology mapping using high-resolution airborne laser altimetry. Geomorphology 57:331–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00164-8
Mwaniki MW, Kuria DN, Boitt MK, Ngigi TG (2017) Image enhancements of Landsat 8 (OLI) and SAR data for preliminary landslide identification and mapping applied to the central region of Kenya. Geomorphology 282:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.015
PADCNR (2019) pennsylvania spatial data access| PAMAP program—DEM Mosaics by Lidar delivery zones. https://www.pasda.psu.edu/uci/DataSummary.aspx?dataset=1248. Accessed 18 Jan 2021
Pardeshi SD, Autade SE, Pardeshi SS (2013) Landslide hazard assessment: recent trends and techniques. SpringerPlus 2:523. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-523
Parker RN, Densmore AL, Rosser NJ et al (2011) Mass wasting triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake is greater than orogenic growth. Nat Geosci 4:449–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1154
Pawłuszek K, Marczak S, Borkowski A, Tarolli P (2019) Multi-aspect analysis of object-oriented landslide detection based on an extended set of LiDAR-derived terrain features. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8:321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080321
Radbruch-Hall DH (1982) Landslide overview map of the conterminous United States. US Government Printing Office, Washington
Rib HT, Liang T (1978) Recognition and identification. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides, analysis and control. Transportation Research Board, Special Report, vol 176, pp 34–80
Richards JA (1999) Remote sensing digital image analysis. Springer
Sato HP, Yagi H, Koarai M et al (2007) Airborne LIDAR data measurement and landform classification mapping in Tomari-no-tai Landslide Area, Shirakami Mountains, Japan. In: Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang F, Wang G (eds) Progress in landslide science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 237–249
Schuster RL (1996) Socio-economic significance of landslides. In: Turner AX, Shuster RJ (eds) Landslides, investigation and mitigation: transportation research board, national research council, special report, vol 247, pp 12–35
Van Den Eeckhaut M, Kerle N, Poesen J, Hervás J (2012) Object-oriented identification of forested landslides with derivatives of single pulse LiDAR data. Geomorphology 173–174:30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.024
Math Works (2020a) Image processing toolbox documentation, R2020b. https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/. Accessed 13 Jan 2021
Math Works (2020b) Remove small objects from binary image—MATLAB bwareaopen, R2020b. https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/bwareaopen.html. Accessed 18 Jan 2021
Math Works (2020c) Morphologically close image - MATLAB imclose, R2020b. https://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/imclose.html. Accessed 18 Jan 2021
Xu C, Xu X, Dai F et al (2013) Application of an incomplete landslide inventory, logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping related to the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of China. Nat Hazards 68:883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0661-7
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their profound appreciation gratitude to Ms. Lynn Highland of the US Geological Survey and Ms. Helen L. Delano of the Pennsylvania Department of Conversation and Natural Resources for their help in providing the data and research material for this study. The authors would also like to acknowledge Dr. Ben Leshchinsky for his time and invaluable feedback to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alimohammadlou, Y., Tanyu, B.F., Abbaspour, A. et al. Automated landslide detection model to delineate the extent of existing landslides. Nat Hazards 107, 1639–1656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04650-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04650-8