Abstract
The Mexican subduction zone, the Gulf of California spreading center, as well as the triple junction point around the Jalisco and the Michoacán Blocks, represents the most active seismogenic belts inducing seismic hazard in the Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán region. Herein, considering such seismotectonic setting, we develop a new seismic source model for the surrounding of Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán to be used as an input in the assessment of the seismic hazard of the region. This new model is based on revised Poissonian earthquake (1787–2018) and focal mechanism (1963–2015) catalogs, as well as crustal thickness data and all information about the geometry of the subducting slabs. The proposed model consists of a total of 37 area sources, comprising all the three different possible categories of seismicity: shallow crustal, interface subduction, and inslab earthquakes. A special care was taken during the delimitation of the boundaries for each area source to ensure that they represent a relatively homogeneous seismotectonic region and to include a relatively large number of earthquakes that enable us to compute as reliable as possible seismicity parameters. Although the sources were delimited following the standard criteria of assessing the probabilistic seismic hazard, they are also characterized in terms of their seismicity parameters (annual rate of earthquakes above Mw 4.0, b-value, and maximum expected magnitude), mean seismogenic depth, as well as the predominant stress regime. The proposed model defines and characterizes regionalized potential seismic sources that can contribute to the seismic hazard at the Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán region, providing the necessary information for seismic hazard estimates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Rashad Sawires, upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Abe K (1981) Magnitudes of large shallow earthquakes from 1904 to 1980. Phys Earth Planet Inter 27:72–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(81)90088-1
Aki K (1965) Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula logN=a-bM and its confidence limits. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 43:237–239
Allan JF, Nelson SA, Luhr JF et al (1991) Pliocene-Holocene rifting and associated volcanism in Southwest Mexico: An exotic terrane in the making. Am Assoc Pet Geol 47:425–445
Al-Shijbi Y, El-Hussain I, Deif A et al (2018) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Arabian Peninsula. Pure Appl Geophys 176:1503–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2033-4
Ambraseys NN, Adams RD (1996) Large-magnitude central American earthquakes, 1898–1994. Geophys J Int 127:665–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb04046.x
Anderson JG, Bodin P, Brune JN et al (1986) Strong ground motion from the Michoacan, Mexico, earthquake. Science 233:1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.233.4768.1043
Anderson JG, Singh SK, Espindola JM, Yamamoto J (1989) Seismic strain release in the Mexican subduction thrust. Phys Earth Planet Inter 58:307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(89)90102-7
Araya R, Der Kiureghian A (1988) Seismic hazard analysis: improved models, uncertainties and sensitivities (Report No. UCB/EERC-90/11)
Arciniega-Ceballos A, Baena-Rivera M, Sánchez-Sesma FJ (2018) The 1985 (M8.1) Michoacán earthquake and Its effects in Mexico City. In: Kruhl JH, Adhikari R, Dorka UE (eds) Living under the threat of earthquakes. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 65–75
Bandy W, Mortera-Gutierrez C, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, Hilde TWC (1995) The subducted Rivera-Cocos plate boundary: where is it, what is it, and what is its relationship to the colima rift? Geophys Res Lett 22:3075–3078. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03055
Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:501–520
Beauval C, Yepes H, Alvarado A et al (2014) Probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment in Quito, estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 85:1316–1327. https://doi.org/10.1002/2012TC003224.Boore
Bott MHP (1959) The mechanics of oblique slip faulting. Geol Mag 96:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800059987
Bourgois J, Michaud F (1991) Active fragmentation of the North America plate at the Mexican triple junction area off Manzanillo. Geo Marine Lett 11:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02431030
Campos-Enríquez JO, Alatorre-Zamora MA (1998) Shallow crustal structure of the junction of the grabens of Chapala Tepic-Zacoalco and Colima, Mexico. Geofis Int 37:263–282. https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1998.37.4.513
Cooke P (1979) Statistical inference for bounds of random variables. Biometrika 66:367–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.2.367
Cornell CA (1986) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606
Dañobeitia J, Bartolomé R, Prada M et al (2016) Crustal architecture at the collision zone between Rivera and North American plates at the Jalisco block: Tsujal project. Pure Appl Geophys 173:3553–3573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1388-7
Deif A, Al-Shijbi Y, El-Hussain I et al (2017) Compiling an earthquake catalogue for the Arabian Plate, Western Asia. J Asian Earth Sci 147:345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.07.033
Delvaux D, Barth A (2010) African stress pattern from formal inversion of focal mechanism data. Tectonophysics 482:105–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.05.009
Delvaux D, Sperner B (2003) New aspects of tectonic stress inversion with reference to the TENSOR program. Geol Soc Spec Publ 212:75–100. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.212.01.06
DeMets C, Stein S (1990) Present-day kinematics of the Rivera Plate and implications for tectonics in southwestern Mexico. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb095ib13p21931
Dewey JW, Suárez G (1991) Seismotectonics of Middle America. In: Slemmons DB, Engdahl ER, Zoback MD, Blackwell DD (eds) Neotectonics of North America: decade map. Geological Society of America, USA, pp 309–321
Doser DI (1992) Faulting processes of the 1956 San Miguel, Baja California, earthquake sequence. Pure Appl Geophys 139:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876824
Ekström G, Nettles M, Dziewoński AM (2012) The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys Earth Planet Inter 200–201:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002
El-Hussain I, Al-Shijbi Y, Deif A et al (2018) Developing a seismic source model for the Arabian Plate. Arab J Geosci 11:11–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3797-7
Espindola JM, Lopez-Loera H, Mena M, Zamora-Camacho A (2016) Internal architecture of the Tuxtla volcanic field, Veracruz, Mexico, inferred from gravity and magnetic data. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 324:15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.05.006
Esteva LR (1963) Regionalizacion sismica de la Republica Mexicana. Rev Soc Mex do Ing Sismica 1:31–35
Farreras SF (1997) Tsunamis en México. In: Lavin MF (ed) Oceanografía Física en México. Unión Geofísica Mexicana, Mexico, pp 73–96
Ferrari L, Pasquaré G, Venegas S et al (1994) Regional tectonics of western Mexico and its implications for the northern boundary of the Jalisco block. Geofis Int 33:139–151
Ferrari L, Orozco-Esquivel T, Manea V, Manea M (2012) The dynamic history of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt and the Mexico subduction zone. Tectonophysics 522–523:122–149
Figueroa J (1970) Catálogo de sismos ocurridos en la República Mexicana. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, p 88
Frohlich C (1992) Triangle diagrams: ternary graphs to display similarity and diversity of earthquake focal mechanisms. Phys Earth Planet Inter 75:193–198
Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seismol Soc Am 64:1363–1367
Garduño VH, Tibaldi A (1991) Kinematic evolution of the continental active triple junction of the western Mexican volcanic belt. Comptes rendus l’Académie des Sci Série II:135–142
Gephart JW, Forsyth DW (1984) An improved method for determining the regional stress tensor using earthquake focal mechanism data: application to the San Fernando earthquake sequence. J Geophys Res 89:9305–9320. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB11p09305
Goff JA, Bergman EA, Solomon SC (1987) Earthquake source mechanisms and transform fault tectonics in the Gulf of California. J Geophys Res 92:10485–10510
Gonzalez-Ortega A, Fialko Y, Sandwell D et al (2014) El Mayor-Cucapah (Mw 7.2) earthquake: early near-field postseismic deformation from InSAR and GPS observations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:1482–1497. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010193
Gonzalez-Ruiz JR (1986) Earthquake source mechanics and tectonophysics of the middle America subduction zone in Mexico. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz
Gupta ID (2006) Delineation of probable seismic sources in India and neighbourhood by a comprehensive analysis of seismotectonic characteristics of the region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:766–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.007
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hamdache M, Peláez JA, Kijko A, Smit A (2017) Energetic and spatial characterization of seismicity in the Algeria–Morocco region. Nat Hazards 86:273–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2514-7
Hayes GP, Moore GL, Portner DE et al (2018) Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science 362:58–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat4723
Heidbach O, Tingay M, Barth A et al (2009) Global spatial wave-length analysis of the tectonic intraplate stress pattern. Tectonophysics 482:3–16
NEIC-USGS National Earthquake Information Center. http://neic.cr.usgs.gov/. Accessed May 2019
ISC - International Seismological Centre, Thatcham UK (2011) On-line Bulletin. http://www.isc.ac.uk. Accessed May 2019
Jaimes MAT, Reinoso AE (2006) Comparación del comportamiento de edificios en el valle de México ante sismos de subducción y falla normal. Rev Ing Sísmica 75:1–22
Kebede F, Van Eck T (1997) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Horn of Africa based on seismotectonic regionalisation. Tectonophysics 270:221–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00215-6
Kelleher J, Sykes L, Oliver J (1973) Possible criteria for predicting earthquake locations and their application to major plate boundaries of the Pacific and the Caribbean. J Geophys Res 78:2547–2585. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb078i014p02547
Khan PK, Ghosh M, Chakraborty PP, Mukherjee D (2011) Seismic b-value and the assessment of ambient stress in Northeast India. Pure Appl Geophys 168:1693–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-010-0194-x
Kijko A, Singh M (2011) Statistical tools for maximum possible earthquake magnitude estimation. Acta Geophys 59:674–700. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-011-0012-6
Knopoff L (2000) The magnitude distribution of declustered earthquakes in Southern California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:11880–11884. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190241297
Langridge RM, Weldon RJ, Moya JC, Suárez G (2000) Paleoseismology of the 1912 Acambay earthquake and the Acambay-Tixmadejé fault, Trans-Mexican volcanic belt. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105:3019–3037. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jb900239
Langridge RM, Persaud M, Zúñiga FR et al (2013) Preliminary paleoseismic results from the Pastores fault and its role in the seismic hazard of the Acambay graben, Trans-Mexican volcanic belt, Mexico. Rev Mex Ciencias Geológicas 30:463–481
Li Y, Shan X, Zhu C et al (2020) Geodetic model of the 2018 Mw 7.2 pinotepa, Mexico, earthquake inferred from insar and GPS data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 110:1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120190101
Lou ZM (1992) Stress field constraints on intraplate seismicity in Eastern North America. J Geophys Res 464:761–772
Luhr JF, Nelson SA, Allan JF, Carmichael ISE (1985) Active rifting in southwestern Mexico: manifestations of an incipient eastward spreading-ridge jump. Geology 13:54–57. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13%3c54:ARISMM%3e2.0.CO;2
Mai MP, Beroza GC (2000) Source scaling properties from finite-fault-rupture models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:604–615. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990126
Marin S, Avouac JP, Nicolas M, Schlupp A (2004) A probabilistic approach to seismic hazard in metropolitan France. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:2137–2163. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030232
Meletti C, Galadini F, Valensise G et al (2008) A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 450:85–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.01.003
Miyamura S (1976) Provisional magnitudes of middle American earthquakes not listed in the magnitude catalogue of Gutenberg-Richter. Bull Int Inst Seismol Earthq Eng 14:41–46
Molnar P, Sykes LR (1969) Tectonics of the caribbean and middle america regions from focal mechanisms and seismicity. Bull Geol Soc Am 80:1639–1684. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[1639:TOTCAM]2.0.CO;2
Nava FA, Márquez-Ramírez VH, Zúñiga FR et al (2017) Gutenberg-Richter b-value maximum likelihood estimation and sample size. J Seismol 21:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-016-9589-1
Nishenko SP, Singh SK (1987a) Conditional probability for the recurrence of large and great interpolate earthquakes along the Mexican subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:2059–2114
Nishenko SP, Singh SK (1987b) The Acapulco-Ometepec, Mexico, earthquakes of 1907–1982: evidence for a variable recurrence history. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1359–1367
Ordaz M (2015) Estudios recientes de peligro sísmico y criterios para la modificación de las ntc de diseño por sismo.
Ordaz M, Reyes C (1999) Earthquake hazard in Mexico City: observations versus computations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1379–1383
Ortuño M, Corominas O, Villamor P et al (2019) Evidence of recent ruptures in the central faults of the Acambay Graben (central Mexico). Geomorphology 326:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.07.010
Pacheco JF, Singh SK (2010) Seismicity and state of stress in Guerrero segment of the Mexican subduction zone. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006453
Panzera F, Lombardo G, Rigano R (2011) Use of different approaches to estimate seismic hazard: the study cases of Catania and Siracusa, Italy. Boll di Geofis Teor ed Appl 52:687–706. https://doi.org/10.4430/bgta
Pardo M, Suárez G (1995) Shape of the subducted Rivera and Cocos plates in southern Mexico: seismic and tectonic implications. J Geophys Res 100:12357–12373
Peláez JA, López Casado C (2002) Seismic hazard estimate at the Iberian Peninsula. Pure Appl Geophys 159:2699–2713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-002-8754-3
Pérez-Campos X, Kim YH, Husker A et al (2008) Horizontal subduction and truncation of the Cocos Plate beneath central Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035127
Ramírez-Herrera MT, Corona N, Ruiz-Angulo A et al (2018) The 8 September 2017 tsunami triggered by the M w 8.2 intraplate earthquake, Chiapas, Mexico. Pure Appl Geophys 175:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1765-x
Robson DS, Whitlock JH (1964) Estimation of a truncation point. Biometrika 51:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/51.1-2.33
Rodríguez-Pascua MA, Pérez-López R, Garduño-Monroy VH et al (2017) Estimation of the epicentral area of the 1912 Acambay earthquake (M 6.9, Mexico) determined from the earthquake archaeological effects (EAE) and the ESI07 macroseismic scale. Quat Int 451:74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.06.045
Rosas-Elguera J, Ferrari L, Garduño-Monroy VH, Urrutia-Fucugauchi J (1996) Continental boundaries of the Jalisco block and their influence in the Pliocene-Quaternary kinematics of western Mexico. Geology 24:921–924. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024%3c0921:CBOTJB%3e2.3.CO;2
Rosas-Elguera J, Alva-Valdivia LM, Goguitchaichvili A et al (2003) Counterclockwise rotation of the michoacan block: implications for the tectonics of Western Mexico. Int Geol Rev 45:814–826. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.45.9.814
Salgado-Gálvez MA, Ordaz MG, Singh K, et al (2018) Homogeneous and Continous Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Model for Latin America and the Caribbean. In: 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece. Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 1–12
Sánchez AJ, Farreras SF (1993) Catalog of tsunamis on the western coast of Mexico, World Data Center A for Solid Earth Geophysics, Publication SE-5O, National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A., pp. 79
Sawires R, Aboud E (2019) Subsurface structural imaging of Ceboruco Volcano area, Nayarit, Mexico using high-resolution aeromagnetic data. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 371:162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.01.012
Sawires R, Peláez JA, Fat-helbary RE, Ibrahim HA (2015) An earthquake catalogue (2200 B.C. to 2013) for seismotectonic and seismic hazard assessment studies in Egypt. In: D’Amico S (ed) Earthquakes and their impact on society. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 97–136
Sawires R, Peláez JA, Ibrahim HA, Hernández MTG (2015) An updated seismic source model for Egypt. In: Moustafa A (ed) Earthquake engineering from engineering - seismology to optimal seismic design of engineering structures. InTech, London, pp 1–52
Sawires R, Peláez JA, Ibrahim HA et al (2016) Delineation and characterization of a new seismic source model for seismic hazard studies in Egypt. Nat Hazards 80:1823–1864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2034-x
Sawires R, Peláez JA, AlHamaydeh M, Henares J (2019) A state-of-the-art seismic source model for the United Arab Emirates. J Asian Earth Sci 186:104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104063
Sawires R, Santoyo MA, Peláez JA, Corona Fernández RD (2019) An updated and unified earthquake catalog from 1787 to 2018 for seismic hazard assessment studies in Mexico. Sci data 6:241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0234-z
Sawires R, Peláez JA, AlHamaydeh M, Henares J (2020) Up-to-date earthquake and focal mechanism solutions datasets for the assessment of seismic hazard in the vicinity of the United Arab Emirates. Data Br. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104844
SSN Servicio Sismológico Nacional, UNAM, México. http://www.ssn.unam.mx/. Accessed May 2019
Shi Y, Bolt BA (1982) The standard error of the Magnitude-frequency b value. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:1677–1687
Singh SK, Pardo M (1993) Geometry of the Benioff zone and state of stress in the overriding plate in central Mexico. Geophys Res Lett 20:1483–1486. https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL01310
Singh SK, Rodriquez M, Espindola JM (1984) A catalog of shallow earthquakes of Mexico from 1900 to 1981. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:267–279
Singh SK, Lermo J, Domínguez T et al (1988) A study of amplification of seismic waves in the Valley of Mexico with respect to a hill zone site (CU). Earthq Spectra 4:653–673
Singh SK, Pacheco JF, Shapiro N (1998) The earthquake of 16 November, 1925 (Ms=7.0) and the reported tsunami in Zihuatanejo Mexico. Geofis Int 37:49–52
Singh SK, Cruz-Atienza V, Pérez-Campos X et al (2018) Deadly intraslab Mexico earthquake of 19 September 2017 (Mw 7.1): ground motion and damage pattern in Mexico City. Seismol Res Lett 89:2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180159
Stein S, Wysession M (2003) An Introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure. Blackwell, Oxford
Stock JM, Lee J (1994) Do microplates in subduction zones leave a geological record? Tectonics 13:1472–1487. https://doi.org/10.1029/94TC01808
Suárez G, Albini P (2009) Evidence for great tsunamigenic earthquakes (M8.6) along the Mexican subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:892–896. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080201
Suárez G, Caballero-Jiménez GV (2012) Quantitative evaluation of historical earthquakes on the Mexican volcanic belt. In: Pérez-López R, Silva PG, Rodríguez-Pascua MA, et al. (Eds) Earthquake geology and archaeology: science, society, and seismic hazard. Proceedings of the 3rd INQUA−IGCP-567 International Workshop on Active Tectonics, Paleoseismology and Archaeoseismology, pp. 183–185
Suárez G, Monfret T, Wittlinger G, David C (1990) Geometry of subduction and depth of the seismogenic zone in the Guerrero gap, Mexico. Nature 345:336–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/345336a0
Suárez G, Jaramillo SH, Bandy WL (2013) Relative motion between the Rivera and North American plates determined from the slip directions of earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 170:2163–2172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-013-0667-9
Suter M (1987) Orientational data on the state of stress in northeastern Mexico as inferred from stress-induced borehole elongations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 92:2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB03p02617
Thatcher W (1972) Regional variations of seismic source parameters in the northern Baja California area. J Geophys Res 77:1549–1565. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb077i008p01549
Urrutia-Fucugauchi J, Flores-Ruiz JH (1996) Bouguer gravity anomalies and regional crustal structure in central Mexico. Int Geol Rev 38:176–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206819709465330
Utsu T (1965) A method for determining the value of b in a formula log n = a-bM showing the magnitude-frequency relation for earthquakes. Geophys Bull Hokkaido Univ 13:99–103
Vilanova SP, Fonseca JFBD (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment for Portugal. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1702–1717. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050198
Viveros JAB, Reynoso GS, Schroeder MGO (2017) A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico based on historical and instrumentally recorded seismicity. Geofis Int 56:87–101. https://doi.org/10.19155/geofint.2017.056.1.7
Weichert DH (1980) Estimation of the earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observation periods for different magnitudes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:1337–1346
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002
Wiemer S, Giardini D, Fäh D et al (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland: best estimates and uncertainties. J Seismol 13:449–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-008-9138-7
Zúñiga FR, Castro RR (2005) The RESNOM seismic catalog and its bearing on the seismicity of Northwestern Mexico. Geofis Int 44:143–155
Zúñiga RF, Guzman M (1994) Main seismogenic sources in Mexico. In: Technical Report, Seismic Hazard Project, Instituto Panamericano de Geografia and Historia (IPGH), Mtx 1-Mtx 82
Zúñiga FR, Suárez G, Figueroa-Soto Á, Mendoza A (2017) A first-order seismotectonic regionalization of Mexico for seismic hazard and risk estimation. J Seismol 21:1295–1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9666-0
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Editor-in-Chief, Prof. Harsh K. Gupta, and the two anonymous reviewers, for their thoughtful remarks and invaluable comments.
Funding
The first author would like to acknowledge the postdoctoral funding to do a research stay at the Institute of Geophysics, UNAM, Michoacán Unit, Campus of Morelia. This work was partially financed by the CONACYT PN-2015-639 project and the Consejería de Economía, Conocimiento, Empresa y Universidad, in the frame of the Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía 2014–2020—call made by the University of Jaén 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Rashad Sawires, Miguel A. Santoyo, Jose A. Peláez, and Jesús Henares. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Rashad Sawires and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors are declaring that they have no competing financial, professional, or personal interests that might have influenced the performance or presentation of the work described in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix I: Interface subduction-related seismogenic sources
1.1 SUB-01: Jalisco
This seismic source (SUB-01; Figs. 6, 7) includes the interface/interplate earthquake activity (an average depth of 20 km; Table 2) occurred due to the tectonic interaction between the Rivera Plate (to the southwest) and the North American Plate (to the northeast) (Figs. 1, 3, 6, 7). To the north and to the west from this defined zone, an abrupt change in both the seismicity and the faulting mechanisms is observed. This source underneath most of the coastal area of the state of Jalisco. Seismic activity rate in this region is relatively low, in comparison with those subsequent sources to the southeast. This low-occurrence seismic activity is greatly confirmed by the young age (about 10 My; Dewey and Suárez 1991) of the subducting plate and the slow subduction rates (< 2.0 cm/yr) (DeMets and Stein 1990; Suárez et al. 2013). This source (SUB-01; Figs. 6, 7) is compatible with the southeast portion of the SUB1 source (Fig. 2e) defined by Zúñiga et al. (2017). The November 22, 1837, Ms 7.7, the March 09, 1875, Ms 7.4, the January 20, 1900, Ms 7.6, the November 30, 1934, Ms 7.0, and the March 27, 1960 (Mw 6.0, ML 6.1) earthquakes represent examples for the largest reported events observed in this area source (see Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7).
1.2 SUB-02: Colima
This source (SUB-02; Figs. 6, 7) covers the interface/interplate earthquake activity (h ≤ 35 km, with an average depth of 11 km; Table 2) occurred due to the subduction of the northeastern portion of the Cocos Plate beneath the North American Plate (Figs. 1, 3, 6, 7). Geographically, this source is spanning all the coastal area of the Colima state, as well as some of the northwestern coast of the Michoacán state. Tectonically, it covers the seismic activity surrounding the Colima Rift. While Zúñiga et al. (2017) defined only one seismic source (SUB2; Fig. 2e) covering most of the subduction-related seismicity along the coastal area of Colima, Michoacán, Guerrero and western Oaxaca states, in the current model it has been preferred to subdivide this region into several sources (see Figs. 6, 7) depending on the characteristics of seismicity and the faulting style obtained from focal mechanism solutions (Fig. 7) and following the study by Pardo and Suárez (1995). This source (SUB-02; Figs. 6, 7) is compatible with the northwestern portion of the SUB2 source (Fig. 2e) delimited by Zúñiga et al. (2017). A relatively greater number of large earthquakes, in comparison to the previous defined source (SUB-01), has been observed in this one (SUB-02). The largest observed earthquakes within this area source are the March 25, 1806, Ms 7.5, the May 31, 1818, Ms 7.7, the June 22, 1932, Ms 7.0, the July 25, 1932, Ms 6.9, the June 29, 1935, Ms 6.9, the Jalisco-Colima tsunamigenic October 09, 1995 (Ms 7.3, Mw 8.0), and the January 22, 2003 (Ms 7.6, Mw 7.6) earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7).
1.3 SUB-03: Michoacán
As a continuation for the interface/interplate earthquake activity (h ≤ 35 km, with an average depth of 16 km; Table 2) occurred along the Mexican subduction zone (Figs. 3, 6, 7), this source (SUB-03; Figs. 6, 7) has been delimited to cover the seismicity along most of the coastal region of the state of Michoacán. Altogether with the previous seismic area source (SUB-02) and the subsequent ones (from SUB-04 to SUB-09), they are representing the subduction-related seismicity due to the interaction between the Cocos and the North American Plates (Figs. 1, 3, 6, 7). From the significant recorded earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this seismic source, can be quoted the June 07, 1918, Ms 6.6, the January 30, 1973 (Ms 7.5, Mw 7.7), the June 30, 1973, Ms 7.5, the October 25, 1981 (Ms 7.3, Mw 7.2), the September 19, 1985 (Ms 8.1, Mw 8.1), and the January 11, 1997 (mb 6.5, ML 7.3) earthquakes. Among them, the September 19, 1985 (Ms 8.1, Mw 8.1) Michoacán earthquake represents a turning point in the seismic history of Mexico. This significant earthquake broke about 200 km along the Mexican subduction zone beneath the coast of Michoacán (e.g., Singh et al. 1988; Arciniega-Ceballos et al. 2018). It caused significant damages, reaching distances up to 300 km from its epicenter (e.g., Mexico City). A maximum horizontal acceleration value of 0.17 g was recorded at Mexico City, exceeding the limit of the seismic input of the building code in force (Anderson et al. 1986), as well as remarkable spectral amplifications (Singh et al. 1988). Official counting show that between 10,000 and 35,000 people died and/or missed, as well as more than 6,000 buildings were destroyed or seriously damaged (Arciniega-Ceballos et al. 2018).
1.4 SUB-04, SUB-05, and SUB-06: Guerrero
Guerrero region has been the goal of several recent seismic monitoring studies (e.g., Pacheco and Singh 2010), which allows researchers to better understanding the behavior and the geometry of the subduction zone specifically in this region. Two local seismic networks were in operation in the Guerrero region since about 1985. They are the Guerrero Accelerograph Array (Anderson et al. 1986), and the Guerrero Seismic Network (Suárez et al. 1990). Several researchers (e.g., Nishenko and Singh 1987b) have identified the coastal region of the state of Guerrero as a highly potential seismic zone for likely future earthquakes from the hypothesis of seismic gaps (Kelleher et al. 1973).
In the current work, three different seismic sources (SUB-04 “Guerrero Northwest”, SUB-05 “Guerrero Gap”, and SUB-06 “Guerrero Southeast”; Figs. 6, 7) have been delimited along the coast of the state of Guerrero, depending on the seismicity, the focal mechanisms characteristics (Figs. 3, 6, 7), as well as the geometry of the subducting slab (Fig. 4) and the crustal thickness (Fig. 5). While the seismic activity of the SUB-04 “Guerrero Northwest” source (an average depth of 20 km; Table 2 and Figs. 6, 7) is relatively similar to that exists in the previous one (SUB-03; Figs. 6, 7), it has been preferred to differentiate them because the geometry of the subducting slab along Guerrero (SUB-04; Figs. 6, 7) is completely different rather than Michoacán (SUB-03) (refer to Pardo and Suárez 1995; Pérez-Campos et al. 2008; Hayes et al. 2018). The largest observed/reported earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) in this seismic source (SUB-04) are the March 27, 1908, Ms 7.0, the May 08, 1933, Ms 6.9, the February 22, 1943, Ms 7.7, the March 14, 1979 (Ms 7.6, Mw 7.4), the September 21, 1985 (Ms 7.6, Mw 7.5), and the April 18, 2014, Mw 7.3, events.
The second area source (SUB-05 “Guerrero Gap”; Figs. 6, 7) has been delimited specifically to cover the scattered seismicity (an average depth of 16 km; Table 2) along the so-called “Guerrero Gap” (Suárez et al. 1990). Although there is no reported significant recent seismicity, several historical and early instrumental earthquakes (Figs. 3, 6, 7) have been located in this region. The January 24, 1899, Ms 7.9, the January 28, 1934, Ms 6.8, the November 17, 1950, Ms 6.3, the May 31, 1990, Mw 6.0, and the April 13, 2007, Mw 6.0, earthquakes are from the largest reported ones here (Table 1).
The third area source (SUB-06 “Guerrero Southeast”; Figs. 6, 7) is characterized by a relative significant number of earthquakes with large magnitudes (an average depth of 17 km; Table 2) rather than the previous one (SUB-05; Figs. 6, 7). It covers the southeastern coastal region of the state of Guerrero. Historically, the April 07, 1845, Ms 7.9, the May 04, 1820, Ms 7.6, and the May 29, 1887, Ms 7.2, earthquakes are the largest reported ones (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7). Moreover, since 1900, the April 15, 1907, Ms 7.7, the March 26, 1908, Ms 7.6, the July 28, 1957, Ms 7.7, and the April 25, 1989 (mb 6.2, Mw 6.9), earthquakes are from the most significant recorded events (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) in this source.
1.5 SUB-07: Guerrero-West Oaxaca
This area source (SUB-07; Figs. 6, 7) is located about 500 km far from the Jalisco and Colima states. It covers some of the coastal regions between the states of Guerrero and Oaxaca. It is characterized by the predominance of relatively large earthquakes (Figs. 3, 6, 7), both historical and instrumental (an average depth of 18 km; Table 2). Historically, the May 05, 1854, Ms 7.7, the December 02, 1890, Ms 7.2, the November 02, 1894, Ms 7.4, the August 04, 1928, Ms 7.4, and the August 17, 1929, Ms 7.0, earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 5) were the largest observed events. Moreover, in the instrumental period, several large earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6) were also reported, e.g., the August 02, 1968, Ms 7.4, the September 14, 1995, Mw 7.3, the February 25, 1996, Mw 7.1, the March 20, 2012 (mb 6.5, Mw 7.5), and the February 16, 2018, Mw 7.3, events. Among them, while the May 05, 1854, Ms 7.7, earthquake is the largest recorded event, the February 16, 2018, Mw 7.3, earthquake (e.g., Li et al. 2020) is the most significant recent one in this area source.
1.6 SUB-08: South Oaxaca
This seismic source (SUB-08; Figs. 6, 7) is a continuation for the interface subduction-related earthquakes. It covers the southern coastal region of the state of Oaxaca. It is characterized by the occurrence of larger earthquakes (an average depth of 16 km; Table 2) relatively to the previously defined sources, along the Mexican subduction zone. The maximum reported magnitudes (Table 1) within the borders of this source correspond to the March 28, 1787, Mw 8.6 (Suárez and Albini 2009), the May 11, 1870, Ms 7.9, the June 17, 1928, Ms 8.0, the October 09, 1928, Ms 7.6, the November 29, 1978, (Ms 7.8, Mw 7.8), and the September 30, 1999 (mb 6.5, Mw 7.5), earthquakes, among others. The epicenter of the largest reported earthquake (the March 28, 1787, Mw 8.6 event) all over the seismic record in Mexico is situated within this seismic source. Suárez and Albini (2009) stated that this tsunamigenic earthquake occurring along the Mexican subduction zone had an estimated rupture length of about 450 km. A maximum felt intensity equals to VIII (MMI scale) was reported due to this earthquake (Suárez and Albini 2009).
1.7 SUB-09: Southeast Oaxaca
Due to the large distance (more than 500 km) between the seismicity occurred in this region (SUB-09; Figs. 3, 6, 7) and the Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán region, this will be the most distant considered source along the Mexican subduction zone (Fig. 1). Following the subdivision criteria of the Mexican subduction zone by Pardo and Suárez (1995), this source was defined to cover the subduction interface seismicity at the southeastern part of the state of Oaxaca (Figs. 6, 7). Still largest earthquakes occurred in this region (an average depth of 16 km; Table 2), with a focal mechanism style showing a mixed behavior. The June 05, 1897, Ms 7.4, the March 22, 1928, Ms 7.5, the August 23, 1965 (Ms 7.8, Mw 7.5), and the January 24, 1983 (mb 6.3, Mw 6.8) are the largest reported events in this zone (Table 1).
Appendix II: Inslab/intraplate seismogenic regions
2.1 IN-01: Jalisco-Colima inslab intermediate-depth
This area source (IN-01; Figs. 6, 7) covers the intermediate-depth seismicity (35 < h ≤ 75 km, with an average depth value of 53 km; Table 2), starting from the Middle American trench up to about 200 km horizontal distance, beneath the states of Jalisco and Colima, as well as the western part of Michoacán. Together with the subsequent intermediate-depth coastal area sources (IN-02, IN-03, IN-04, and IN-05; Figs. 6, 7), they represent a transitional volumetric region between the subduction-related seismicity (SUB-sources) and the deeper inslab one (IND-sources). Within this seismic source (IN-01), only three focal mechanisms are available, corresponding to the January 26, 1974 (mb 5.2, Mw 5.6), the March 9, 1981, mb 5.7, and the August 15, 1999 (Ms 5.2, Mw 5.2) earthquakes. They are exhibiting normal-faulting with strike-slip component, thrust-faulting, and normal-faulting mechanisms, respectively (Fig. 7). On the other hand, the largest observed earthquakes (Table 1, Fig. 6) within this source are the June 07, 1911, Ms 7.7, the April 26, 1968 (Ms 6.3, Mw 6.1), the October 18, 1973 (mb 6.0, Ms 6.8), the March 09, 1981, mb 5.7, and the February 09, 2018, Mw 6.0, earthquakes.
2.2 IN-02: Michoacán-Guerrero coastal inslab intermediate-depth
For about 450 km-distance parallel to the Middle American trench (Fig. 1), and about 120 km-distance perpendicular to it, a second seismic source (IN-02; Figs. 6, 7) has been delimited beneath the states border of Michoacán and Guerrero to cover the intermediate-depth inslab seismicity (an average depth of 45 km; Table 2). Faulting mechanism (Fig. 7) is similar to the previous IN-01 source; mostly earthquakes exhibit thrust-faulting mechanisms, except some of them that show a normal-faulting style. Examples for the largest reported earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this area source are the July 30, 1909, Ms 7.3, the December 16, 1911, Ms 7.6, the May 11, 1962, Ms 7.2, the July 02, 1968, Ms 6.7, the January 26, 1979 (Ms 6.9, Mw 6.6), and the December 10, 1994 (Ms 6.6, Mw 6.5) events.
2.3 IN-03: Guerrero-Oaxaca coastal inslab intermediate-depth
Along the Guerrero-Oaxaca coastal boundary, and parallel to the Middle American trench (Fig. 1), this area source (IN-03; Figs. 6, 7) has been defined to depict the inslab intermediate-depth seismicity (an average depth of 48 km; Table 2 and Fig. 6), which mainly shows thrust-faulting mechanisms. The largest observed events (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) inside this zone are the December 21, 1965, mb 5.2, the July 18, 1974, mb 5.6, the July 02, 1984 (mb 5.9, Mw 6.4), the June 07, 1987, mb 5.5, and the June 07, 1992, mb 5.3, earthquakes.
2.4 IN-04: Southern Oaxaca inslab intermediate-depth
As in-depth continuation for the previously defined subduction area source (SUB-08; Figs. 6, 7), and as a lateral extension of the inslab intermediate-depth sources (IN-01, IN-02, and IN-03) parallel to the Middle American trench, this area source (IN-04; Figs. 6, 7) has been defined. This seismic source covers the intermediate-depth inslab seismicity (35 < h ≤ 75 km, with an average depth of 55 km; Table 2) that occur beneath southern Oaxaca. Seismicity show a mixed style of faulting mechanisms, normal and thrust faulting, which considered as a transitional area between the thrust-faulting subduction interface seismicity (for SUB-sources) and the deeper normal-faulting intraslab seismicity (IND-sources). The maximum observed earthquakes in this seismic zone are the January 15, 1931, Ms 7.8, the May 13, 1954, Mw 6.3, the December 13, 1984, mb 5.4, the August 19, 2006, Ms 5.4, and the February 08, 2010, ML 5.8, events, among others (Table 1).
2.5 IN-05: Oaxaca-Chiapas inslab intermediate-depth
Another seismic source (IN-05; Figs. 6, 7) has been defined to cover the inslab intermediate-depth seismicity (an average depth of 55 km; Table 2) located beneath the border between the states of Oaxaca and Chiapas. This source is an extension in depth of the last considered subduction zone (SUB-09; Figs. 6, 7). The largest reported earthquakes within this seismic source are the June 07, 1946, Ms 6.9, the April 22, 1962, Ms 6.0, the April 06, 1992, MD 6.4, the August 18, 2004, mb 5.7, the January 21, 2012 (mb 5.9, Mw 6.2), and the September 08, 2017 (Ms 8.2, Mw 8.2) events (Table 1). Few focal mechanism solutions are available in this source, which mainly shows a mixed normal- and thrust-faulting mechanisms (Fig. 7). Among the largest Mexican earthquakes, the most recent and largest instrumental one, the September 08, 2017 (Ms 8.2, Mw 8.2) Chiapas earthquake, is located here. This earthquake is the largest reported one in Chiapas since 1902 (Ramírez-Herrera et al. 2018). There were more than 100 fatalities, huge damage all over the states of Chiapas, Oaxaca, and Tabasco, and about 41,000 buildings were damaged in Chiapas only; more than 1.5 million people were somehow affected by this earthquake. This intraplate normal-faulting event, occurred on the oceanic subducting plate, generated a tsunami that was recorded at many tide gauges in Mexico and the Pacific Ocean (Ramírez-Herrera et al. 2018).
2.6 IN-06: Michoacán-Guerrero inslab intermediate-depth
However, the previously defined sources (from IN-01 to IN-05) are exhibiting a clear mixed style of faulting, the subsequent ones (from IN-06 to IN-09) are showing a normal-faulting mechanism as the most dominant style (Fig. 7). At a horizontal distance of about 120 km far from the trench, another seismic source (IN-06; Figs. 6, 7) has been delimited to delineate the inslab intermediate-depth (35 < h ≤ 75 km, with an average depth value of 62 km; Table 2) earthquakes exhibiting mostly normal-faulting mechanism solutions (Fig. 7). The maximum observed magnitudes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6) within this source correspond to the July 05, 1978, mb 5.6, the May 23, 1994 (mb 5.9, Mw 6.3), the December 29, 1999, mb 5.9, the August 11, 2006 (mb 6.0, Mw 6.1), the December 11, 2011 (mb 6.1, Mw 6.5), and the November 15, 2012 (Mw 6.1, ML 6.1) earthquakes, among others.
2.7 IN-07: Guerrero-Puebla-Oaxaca inslab intermediate-depth
As a lateral continuation of the previous seismic source (IN-06; Figs. 6, 7), and to cover the inslab intermediate-depth earthquakes (an average depth of 57 km; Table 2) beneath the common border between the states of Guerrero, Puebla, and Oaxaca, this area source (IN-07; Figs. 6, 7) is proposed. The focal mechanism characterization (Fig. 7) of this source is similar to the previous one. From the largest reported earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this source, the October 24, 1980 (mb 6.4, Ms 7.0), the July 21, 2000, ML 6.0, the May 22, 2009, mb 5.8, the June 16, 2013, Mw 5.9, and the September 19, 2017 (Mw 7.1, ML 7.1) events can be cited. One of the most recent and destructive earthquakes in the seismic record of Mexico is the September 19, 2017 (Mw 7.1, ML 7.1) Morelos-Puebla intraslab earthquake, which occurred 32 years after the well-known September 19, 1985 (Ms 8.1, Mw 8.1) Michoacán earthquake. The September 19, 2017 earthquake had a depth of 57 km and a hypocentral distance of about 127 km from Mexico City (Singh et al. 2018). Several towns and villages in the epicentral area of the earthquake were destroyed. A total of 369 persons died in Mexico City (228), Morelos (74) and Puebla (45). In addition, 44 buildings collapsed, and about 600 buildings were damaged in Mexico City (Singh et al. 2018).
2.8 IN-08: Northern Oaxaca inslab intermediate-depth
This seismic source (IN-08; Figs. 6, 7) represents a lateral extension of the previously considered one (IN-07). Moderate-magnitude inslab intermediate-depth earthquakes (an average depth of 65 km; Table 2) are located in this source. The September 07, 1983, mb 5.3, the September 15, 1985 (mb 6.0, Mw 6.0), the February 23, 1994, mb 5.6, the August 28, 1994, mb 5.5, and the June 15, 1999 (mb 6.4, Mw 6.9) earthquakes are the largest reported ones (Table 1). All the available focal mechanisms exhibit a normal-faulting mechanism (Fig. 7).
2.9 IN-09: Oaxaca-Veracruz inslab intermediate-depth
This source (IN-09; Figs. 6, 7) is the last and most distant one defined for the intermediate-depth inslab seismicity (an average depth of 52 km; Table 2). This is due to the large distance between seismicity in this area source and the region of interest. This area source covers intermediate-depth intraplate seismicity (35 < h ≤ 75 km) occurring beneath the eastern border between the states of Oaxaca and Veracruz. Moderate-magnitude earthquakes are reported to be occurred here. For instance, the July 11, 1946, Mw 7.1, the September 17, 1967, mb 5.3, the October 20, 1969, mb 5.4, and the July 29, 1985, mb 5.3, earthquakes (Table 1). Only one focal mechanism solution is available inside this area source, which corresponds to the January 06, 2013, Ms 5.3 earthquake, showing a strike-slip faulting mechanism (Fig. 7).
2.10 IND-01: Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán inslab deep
This source (IND-01; Figs. 6, 7) defines the inslab deeper seismicity (> 75 km, with an average depth of 100 km; Table 2) occurring far from the Middle American trench (Fig. 1), beneath the states of Jalisco, Colima and Michoacán, due to the subducting slabs. This zone is characterized by few scattered low- to moderate-magnitude earthquakes (Figs. 3, 6, 7). The largest reported events within this region were the July 29, 1973, mb 5.1, the October 21, 1976, mb 4.7, the January 19, 1988, mb 5.3, the September 29, 1992, mb 5.0, and the August 15, 1999, Mw 5.3, earthquakes. Only two focal mechanism solutions (Fig. 7) exhibiting normal-faulting mechanisms are available. They are related to the July 29, 1973, mb 5.0, and the September 29, 1992, Ms 5.3, earthquakes (Table 1).
2.11 IND-02: Michoacán-Guerrero inslab deep
As a lateral continuation of the previous source (IND-01; Figs. 6, 7), and beneath the continental border between Michoacán and Guerrero states, this second source (IND-02; Figs. 6, 7) delimits the deeper inslab seismicity (mean depth value of 98 km; Table 2 and Figs. 3, 6, 7), mostly exhibiting normal-faulting mechanisms (Fig. 7). It is considered as an extension in depth of the IN-06 inslab intermediate-depth seismic source (Figs. 6, 7). In contrast to the previously mentioned seismic source (IND-01), this one shows large earthquakes, both historical and instrumental (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7), for instance, the June 19, 1858, Ms 7.5, the June 28, 1938, Ms 6.5, the June 20, 1942, Ms 6.7, the April 21, 1945, Ms 6.5, the July 06, 1964 (mb 6.5, Mw 7.3), and the May 22, 1997, Mw 6.5, events (Table 1).
2.12 IND-03: Guerrero-Puebla-Oaxaca inslab deep
Same as in the IN-07 inslab intermediate-depth seismic source (Figs. 6, 7), and as a continuation in depth to that source, this inslab deeper seismic source (IND-03 with an average depth of 95 km; Table 2 and Figs. 6, 7) has been proposed. It is situated in depth beneath the common border between the states of Guerrero, Puebla and Oaxaca. No focal mechanism solutions were available within this zone. From the largest observed earthquakes occurred in this seismic source (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) can be cited the March 16, 1874, Ms 7.3, the May 17, 1879, Ms 7.0, the July 19, 1882, Ms 7.5, the February 03, 1911, Ms 7.2, and the January 06, 1948, Ms 7.0, earthquakes (Table 1).
2.13 IND-04: Puebla-Veracruz-Oaxaca inslab deep
This source (IND-04; Figs. 6, 7) delimits the inslab deep seismicity (an average depth of 92 km; Table 2) occurring along the subducting slab. It covers the geographical area, in depth (> 75 km), which defines the common borders between the states of Puebla, Veracruz and Oaxaca. It is an in-depth extension for the previously defined IN-08 inslab intermediate-depth seismic source. Large earthquakes were reported to be occurred within this defined seismic source (Figs. 6, 7). They are the October 03, 1864, Ms 7.3, the September 24, 1910, Ms 6.9, the July 26, 1937, Ms 7.2, the December 12, 1951, Ms 7.0, the May 24, 1959, Ms 6.8, and the August 28, 1973 (mb 6.6, Ms 7.3) earthquakes, among others (Table 1). Only one focal mechanism solution is available in this source, exhibiting a normal-faulting mechanism, corresponding to the August 28, 1973 (mb 6.6, Ms 7.3) earthquake.
2.14 IND-05: Veracruz-Oaxaca inslab deep
At about 500 km far away, as a conservative distance, from the boundaries of the Michoacán State, a final inslab deep seismic source (IND-05; Figs. 6, 7) was defined to cover the seismicity (an average depth of 120 km; Table 2) that occurred in depth beneath the eastern border between the states of Veracruz and Oaxaca. It is considered an extension in depth for the intraplate seismicity defined in the IN-09 inslab intermediate-depth seismic source (Figs. 6, 7). From the largest observed earthquakes within this source are the June 02, 1916, Ms 7.0, the July 13, 1960 (Ms 6.9, ML 6.9), the June 22, 1979 (mb 6.5, Mw 6.9), the October 21, 1995 (Mw 7.2, ML 7.1), the February 12, 2008 (mb 5.9, Mw 6.5), and the April 07, 2011 (Mw 6.7, ML 6.7) events (Table 1). Several focal mechanism solutions are available in this source, most of them showing a normal- and strike-slip faulting mechanisms.
Appendix III: Shallow crustal seismogenic sources
3.1 SC-01: Gulf of California
This seismic source (SC-01; Figs. 6, 7) delimits the shallow crustal seismicity (an average depth of 17 km; Table 2) in the Gulf of California occurred along the transform boundary between the Pacific Plate (toward the west) and the North American Plate (toward the east). Fault-plane solutions for earthquakes occurred within this area source show a mixed mode of faulting, resulting from the stresses produced by the interaction between both plates. Most of the earthquakes show a strike-slip faulting regime, although some of them shows normal-faulting mechanisms (Fig. 7). This depends whether they occurred along the transform plate boundary (the first case), or along the spreading ridges (the second one) (Doser 1992; Thatcher 1972). The largest observed earthquakes (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6) included in this seismic source are the March 05, 1901, Ms 7.2, the December 09, 1901, Ms 7.5, the May 23, 1918, Ms 6.8, the August 28, 1923, Mw 6.8, the June 27, 1945, Ms 6.8, the October 21, 2010 (mb 6.1, Ms 6.9, Mw 6.7), and the September 13, 2015 (ML 6.7, Mw 6.7) earthquakes.
3.2 SC-02: Pacific-Rivera Ridge
This area source (SC-02; Figs. 6, 7) includes the shallow seismicity (mean depth value of 17 km; Table 2) included along the divergent spreading boundary (Pacific-Rivera Ridge, Fig. 1), between the Pacific Plate (to the northwest) and the Rivera Plate (to the southeast). Fault-plane solutions (Fig. 7) show mixed faulting mechanisms: normal-faulting, strike-slip faulting with normal component, and strike-slip faulting mechanisms. Examples of large earthquakes (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6, 7) that have been reported to be occurred within this seismic source are the May 09, 1946, Mw 6.3, the September 30, 1953, Ms 6.8, the February 17, 1984, Mw 6.1, the November 13, 2001, Mw 6.1, and the May 08, 2005, Ms 6.1 earthquakes.
3.3 SC-03: Transition between the Gulf of California and the Subduction zone
Since there are no structural, morphologic nor seismic evidences that could confirm the continuation of the Gulf of California (SC-01) transform boundary to the Jalisco Block (Dañobeitia et al. 2016), and to delimit the scattered seismicity (mean depth value of 16 km; Table 2) along this transition area, this area source (SC-03; Figs. 6, 7) has been defined. This source is bordered by El Gordo Graben from the east and the near aseismic part of the Rivera Plate from the west (Fig. 1). It covers the seismicity surrounding the Tres Marías Islands, to the north (Figs. 1, 3, 6, 7), approaching the Mexican subduction zone (SUB-01) to the south. The May 11, 1926 (Ms 6.2, Mw 6.2), the December 04, 1948, Ms 6.9, the August 12, 1971, mb 5.6, and the February 09, 1976, mb 5.6 earthquakes represent the largest recorded events within this zone (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6).
3.4 SC-04: Rivera transform fault
This seismic source (SC-04; Figs. 3, 6) corresponds to the shallow seismicity (mean depth value of 16 km; Table 2) due to the Rivera Transform Fault (Fig. 1), delimiting the southwestern border between the Rivera and the Pacific Plates. Mostly earthquakes show strike-slip faulting mechanisms (Fig. 7). Several large earthquakes were documented (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6, 7) to be occurred within this source. Examples for the largest reported events are the January 14, 1899, Ms 7.4, the April 10, 1906, Ms 7.2, the November 16, 1925, Ms 7.0, the December 06, 1965 (Ms 6.1, Mw 6.7), the October 20, 1972 (Ms 6.4, Mw 6.7), the May 01, 1997 (mb 6.1, Mw 6.9), and the January 21, 2016, Mw 6.6, earthquakes. One of the largest tsunamis that was reported during the twentieth century at the Port of Zihuatanejo, Guerrero, was related to the November 16, 1925, Ms 7.0, earthquake (Singh et al. 1998). In spite of the earthquake’s epicenter that was located 600 km far from the Port of Zihuatanejo, a high tsunami of about 6 to 9 m was reported (Sánchez and Farreras 1993; Farreras 1997).
3.5 SC-05: Rivera-Cocos-Pacific Junction
This seismic source (SC-05; Figs. 6, 7) was delimited including areas from the Middle American Trench (to the north) southward along the border between the Rivera (to the northwest), the Cocos (to the southeast), and the Pacific (to the southwest) Plates. This is to cover the seismicity (an average depth of 16 km; Table 2 and Figs. 3, 6, 7) in this common border between the surrounding tectonic plates. The largest reported events (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this area source are the December 22, 1937, Ms 6.5, the August 29, 1989 (mb 5.7, Ms 6.6), the May 19, 2001, ML 6.5, and the September 23, 2008, ML 6.4, earthquakes. Most of the seismicity exhibits strike-slip faulting mechanisms (Fig. 7), with some of them showing a normal-faulting behavior.
3.6 SC-06: Pacific-Cocos Rise
Even when this seismic source (SC-06; Figs. 6, 7) defines a relatively distant shallow seismicity (mean depth value of 13 km; Table 2) along the Pacific-Cocos Rise (Fig. 1), it was delimited because its related seismicity could contribute to some extent to the seismic hazard at the Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán region. Moderate seismic activity (Figs. 3, 6, 7) was observed along this region. The largest observed earthquakes (Table 1) are the January 25, 1931, Ms 6.0, the January 20, 1955, Mw 6.0, the October 22, 1978 (mb 5.1, Mw 5.7), the October 28, 1994 (mb 5.3, Mw 5.9), the January 22, 2011, Ms 5.5, and the July 23, 2016, mb 5.5, events. Although this source defines the divergence between the Cocos (to the east) and the Pacific (to the west) Plates, most of the available focal mechanism solutions (Fig. 7) show a strike-slip style of faulting.
3.7 SC-07 and SC-08: Outer-Rise earthquakes
A few scattered but significant seismicity (Figs. 3, 6, 7) characterizes these delimited seismic sources (SC-07 and SC-08; Figs. 6, 7). The involved area extends parallel to the Mexican subduction zone and the Middle American trench (Fig. 1). They were defined to delimit the so-called outer-rise earthquakes taken place to the west of the trench up to an average horizontal distance of 100 km (Figs. 6, 7). The seismicity within this region is preferred to be differentiated into two different sources (SC-07 and SC-08, with mean depth values of 16 and 19 km, respectively; Table 2), depending on the seismicity, the characteristics of the trench, as well as the proximity (as SC-07) or the remoteness (as SC-08) in relation to the region of interest. The largest observed events (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6, 7) within the source SC-07 are the January 14, 1903, Ms 7.7, the April 10, 1957, Ms 6.2, the February 04, 1970, (Ms 6.6, Mw 6.4), the December 16, 1997, ML 6.0, and the April 18, 2002, Mw 6.7, earthquakes. While, in the source SC-08, the December 29, 1917, Ms 7.1, the December 29, 1936, Ms 6.3, the October 28, 1942, Ms 6.2, the September 30, 1993 (mb 5.6, Mw 6.5), the July 04, 1994 (mb 6.1, Mw 6.5), the May 05, 1999 (mb 5.9, Mw 6.3), and the August 13, 2011, Ms 6.3, earthquakes are examples for the largest reported events. Few focal mechanism solutions (Fig. 7) are available for both sources.
3.8 SC-09: Sierra Madre Occidental
This area source (SC-09; Figs. 6, 7) is compatible to a great extent with the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMO) source (Fig. 2e) defined by Zúñiga et al. (2017). In the proposed delimitation, it includes the shallow seismicity (mean depth value of 13 km; Table 2) beneath most of Sinaloa state and the western portion of Durango state (Figs. 6, 7). It is characterized by low-to-moderate-magnitude scarce earthquakes. The largest reported events (Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this seismic source are the May 10, 1930, Mw 5.9, the October 02, 1988, mb 4.9, and the September 05, 2011, Ms 4.8, earthquakes. Only one focal mechanism solution (Fig. 7) is available within this source, corresponding to the July 12, 2009, Ms 4.6, earthquake, reflecting a normal-faulting mechanism.
3.9 SC-10: Durango-Zacatecas
This proposed seismic source (SC-10; Figs. 6, 7) includes the scattered shallow seismicity (mean depth value of 7 km; Table 2 and Figs. 3, 6, 7) occurring within the shallow crust of Durango and Zacatecas states, as well as the southern Sinaloa state (to the west), Aguascalientes and Nayarit states (to the south) and Coahuila (to the northeast) (Figs. 6, 7). It roughly covers the southern section of the previously defined SMO and BAR sources (Fig. 2e) proposed by Zúñiga et al. (2017). A few seismicity (Figs. 6) has been reported within this relatively stable region (included in the North American Plate), with the exception of the November 01, 1928, Mw 6.5, Durango earthquake that lies to the north from this source. The largest observed earthquakes (Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this area source are the May 31, 1995, mb 4.8, and the August 01, 2007, Ms 4.4, events. No focal mechanism solutions are available in this area source.
3.10 SC-11: Burgos Basin
Toward the northeastern portion of Mexico, and to the west of the Gulf of Mexico (Figs. 6, 7), another seismic source (SC-11) has been delimited to cover the low-to-moderate-magnitude earthquakes (mean depth value of 8 km; Table 2 and Figs. 3, 6) occurred within the Burgos Basin in the states of Nuevo León and San Luis Potosí, as well as some areas of the states of Coahuila (to the northwest), Zacatecas (to the west), and Guanajuato and Querétaro (to the south) (Figs. 6, 7). This area source overlaps with the BB seismic zone (Fig. 2e) defined by Zúñiga et al. (2017). The largest reported events are the February 26, 1986, mb 4.8, the September 10, 1989, Ms 4.4, and the November 26, 2013, Ms 4.3, earthquakes. No focal mechanism solutions are available within this source. However, Suter (1987), based on borehole elongation data, proposed a NW–SE trend for the minimum stress axis in this region. Moreover, a slight N-S alignment of low-magnitude earthquake epicenters recorded in the last years is observable (Zúñiga et al. 2017).
3.11 SC-12: Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt
This proposed seismic source (SC-12; Figs. 6, 7) includes scattered moderate-magnitude earthquakes (an average depth value of 14 km; Table 2 and Figs. 3, 6, 7) occurring along the TMVB (Fig. 1) crossing Mexico, starting from the Pacific coast (to the west) and ending with the coast of the Gulf of Mexico (to the east). This seismic source is situated below the highly populated regions along the TMVB: southern Nayarit, Jalisco, southern Guanajuato, northern Michoacán, southern Querétaro, Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico, Morelos, Tlaxcala, Puebla, and Veracruz (Figs. 6, 7). This source is of utmost importance from the seismic hazard point of view due to the higher population density within these previously mentioned states. In the past, due to the shallower depths of the earthquakes and their proximity to the densely populated cities along the TMVB, some moderate- to high-size earthquakes (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6, 7) were turned catastrophic. For instance, the February 11, 1875, Ms 7.5, earthquake that occurred close to the city of Guadalajara, caused a remarkable damage in Guadalajara and the neighboring cities (Suárez and Caballero-Jiménez 2012). Another largely famous example was the November 19, 1912, Ms 6.9, Acambay earthquake that occurred within the Acambay Graben. This graben has been the subject of further paleoseismological studies (e.g., Langridge et al. 2000, 2013; Ortuño et al. 2019) concluding that a significant earthquake is expected within this region every 300–600 years. From a seismicity point of view (Table 1; Figs. 3, 6, 7), some of the largest reported earthquakes within this defined seismic source are the February 11, 1875, Ms 7.5, the November 19, 1912, Ms 6.9, the June 03, 1932, Ms 8.2, the June 18, 1932, Ms 7.8, the April 15, 1941, Ms 7.7, the October 03, 1947, Ms 7.0, the June 04, 1960, Ms 6.4, and the May 08, 2016, mb 5.8, events. A few focal mechanism solutions (Fig. 7) are available in this area source, most of them indicating a normal-faulting mechanism with some left-lateral strike-slip component.
3.12 SC-13: Tuxtla volcanic field
This seismic source (SC-13; Figs. 6, 7) incorporates the shallow crustal seismicity (mean depth value of 17 km; Table 2) within the Tuxtla Volcanic Field. This volcanic field, also known as Los Tuxtlas Field, is an isolated basaltic volcanic area that emerges from the lowlands of the western border of the Gulf of Mexico (Espindola et al. 2016). Due to its remoteness from the TMVB, it was preferred to define a separate seismic source including this seismicity that might be related to some extent to the volcanic activity. Few moderate earthquakes are observed within this seismic source (Figs. 6, 7). The August 26, 1959, Ms 6.4, the March 11, 1967, Mw 5.9, and the October 29, 2009, Mw 5.7, earthquakes depict the largest reported events in this seismic source. Only one focal mechanism solution (the October 29, 2009, Mw 5.7, earthquake) is available within the limits of this source, exhibiting a thrust-faulting mechanism (Fig. 7).
3.13 SC-14: Guerrero-Puebla
This area source (SC-14; Figs. 6, 7) was delimited to include the shallow-depth moderate-seismic activity (an average depth value of 34 km; Table 2 and Figs. 3, 6) to the south of the TMVB. It mostly consists of the shallow crustal activity occurred beneath the Guerrero-Oaxaca border as well as in southern Puebla (Figs. 6, 7). This seismic source is compatible with the northern portion of the NAM zone (Fig. 2e) proposed by Zúñiga et al. (2017). The January 16, 1902, Ms 7.0, the November 21, 1916, Ms 6.8, the October 19, 1917, Ms 6.3, the December 23, 1937, Ms 7.5, and the December 14, 1950, Ms 7.3, events are the largest recorded earthquakes (Table 1, Figs. 3, 6, 7) within this source. Only one fault-plane solution (Fig. 7) is reported in this zone, related to the October 29, 2001, Ms 5.0, earthquake, exhibiting a normal-faulting mechanism.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sawires, R., Santoyo, M.A., Peláez, J.A. et al. Western Mexico seismic source model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Jalisco-Colima-Michoacán region. Nat Hazards 105, 2819–2867 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04426-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04426-6