1 Correction to: Nat Hazards https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03697-y

The article was published with errors. This correction stands to correct Figure 9 found in the original article. The authors and the publisher regret the noted discrepancy and ask readers to note the correct figure provided herein. Provided is the correct Fig. 9. With attention to the correction, the original article has been corrected.

Fig. 9
figure 1

Sensitivity analysis for the a IL model and b IR model. Higher VR percent indicates greater influence in the prediction of the variable of interest (e.g., IR or IL)