Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-hazard model for developing countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disaster risk assessment related to natural events has generally been carried out separately by specialists in each area of earth sciences, which has two negative consequences: Firstly, results of investigations are presented in different formats, mainly maps, which differ significantly from each other in aspects such as scale, symbols and units; secondly, it is common for an area or territory to contain several hazards that can potentially interact with each other, generating cascade effects or synergies. While some authors have proposed a multi-hazard analysis framework based on the use of probabilities, the quality and quantity of data required for this approach are rarely available in developing countries. Qualitative methods, on the other hand, have traditionally been limited to overlapping maps, without considering possible spatial interactions. Given the importance of integrated assessment of natural hazards for land use planning and risk management, this article proposes a heuristic multi-hazard model appropriate for developing countries, based on a standardization of classifications and a spatial interaction matrix between hazards. The model can be adjusted to be applied at different scales and in different territories; to demonstrate its versatility, it is applied to the municipality of Poás, Costa Rica, a territory with multiple natural hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarado G (2000) Los volcanes de Costa Rica: su geología, historia y riqueza natural, 2nd edn. EUNED, San José

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrantes G (2015) Modelo de multi-amenaza natural para países en vías de desarrollo: caso de aplicación cantón de Poás, Costa Rica. Instituto tecnológico de Costa Rica: thesis for the degree of doctor in natural sciences

  • Barrantes G, Núñez S, Malavassi E (2011) La simulación computaciónan como herramienta para el ordenamiento territoriaal y la gestión del riesgo: el caso de caída de ceniza proveniente del Volcán Irazú, Costa Rica. Revista geográfica de América Central (Special) 48E:197–212

  • Delmonaco G, Margottini C, Spizzichino D (2007) Assessing and mapping multipler risks for spatial planning: approaches, methodologies and tools in Europe. European Union, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilley M, Chen R, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam A, Arnold M, Agwe J, Yetman G (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. The World Bank and Columbia University, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischhauer M, Greiving S, Wanczura S (2006) State of the art of spatial planning and natural risk mapping in European countries. AESOP 05, Viena

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinimann HR, Holtenstein K, Kienholz H, Krummenhacher B, Mani P (1998) Methoden zur Analyse und Bewertung von Naturgefahren. In: Umwelt-Materialien, Naturgefahren BUWAL, 85, Bern, p 248

  • INEC (2012) Estadísticas de poblacón del Censo 2010. Population statistics from the 2010 Census. http://www.inec.go.cr/Web/Home/GeneradorPagina.aspx. Accessed 15 October 2012

  • Kappes M, Keiler M, von Elverfeldt K, Glade T (2012) Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat Hazards 64:1925–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komendantova N, Mrzyglocki R, Mignan A, Khazai B, Wenzel F, Patt A, Fleming K (2014) Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: feedback from civil protection stakeholders. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 8:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzocchi W, Garcia A, Gasparini P, Mastellone ML, Di Ruocco A (2012) Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy. Nat Hazards 62:551–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero W, Soto G, Alvarado G, y Rojas W (2010) División del deslizamiento tectónico y transtensión en el macizo del Volcán Poás (Costa Rica), basado en estudios neotectónicos y de sismicidad histórica. Revista Geológica de América Central 43:13–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Perales M, Cantarero F (2010) Problemas y retos en el análisis de los riesgos múltiples del territorio: propuesta metodológica para la elaboración de cartografías multi-peligros. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 52:245–271

    Google Scholar 

  • PREDECAN (2009) Incorporando la gestión del riesgo de desastres en la planificación y gestión territorial: guía técnica para la interpretación y aplicación del análisis de amenazas y riesgos. General Secretariat of the Andean Community, Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser JT, Carr MJ (1987) Poás volcano, Costa Rica: geology of the summit region and spatial and temporal variations among the most recent lavas. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 33(1–3):131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz P, Gazel E, Alvarado GE, Carr MJ, Soto GJ (2010) Caracterización geoquímica y petrográfica de las unidades geológicas del macizo del volcán Poás, Costa Rica (Geochemical and petrographic characterization of the geological units of the Poás volcano massif). Revista Geológica de América Central 43:37–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Ph.D. Eduardo Malavassi for his guidance and corrections and to The Office of the Vice Provost for Research of the National University of Costa Rica for the support received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Barrantes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrantes, G. Multi-hazard model for developing countries. Nat Hazards 92, 1081–1095 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3239-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3239-6

Keywords

Navigation