Abstract
The theoretical relationships between resilience and vulnerability have long been debated, but limited research has been done to test their relationships from an empirical perspective. This study presents an important case to demonstrate the empirical verification of the relationships. After reviewing relevant theories, we propose revisions of two widely adopted disaster risk and vulnerability formulas and apply them in a Taiwanese case of Typhoon Morakot. The data incorporate four natural hazard data sets, a Taiwan Social Change Survey of nonvictims as the reference group, and a longitudinal data set of Social Impact and Recovery Survey for Typhoon Morakot victims (2010–2012). With those data, two sets of models were constructed based on the two revised formulas. The first set of models estimates a disaster risk, defined as the probability and expected value of victimization determined by the typhoon hazard, household’s exposure, and contextual vulnerability composed of social class, ethnicity, education, and family status. The second set of models estimates an affected household’s outcome vulnerability, defined as the continuous trajectory of household living condition consisted of exposure, contextual vulnerability, and resilience. In the second set, outcome vulnerability is measured through household income pre- and post-disaster to depict the impact and dynamism; resilience is measured through social capital variables. Logit, ordinal linear regression (OLS), and fixed-effect regression were applied to statistically estimate the models. The results highlight that contextual vulnerability deteriorates the disaster risk of typhoon. Resilience has an impact on outcome vulnerability, but its effect is uncertain, likely to be restricted in the disaster recovery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347–364
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281
Aldrich DP (2012) Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
Aldrich DP, Crook K (2008) Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: sitting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans. Political Res Q 61:379–389
Aldrich DP, Meyer MA (2015) Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci 59:254–269
Béné C, Wood RG, Newsham A, Davies M (2012) Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes IDS working papers 2012:1–61 doi:10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x
Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazard 41:283–295. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University, Tokyo
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London
Bohle HG, Downing TE, Watts MJ (1994) Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Glob Environ Chang 4:37–48
Brand FX, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12:23
Buckle P (2006) Assessing social resilience. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C Thomas, Illinois
Carpenter SR, Gunderson LH (2001) Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience 51:451–457
Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County South Carolina. Ann Ass Am Geogr 90:713–737
Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261
Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Chang 18:598–606
Dilley M, Chen R, Deichmann U (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank Hazard Management Unit, Washington
Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394
Elliott J, Haney T, Sams-Abiodum P (2010) Limits to social capital: comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighbors devastated by Hurricane Katrina. Sociol Q 51:624–648
Erikson R, Goldthorpe JH (1992) The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford University Press, New York
Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403
Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267
Frigerio I, De Amicis M (2016) Mapping social vulnerability to natural hazards in Italy: a suitable tool for risk mitigation strategies. Environ Sci Policy 63:187–196. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.001
Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17:155–167
Füssel H-M (2009) Review and quantitative analysis of indices of climate change exposure, adaptive capacity, sensitivity, and impacts: background note to the world development report 2010. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75:301–329
Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16:293–303. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
Garrison MEB, Sasser DD (2009) Families and disasters: making meaning out of adversity. In: Cherry KE (ed) Lifespan perspectives on natural disasters: coping with Katrina, Rita, and other storms. Springer, New York, pp 113–130
Gundersen V, Kaltenborn BP, Williams DR (2016) A bridge over troubled water: a contextual analysis of social vulnerability to climate change in a riverine landscape in south-east Norway Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift—Norwegian. J Geogr 70:216–229. doi:10.1080/00291951.2016.1194317
Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439
Gunderson LH (2010) Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecol Soc 15:18
Haines VA, Hurlbert JS, Beggs JJ (1996) Exploring the determinants of support provision: provider characteristics, personal networks, community contexts, and support following life events. J Health Soc Behav 37:252–264
Hawkins RL, Maurer K (2010) Bonding, bridging and linking: how social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Br J Soc Work 40:1777–1793
Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23
Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 292–317
Hopkins D (2015) Applying a comprehensive contextual climate change vulnerability framework to New Zealand’s tourism industry. Ambio 44:110–120. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0525-8
Hout M (1983) Mobility tables. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.
Hsu H-H, Chou C, Wu YC, Lu MM, Chen CT, Chen YM (2011) Climate change in taiwan: scientific report 2011. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan
Hurlbert J, Haines VA, Beggs J (2000) Core networks and tie activation: what kinds of routine networks allocated resources in nonroutine situations? Am Sociol Rev 65:598–618
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 976
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working group II contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report—changes to the underlying scientific/technical assessment. Intergovernmental panel on climate change
Joakim E, Mortsch L, Oulahen G (2015) Using vulnerability and resilience concepts to advance climate change adaptation. Environ Hazard 14:137–155
Jongman B, Winsemius HC, Aerts JCJH, de Perez EC, van Aalst MK, Kron W, Ward PJ (2015) Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:E2271–E2280 doi:10.1073/pnas.1414439112
Kaniasty K, Norris FH (1993) A test of the social support deterioration model in the context of natural disaster. J Personal Soc Psychol 64:395–408
Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2005) The social contours of risk: risk analysis, corporations and the globalization of risk, vol II. Earthscan, London
Klein R, Nicholls R, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazard 5:35–45
Koks EE, Jongman B, Husby TG, Botzen WJW (2015) Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environ Sci Policy 47:42–52. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
Korup O, Clague JJ (2009) Natural hazards, extreme events, and mountain topography. Quatern Sci Rev 28:977–990. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.021
Kuhlicke C (2013) Resilience: a capacity and a myth: findings from an in-depth case study in disaster management research. Nat Hazard 67:61–76. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9646-y
Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lin KH, Polsky C (2015) Indexing livelihood vulnerability to the effects of typhoons in indigenous communities of Taiwan. Geogr J. doi:10.1111/geoj.12141
Lin KH, Chang YC, Liu GY, Chan CH, Lin TH, Yeh CH (2015) An interdisciplinary perspective on social and physical determinants of seismic risk. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 15:2173–2182
Lucini B (2013) Social capital and sociological resilience in megacities context. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 4:58–71
Ludena CE, Yoon SW (2015) Local vulnerability indicators and adaptation to climate change: a survey. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington
Luers AL, Lobell David B, Sklar Leonard S, Lee Addams C, Matson Pamela A (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley Mexico. Glob Environ Chang 13:255–267
Manyena SB (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30:433–450
McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Miller F et al (2010) Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecol Soc 15:11
MPDRC (2012) An innovative approach for post-disaster reconstruction of Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. Morakot post-disaster reconstruction council, Executive Yuan, Republic of China, Taipei, Taiwan
MPDRC (2014) Morakot Typhoon post-disaster reconstruction council, Executive Yuan’s five-year mission successful closes on August 8th, 2014, http://morakotdatabase.nstm.gov.tw/88flood.www.gov.tw/files/committee_other/219.pdf?id=219&type=pdf&location=committee_other
Murphy DJ, Wyborn C, Yung L, Williams DR (2015) Key concepts and methods in social vulnerability and adaptive capacity. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Colorako
NCDR (2012) Social impacts and recovery survey of Typhoon Morakot, wave 1~3. National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction, New Taipei City, Taiwan. doi:https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/group/sciitem/3/1384. https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/group/sciitem/3/1674
NHRA (2015) Natural Hazards Risk Atlas. http://maplecroft.com/
O’Brien K et al (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Chang 14:303–313
O’Brien K, Eriksen SH, Nygaard L, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88
Okpara UT, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ (2016) Perspectives on contextual vulnerability in discourses of climate conflict. Earth Syst Dyn 7:89–102. doi:10.5194/esd-7-89-2016
Pelling M (1998) Participation, social capital and vulnerability to urban flooding in Guyana. J Int Dev 10:469–486
Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292
TSCS (2010) Taiwan social change survey. Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. doi:http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/scDownload.php
Turner BL II (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Glob Environ Chang 20:570–576. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
Turner NJ, Clifton H (2009) “It’s so different today”: climate change and indigenous lifeways in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 19:180–190
Turner BL II et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079
UNDRO (1980) Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis. UNDRO, Geneva
UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. United Nations framework convention on climate change
UNISDR (2004) Living with risks: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. United Nations Publication, Geneva, Switzerland. doi:http://www.unisdr.org/files/657_1wr1.pdf
Veland S, Howitt R, Dominey-Howes D, Thomalla F, Houston D (2013) Procedural vulnerability: understanding environmental change in a remote indigenous community. Glob Environ Chang 23:314–326. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.009
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Project NO. 104-2410-H-001-002-MY2). The authors also like to thank Ms. Rico Yang for her assistance on data management.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, KH.E., Lee, HC. & Lin, TH. How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability. Nat Hazards 88, 1229–1250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2916-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2916-1