Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling river-floodplain interaction during flood propagation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The (re)integration of flood storage areas in the river system is considered and proved as an effective flood protection measure. By their (controlled) filling and emptying, inundation risks for downstream areas with higher vulnerability can be reduced. They have an influence not only on the flood level, but also on the residence time of the water in the river ecosystem, which is an important biological parameter. A good prediction of storage flow is therefore necessary in an integrated ecosystem model. In such a model, which is being developed by the universities of Ghent and Antwerp, hydraulic, biological and biogeochemical processes are coupled. In this paper, a one-dimensional hydrodynamic module of the integrated STRIVE (STReam RIVer Ecosystem) model, which is based on the de Saint–Venant equations and solved by the Preissmann scheme, is adapted to be able to include flow exchange with storage cells. This model is validated with experimental laboratory measurements on a small scale. The flow between the storage cells and the river is controlled by weirs (flooded river banks). Model simulations with STRIVE are also compared with HEC-RAS simulations. Good agreement between simulations of both models and between the STRIVE simulations and the measurements is found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buis K, Anibas C, Bal K et al (2007) Fundamentele studie van uitwisselingsprocessen in rivierecosystemen—geïntegreerde modelontwikkeling. Water 32:51–54 (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee C, Förster S, Bronstert A (2008) Comparison of hydrodynamic models of different complexities to model floods with emergency storage areas. Hydrol Process 22(24):4695–4709. doi:10.1002/hyp.7079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunge JA, Holly FM, Verwey A (1980) Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Doncker L, Troch P, Verhoeven R, Bal K, Desmet N, Meire P (2009) Relation between resistance characteristics due to aquatic weed growth and the hydraulic capacity of the river AA. River Res Appl 25:1287–1303. doi:10.1002/rra.1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declercq F (2007) Overstromingsgebieden: experimentele opzet en numerieke modellering in “Femme”. Master Thesis, Ghent University (in Dutch)

  • Förster S, Chatterjee C, Bronstert A (2008) Hydrodynamic simulation of the operational management of a proposed flood emergency storage area at the middle. Elbe River River Res Appl 124:900–913. doi:10.1002/rra.1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gejadze IY, Monnier J (2007) On a 2D ‘zoom’ for the 1D shallow water model: Coupling and data assimilation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:4628–4643. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard M, Rymen J, Beauchard O, El Kahloun M, Meire P (2008) Importance of mowing and flood frequency in promoting species richness in restored floodplains. J Appl Ecol 45(6):1780–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson FM (1966) Open channel flow. The Macmillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Horritt MS, Bates PD (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. J Hydrol 268:87–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Rauberg J, Apel H, Disse M, Lindenschmidt KE (2007) The effectiveness of polder systems on peak discharge capping of floods along the middle reaches of the Elbe River in Germany. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1391–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydrologic Engineering Center, US Army Corps of Engineers (2008) HEC-RAS river analysis system, Version 4.0. http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-ras/

  • Jaffe DA, Sanders BF (2001) Engineered levee breaches for flood mitigation. J Hydrol Eng 127(6):471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneis D, Förster S, Bronstert A (2009) Simulation of water quality in a flood detention area using models of different spatial discretization. Ecol Model 220:1631–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetaert K, deClippele V, Herman P (2002) FEMME, a flexible environment for mathematically modelling the environment. Ecol Model 151:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W (2007) Computational river dynamics. Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by the FWO (Flemish Fund for Scientific Research) (G.0306.04) and fits in a multidisciplinary research project ‘A fundamental study on exchange processes in river ecosystems’(University of Antwerp, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Ghent University, 2004–2009). The first author also wishes to thank the BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds)—B/10677/02—BOF09/DOC/353 for personal funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Meire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meire, D., De Doncker, L., Declercq, F. et al. Modelling river-floodplain interaction during flood propagation. Nat Hazards 55, 111–121 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9554-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9554-1

Keywords

Navigation