Abstract
We consider a geographic optimization problem in which we are given a region R, a probability density function f(⋅) defined on R, and a collection of n utility density functions u i (⋅) defined on R. Our objective is to divide R into n sub-regions R i so as to “balance” the overall utilities on the regions, which are given by the integrals \(\iint _{R_{i}}f(x)u_{i}(x)\, dA\). Using a simple complementary slackness argument, we show that (depending on what we mean precisely by “balancing” the utility functions) the boundary curves between optimal sub-regions are level curves of either the difference function u i (x) − u j (x) or the ratio u i (x)/u j (x). This allows us to solve the problem of optimally partitioning the region efficiently by reducing it to a low-dimensional convex optimization problem. This result generalizes, and gives very short and constructive proofs of, several existing results in the literature on equitable partitioning for particular forms of f(⋅) and u i (⋅). We next give two economic applications of our results in which we show how to compute a market-clearing price vector in an aggregate demand system or a variation of the classical Fisher exchange market. Finally, we consider a dynamic problem in which the density function f(⋅) varies over time (simulating population migration or transport of a resource, for example) and derive a set of partial differential equations that describe the evolution of the optimal sub-regions over time. Numerical simulations for both static and dynamic problems confirm that such partitioning problems become tractable when using our methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams RA, Essex C (2009) Calculus: A Complete Course. Pearson Education Canada
Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse J-F (1989) Demand for differentiated products, discrete choice models, and the characteristics approach. Rev Econ Stud 56(1):21–35
Aronov B, Carmi P, Katz MJ (2009) Minimum-cost load-balancing partitions. Algorithmica 54(3):318–336
Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:265–290
Aurenhammer F, Hoffmann F, Aronov B (1998) Minkowski-type theorems and least-squares clustering. Algorithmica 20:61–76. doi:10.1007/PL00009187
Bergeijk PAG, Brakman S (2010) The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge University Press
Boyd S (2010) Analytic center cutting-plane method. University Lecture. see, http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee364b/lectures/accpm_slides.pdf
Boyd S Subgradients. University Lecture, 2010. see, http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee364b/lectures/subgradients_slides.pdf
Brams SJ, Taylor AD (1996) Fair division: from Cake-cutting to Dispute Resolution. Fair Division: From Cake-cutting to Dispute Resolution. Cambridge University Press
Canter D, Hammond L (2006) A comparison of the efficacy of different decay functions in geographical profiling for a sample of US serial killers. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 3(2):91–103
Carlsson JG (2012) Dividing a territory among several vehicles. INFORMS J Comput 24(4):565–577
Carlsson JG, Devulapalli R (2012) Dividing a territory among several facilities. INFORMS J Comput 25(4):730–742
Curtin KM, Hayslett-McCall K, Qiu F (2010) Determining optimal police patrol areas with maximal covering and backup covering location models. Networks and Spatial Economics 10(1):125–145
de Grange L, Fernández E, de Cea J, Irrazábal M (2010) Combined model calibration and spatial aggregation. Networks and Spatial Economics 10(4):551–578
de Grange L, Ibeas A, González F (2011) A hierarchical gravity model with spatial correlation: Mathematical formulation and parameter estimation. Networks and Spatial Economics 11(3):439–463
Drezner Z, Scott CH (2010) Optimizing the location of a production firm. Networks and Spatial Economics 10(3):411–425
Eisenberg E, Gale D (1959) Consensus of subjective probabilities: the pari-mutuel method. Ann Math Stat 30(1):165–168
Fu-qing D, Zheng L, Li-li W (2009) Study on the method of sector division based on the power diagram. In: ICMTMA ’09. International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, 2009, vol 2, pp 393–395
Gale D (1989) The Theory of Linear Economic Models. Economics / mathematics. University of Chicago Press
Guruprasad KR, Ghose D (2011) Coverage optimization using generalized Voronoi partition. 0908.3565v3
Haltiner GJ, Williams RT (1980) Numerical Prediction and Dynamic Meteorology. Wiley
Haugland D, Ho SC, Laporte G (2007) Designing delivery districts for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Eur J Oper Res 180(3):997–1010
Ingram DR, Clarke DR, Murdie RA (1978) Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department. Social Science & Medicine. Part D: Medical Geography 12(1):55–62
Isaacson E, Keller HB (1994) Analysis of Numerical Methods. Dover books on advanced mathematics. Dover Publications
Krantz SG, Parks HR (2008) Geometric Integration Theory. Cornerstones Series. Birkhäuser
Lederer PJ (2003) Competitive delivered spatial pricing. Networks and Spatial Economics 3(4):421–439
LeVeque RJ (2012) Clawpack. http://depts.washington.edu/clawpack/
Levitt J (2012) All about redistricting. http://redistricting.lls.edu/where-state.php. [Online; accessed 07-June-2012]
Lewer JJ, Van den Berg H (2008) A gravity model of immigration. Econ Lett 99(1):164–167
Lockwood EH (2007) Book of Curves. A Book of Curves. Cambridge University Press
Luenberger DG (1997) Optimization by vector space methods. Series in decision and control. Wiley
Mitchell JSB (1993) Shortest paths among obstacles in the plane. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual symposium on Computational geometry, SCG ’93, pp 308–317. ACM, New York
NAG (1995) Fortran library manual. Numerical Algorithms Group, Ltd., Oxford, UK, Mark, 17
National Research Council (U.S.) (1993) Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics. Panel on Statistics and Oceanography, Eddy, W.F., National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Mathematical Sciences, and National Research Council (U.S.). Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications. Statistics and Physical Oceanography. National Academy Press
Nekola JC, White PS (1999) Special paper: The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26(4):867–878
Norman G (1981) Spatial competition and spatial price discrimination. Rev Econ Stud:97–111
Ogilvy CS (1990) Excursions in Geometry. Dover Classics of Science and Mathematics. Dover Publications
O’Leary M (2011) Modeling criminal distance decay. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 13:161–198
Pavone M, Arsie A, Frazzoli E, Bullo F (2011) Distributed algorithms for environment partitioning in mobile robotic networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(8):1834–1848
Pimenta L, Kumar V, Mesquita RC, Pereira G (2008) Sensing and coverage for a network of heterogeneous robots. In: CDC 2008. 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2008, pp 3947–3952
Poulin R (2003) The decay of similarity with geographical distance in parasite communities of vertebrate hosts. J Biogeogr 30(10):1609–1615
Quarteroni A, Sacco R, Saleri F (2007) Numerical Mathematics. Texts in applied mathematics. Springer
Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge
Salazar-Aguilar MA, Ríos-Mercado RZ, Cabrera-Ríos M (2011) New models for commercial territory design. Networks and Spatial Economics 11(3):487–507
Sheppard E (1978) Theoretical underpinnings of the gravity hypothesis. Geogr Anal 10(4):386–402
Sheppard E (1979) Geographic potentials. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 69(3):438–447
Stock R (1983) Distance and the utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 17(9):563–570
Tobler W (1976) Spatial interaction patterns. J Environ Syst 6:271–301
Varga RS (2009) Matrix Iterative Analysis. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Yinyu Ye and Shuzhong Zhang for their helpful suggestions.
J.G.C. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Boeing Company, DARPA YFA grant N66001-12-1-4218, NSF award CMMI-1234585, ONR grant N000141210719, and AFOSR award 11819022.
R.D. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Boeing Company and ONR grant N000141210719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carlsson, J.G., Carlsson, E. & Devulapalli, R. Shadow Prices in Territory Division. Netw Spat Econ 16, 893–931 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9303-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9303-9