Skip to main content
Log in

Shadow Prices in Territory Division

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a geographic optimization problem in which we are given a region R, a probability density function f(⋅) defined on R, and a collection of n utility density functions u i (⋅) defined on R. Our objective is to divide R into n sub-regions R i so as to “balance” the overall utilities on the regions, which are given by the integrals \(\iint _{R_{i}}f(x)u_{i}(x)\, dA\). Using a simple complementary slackness argument, we show that (depending on what we mean precisely by “balancing” the utility functions) the boundary curves between optimal sub-regions are level curves of either the difference function u i (x) − u j (x) or the ratio u i (x)/u j (x). This allows us to solve the problem of optimally partitioning the region efficiently by reducing it to a low-dimensional convex optimization problem. This result generalizes, and gives very short and constructive proofs of, several existing results in the literature on equitable partitioning for particular forms of f(⋅) and u i (⋅). We next give two economic applications of our results in which we show how to compute a market-clearing price vector in an aggregate demand system or a variation of the classical Fisher exchange market. Finally, we consider a dynamic problem in which the density function f(⋅) varies over time (simulating population migration or transport of a resource, for example) and derive a set of partial differential equations that describe the evolution of the optimal sub-regions over time. Numerical simulations for both static and dynamic problems confirm that such partitioning problems become tractable when using our methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams RA, Essex C (2009) Calculus: A Complete Course. Pearson Education Canada

  • Anderson SP, De Palma A, Thisse J-F (1989) Demand for differentiated products, discrete choice models, and the characteristics approach. Rev Econ Stud 56(1):21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronov B, Carmi P, Katz MJ (2009) Minimum-cost load-balancing partitions. Algorithmica 54(3):318–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:265–290

  • Aurenhammer F, Hoffmann F, Aronov B (1998) Minkowski-type theorems and least-squares clustering. Algorithmica 20:61–76. doi:10.1007/PL00009187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeijk PAG, Brakman S (2010) The Gravity Model in International Trade: Advances and Applications. Cambridge University Press

  • Boyd S (2010) Analytic center cutting-plane method. University Lecture. see, http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee364b/lectures/accpm_slides.pdf

  • Boyd S Subgradients. University Lecture, 2010. see, http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee364b/lectures/subgradients_slides.pdf

  • Brams SJ, Taylor AD (1996) Fair division: from Cake-cutting to Dispute Resolution. Fair Division: From Cake-cutting to Dispute Resolution. Cambridge University Press

  • Canter D, Hammond L (2006) A comparison of the efficacy of different decay functions in geographical profiling for a sample of US serial killers. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 3(2):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson JG (2012) Dividing a territory among several vehicles. INFORMS J Comput 24(4):565–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson JG, Devulapalli R (2012) Dividing a territory among several facilities. INFORMS J Comput 25(4):730–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin KM, Hayslett-McCall K, Qiu F (2010) Determining optimal police patrol areas with maximal covering and backup covering location models. Networks and Spatial Economics 10(1):125–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grange L, Fernández E, de Cea J, Irrazábal M (2010) Combined model calibration and spatial aggregation. Networks and Spatial Economics 10(4):551–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grange L, Ibeas A, González F (2011) A hierarchical gravity model with spatial correlation: Mathematical formulation and parameter estimation. Networks and Spatial Economics 11(3):439–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z, Scott CH (2010) Optimizing the location of a production firm. Networks and Spatial Economics 10(3):411–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg E, Gale D (1959) Consensus of subjective probabilities: the pari-mutuel method. Ann Math Stat 30(1):165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu-qing D, Zheng L, Li-li W (2009) Study on the method of sector division based on the power diagram. In: ICMTMA ’09. International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, 2009, vol 2, pp 393–395

  • Gale D (1989) The Theory of Linear Economic Models. Economics / mathematics. University of Chicago Press

  • Guruprasad KR, Ghose D (2011) Coverage optimization using generalized Voronoi partition. 0908.3565v3

  • Haltiner GJ, Williams RT (1980) Numerical Prediction and Dynamic Meteorology. Wiley

  • Haugland D, Ho SC, Laporte G (2007) Designing delivery districts for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands. Eur J Oper Res 180(3):997–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram DR, Clarke DR, Murdie RA (1978) Distance and the decision to visit an emergency department. Social Science & Medicine. Part D: Medical Geography 12(1):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacson E, Keller HB (1994) Analysis of Numerical Methods. Dover books on advanced mathematics. Dover Publications

  • Krantz SG, Parks HR (2008) Geometric Integration Theory. Cornerstones Series. Birkhäuser

  • Lederer PJ (2003) Competitive delivered spatial pricing. Networks and Spatial Economics 3(4):421–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVeque RJ (2012) Clawpack. http://depts.washington.edu/clawpack/

  • Levitt J (2012) All about redistricting. http://redistricting.lls.edu/where-state.php. [Online; accessed 07-June-2012]

  • Lewer JJ, Van den Berg H (2008) A gravity model of immigration. Econ Lett 99(1):164–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood EH (2007) Book of Curves. A Book of Curves. Cambridge University Press

  • Luenberger DG (1997) Optimization by vector space methods. Series in decision and control. Wiley

  • Mitchell JSB (1993) Shortest paths among obstacles in the plane. In: Proceedings of the ninth annual symposium on Computational geometry, SCG ’93, pp 308–317. ACM, New York

  • NAG (1995) Fortran library manual. Numerical Algorithms Group, Ltd., Oxford, UK, Mark, 17

  • National Research Council (U.S.) (1993) Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics. Panel on Statistics and Oceanography, Eddy, W.F., National Research Council (U.S.). Board on Mathematical Sciences, and National Research Council (U.S.). Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications. Statistics and Physical Oceanography. National Academy Press

  • Nekola JC, White PS (1999) Special paper: The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26(4):867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman G (1981) Spatial competition and spatial price discrimination. Rev Econ Stud:97–111

  • Ogilvy CS (1990) Excursions in Geometry. Dover Classics of Science and Mathematics. Dover Publications

  • O’Leary M (2011) Modeling criminal distance decay. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 13:161–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavone M, Arsie A, Frazzoli E, Bullo F (2011) Distributed algorithms for environment partitioning in mobile robotic networks. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(8):1834–1848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimenta L, Kumar V, Mesquita RC, Pereira G (2008) Sensing and coverage for a network of heterogeneous robots. In: CDC 2008. 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2008, pp 3947–3952

  • Poulin R (2003) The decay of similarity with geographical distance in parasite communities of vertebrate hosts. J Biogeogr 30(10):1609–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quarteroni A, Sacco R, Saleri F (2007) Numerical Mathematics. Texts in applied mathematics. Springer

  • Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge

  • Salazar-Aguilar MA, Ríos-Mercado RZ, Cabrera-Ríos M (2011) New models for commercial territory design. Networks and Spatial Economics 11(3):487–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard E (1978) Theoretical underpinnings of the gravity hypothesis. Geogr Anal 10(4):386–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard E (1979) Geographic potentials. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 69(3):438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock R (1983) Distance and the utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 17(9):563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W (1976) Spatial interaction patterns. J Environ Syst 6:271–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga RS (2009) Matrix Iterative Analysis. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Yinyu Ye and Shuzhong Zhang for their helpful suggestions.

J.G.C. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Boeing Company, DARPA YFA grant N66001-12-1-4218, NSF award CMMI-1234585, ONR grant N000141210719, and AFOSR award 11819022.

R.D. gratefully acknowledges the support of the Boeing Company and ONR grant N000141210719.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Gunnar Carlsson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 7.16 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carlsson, J.G., Carlsson, E. & Devulapalli, R. Shadow Prices in Territory Division. Netw Spat Econ 16, 893–931 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9303-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9303-9

Keywords

Navigation