Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlations between the psychological peculiarities of an individual and the efficacy of a single neurofeedback session (by the EEG characteristics)

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Modifications of different EEG rhythms induced by a single neurofeedback session (by the EEG characteristics) directed toward an increase in the ratio of the spectral powers (SPs) of the α vs θ oscillations were compared with the psychological characteristics of the tested subjects (the group included 30 persons). A generally accepted neurofeedback technique was used; the intensity of acoustic white noise served as the feedback signal. EEG potentials were recorded from the C3 and C4 leads. Psychological testing was carried out using Eysenck’s (EPQ), Rusalov’s (OST), and (16 PF) questionnaires. The directions of changes in the SPs of EEG frequency components were found to significantly correlate with some individuality-related peculiarities of the tested subjects. The SP of the δ rhythm correlated with the EPQ scale “neuroticism,” OST scale “social plasticity,” and 16 PF factors H (“parmia”), I (“premsia”), and Q3 (“self-control of behavior”). The SP of the θ component demonstrated correlations with the OST scales “ergisity,” “plasticity,” and “social temp” and with 16 PF factors M (“autia”), Q4 (“frustration”), and Q1 (“exvia”). The SP of the α rhythm correlated with 16 PF factors Q3 (“self-control of behavior”), G (“strength of superEgo”), O (“hypothymia”), L (“protension”), and N (“shrewdness”). The SP of the β rhythm correlated with the OST scale “emotionality,” while that of the γ rhythm showed correlations with the 16 PF indices L (“protension”) and M (“autia”). Changes in the ratio of the α vs θ SPs correlated with the EPQ scale “neuroticism.” Thus, our data confirm the statement that a high individual variability of the results of a single (first in the series) neurofeedback session is to a great extent related to peculiarities of the individual psychological pattern of the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. I. Soroko and T. Zh. Musuraliev, “Possibilities for directed transformations of the EEG parameters in humans using a technique of adaptive biocontrol,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 21, No. 5, 5–17 (1995).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Ankoli and F. Green Kenneth, “Authoritarianism, introspection, and alpha wave biofeedback training,” Psychophysiology, 14, No. 1, 40–44 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Yamaguchi, “Characteristics of alpha-enhancement biofeedback training with eyes closed,” Tohoku Psychol. Folia, 39, No. 1, 40–50 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. V. Hard and J. Kamiya, “Anxiety change through electroencephalographic alpha feedback seen only in high anxiety subjects,” Science, 201, No. 4350, 79–80 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. N. Konareva, “Modifications of the EEG frequency pattern in humans related to a single neurofeedback session,” Neurophysiology, 37, Nos. 5/6, 388–395 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. F. Bourlachouk and S. M. Morozov, A Vocabulary/Reference Book for Psychodiagnostics [in Russian], Piter, Saint Petersburg (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. M. Mel’nikov and L. T. Yampol’skii, Introduction to Experimental Psychology of the Persomality [in Russian], Prosveshchenie, Moscow (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. M. Rusalov, “An objective and a communicative aspects of the human’s temperament,” Psikhol. Zh., 10, No. 1, 10–21 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. A. Zhirmunskaya, A. I. Rybnikov, and S. M. Lozhnikov, “Functional importance of some phenomena of electroencephalogram in humans,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 8, No. 5, 749–756 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. N. Konareva, Individual Peculiarities of Event-Related EEG Potentials in Humans [in Russian], Cand. Thesis, Biol. Sci., Simferopol’ (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Roth and G. Sask, “Relations between slow (4 cps) EEG activity, sensorimotor speed, and psychopathology,” Int. J. Psychophysiol., 9, No. 2, 121–127 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. É. A. Golubeva, S. A. Izyumova, R. S. Trubnikova, and V. V. Pechenkov, “Correlation of the rhythms of the encephalogram with the main properties of the nervous system,” in: Problems of Differential Psychophysiology [in Russian], V. D. Nebylitsyn (Ed.), Vol. 8, Nauka, Moscow (1974), pp. 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. N. Rusalova and I. G. Kalashnikova, “Psychophysiological testing of temperament,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 42, No. 1, 44–50 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. N. S. Leytes, É. A. Golubeva, and B. R. Kadyrov, “A dynamic aspect of mental activity and an activated state of the brain,” in: Psychophysiological Studies of Intellectual Self-Regulation and Activity [in Russian], V. M. Rusalov and É. A. Golubeva (eds.), Nauka, Moscow (1980), pp. 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T.L. Bennet, “Bioelectrical activity of the hippocampus,” in: Functional Importance of Electrical Processes in the Brain [in Russian], V. S. Rusinov (ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1977), pp. 232–239.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Ermiš, “EEG and autonomic correlates of extraversion and neuroticism,” Activ. Nerv. Super., 27, No. 3, 221–223 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. F. W. Deakin and K. A. Exley, “Personality and male-female influences on the EEG alpha rhythm, ” Biol. Psychol., 8, No. 4, 285–290 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. G. O’Gorman and J. M. Lloyd, “Extraversion, impulsiveness, and EEG alpha activity,” Pers. Individ. Differ., 8, No. 2, 169–174 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. R. Turovskaya, “Individual peculiarities of the autonomic balance and equilibrium of the main neural processes,” in: Psychology and Psychophysiology of Individual Differences [in Russian], A. A. Smirnov (ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1977), pp. 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. J. Knott, “Neuroelectrical activity related to panic disorder,” Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiat., 14, No. 5, 697–707 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. I. V. Ravich-Shcherbo, T. M. Maryutina, and E. L. Grigorenko, Psychogenetics [in Russian] Aspekt Press, Moscow (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. F. Lubar, “Neocortical dynamics: implication for understanding the role of neurofeedback and related techniques for the enhancement of attention,” Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 22, No. 2, 111–126 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. V. J. Knott, A. L. Hovson, and M. Perugimi, “The effect of acute tryptophan depletion and fenfluramine on quantative EEG and mood in healthy male subjects,” Biol. Psychiat., 46, No. 2, 229–238 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. N. Sadato, S. Nakamura, and T. Oohashi, “Neural networks for generation and suppression of alpha rhythm: a PET study,” NeuroReport, 9, No. 5, 893–897 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. T. W. Kjaer, C. Bertelsen, P. Piccini, et al., “Increased dopamine tone during meditation-induced change of consciousness,” Cognitive Brain Res., 13, No. 2, 255–259 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. V. Panyushkina, N. S. Kurova, S. F. Egorov, and V. V. Koshelev “Individual EEG reactions of healthy humans to mutually antagonistic noradrenotropic influences,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 44, No. 3, 457–469 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. G. Graeff, M. Silva, C. M. Del Ben, et al., “Comparison between two models of experimental anxiety in healthy volunteers and panic disorder patients,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 25, Nos. 7/8, 753–759 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. M. Bagby, R. D. Levitan, S. H. Kennedy, et al., “Selective alteration of personality in response to noradrenergic and serotonergic antidepressant medication in depressed sample: evidence of non-specificity,” Psychiat. Res., 86, No. 3, 211–216 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. J. R. Kaplan, S. B. Manuck, M. B. Fontenot, and J. J. Mann, “Central nervous system monoamine correlates of social dominance in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis),” Neuropsychopharmacology, 26, No. 4, 431–443 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. E. Tancer, R. B. Mailman, M. B. Stein, et al., “Neuroendocrine responsivity to monoaminergic system probes in generalized social phobia,” Anxiety, 1, No. 5, 216–223 (1994).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. T. H. Rammsayer, “Dopamine and extraversion: differential responsivity may be the key,” Behav. Brain Sci., 22, No. 3, 535–536 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. K. J. Ressler and C. B. Nemeroff, “Role of norepinephrine in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders,” Biol. Psychiat., 46, No. 9, 1219–1233 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Sheperd, Neurobiology [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. I. Kotlyar and A. S. Pivovarov, “Molecular mechanisms of the neuronal plasticity in learning: role of secondary messengers,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 29, No. 2, 195 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. N. Khayutin and L. P. Dmitrieva, “Formation of early species-specific behavior. The role of environmental factors,” Usp. Physiol. Nauk, 21, No. 4, 23–49 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vernadskii Tavricheskii National University, Simferopol’ Crimean Autonomic Republic, Ukraine

    I. N. Konareva

Authors
  1. I. N. Konareva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. N. Konareva.

Additional information

Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 239–247, May–June, 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konareva, I.N. Correlations between the psychological peculiarities of an individual and the efficacy of a single neurofeedback session (by the EEG characteristics). Neurophysiology 38, 201–208 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-006-0047-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-006-0047-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation