Skip to main content
Log in

Between the Individual and the Collective: Ford Madox Ford, Peter Kropotkin and the Spirit of Collaboration

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a letter to his daughter Julie dated 11 September 1935, the British author and editor Ford Madox Ford wrote that he had “no politics at all except the belief––which I share with Lenin––that the only thing that can save the world is the abolition of all national feelings and the prevailing of the Small Producer” (Ford and Bowen 1993, p. 441). While scholars have related Ford’s social vision as displayed in his first magazine The English Review (1908–1910) and in his war tetralogy Parade’s End (1924–1928) to C.H. Douglas’s Social Credit Movement (Green 1981) and Tory Radicalism (Gasiorek 2002), this essay argues that Ford’s political philosophy of the thirties transcends national boundaries, making these predominantly British identifications less relevant for his later writings: Provence (1935), Great Trade Route (1937) and A History of Our Own Times (1988). It asserts that Ford recalls an earlier connection with the Russian prince, scientist and Anarchist Communist Peter Kropotkin (1842–1921) to advocate a society consisting of small, self-sufficient communities. It traces the similarities between Ford’s and Kropotkin’s philosophies in the areas of politics, historiography and the local and demonstrates that Ford shares with Kropotkin a belief in mutual aid and self-jurisdiction as two main factors for evolution. Rather than considering Ford’s essays of the thirties as mere expressions of nostalgia and francophilia (Judd 1990), the article shows that Ford was concerned with the political situation of his own day and saw Anarchist Communism as the logical solution to an integration of individual and communal interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antliff, A. (2007). Anarchist modernism: Art, politics, and the first American avant-garde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, J. W. (1981). A liberal descent: Victorian historians and the English past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahm, C. (1989). Kropotkin and the rise of revolutionary anarchism 1872–1886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G. A. (1988). Foreword. In A history of our own times (pp. i–vii). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1924). Joseph Conrad: A personal remembrance. London: Duckworth & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1924–1928). Parade’s end. Everymen’s Library Edition. London: Random House, 1929.

  • Ford, F. M. (1930). The English novel: From the earliest days to the death of Joseph Conrad. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1932). Return to yesterday. Manchester: Carcanet, 1999.

  • Ford, F. M. (1933). It was the nightingale. Manchester: Carcanet, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1935). Provence: From minstrels to the machine. Manchester: Carcanet, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1937). Great trade route. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1938a). Mightier than the sword. London: G. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1938b). The march of literature : From Confucius to modern times. London: Allen and Unwin, 1947.

  • Ford, F. M. (1988). A history of our own times. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, F. M. (1990). Creative history and the historic sense. In S. J. Stang & R. Stang (Eds.), The Yale Review, 78(4), 511–524.

  • Ford, F. M., & Bowen, S. (1993). France, England, and America, 1929–1939. In S. J. Stang & K. Cochran (Eds.), The correspondence of Ford Madox Ford and Stella Bowen. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorek, A. (2002). The politics of cultural nostalgia: History and tradition in Ford Madox Ford’s Parade’s End. Literature and History, Special Issue Wartime Refractions, 11(2), 52–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (1981). Ford Madox Ford: Prose and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, S. J. (2005). Culture and new historicism towards a poetics of culture. In M. Payne (Ed.), The Greenblatt reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. (2002). Fragmenting modernism: Ford Madox Ford, the novel and the Great War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueffer (Ford), F. M. (1914). On impressionism. In F. MacShane (Ed.), The critical writings of Ford Madox Ford (pp. 33–55). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueffer (Ford), F. M. (1911). Ancient Lights and Certain New Reflections: Being the Memories of a Young Man. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, L. (1988). A poetics of postmodernism: History, theory, fiction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, F., & Burkitt, B. (1997). The political economy of social credit and guild socialism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, A. (1990). Ford Madox Ford. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenner, H. (1975). The Pound era: The age of Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot, James Joyce and Wyndham Lewis. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1901). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. In E. Capouya & K. Tompkins (Eds.), The essential Kropotkin (pp. 170–207). London: MacMillan, 1975.

  • Kropotkin, P. (1909). The Great French Revolution: 1789–1793. In E. Capouya & K. Tompkins (Eds.), The essential Kropotkin (pp. 208–225). London: MacMillan, 1975.

  • Kropotkin, P. (1912). Modern science and anarchism. In R. N. Baldwin (Ed.), Kropotkin’s revolutionary pamphlets. New York: Dover Publications, 1970.

  • Lamberti, E. (2004). Writing history: Ford and the debate on ‘objective truth’ in the late twentieth century. In J. Wiesenfarth (Ed.), History and representation in Ford Madox Ford’s writings (pp. 99–110). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacShane, F. (Ed.). (1964). Introduction. In The critical writings of Ford Madox Ford (pp. ix-xiv). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Saunders, M. (2004). Critical biography: Rhetoric, tone and autobiography in Ford’s critical writings. In J. Wiesenfarth (Ed.), History and representation in Ford Madox Ford’s writings (pp. 173–188). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shpayer-Makov, H. (1987). The reception of Peter Kropotkin in Britain, 1886–1917. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, 19(3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stang, S. J. (1988). Introduction. In A history of our own times (pp. xv–xxii). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit Van Puymbroeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Puymbroeck, B. Between the Individual and the Collective: Ford Madox Ford, Peter Kropotkin and the Spirit of Collaboration. Neophilologus 97, 231–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-011-9293-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-011-9293-x

Keywords

Navigation