Skip to main content
Log in

Pygmalion’s Folly and the Author’s Craft in Jean de Meun’s Roman de la Rose

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article studies Jean de Meun’s reworking of the Pygmalion myth in his continuation of the Romance of the Rose. Through a close textual reading, we argue that Jean de Meun in his retelling of the myth mimetically interweaves Pygmalion’s folly and the author’s writing. Although earlier critical studies have recognized the figure of Pygmalion in the Rose as symbolizing the poet, they have generally overlooked how Pygmalion’s folly operates on the level of authorship. We will argue that the Cypriot sculptor’s ‘foolish’ transformation of matter (i.e. his statue of Galatea becoming ‘real’) is imitated in Jean’s transformation of poetic matter into a tangible written artifact. Moreover, this artistic substantiation through madness stages authorial craft as a mimesis of divine power in order to confer to the author a quasi-demiurgic status of deus artifex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Kevin Brownlee (1982) ArticleTitle“Orpheus’ Song Re-Sung: Jean de Meun’s Reworking of Metamorphoses X,” Romance Philology 36 IssueID2 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, Kevin. “Jean de Meun and the Limits of Romance. Genius as Rewriter of Guillaume de Lorris,” in Romance: Generic Transformation from Chrétien de Troyes to Cervantes. Eds. Kevin Brownlee and Marina Scordilis. Hanover: UP of New England for Dartmouth Coll., 1985.

  • Brownlee, Kevin. “Pygmalion, Mimesis, and the Multiple Endings of the Roman de la Rose,” Yale French Studies 95 - Rereading Allegory: Essays in Memory of Daniel Poirion (1999): 193–211.

  • Cerquiglini-Toulet, Jacqueline. “Fullness and Emptiness: Shortages and Storehouses of Lyric Treasure in the Fourtheenth and Fifteenth Centuries,” in Contexts: Style and Values in Medieval Art and Literature. Special issue of Yale French Studies. Eds. Daniel Poirion and Nancy Freeman Regalado (1991): 224–239.

  • Ernst Curtius (1953) European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages Pantheon New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragonetti, Roger. “Pygmalion ou les pièges de la fiction dans le Roman de la Rose,” in Orbis medievalis. Mélanges de langue et de littérature offerts à R. R. Bezzola. Eds. Georges Güntert et al., Berne: Francke, 1978, pp. 89–111.

  • Nancy Freeman Regalado (1981) ArticleTitle“«Des contraires choses». La fonction poétique de la citation et des exempla dans le Roman de la Rose de Jean de Meun,” Littérature 41 62–81

    Google Scholar 

  • John Fleming (1969) The Roman de la Rose. A Study in Allegory and Iconography Princeton University Press Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume de Lorris and Jean de Meun. The Romance of the Rose. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. Trans. Charles Dahlberg.

  • Guillaume de Lorris and Jean de Meun. Le roman de la rose. Ed. Félix Lecoy, 3 vols. Paris: Champion, 1973.

  • Alan Gunn (1952) The Mirror of Love. A Reinterpretation of “The Romance of the Rose” Texas Tech Press Lubbock, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarah-Grace Heller (2000) ArticleTitle“Fashioning a Woman: The Vernacular Pygmalion in the Roman de la Rose,” Medievalia et Humanistica 27 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Hill (1974) ArticleTitle“Narcissus, Pygmalion, and the Castration of Saturn: Two Mythographical Themes in the Roman de la Rose,” Studies in Philology 71 IssueID4 404–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Hillis Miller (1990) Versions of Pygmalion Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia Huot (1987) From Song to Book. The Poetics of Writing in Old French Lyric and Lyrical Narrative Poetry Cornell University Press Ithaca and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia Huot (1993) The Romance of the Rose and its Medieval Readers: Interpretation, Reception, Manuscript Transmission Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia Huot (2003) Madness in Medieval French Literature Identities Found and Lost Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovid (1976) (Publius Ovidius Naso) Metamorphoses Harvard University Press Cambridge Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Poirion (1970) “Narcisse et Pygmalion dans le Roman de la Rose,” Raymond J. Cormier Urban T. Holmes (Eds) Essays in Honor of Louis Francis Solano Chapel Hill, North Carolina University of North Carolina Press 153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitti, Karl. “From Clerc to Poète: The Relevance of the Romance of the Rose to Machaut’s World,” in Machaut’s World: Science and Art in the Fourteenth Century. Eds. Madeleine Pelner Cosman and Bruce Chandler (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 314). New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1978.

  • Walters, Lori. “Reading the Rose: Literacy and the Presentation of the Roman de la Rose in Medieval Manuscripts,” Romanic Review 85 (1–1994): 1–26.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinier Leushuis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leushuis, R. Pygmalion’s Folly and the Author’s Craft in Jean de Meun’s Roman de la Rose . Neophilologus 90, 521–533 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-005-4232-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11061-005-4232-3

Keywords

Navigation