Abstract
Poetry, fiction, and the language of the theatre make for powerful articulations of the imaginary’s engagement with what it means to be human. Critical posthumanist scholarship has been attentive to this tradition, often looking to literature for representations of different figures of the posthuman. This chapter considers critical posthumanism’s readiness to maintain literary reference as a staple of posthumanist theory, and asks to what extent this remains urgent in the context of post-print and post-literary culture and among immanent challenges to the assumptions underwriting human “meaning.” Linked to this is literature’s capacity to read posthumanism back. The suggestion is that literature’s affording of ideas and situations for posthumanism to think with appears undimmed, not least because its forms and modalities have themselves evolved, and not necessarily more slowly than posthumanism’s own transformations. Thinking about literature’s evolving relation to, and relating of, the posthuman, it emerges, therefore provides cause not so much for critical inattention to literature, as motivation for critique’s reattachment to literature’s becomings. In that reattachment critical posthumanism has its own part to play, and one that can redefine it in turn.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Anderson, A., Felski, R., & Moi, T. (2019). Character: Three inquiries into literary studies. University of Chicago Press.
Armand, L. (2020). The conceptualist ends of writing and the end of conceptualism. CounterText, 6(3), 63–77.
Askin, R. (2017). Objects. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman (pp. 170–181). Cambridge University Press.
Badmington, N. (Ed.). (2000). Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Badmington, N. (2004). Alien Chic: Posthumanism and the other within. Routledge.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Barth, J. (1984). The literature of exhaustion. In The Friday book: Essays and other nonfiction (pp. 62–76). G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Bloom, H. (1998). Shakespeare: The invention of the human. Riverhead Books.
Borg, R. (2019). Fantasies of self-mourning: Modernism, the posthuman and the finite. Brill.
Borsuk, A. (2018). The book. MIT Press.
Borsuk, A., & Bouse, B. (2016). Between page and screen. SpringGun Press.
Bradley, A. (2011). Originary technicity: The theory of technology from Marx to Derrida. Palgrave Macmillan.
Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Polity.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity.
Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity.
Brown, B. (2003). A sense of things: The object matter of American literature. University of Chicago Press.
Callus, I. (2016). Drop the “proto-”: Posthumanism and prefiguration. Word and Text, 6, 165–171.
Callus, I., & Aquilina, M. (2017). E-Literature. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman (pp. 121–138). Cambridge University Press.
Calvino, I. (2010). The Complete Cosmicomics. (M. McLaughlin, T. Parks, & W. Weaver, Trans.). Penguin.
Campana, J., & Maisano, S. (Eds.). (2016). Renaissance posthumanism. Fordham University Press.
Cave, T. (2016). Thinking with literature: Towards a cognitive criticism. Oxford University Press.
Cayley, J. (2018). Grammalepsy: Essays on digital language art. Bloomsbury Academic.
Citton, Y. (2017a). Lire, interpréter, actualiser: Pourquoi les études littéraires? Éditions Amsterdam.
Citton, Y. (2017b). The ecology of attention (B. Norman, Trans.). Polity.
Clarke, B. (1995). Allegories of writing: The subject of metamorphosis. SUNY Press.
Clarke, B. (2008). Posthuman metamorphoses: Narrative and systems. University of Minnesota Press.
Clarke, B., & Rossini, M. (Eds.). (2017). The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. J. (2015). Stone: An ecology of the inhuman. University of Minnesota Press.
Colebrook, C. (2014). Death of the Posthuman: Essays on extinction (Vol. 1). Open Humanities Press.
Colebrook, C. (2017). Futures. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the Posthuman (pp. 196–208). Cambridge University Press.
Collins, C. (2013). Paleopoetics: The evolution of the preliterate imagination. Columbia University Press.
Coover, R. (2020). The digital imaginary: Literature and cinema of the database. Bloombsury Academic.
CounterText: A Journal for the Study of the Post-Literary (2015). Edinburgh University Press.
Dante [Alighieri]. (1993). Paradiso (T. Di Salvo, Ed.). Zanichelli.
Dante [Alighieri]. (2007). Paradiso (R. Hollander & J. Hollander, Trans.). Anchor Books.
De Bruin-Molé, M. (2018). Gothic remixed: Monster mashups and Frankenfictions in 21st-century culture. Bloomsbury Academic.
de Grainville, J-B. F. X. (2002). The last man (I. F. Clarke & M. Clarke, Trans.). Wesleyan University Press.
Dermisache, M. (2018). Selected writings (D. Owen & L. Pearson, Eds.). Siglio/Ugly Duckling Press.
Derrida, J. (1992). Acts of literature (D. Attridge, Ed.). Routledge.
Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (P. Kamuf, Trans.). Routledge.
Derrida, J. (2006). The animal that therefore I am (D. Wills, Trans.). Fordham University Press.
Dillard, A. (1989). The writing life. Harper & Row.
Don’t Look Up. (2021). Dir. and screenplay Adam McKay. Hyperobject Industries.
Dworkin, C. (2020). Radium of the word: A poetics of materiality. University of Chicago Press.
Easthope, A. (1991). Literary into cultural studies. Routledge.
Elstermann, A. (2020). Computer-generated text as a Posthuman mode of literature production. Open Library of the Humanities, 6(2), 1–23.
Farrier, D. (2019). Anthropocene poetics: Deep time, sacrifice zones, and extinction. University of Minnesota Press.
Frisch, M. (2007). Man in the Holocene (G. Skelton, Trans.). Dalkey Archive.
Funkhouser, C. (2011). Prehistoric digital poetry: An archaeology of forms 1959–1995. University of Alabama Press.
Graham, E. L. (2002). Representations of the post/human: Monsters, aliens and others in popular culture. Manchester University Press.
Graham, J. (2017). Fast. HarperCollins.
Gray, C. H. (Ed.). (1995). The Cyborg handbook. Routledge.
Grech, M. (2016). Proto-Posthumanisms. Word and Text, 6, 5–8.
Grech, M. (2022, forthcoming). Spectrality and survivance: Living the Anthropocene. Rowman & Littlefield.
Grosz, E. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics and the limits of materialism. Columbia University Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Harvey, W. J. (1965). Character and the novel. Cornell University Press.
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became Posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2005). My mother was a computer: Digital subjects and literary texts. University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2006). Traumas of code. Critical Inquiry, 33(1), 136–157.
Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2010). After shocks: Posthuman ambivalence. Postmedieval, 1(1–2), 262–271.
Hayles, N. K. (2021). Postprint: Books and becoming computational. Columbia University Press.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury.
Herbrechter, S. (2017). Critical Posthumanism. Genealogy of the Posthuman. https://criticalposthumanism.net/critical-posthumanism/
Herbrechter, S. (2021). Before humanity: Posthumanism and ancestrality. Brill.
Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (2008). What is a posthumanist reading? Angelaki, 13(1), 95–111.
Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (2009). Cy-Borges: Memories of the Posthuman in the work of Jorge Luis Borges. Bucknell University Press.
Herbrechter, S., & Callus, I. (Eds.). (2012). Posthumanist Shakespeares. Palgrave Macmillan.
Herbrechter, S., I. Callus, & M. Rossini (Eds.) (2016). European posthumanism. Routledge.
Hergenrader, T. (2019). Collaborative worldbuilding for writers and gamers. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hochman, B. (1985). Character in literature. Cornell University Press.
Joy, E. A., & Dionne, C. (Eds.). (2010). When did we become Posthuman? Postmedieval 1(1–2).
Joyce, M. (2000). Othermindedness: The emergence of network culture. University of Michigan Press.
Lacoue-Labarthe, P., & Nancy, J.-L. (1988). The literary absolute: The theory of literature in German romanticism (P. Barnard & C. Lester, Trans.). SUNY Press.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern [1991] (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Levenston, E. A. (1992). The stuff of literature: Physical aspects of text and their relation to literary meaning. SUNY Press.
Levin, H. (1952). The Overreacher: A study of Christopher Marlowe. Harvard University Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1992). The postmodern explained to children: Correspondence 1982–1985 (J. Pefanis & T. Morgan, Eds.). Turnaround.
Martin, T. (2017). Contemporary drift: Genre, historicism and the problem of the present. Columbia University Press.
McCarthy, C. (2006). The road. Alfred A. Knopf.
McCarthy, T. (2021). The making of incarnation. Penguin.
McGann, J. (2001). Radiant textuality: Literature after the world wide web. Palgrave.
McGurl, M. (2012). The Posthuman comedy. Critical Inquiry, 38, 533–553.
Meillassoux, Q. (2009). After finitude: An essay on the nature of contingency. (R. Brassier, Trans.) Continuum.
More, T. (2002). Utopia (G. M. Logan & M. R. Adams, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. University of Minnesota Press.
Morton, T. (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with nonhuman people. Verso.
Moslund, S. P., Marcussen, M. K., & Pedersen, M. K. (2020). Introduction. In S. P. Moslund, M. K. Marcussen, & M. K. Pedersen (Eds.), How literature comes to matter: Post-anthropocentric approaches to fiction (pp. 1–27). Edinburgh University Press.
Muller, C. J. (2016). Prometheanism: Technology, digital culture and human obsolescence. Rowman & Littlefield.
Nayar, P. (2014). Posthumanism. Polity.
Neyrat, F. (2020). Literature and materialisms. Routledge.
Ovid. (1987). Metamorphoses (A. D. Melville, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Parks, T. (1993). Shear. William Heinemann.
Powers, R. (2018). The overstory. W. W. Norton.
Powers, R. (2021). Bewilderment. W. W. Norton.
Pressman, J. (2014). Digital modernism: Making it new in new media. Oxford University Press.
Pressman, J. (2020). Bookishness: Loving books in a digital age. Columbia University Press.
Royle, N. (2011). Veering: A theory of literature. Edinburgh University Press.
Rutsky, A. L. (1999). High Technē: Art and technology from the machine aesthetic to the Posthuman. University of Minnesota Press.
Ryan, M.-L. (2006). Avatars of story. University of Minnesota Press.
Sallis, J. (1994). Stone. Indiana University Press.
Shelley, M. (1992). Frankenstein. Introd. W. Lesser. Everyman’s library.
Smith, M., & J. Morra (Eds.). (2006). The prosthetic impulse: From a posthuman present to a biocultural future. MIT Press.
Sorgner, S. L. (2020). Transhumanism. In M. R. Thomsen & J. Wamberg (Eds.), The Bloomsbury handbook of posthumanism (pp. 35–46). Bloomsbury Academic.
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus (R. Beardsworth & G. Collins, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
Tabbi, J. (Ed.). (2018). The Bloomsbury handbook of electronic literature. Bloomsbury Academic.
Taylor, M. A. (2013). Universes without us: Posthuman cosmologies in American literature. University of Minnesota Press.
Thomsen, M. R. (2013). The new human in literature: Posthuman visions of changes in body, mind and society after 1900. Bloomsbury Academic.
Tillyard, E. M. W. (1943). The Elizabethan world picture. Chatto & Windus.
Tomasula, S. (2018). Our tools make us (and our literature) post. In J. Tabbi (Ed.), The Bloomsbury handbook of electronic literature (pp. 39–58). Bloomsbury Academic.
Trexler, A. (2015). Anthropocene fictions: The novel in a time of climate change. University of Virginia Press.
Ulmer, G. (1988). The puncept in grammatology. In J. Culler (Ed.), On puns: The foundation of letters (pp. 164–189). Blackwell.
Vermeulen, P. (2020). Literature and the anthropocene. Routledge.
Wallace, J. (2005). D. H. Lawrence, science and the posthuman. Palgrave Macmillan.
Weisman, A. (2007). The world without us. St. Martin’s Press.
Wills, D. (1995). Prosthesis. Stanford University Press.
Wills, D. (2008). Dorsality: Thinking back through technology and politics. University of Minnesota Press.
Wills, D. (2016). Inanimation: Theories of inorganic life. University of Minnesota Press.
Wolfe, C. (2003). Animal rites: American culture, the discourse of species, and posthumanist theory. University of Chicago Press.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Callus, I. (2022). Literature and Posthumanism. In: Herbrechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., John Müller, C. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04958-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04957-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04958-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities