Abstract
Purpose
Astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are mainly diffuse primary brain tumors harboring a diagnostic and prognostically favorable isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation. They are still incurable besides growing molecular knowledge and therapy options. Circumscribed astrocytomas are also discussed here, although they represent a separate entity despite similarities in the nomenclature.
Methods
We reviewed clinical trials, preclinical approaches as well as guideline recommendations form the major scientific Neuro-Oncology organizations for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas according to PRISMA guidelines.
Results
After histopathological diagnosis and eventually a maximal safe resection, patients with good prognostic factors may be followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). If further treatment is necessary, either after diagnosis or at progression, diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are mainly treated with combined radiochemotherapy or maximal safe resection followed by combined radiochemotherapy according to current guidelines based on randomized trials. Circumscribed gliomas like pilocytic astrocytomas, CNS WHO grade 1, or pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, CNS WHO grade 2, are often treated with surgery alone. Current approaches for therapy optimization include decision of the best chemotherapy regimen. The IDH mutation presents a rational target for small molecule inhibition and immune therapy in diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, while the BRAF pathway is frequently mutated and treatable in circumscribed gliomas.
Conclusion
Despite establishment of standard treatment approaches for gliomas that include resection, radio- and chemotherapy, there is a lack of effective treatments for progressive disease. Immune- and targeted therapies are currently investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Relevant advances in the molecular diagnostics of brain tumors have been made in recent years, which led to the inclusion of genetic markers into the current 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system [1]. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 mutations, 1p/19q codeletions and TP53/ATRX status became mandatory diagnostic and prognostic markers in glioma.
IDH mutations define distinct tumors and the diagnosis of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas is no longer based on pure histological appearance, but on the presence of an IDH mutation (both entities) and on the presence (oligodendroglioma) or absence of 1p/19q codeletion which is often associated with loss of ATRX (astrocytoma). This classification allows a better prognostication compared to the earlier histology-based classifications [2].
As a separate group with similarities mainly by the historical terminology, pilocytic astrocytomas are defined by alterations in the MAPK pathway, often characteristic and targetable BRAF mutations. In addition to their lower molecular complexity, they are less heterogenous and non-diffuse, allowing for local treatments. Especially surgery, but also radiotherapy, are effective long-term measures to help or even cure patients [3]. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, CNS WHO grade 2, are often characterized by a BRAF V600 mutation [4].
Methylation profiling has recently allowed a more refined diagnosis of brain tumors [5]. IDH mutations induce a neomorphic function of the enzyme [6] which leads to hypermethylation and changes in the immune environment [7]. Therefore, IDH mutant gliomas show methylation profiles distinct from IDH wild-type gliomas. Consequently, the WHO classification defines glioblastoma only in IDH wild-type situation, as well as diffuse hemispheric and midline glioma, and groups former secondary glioblastoma into the class of astrocytoma, IDH mutant, WHO grade 4 [1].
All the recent advances in molecular understanding have potentially strong implications on current therapy and clinical trials. However, there is still a gap towards routine clinical usage of molecular profiles for clinical decision making. Additionally, most gliomas are not curable today, underlining the need for further treatment development. New targeted- and immune-therapies have entered clinical trials in recent years, offering potential for identifying successful biomarker-drug combinations and treatment stratification based on molecular profiles. This review summarizes the current standard of care for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, highlights recent advances in clinical studies and gives an outlook for future perspectives.
Methods
Search strategy
A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement was implemented. References were retrieved from the PubMed database using the search terms “glioma”, “astrocytoma”, “oligodendroglioma”, “pilocytic astrocytoma”, “pleomorphic xantoastrocytoma”, “trial”, “clinical”, “surgery”, “radiotherapy”, “chemotherapy” and “immunotherapy” as of August 31st, 2022. Publications between September 1st, 2003, and August 31st, 2022 (span of 20 years) were considered.
Only original research papers with available full text in English were included. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included. Case reports, review papers, commentaries, editorials, and meeting abstracts were excluded. Uncontrolled trials were only included in case of high conceptual importance as agreed within the authors. Only studies that included a tumor entity relevant for the scope of this review (astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant or astrocytoma that fall in the group of circumscribed gliomas) were included. Furthermore, information on histology and at least IDH and 1p/19q status should be described in the publication to allow judgment based on the current WHO classification. For conventional treatments, guidelines of the scientific associations EANO, ASCO, SNO and EURACAN were analyzed for reference and bias reduction [8,9,10].
Research for the preclinical evidence and emerging treatments section was identified using similar search terms. Clinical and preclinical studies with high translational relevance were included as agreed within the authors.
Study selection
Initial literature analysis was performed by reviewing titles and abstracts of identified papers and selection based on above mentioned criteria. Full text of relevant articles was extracted. We identified nine completed and three ongoing clinical trials with published study protocols which were included in the analysis (Table 1).
Results
Molecular features of astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma
According to the current WHO classification astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas are defined as IDH1/2 mutant tumors, with the exemption of circumscribed gliomas that include entities like pilocytic astrocytoma and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma as well as pediatric type gliomas [1]. The most common IDH mutation is the IDH1(R132H) mutation. Oligodendrogliomas are defined by 1p/19q codeletion, while astrocytomas are 1p/19q non-codeleted tumors with ATRX loss. The term oligoastrocytoma is not in use anymore since morphologically mixed tumors can regularly be assigned to either astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma based on the above-mentioned molecular markers [11].
In the next sections, treatment options in the three groups of circumscribed and diffuse astrocytomas as well as oligodendrogliomas are described (Fig. 1). Pediatric type low grade gliomas are not covered in this review. Furthermore, according to the recent WHO classification, diffuse gliomas without IDH mutation are not covered as they predominantly harbor molecular features of glioblastoma.
Current standard of treatment for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas
Circumscribed astrocytomas
The recent WHO classification subclassifies circumscribed astrocytomas in pilocytic astrocytoma, high-grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP), pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and subependymal giant cell astrocytoma. Recently, guidelines for this new group were published by EANO/EURACAN/SNO [10]. Pilocytic astrocytomas show a low rate of malignant progression. Main treatment is surgical resection. Radiotherapy of the tumor region is advised if there are no surgical options [12] and if there is radiographic evidence of progression. Pilocytic astrocytomas harbor alterations in the MAPK signaling pathway [13] which can be regarded as a therapeutic avenue for patients where neither operation nor radiotherapy is a viable option. Pending on the exact molecular alteration, there are pharmacologic approaches with selective BRAF and MEK inhibitors [14]. In the extremely rare instance of HGAP, patients undergo surgical intervention followed by radiochemotherapy [15, 16].
Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, CNS WHO grade 2, are resected microsurgically. Radiotherapy may be indicated for patients with partial resection, tumor progression, or inoperability. Pharmacologic inhibition of the BRAF pathway when a BRAF V600 mutation is detected and parallel inhibition of MEK to prevent rapid development of resistance appears to be helpful for some patients [17] and is currently under controlled clinical evaluation. Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma with CNS WHO grade 3 are treated similarly to astrocytoma, IDH mutant with resection followed by sequential radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide. In tumors with CNS WHO grade 2, radiochemotherapy can be delayed to the moment of progressive disease as surgery is potentially curative. The frequent BRAF V600E mutation offers the possibility for combined BRAF/MEK inhibition [14]. Subependymal giant cell astrocytomas typically arise in patients with TSC1/2 mutation. These tumors show responses to mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibition with everolimus in regards of tumor growth and seizure control [18], and thus everolimus has been approved by FDA and EMA. Following full dose treatment, a reduced maintenance dose of everolimus appears reasonable to keep tumor stability [19].
Diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant
The mainstay of treatment for CNS WHO grade 2 diffuse astrocytoma is surgical resection [20], however this is not curative. Younger patients below age 40–45 that are asymptomatic besides having controllable seizures, can be followed up after full surgical resection. Patients above this age or with incomplete resection should be postoperatively receive radio-chemotherapy. Whereby the criterion of “age over 40” is a soft criterion, which will not necessarily mean to begin with the therapy in any case. The RTOG 9802 study showed a survival benefit of radiotherapy combined with procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine (PCV)-chemotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone [21]. However, treatment of patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma with temozolomide alone is probably inferior to radiotherapy based on data from the EORTC 22,033–26,033 trial [22]. Radiotherapy with PCV is now considered standard of care. Although randomized controlled trials are missing temozolomide is often used based on its good safety profile and convenient application. Radiotherapy can be administered in dosages between 45 and 54 Gy based on two clinical trials that did not show a difference between these and higher dose regimens [23, 24].
For patients with CNS WHO grade 3 diffuse astrocytoma maximal safe resection followed by radiochemotherapy is considered standard of care. In the NOA-04 trial, there was no relevant difference between PCV or temozolomide compared to radiotherapy alone [25]. The CATNON (EORTC-26,053) trial showed that radiotherapy followed by up to 12 cycles of temozolomide prolongs overall survival in IDH-mutant tumors [26]. Concomitant temozolomide given together with radiotherapy has no relevant further impact [27].
Diffuse astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 represents a new entity, without specific studies available. It is expected that those tumors were covered in multiple clinicals trials for glioblastoma as well as anaplastic astrocytoma. Accordingly, treatment consists of radiotherapy with temozolomide after maximal safe resection.
At time of progression, similar treatments as in the primary state of disease including re-operation, re-radiotherapy, and systemic regimens with temozolomide or lomustine are an option, however newer studies are missing that take also current standard first line therapy into account. Bevacizumab does not prolong progression-free or overall survival in patients with IDH-mutant astrocytoma in the TAVAREC trial [28] but could be a potential treatment in cases of symptomatic radionecrosis [29].
Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted
Oligodendrogliomas are classified into WHO Grade 2 and 3. Operation is the first and main treatment for WHO grade 2 oligodendrogliomas. Considerations regarding different postoperative approaches, namely watch and wait and adjuvant therapy in patients with tumors are managed similarly to astrocytoma, with the exemption that asymptomatic tumors with incomplete resection can be followed up initially. For adjuvant treatment, patients are treated with radiotherapy and 4–6 subsequent cycles of PCV chemotherapy based on the RTOG 9802 trial [21].
For patients with CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas two randomized controlled trials showed a survival benefit of administering PCV chemotherapy before or after radiotherapy following surgical resection [30, 31]. Chemotherapy with temozolomide alone seems to be inferior to radiotherapy or the combination of radiotherapy with temozolomide based on results of the original CODEL trial [32]. Whether temozolomide instead of PCV upfront together with radiotherapy is an option for patients with WHO grade 2 or 3 tumors is currently evaluated in the revised CODEL trial and discussed below. Treatment options at the time of progression include re-operation, re-radio- and chemotherapy and clinical trials using the IDH R132H vaccine [33].
Emerging treatments
Improving chemotherapeutic options
Ongoing clinical trials aim at improving the prognosis of patients with astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma and to reduce the burden of the therapy in patients with favorable prognosis. As oligodendrogliomas are rather chemosensitive, current trials focus on improving the chemotherapy regimen especially for 1p/19q codeleted tumors.
The IMPROVE-CODEL/NOA-18 trial aspires to prove the superiority of lomustine and temozolomide (CETEG) plus RT-PCV at progression over RT-PCV as determined at the level of overall survival without sustained functional deterioration for patients with oligodendroglioma [34]. The combination of lomustine and temozolomide has been proven to be beneficial over temozolomide in patients with MGMT promotor methylated glioblastoma in the NOA-09/CETEG trial [35] and is currently evaluated in patients with 1p/19q codeletion. The target is to explore the potential of delaying radiotherapy resulting in beneficial effects on quality of life in a population with rather good prognosis. The redefined CODEL trial [32] is now targeting to investigate whether PCV can be substituted by temozolomide which has the advantage of easier administration and a favorable side effect profile.
Targeting IDH
One common genetic hallmark of diffuse astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas is the IDH-mutation, which is presented on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II [36], making mutant IDH a potential target for immunotherapy and suitable for vaccination approaches. The single arm NOA-16 trial evaluated an IDH-specific peptide vaccination for astrocytoma with IDH1 R132H mutation in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed patients [37]. The study met the safety endpoint and immune responses were observed for most patients. Currently recruiting is the AMPLYFY-NEOVAC trial, assessing the IDH-specific vaccination alone or in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor avelumab against avelumab alone in a randomized comparative trial design [33].
Other approaches use small molecule inhibition of IDH. The IDH inhibitors enasidenib and ivosidenib were approved for treatment of IDH1/2 mutant acute myeloid leukemia [38, 39]. Preclinical studies showed delayed tumor growth through small molecule IDH1 inhibition in glioma cells [40]. In a phase I trial, the brain penetrant IDH1/2 inhibitor vorasidenib showed preliminary activity in progressive IDH mutant glioma [41]. The ongoing INDIGO trial evaluates vorasidenib against placebo in primary astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma patients with small lesions that would otherwise undergo watch and wait strategy [42].
Further molecular target-based treatment options
Molecular profile based individual treatment decisions after discussion in molecular tumor boards have been established in oncology [43, 44], and are particularly used in neuro oncology for patient cases of rare entities or progressive situations where no treatment options are available [45]. The drugs used are often repurposed from other indications, administered according to similar genetic vulnerabilities, and ranked in an order based on evidence levels [46]. For astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas based on the specific IDH mutation, PARP inhibitors are considered an option. IDH mutations can compromise the base excision repair system which could render tumors sensitive to PARP inhibitors [47] if the tumor harbors a TP53 wild-type gene [48]. However, a phase II study did not show a benefit of the PARP inhibitor veliparib in patients with non IDH mutated glioblastoma given in addition to temozolomide [49], but trial results of ongoing studies for IDH mutant glioma are pending [50]. Further potential molecular based treatment options that have been investigated in IDH mutant glioma include the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway that could be targeted with mTOR inhibition [51]. In low grade glioma with activation of the MEK/ERK pathway, aberrations in BRAF or NF1 MEK inhibition with trametinib or selumetinib revealed promising activity in pediatric patients [52, 53].
Preclinical evidence and further perspective
There is an increasing interest in immunotherapies for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. However, preclinical studies specifically designed for IDH mutant gliomas are rare, based on the difficulty of culturing IDH mutant glioma cells in preclinical models. Preclinical studies evaluated IDH inhibition together with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) to enhance efficacy of adoptive T-cell transfer of mice vaccinated with a IDH1-R132H peptide [7] or peptides derived from glioma-associated antigens [54]. Inhibition of IDH + ICI prolonged survival of mice compared to IDH inhibition or ICI alone which may translate into a promising rationale for the combination arm in the APLIFY-NEOVAC trial. Furthermore, inhibition of 2-hydroxyglutarate mediated immunosuppression with an AhR inhibitor in combination with ICI increased overall survival in mice with IDH mutant glioma [55].
Further prospective therapies could be derived from developments in IDH wildtype gliomas. Cell therapies have gained high interest in recent years. Especially chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are being assessed in clinical trials for glioma patients. GD2-CAR T cells showed promising results in three patients with H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas [56]. However, there is currently limited evidence for IDH mutant tumors being significantly affected by GD2-CAR T therapy.
Conclusion
Advances in molecular diagnostics have increased the biological knowledge of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas in recent years. A substantial number of large clinical trials have been completed and established the role of chemotherapy in addition to resection and radiotherapy in a multimodal treatment approach for gliomas. Several questions for further studies remain.
Of high importance is the unknown optimal chemotherapy regimen for diffuse gliomas. Temozolomide is an easy to administer option with a low side effect profile, but the equivalence to PCV has not been shown for oligodendrogliomas and grade 2 astrocytomas. WHO grade 4 astrocytomas present a new entity and it is currently unclear whether these tumors should be treated with concomitant temozolomide [57] or adjuvant temozolomide only [27]. Besides this, the role of upfront combinatorial chemotherapy without early radiotherapy for chemosensitive oligodendroglioma is currently being answered in the IMPROVE-CODEL trial [34]. However, these combinatorial treatments are not curative for most patients and progression is likely at some point in time. At tumor progression, established treatment options are limited to re-operation, re-radiotherapy, and chemotherapy with a lack of clearly effective treatment strategies at this stage.
New targeted advances with small molecules and immunotherapies currently focus on addressing the IDH mutation, one of the genetic hallmarks of astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma. Immunotherapeutic treatments are new promising approaches, but they have yet to overcome critical issues including the immunosuppressive tumoral microenvironment in the brain [58]. Finally, the overall effect of drugs used for molecular based targeted therapies as monotherapy, even when selected for high confidence targets, has often been low. Future clinical trials certainly have to evaluate rational combinatory therapies while balancing potential side effects.
References
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251.
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, Aldape KD et al (2015) Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med 372:2481–2498.
Salles D, Santino SF, Ribeiro DA et al (2022) The involvement of the MAPK pathway in pilocytic astrocytomas. Pathol Res Pract 232:153821.
Dias-Santagata D, Lam Q, Vernovsky K et al (2011) BRAF V600E mutations are common in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. PLoS ONE 6:e17948.
Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M et al (2018) DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555:469–474.
Pirozzi CJ, Yan H (2021) The implications of IDH mutations for cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18:645–661.
Bunse L, Pusch S, Bunse T et al (2018) Suppression of antitumor T cell immunity by the oncometabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate. Nat Med 24:1192–1203.
Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M et al (2021) EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18:170–186.
Mohile NA, Messersmith H, Gatson NT et al (2022) Therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults: ASCO-SNO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 40:403–426.
Ruda R, Capper D, Waldman AD et al (2022) Eano-Euracan-Sno Guidelines on circumscribed astrocytic GLIOMAS, Glioneuronal and Neuronaltumors. Neuro Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac188
Sahm F, Reuss D, Koelsche C et al (2014) Farewell to oligoastrocytoma: in situ molecular genetics favor classification as either oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma. Acta Neuropathol 128:551–559.
Brown PD, Buckner JC, O’Fallon JR et al (2004) Adult patients with supratentorial pilocytic astrocytomas: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1153–1160.
Jones DT, Hutter B, Jager N et al (2013) Recurrent somatic alterations of FGFR1 and NTRK2 in pilocytic astrocytoma. Nat Genet 45:927–932.
Wen PY, Stein A, van den Bent M et al (2022) Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant low-grade and high-grade glioma (ROAR): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2, basket trial. Lancet Oncol 23:53–64.
Reinhardt A, Stichel D, Schrimpf D et al (2018) Anaplastic astrocytoma with piloid features, a novel molecular class of IDH wildtype glioma with recurrent MAPK pathway, CDKN2A/B and ATRX alterations. Acta Neuropathol 136:273–291.
Bender K, Perez E, Chirica M et al (2021) High-grade astrocytoma with piloid features (HGAP): the Charite experience with a new central nervous system tumor entity. J Neurooncol 153:109–120.
Berzero G, Bellu L, Baldini C et al (2021) Sustained Tumor Control with MAPK inhibition in BRAF V600-Mutant adult glial and glioneuronal tumors. Neurology 97:e673–e683.
Krueger DA, Care MM, Holland K et al (2010) Everolimus for subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis. N Engl J Med 363:1801–1811.
Bobeff K, Krajewska K, Baranska D et al (2021) Maintenance therapy with Everolimus for Subependymal Giant Cell Astrocytoma in patients with tuberous sclerosis - final results from the EMINENTS Study. Front Neurol 12:581102.
Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS et al (2017) Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol 28:1942–1948.
Buckner JC, Shaw EG, Pugh SL et al (2016) Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med 374:1344–1355.
Baumert BG, Hegi ME, van den Bent MJ et al (2016) Temozolomide chemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk low-grade glioma (EORTC 22033–26033): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 intergroup study. Lancet Oncol 17:1521–1532.
Breen WG, Anderson SK, Carrero XW et al (2020) Final report from Intergroup NCCTG 86-72-51 (Alliance): a phase III randomized clinical trial of high-dose versus low-dose radiation for adult low-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol 22:830–837.
Karim AB, Maat B, Hatlevoll R et al (1996) A randomized trial on dose-response in radiation therapy of low-grade cerebral glioma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Study 22844. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:549–556.
Wick W, Roth P, Hartmann C et al (2016) Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. Neuro Oncol 18:1529–1537.
van den Bent MJ, Baumert B, Erridge SC et al (2017) Interim results from the CATNON trial (EORTC study 26053 – 22054) of treatment with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma: a phase 3, randomised, open-label intergroup study. Lancet 390:1645–1653.
van den Bent MJ, Tesileanu CMS, Wick W et al (2021) Adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON; EORTC study 26053 – 22054): second interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 22:813–823.
van den Bent MJ, Klein M, Smits M et al (2018) Bevacizumab and temozolomide in patients with first recurrence of WHO grade II and III glioma, without 1p/19q co-deletion (TAVAREC): a randomised controlled phase 2 EORTC trial. Lancet Oncol 19:1170–1179.
Fleischmann DF, Jenn J, Corradini S et al (2019) Bevacizumab reduces toxicity of reirradiation in recurrent high-grade glioma. Radiother Oncol 138:99–105.
Cairncross G, Wang M, Shaw E et al (2013) Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term results of RTOG 9402. J Clin Oncol 31:337–343.
van den Bent MJ, Brandes AA, Taphoorn MJ et al (2013) Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term follow-up of EORTC brain tumor group study 26951. J Clin Oncol 31:344–350.
Jaeckle KA, Ballman KV, van den Bent M et al (2021) CODEL: phase III study of RT, RT + TMZ, or TMZ for newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Analysis from the initial study design. Neuro Oncol 23:457–467.
Bunse L, Rupp AK, Poschke I et al (2022) AMPLIFY-NEOVAC: a randomized, 3-arm multicenter phase I trial to assess safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of IDH1-vac combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting programmed death-ligand 1 in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutant gliomas. Neurol Res Pract 4:20.
Wick A, Sander A, Koch M et al (2022) Improvement of functional outcome for patients with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 gliomas with co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL: the NOA-18 trial. BMC Cancer 22:645.
Herrlinger U, Tzaridis T, Mack F et al (2019) Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 393:678–688.
Schumacher T, Bunse L, Pusch S et al (2014) A vaccine targeting mutant IDH1 induces antitumour immunity. Nature 512:324–327.
Platten M, Bunse L, Wick A et al (2021) A vaccine targeting mutant IDH1 in newly diagnosed glioma. Nature 592:463–468.
Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Pollyea DA et al (2017) Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 130:722–731.
DiNardo CD, Stein EM, de Botton S et al (2018) Durable remissions with Ivosidenib in IDH1-Mutated relapsed or refractory AML. N Engl J Med 378:2386–2398.
Rohle D, Popovici-Muller J, Palaskas N et al (2013) An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science 340:626–630.
Mellinghoff IK, Penas-Prado M, Peters KB et al (2021) Vorasidenib, a dual inhibitor of mutant IDH1/2, in recurrent or progressive glioma; results of a first-in-human phase I Trial. Clin Cancer Res 27:4491–4499.
Mellinghoff IK, Bent MJVD, Clarke JL et al (2020) INDIGO a global randomized double-blind phase III study of vorasidenib VOR; AG-881 vs placebo in patients pts with residual or recurrent grade II glioma with an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 IDH1/2 mutation. J Clin Encol. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0611
van der Velden DL, Hoes LR, van der Wijngaart H et al (2019) The drug rediscovery protocol facilitates the expanded use of existing anticancer drugs. Nature 574:127–131.
Rodon J, Soria JC, Berger R et al (2019) Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial. Nat Med 25:751–758.
Kessler T, Berberich A, Casalini B et al (2020) Molecular profiling-based decision for targeted therapies in IDH wild-type glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2:vdz060.
Wick W, Kessler T (2018) Drug Repositioning meets Precision in Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 24:256–258.
Sulkowski PL, Corso CD, Robinson ND et al (2017) 2-Hydroxyglutarate produced by neomorphic IDH mutations suppresses homologous recombination and induces PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aal2463
Sizemore ST, Mohammad R, Sizemore GM et al (2018) Synthetic lethality of PARP inhibition and Ionizing Radiation is p53-dependent. Mol Cancer Res 16:1092–1102.
Sim HW, McDonald KL, Lwin Z et al (2021) A randomized phase II trial of veliparib, radiotherapy, and temozolomide in patients with unmethylated MGMT glioblastoma: the VERTU study. Neuro Oncol 23:1736–1749.
Sim HW, Galanis E, Khasraw M (2022) PARP inhibitors in glioma: a review of Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041003
Wahl M, Chang SM, Phillips JJ et al (2017) Probing the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in gliomas: a phase 2 study of everolimus for recurrent adult low-grade gliomas. Cancer 123:4631–4639.
Fangusaro J, Onar-Thomas A, Young Poussaint T et al (2019) Selumetinib in paediatric patients with BRAF-aberrant or neurofibromatosis type 1-associated recurrent, refractory, or progressive low-grade glioma: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:1011–1022.
Perreault S, Larouche V, Tabori U et al (2019) A phase 2 study of trametinib for patients with pediatric glioma or plexiform neurofibroma with refractory tumor and activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway: TRAM-01. BMC Cancer 19:1250.
Kadiyala P, Carney SV, Gauss JC et al (2021) Inhibition of 2-hydroxyglutarate elicits metabolic reprogramming and mutant IDH1 glioma immunity in mice. J Clin Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI139542
Friedrich M, Sankowski R, Bunse L et al (2021) Tryptophan metabolism drives dynamic immunosuppressive myeloid states in IDH-mutant gliomas. Nat Cancer 2:723–740.
Majzner RG, Ramakrishna S, Yeom KW et al (2022) GD2-CAR T cell therapy for H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas. Nature 603:934–941.
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996.
Grabowski MM, Sankey EW, Ryan KJ et al (2021) Immune suppression in gliomas. J Neurooncol 151:3–12.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors (TK, JI, WW and AW) contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by TK. Figure design was implemented by JI. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
Wolfgang Wick is one of the inventors and patent-holders on ‘Peptides for use in treating or diagnosing IDH1R132H positive cancers’ (EP2800580B1). All other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kessler, T., Ito, J., Wick, W. et al. Conventional and emerging treatments of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. J Neurooncol 162, 471–478 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04216-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04216-z