Abstract
Introduction
We aimed to evaluate IDH1 p.R132H mutation and 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as biomarkers for patients with IDH-mutant gliomas.
Methods
CSF was collected from patients with infiltrating glioma, and 2HG levels were measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. IDH1 p.R132H mutant allele frequency (MAF) in CSF-ctDNA was measured by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Tumor volume was measured from standard-of-care magnetic resonance images.
Results
The study included 48 patients, 6 with IDH-mutant and 42 with IDH-wildtype gliomas, and 57 samples, 9 from the patients with IDH-mutant and 48 from the patients with IDH-wildtype gliomas. ctDNA was detected in 7 of the 9 samples from patients with IDH-mutant glioma, and IDH1 p.R132H mutation was detected in 5 of the 7 samples. The MAF ranged from 0.3 to 39.95%. Total 2HG level, D-2HG level, and D/L-2HG ratio in CSF were significantly higher in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas than in patients with IDH-wildtype gliomas. D-2HG level and D/L-2HG ratio correlated with total tumor volume in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas but not in patients with IDH-wildtype gliomas.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that detection of IDH1 p.R132H mutation by ddPCR and increased D-2HG level in CSF may help identify IDH-mutant gliomas. Our results also suggest that D-2HG level and D/L-2HG ratio correlate with tumor volume in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- 2HG:
-
2-Hydroxyglutarate
- cfDNA:
-
Cell-free DNA
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- ctDNA:
-
Circulating tumor DNA
- D-2HG:
-
D-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate
- FLAIR:
-
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- IDH1 :
-
Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1
- L-2HG:
-
L-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate
- MAF:
-
Mutant allele frequency
- MR:
-
Magnetic resonance
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
References
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X et al (2008) An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 321:1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164382
Yan H, Parsons W, Jin G et al (2009) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 8:765–773
Paschka P, Schlenk RF, Gaidzik VI et al (2010) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia and confer adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation without FLT3 internal tandem duplication. J Clin Oncol 28:3636–3643. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.28.3762
Borger DR, Tanabe KK, Fan KC et al (2012) Frequent mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in cholangiocarcinoma identified through broad-based tumor genotyping. Oncology 17:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0386
Dang L, White DW, Gross S et al (2009) Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 462:739–744. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08617
Waitkus MS, Diplas BH, Yan H (2016) Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations in gliomas. NeuroOncology 18:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov136
Ye D, Guan K-L, Xiong Y (2018) Metabolism, activity, and targeting of D- and L-2-hydroxyglutarates. Trends Cancer 4:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2017.12.005
Bi J, Chowdhry S, Wu S et al (2020) Altered cellular metabolism in gliomas—an emerging landscape of actionable co-dependency targets. Nat Rev Cancer 20:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0226-5
Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ et al (2014) Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094
Mattos-Arruda LD, Mayor R, Ng CKY et al (2015) Cerebrospinal fluid-derived circulating tumour DNA better represents the genomic alterations of brain tumours than plasma. Nat Commun 6:8839. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9839
Pentsova EI, Shah RH, Tang J et al (2016) Evaluating cancer of the central nervous system through next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Oncol 34:2404–2415. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.66.6487
Miller AM, Shah RH, Pentsova EI et al (2019) Tracking tumour evolution in glioma through liquid biopsies of cerebrospinal fluid. Nature 565:654–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0882-3
Nakamizo S, Sasayama T, Shinohara M et al (2013) GC/MS-based metabolomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from glioma patients. J Neuro-Oncology 113:65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1090-x
Kalinina J, Ahn J, Devi NS et al (2016) Selective detection of the D-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate in the CSF of glioma patients with mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase. Clin Cancer Res 22:6256–6265. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2965
Locasale JW, Melman T, Song S et al (2012) Metabolomics of human cerebrospinal fluid identifies signatures of malignant glioma*. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(M111):014688. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m111.014688
Takayasu T, Shah M, Dono A et al (2020) Cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA and metabolites are informative biomarkers for the evaluation of CNS germ cell tumors. Sci Rep UK 10:14326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71161-0
Ballester LY, Lu G, Zorofchian S et al (2018) Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid metabolites in patients with primary or metastatic central nervous system tumors. Acta Neuropathol Commun 6:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-018-0588-z
Pirozzi CJ, Yan H (2021) The implications of IDH mutations for cancer development and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18:645–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00521-0
Ye D, Guan K-L, Xiong Y (2018) Metabolism, Activity, and Targeting of D- and L-2-Hydroxyglutarates. Trends Cancer 4:
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Amara CS, Ambati CR, Vantaku V et al (2019) Serum metabolic profiling identified a distinct metabolic signature in Bladder Cancer Smokers: a key metabolic enzymes associated with patient survival. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0936
Sanson M, Marie Y, Paris S et al (2009) Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 codon 132 mutation is an important prognostic biomarker in gliomas. J Clin Oncol 27:4150–4154. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.21.9832
Network CGAR, Brat DJ, Verhaak RGW et al (2015) Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. New Engl J Med 372:2481–2498. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1402121
Soffietti R, Bettegowda C, Mellinghoff IK et al (2022) Liquid biopsy in gliomas: a RANO review and proposals for clinical applications. NeuroOncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac004
Rohle D, Popovici-Muller J, Palaskas N et al (2013) An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science 340:626–630. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236062
Waitkus MS, Diplas BH, Yan H (2018) Biological role and therapeutic potential of IDH mutations in cancer. Cancer Cell 34:186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.04.011
Mellinghoff IK, Penas-Prado M, Peters KB et al (2021) Vorasidenib, a dual inhibitor of mutant IDH1/2, in recurrent or progressive glioma; results of a first-in-human phase I trial. Clin Cancer Res 27:4491–4499. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0611
Mellinghoff IK, Ellingson BM, Touat M et al (2020) Ivosidenib in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1–mutated advanced glioma. J Clin Oncol 38:3398–3406. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.19.03327
Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.26.3541
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number K08CA241651 and the Brain Cancer SPORE 2P50CA127001 (LYB). The metabolomics core was supported by CPRIT Core Facility Support Award RP170005 (“Proteomic and Metabolomic Core Facility”), NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA125123, NIH/NCI grant R01CA220297, NIH/NCI grant R01CA216426, and intramural funds from the Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: LYB. Sample collection: AD, AB, MS, JCR, JJZ. Data collection and processing: YF, LNR, AHMK, VP, NP, RFR. Statistical analysis: YF, LYB. Interpretations of results: YF, YE, LYB. Manuscript writing: YF. Reviewing and editing: LYB. Critical feedback: all authors. Approval of the final manuscript: all authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any conflicts to declare.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the institutional review board at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fujita, Y., Nunez-Rubiano, L., Dono, A. et al. IDH1 p.R132H ctDNA and D-2-hydroxyglutarate as CSF biomarkers in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas. J Neurooncol 159, 261–270 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04060-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04060-1