Skip to main content
Log in

Unexpected hubness: a proof-of-concept study of the human connectome using pagerank centrality and implications for intracerebral neurosurgery

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Understanding the human connectome by parcellations allows neurosurgeons to foretell the potential effects of lesioning parts of the brain during intracerebral surgery. However, it is unclear whether there exist variations among individuals such that brain regions that are thought to be dispensable may serve as important networking hubs.

Methods

We obtained diffusion neuroimaging data from two healthy cohorts (OpenNeuro and SchizConnect) and applied a parcellation scheme to them. We ranked the parcellations on average using PageRank centrality in each cohort. Using the OpenNeuro cohort, we focused on parcellations in the lower 50% ranking that displayed top quartile ranking at the individual level. We then queried whether these select parcellations with over 3% prevalence would be reproducible in the same manner in the SchizConnect cohort.

Results

In the OpenNeuro (n = 68) and SchizConnect cohort (n = 195), there were 27.9% and 43.1% of parcellations, respectively, in the lower half of all ranks that displayed top quartile ranks. We noted three outstanding parcellations (L_V6, L_a10p, and L_7PL) in the OpenNeuro cohort that also appeared in the SchizConnect cohort. In the larger Schizconnect cohort, L_V6, L_a10p, and L_7PL had unexpected hubness in 3.08%, 5.13%, and 8.21% of subjects, respectively.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that lowly-ranked parcellations may serve as important hubs in a subset of individuals, highlighting the importance of studying parcellation ranks at the personalized level in planning supratentorial neurosurgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DVAR:

Spatial standard deviation of successive difference images

ROI:

Regions of interest

HCP:

Human connectome project

SFL:

Superior frontal lobe

TE1p:

Posterior portions of the middle and inferior temporal gyrus

TGd:

Temporal gyrus dorsal

References

  1. Ahsan SA, Chendeb K, Briggs RG et al (2020) Beyond eloquence and onto centrality: a new paradigm in planning supratentorial neurosurgery. J Neurooncol 146(2):229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Spetzler RF, Martin NA (1986) A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 65(4):476–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson F, Abdullah KG, Verma R, Brem S (2020) Tractography and the connectome in neurosurgical treatment of gliomas: the premise, the progress, and the potential. Neurosurg Focus 48(2):E6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reid RC (2012) From functional architecture to functional connectomics. Neuron 75(2):209–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandonnet E, Cerliani L, Siuda-Krzywicka K et al (2017) A network-level approach of cognitive flexibility impairment after surgery of a right temporo-parietal glioma. Neurochirurgie 63(4):308–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maier-Hein KH, Neher PF, Houde JC et al (2017) The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat Commun 8(1):1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastiani M, Shah NJ, Goebel R, Roebroeck A (2012) Human cortical connectome reconstruction from diffusion weighted MRI: the effect of tractography algorithm. Neuroimage 62(3):1732–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Conti Nibali M, Rossi M, Sciortino T et al (2019) Preoperative surgical planning of glioma: limitations and reliability of fMRI and DTI tractography. J Neurosurg Sci 63(2):127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caras A, Mugge L, Miller WK, Mansour TR, Schroeder J, Medhkour A (2020) Usefulness and impact of intraoperative imaging for glioma resection on patient outcome and extent of resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 134:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ottenhausen M, Krieg SM, Meyer B, Ringel F (2015) Functional preoperative and intraoperative mapping and monitoring: increasing safety and efficacy in glioma surgery. Neurosurg Focus 38(1):E3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brodmann K 1909 Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde. In: in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues.

  12. Ambite JL, Tallis M, Alpert K et al (2015) Schiz connect: virtual data integration in neuroimaging. Data Integr Life Sci 9162:37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L, Alpert KI, Calhoun VD et al (2016) Schiz connect: mediating neuroimaging databases on schizophrenia and related disorders for large-scale integration. Neuroimage 124(Pt B):1155–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Glasser MF, Coalson TS, Robinson EC et al (2016) A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 536(7615):171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker CM, Burks JD, Briggs RG et al (2018a) A connectomic atlas of the human cerebrum-chapter 9: the occipital lobe. Oper Neurosurg 15:S372–S406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fattori P, Pitzalis S, Galletti C (2009) The cortical visual area V6 in macaque and human brains. J Physiol Paris 103(1–2):88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker CM, Burks JD, Briggs RG et al (2018b) A connectomic atlas of the human cerebrum-chapter 2: the lateral frontal lobe. Oper Neurosurg 15:S10–S74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chahine G, Diekhof EK, Tinnermann A, Gruber O (2015) On the role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in cognitive ‘branching’: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 77:421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bludau S, Eickhoff SB, Mohlberg H et al (2014) Cytoarchitecture, probability maps and functions of the human frontal pole. Neuroimage 93(Pt 2):260–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baker CM, Burks JD, Briggs RG et al (2018c) A connectomic atlas of the human cerebrum-chapter 7: the lateral parietal lobe. Oper Neurosurg 15:S295-s349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang J, Yang Y, Fan L et al (2015) Convergent functional architecture of the superior parietal lobule unraveled with multimodal neuroimaging approaches. Hum Brain Mapp 36(1):238–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheperjans F, Eickhoff SB, Homke L et al (2008) Probabilistic maps, morphometry, and variability of cytoarchitectonic areas in the human superior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 18(9):2141–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hendriks EJ, Habets EJJ, Taphoorn MJB et al (2018) Linking late cognitive outcome with glioma surgery location using resection cavity maps. Hum Brain Mapp 39(5):2064–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Habets EJ, Kloet A, Walchenbach R, Vecht CJ, Klein M, Taphoorn MJ (2014) Tumour and surgery effects on cognitive functioning in high-grade glioma patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(8):1451–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Raysi Dehcordi S, Mariano M, Mazza M, Galzio RJ (2013) Cognitive deficits in patients with low and high grade gliomas. J Neurosurg Sci 57(3):259–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zuo XN, Xu T, Jiang L et al (2013) Toward reliable characterization of functional homogeneity in the human brain: preprocessing, scan duration, imaging resolution and computational space. Neuroimage 65:374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonilha L, Gleichgerrcht E, Fridriksson J et al (2015) Reproducibility of the structural brain connectome derived from diffusion tensor imaging. PLoS ONE 10(8):e0135247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Some of the data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the SchizConnect database (https://schizconnect.org) As such, the investigators within SchizConnect contributed to the design and implementation of SchizConnect and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. Data collection and sharing for this SchizConnect project was funded by NIMH cooperative agreement 1U01 MH097435.

Funding

No funding was received to conduct this study or assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Sughrue.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Hugh Taylor, Peter Nicholas, Stephane Doyen and Michael Sughrue are employees of Omniscient Neurotechnologies. No other authors report any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PNG 535 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeung, J.T., Taylor, H.M., Young, I.M. et al. Unexpected hubness: a proof-of-concept study of the human connectome using pagerank centrality and implications for intracerebral neurosurgery. J Neurooncol 151, 249–256 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03659-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03659-6

Keywords

Navigation