Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Evidence supporting routine postoperative antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis following oncologic neurosurgery is limited, and actual practice patterns are largely unknown beyond survey data.

Objective

To describe patterns and predictors of postoperative AED prophylaxis following intracranial tumor surgery.

Methods

The MarketScan Database was used to analyze pharmacy claims data and clinical characteristics in a national sample over a 5-year period.

Results

Among 5895 patients in the cohort, levetiracetam was the most widely used AED for prophylaxis (78.5%) followed by phenytoin (20.5%). Prophylaxis was common but highly variable for patients who underwent open resection of supratentorial intraparenchymal tumors (62.5%, reference) or meningiomas (61.9%). In multivariate analysis, biopsies were less likely to receive prophylaxis (44.8%, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33–0.67), and there was near consensus against prophylaxis for infratentorial (9.7%, OR 0.07, CI 0.05–0.09) and transsphenoidal procedures (0.4%, OR 0.003, CI 0.001–0.010). Primary malignancies (52.1%, reference) and secondary metastases (42.2%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis than benign tumors (23.0%, OR 0.63, CI 0.48–0.83), as were patients discharged with home services and patients in the Northeast. There was a large spike in duration of AED use at approximately 30 days.

Conclusions

Use of seizure prophylaxis following intracranial biopsies and supratentorial resections is highly variable, consistent with a lack of guidelines or consensus. Current practice patterns do not support a clear standard of care and may be driven in part by geographic variation, availability of post-discharge services, and electronic prescribing defaults rather than evidence. Given uncertainty regarding effectiveness, indications, and appropriate duration of AED prophylaxis, well-powered trials are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Xu J, Kromer C, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2016) CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2009-2013. Neuro Oncol 18:v1–v75. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Langer CJ, Mehta MP (2005) Current management of brain metastases, with a focus on systemic options. J Clin Oncol 23:6207–6219. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Forsyth PA, Recht LD, Wen PY, Chamberlain MC, Grossman SA, Cairncross JG (2000) Practice parameter: anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 54:1886–1893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen N, Strauss G, Lew R, Silver D, Recht L (1988) Should prophylactic anticonvulsants be administered to patients with newly-diagnosed cerebral metastases? A retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 6:1621–1624. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1988.6.10.1621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahaley MS Jr, Dudka L (1981) The role of anticonvulsant medications in the management of patients with anaplastic gliomas. Surg Neurol 16:399–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moots PL, Maciunas RJ, Eisert DR, Parker RA, Laporte K, Abou-Khalil B (1995) The course of seizure disorders in patients with malignant gliomas. Arch Neurol 52:717–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagen NA, Cirrincione C, Thaler HT, DeAngelis LM (1990) The role of radiation therapy following resection of single brain metastasis from melanoma. Neurology 40:158–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simionescu MD (1960) Metastatic tumors of the brain: a follow-up study of 195 patients with neurosurgical considerations. J Neurosurg 17:361–373. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1960.17.3.0361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimm S, Wampler GL, Stablein D, Hazra T, Young HF (1981) Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: natural history and results of treatment. Cancer 48:384–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrne TN, Cascino TL, Posner JB (1983) Brain metastasis from melanoma. J Neurooncol 1:313–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Boarini DJ, Beck DW, VanGilder JC (1985) Postoperative prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy in cerebral gliomas. Neurosurgery 16:290–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Franceschetti S, Binelli S, Casazza M, Lodrini S, Panzica F, Pluchino F, Solero CL, Avanzini G (1990) Influence of surgery and antiepileptic drugs on seizures symptomatic of cerebral tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 103:47–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kvam DA, Loftus CM, Copeland B, Quest DO (1983) Seizures during the immediate postoperative period. Neurosurgery 12:14–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee ST, Lui TN, Chang CN, Cheng WC, Wang DJ, Heimburger RF, Lin CG (1989) Prophylactic anticonvulsants for prevention of immediate and early postcraniotomy seizures. Surg Neurol 31:361–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. De Santis A, Villani R, Sinisi M, Stocchetti N, Perucca E (2002) Add-on phenytoin fails to prevent early seizures after surgery for supratentorial brain tumors: a randomized controlled study. Epilepsia 43:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. North JB, Penhall RK, Hanieh A, Frewin DB, Taylor WB (1983) Phenytoin and postoperative epilepsy. A double-blind study. J Neurosurg 58:672–677. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.58.5.0672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuijlen JM, Teernstra OP, Kessels AG, Herpers MJ, Beuls EA (1996) Effectiveness of antiepileptic prophylaxis used with supratentorial craniotomies: a meta-analysis. Seizure 5:291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matthew E, Sherwin AL, Welner SA, Odusote K, Stratford JG (1980) Seizures following intracranial surgery: incidence in the first post-operative week. Can J Neurol Sci 7:285–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sayegh ET, Fakurnejad S, Oh T, Bloch O, Parsa AT (2014) Anticonvulsant prophylaxis for brain tumor surgery: determining the current best available evidence. J Neurosurg 121:1139–1147. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS132829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Deutschman CS, Haines SJ (1985) Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in neurological surgery. Neurosurgery 17:510–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Forsyth PA, Weaver S, Fulton D, Brasher PM, Sutherland G, Stewart D, Hagen NA, Barnes P, Cairncross JG, DeAngelis LM (2003) Prophylactic anticonvulsants in patients with brain tumour. Can J Neurol Sci 30:106–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu AS, Trinh VT, Suki D, Graham S, Forman A, Weinberg JS, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Heimberger AB, Sawaya R, Wang X, Qiao W, Hess KR, Lang FF (2013) A prospective randomized trial of perioperative seizure prophylaxis in patients with intraparenchymal brain tumors. J Neurosurg 118:873–883. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.12.JNS111970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Foy PM, Copeland GP, Shaw MD (1981) The incidence of postoperative seizures. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 55:253–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beenen LF, Lindeboom J, Kasteleijn-Nolst Trenite DG, Heimans JJ, Snoek FJ, Touw DJ, Ader HJ, van Alphen HA (1999) Comparative double blind clinical trial of phenytoin and sodium valproate as anticonvulsant prophylaxis after craniotomy: efficacy, tolerability, and cognitive effects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:474–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. North JB (1989) Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 3:425–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Foy PM, Chadwick DW, Rajgopalan N, Johnson AL, Shaw MD (1992) Do prophylactic anticonvulsant drugs alter the pattern of seizures after craniotomy? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:753–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Friedberg MH, Lathi E, Choy H, Furie K, Akerley W, Wahlberg L, Lekos A, Louis S (1996) A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of divalproex sodium prophylaxis in adults with newly diagnosed brain tumors. Neurology 46:985–991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sirven JI, Wingerchuk DM, Drazkowski JF, Lyons MK, Zimmerman RS (2004) Seizure prophylaxis in patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 79:1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.4065/79.12.1489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tremont-Lukats IW, Ratilal BO, Armstrong T, Gilbert MR (2008) Antiepileptic drugs for preventing seizures in people with brain tumors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD004424. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004424.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Joiner EF, Youngerman BE, Hudson TS, Yang J, Welch MR, McKhann GM 2nd, Neugut AI, Bruce JN (2018) Effectiveness of perioperative antiepileptic drug prophylaxis for early and late seizures following oncologic neurosurgery: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.JNS172236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikkelsen T, Paleologos NA, Robinson PD, Ammirati M, Andrews DW, Asher AL, Burri SH, Cobbs CS, Gaspar LE, Kondziolka D, Linskey ME, Loeffler JS, McDermott M, Mehta MP, Olson JJ, Patchell RA, Ryken TC, Kalkanis SN (2010) The role of prophylactic anticonvulsants in the management of brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol 96:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-0056-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Olson JJ, Kalkanis SN, Ryken TC (2015) Evidence-based clinical practice parameter guidelines for the treatment of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: introduction and methods. J Neurooncol 125:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1847-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Olson JJ, Ryken T (2008) Guidelines for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: introduction. J Neurooncol 89:255–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9595-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siomin V, Angelov L, Li L, Vogelbaum MA (2005) Results of a survey of neurosurgical practice patterns regarding the prophylactic use of anti-epilepsy drugs in patients with brain tumors. J Neurooncol 74:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-004-6912-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dewan MC, Thompson RC, Kalkanis SN, Barker FG 2nd, Hadjipanayis CG (2016) Prophylactic antiepileptic drug administration following brain tumor resection: results of a recent AANS/CNS Section on Tumors survey. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.4.JNS16245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Grant RWC, Jenkinson M, Vale L, Marson T, Hill R, McEleny T Seizure Prophylaxis in Glioma (SPRING): A phase III randomised trial comparing prophylactic Levetiracetam versus no prophylactic antiepileptic drug in newly diagnosed presumed supratentorial glioma. In: National Cancer Research Institute Cancer Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

  37. Karhade AV, Larsen AMG, Cote DJ, Dubois HM, Smith TR (2018) National databases for neurosurgical outcomes research: options, strengths, and limitations. Neurosurgery 83:333–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Asemota AO, Ishii M, Brem H, Gallia GL (2018) Costs and their predictors in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lad SP, Babu R, Rhee MS, Franklin RL, Ugiliweneza B, Hodes J, Nimjee SM, Zomorodi AR, Smith TP, Friedman AH, Patil CG, Boakye M (2013) Long-term economic impact of coiling vs clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 72:1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000429284.91142.56(discussion 1011–1003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lad SP, Bagley JH, Karikari IO, Babu R, Ugiliweneza B, Kong M, Isaacs RE, Bagley CA, Gottfried ON, Patil CG, Boakye M (2013) Cancer after spinal fusion: the role of bone morphogenetic protein. Neurosurgery 73:440–449. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pan IW, Harris DA, Luerssen TG, Lam SK (2018) Comparative effectiveness of surgical treatments for pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 83:480–487. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Asemota AO, Ishii M, Brem H, Gallia GL (2017) Comparison of complications, trends, and costs in endoscopic vs microscopic pituitary surgery: analysis from a US Health Claims Database. Neurosurgery 81:458–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Petraglia FW 3rd, Farber SH, Han JL, Verla T, Gallis J, Lokhnygina Y, Parente B, Hickey P, Turner DA, Lad SP (2016) Comparison of bilateral vs. staged unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson’s disease in patients under 70 years of age. Neuromodulation 19:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Desai MJ, Hargens LM, Breitenfeldt MD, Doth AH, Ryan MP, Gunnarsson C, Safriel Y (2015) The rate of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with spinal cord stimulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E531–537. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Margolis JM, Juneau P, Sadosky A, Cappelleri JC, Bryce TN, Nieshoff EC (2014) Health care resource utilization and medical costs of spinal cord injury with neuropathic pain in a commercially insured population in the United States. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95:2279–2287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Neugut AI, Zhong X, Wright JD, Accordino M, Yang J, Hershman DL (2016) Nonadherence to medications for chronic conditions and nonadherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 2:1326–1332. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wright JD, Chen L, Jorge S, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Hu JC, Neugut AI, Ananth CV, Hershman DL (2016) Prescription of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis after high-risk, abdominopelvic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 141:531–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wright JD, Hou JY, Burke WM, Tergas AI, Chen L, Hu JC, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL (2016) Utilization and toxicity of alternative delivery methods of adjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 127:985–991. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Helmers SL, Thurman DJ, Durgin TL, Pai AK, Faught E (2015) Descriptive epidemiology of epilepsy in the U.S. population: a different approach. Epilepsia 56:942–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Faught E, Helmers S, Thurman D, Kim H, Kalilani L (2018) Patient characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: a US database analysis. Epilepsy Behav 85:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hansen RN, Campbell JD, Sullivan SD (2009) Association between antiepileptic drug switching and epilepsy-related events. Epilepsy Behav 15:481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.05.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dasenbrock HH, Devine CA, Liu KX, Gormley WB, Claus EB, Smith TR, Dunn IF (2016) Thrombocytopenia and craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Cancer 122:1708–1717. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kimmell KT, Walter KA (2014) Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing craniotomy for neoplastic disease. J Neurooncol 120:567–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1587-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hansen RN, Nguyen HP, Sullivan SD (2013) Bioequivalent antiepileptic drug switching and the risk of seizure-related events. Epilepsy Res 106:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.04.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. van Breemen MS, Wilms EB, Vecht CJ (2007) Epilepsy in patients with brain tumours: epidemiology, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Neurol 6:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70103-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lam PW, Lum CM, Leung MF (2007) Drug non-adherence and associated risk factors among Chinese geriatric patients in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 13:284–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Delgado MK, Shofer FS, Patel MS, Halpern S, Edwards C, Meisel ZF, Perrone J (2018) Association between electronic medical record implementation of default opioid prescription quantities and prescribing behavior in two emergency departments. J Gen Intern Med 33:409–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4286-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Dr. Wright is a consultant for Clovis Oncology and Tesaro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett E. Youngerman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Youngerman, B.E., Joiner, E.F., Wang, X. et al. Patterns of seizure prophylaxis after oncologic neurosurgery. J Neurooncol 146, 171–180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03362-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03362-1

Keywords

Navigation