Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disparities among racial/ethnic groups of patients diagnosed with ependymoma: analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify racial/ethnic disparities with regard to survival among patients with ependymoma.

Methods

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between the years of 1973–2015 which included 4821 patients diagnosed with ependymoma were analyzed. Multivariable cox proportional hazard ratios were performed to examine overall survival across racial/ethnic groups of patients with ependymoma, mortality risks across specified age groups, and mortality during specified time intervals, all with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Non-Hispanic black patients (n = 421) have higher risk of overall mortality when compared to non-Hispanic white patients (n = 3255) with ependymoma (HR 1.48, CI 1.17–1.87). Risk of mortality was highest when comparing non-Hispanic black children under the age of 3 to non-Hispanic white children of the same age group (HR 3.05, CI 1.55–5.99). Mortality risk has increased among pediatric non-Hispanic black patients compared to pediatric non-Hispanic white patients between the years of 2006–2015, from previous rates between the years 1973–2005 (HR 1.95, CI 1.15–3.33 and HR 2.35, CI 1.24–4.44). Hispanic patients under 3 years had an increased risk of mortality compared to non-Hispanic white patients of this age group (HR 2.49, CI 1.37–4.53). Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 282) had no significant difference in outcomes when compared to non-Hispanic white patients.

Conclusions

Our findings showed higher risk of mortality among non-Hispanic black patients compared to non-Hispanic white patients with ependymoma, with highest risk among pediatric patients. These results demonstrate significant need for research in survival outcomes for this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SEER Cancer Stat Facts. Brain and other nervous system cancer. National Cancer Institute. Bethesda. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html

  2. Villano JL, Parker CK, Dolecek TA (2013) Descriptive epidemiology of ependymal tumours in the United States. Br J Cancer 108:2367–2371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khalid SI, Kelly R, Adogwa O et al (2018) Pediatric spinal ependymomas: an epidemiologic study. World Neurosurg 115:E119–E128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryu SM, Lee SH, Kim ES, Eoh W (2019) Predicting survival of patients with spinal ependymoma using machine learning algorithms with the SEER database. World Neurosurg 124:e331–e339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McGuire CS, Sainani KL, Fisher PG (2009) Both location and age predict survival in ependymomas: a SEER study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52(1):65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bates JE, Choi G, Milano MT (2016) Myxopapillary ependymoma: a SEER analysis of epidemiology and outcomes. J Neurooncol 129(2):251–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldwein JW, Leahy JM, Packer RJ, et al (1990) Intracranial ependymomas in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19(6):1497–1502

  8. Lucchesi KM, Grant R, Kahle KT, Marks AM, DiLuna ML (2016) Primary spinal myxopapillary ependymoma in the pediatric population: a study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. J Neurooncol 130(1):133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 18 Regs Research Data, Nov 2017 Sub (1995–2015) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>—Linked To County Attributes—Total U.S., 1969–2016 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2018, based on the November 2017 submission

  10. Ellis L, Canchola AJ, Spiegel D, Ladabaum U, Haile R, Gomez SL (2018) Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer survival: the contribution of tumor, sociodemographic, institutional, and neighborhood characteristics. J Clin Oncol 36(1):25–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V et al (2008) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Cancer 54(2):78–93

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kehm RD, Spector LG, Poynter JN, Vock DM, Altekruse SF (2018) Does socioeconomic status account for racial and ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival? Cancer 124(20): 4090–4097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs AJ, Lindholm EB, Levy CF, Fish JD, Glick RD (2017) Racial and ethnic disparities in treatment and survival of pediatric sarcoma. J Surg Res 219:43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedrich P, Itriago E, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Ribeiro K (2017) Racial and ethnic disparities in the incidence of pediatric extracranial embryonal tumors. JNCI 109(10):djx050

  15. Henderson TO, Bhatia S, Pinto N et al (2011) Racial and ethnic disparities in risk and survival in children with neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 29(1):76–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khanna V, Achey RL, Ostrom QT et al (2017) Incidence and survival trends for medulloblastomas in the United States from 2001 to 2013. J Neurooncol. 135(3):433–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pajtler KW, Mack SC, Ramaswamy V et al (2017) The current consensus on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma and its distinct molecular variants. Acta Neuropathol 133(1):5–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hübner JM, Kool M, Pfister SM, Pajtler KW (2017) Epidemiology, molecular classification and WHO grading of ependymoma. J Neurosurg Sci 62(1):46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gramatzki D, Witt H, Hentschel B et al (2017) Clinical and molecular subgroups of ependymoma in adulthood: an analysis of the German Glioma Network. J Clin Oncol 35(15):2038–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nuno M, Yu JJ, Varshneya K, Alexander J, Mukherjee D, Black KL, Patil CG (2016) Treatment and survival of supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas in adults. J Clin Neurosci 28:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeboa DN, Liao K, Guadagnolo BA, et al. National patterns of care in the management of World Health Organization Grade II and III Spinal Ependymomas.

  22. Reni M, Gatta G, Mazza E, Vecht C (2007) Ependymoma. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 63(1):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Snider CA, Yang K, Mack SC, Suh JH, Chao ST, Merchant TE, Murphy ES (2018) Impact of radiation therapy and extent of resection for ependymoma in young children: a population-based study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65:e26880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fukuoka K, Kanemura Y, Shofuda T, Fukushima S, Yamashita S, Narushima D et al (2018) Significance of molecular classification of ependymomas: C11orf95-RELA fusion negative supratentorial ependymomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors. Acta Neuropathol Commun 6:134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lillard JC, Venable GT, Khan NR, Tatevossian RG, Dalton J, Vaughn BN, Klimo P (2018) Pediatric supratentorial ependymoma: surgical, clinical, and molecular analysis. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy239/5039612

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data for this study were provided to the researchers from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This research paper was written by Ashley Stenzel and Kirsten Moysich, with substantial input from Robert Fenstermaker and Laura Wiltsie.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten B. Moysich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research did not require an ethical board approval because it utilized data from the de-identified SEER database. As such, it does not contain animals or studies with humans performed by the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not needed for individual participants included in the study, as the authors did not work with human subjects.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 188 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stenzel, A.E., Fenstermaker, R.A., Wiltsie, L.M. et al. Disparities among racial/ethnic groups of patients diagnosed with ependymoma: analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry. J Neurooncol 144, 43–51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03214-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03214-y

Keywords

Navigation