Skip to main content
Log in

The added value of concurrently administered temozolomide versus adjuvant temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

  • Clinical -patient studies
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Temozolomide (TMZ), given concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) and as adjuvant monotherapy afterwards, has led to improved survival in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, it is unclear whether its primary mechanism of action is through enhancement of radiation response, independent cytotoxicity, or both. We sought to determine the relative contribution of concomitant temozolomide in patients treated by concurrent and adjuvant TMZ versus adjuvant TMZ alone in the setting of newly diagnosed GBM. Methods and Materials We identified patients diagnosed with GBM and treated with surgery, involved-field radiotherapy, and chemotherapy at MGH between 2002 and 2004. Eligible patients received either adjuvant temozolomide alone (group 1) or temozolomide concurrently with RT followed by adjuvant TMZ (group 2). The primary endpoint of this retrospective analysis was overall survival (OS). Results Forty-three patients (group 1, n = 21; group 2, n = 22) were included in this study. The median follow-up was 33.7 months for surviving patients. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between these two groups. On univariate analysis, patients who received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide experienced a 2-year OS of 51% and median survival of 25.5 months, compared with a 2-year OS of 36% and median survival of 15.6 months for group 1 patients (P < 0.05). On multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) favoring concurrent TMZ trended towards significance (HR = 0.51, P = 0.08) despite modest patient numbers. Conclusions Concurrent and adjuvant TMZ was associated with improved survival compared to adjuvant TMZ alone, highlighting the potentiation of radiation effect by temozolomide in the clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fine HA, Dear KB, Loeffler JS, Black PM, Canellos GP (1993) Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 71:2585–2597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Medical Research Council Brain Tumor Working Party (2001) Randomized trial of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade astrocytoma: a Medical Research Council trial. J Clin Oncol 19:509–518

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. New Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chakravarti A, Erkkinen MG, Nestler U, Stupp R, Mehta M, Aldape K, Gilbert MR, Black PM, Loeffler JS (2006) Temozolomide-mediated radiation enhancement in glioblastoma: a report on underlying mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res 12:4738–4746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wedge SR, Porteous JK, Glaser MG, Marcus K, Newlands ES (1997) In vitro evaluation of temozolomide combined with X-irradiation. Anti-Cancer Drugs 8:92–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Rijn J, Heimans JJ, van den Berg J, van der Valk P, Slotman BJ (2000) Survival of human glioma cells treated with various combination of temozolomide and X-rays. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:779–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Nat Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, Bromberg JE, Hau P, Mirimanoff RO, Cairncross JG, Janzer RC, Stupp R (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. New Engl J Med 352:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krex D, Klink B, Hartmann C, von Deimling A, Pietsch T, Simon M, Sabel M, Steinbach JP, Heese O, Reifenberger G, Weller M, Schackert G (2007) Long-term survival with glioblastoma multiforme. Brain 130:2596–2606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ulmer S, Braga TA, Barker FG 2nd, Lev MH, Gonzalez RG, Henson JW (2006) Clinical and radiographic features of peritumoral infarction following resection of glioblastoma. Neurology 67:1668–1670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Campbell BH, Saxman SB, Kish JA, Kim HE, Cmelak AJ, Rotman M, Machtay M, Ensley JF, Chao KS, Schultz CJ, Lee N, Fu KK (2004) Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. New Engl J Med 350:1937–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dillman RO, Seagren SL, Propert KJ, Guerra J, Eaton WL, Perry MC, Carey RW, Frei EF 3rd, Green MR (1990) A randomized trial of induction chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation versus radiation alone in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. New Engl J Med 323: 940–945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, Haller DG, Ajani JA, Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Martenson JA (2001) Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. New Engl J Med 345:725–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, Rotman M, Gershenson DM, Mutch DG (1999) Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. New Engl J Med 340:1137–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the statistical support of Alona Muzikansky and Gregory DiRienzo, PhD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnab Chakravarti.

Additional information

Statement of originality: This work is completely original and has not been published or presented elsewhere.

John W. Henson and Bindu Avutu contributed equally to this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sher, D.J., Henson, J.W., Avutu, B. et al. The added value of concurrently administered temozolomide versus adjuvant temozolomide alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 88, 43–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9530-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9530-8

Keywords

Navigation