Advertisement

Neohelicon

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 5–14 | Cite as

The authoring software tool in digital literature as a vector of the global imaginary

  • Odile FargeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Digital writing necessarily requires tools, software or technology. With its constant development, the technology must be “intuitive” and easy to use, with no need for a manual. This intuitive use of the software authoring tool as a kind of universal language places it squarely in the globalization process. A question then arises: while allowing some degree of fair competition, does globalization not also entail a uniform way of producing, doing or thinking? Since the tools used by many digital authors were first developed for commercial purposes, we can ask whether this fact affects their imaginary when they write. Keeping in mind the globalized environment, I will illustrate the closed relationship in which the tools themselves make certain proposals and then anticipate certain specific practices, i.e., how globalization can structure the discourse and influence how authors think about creating their works. There is a globalized imaginary in which communications technology is becoming increasingly interconnected, and in which our imagination inevitably becomes globalized, reflecting beliefs and economic/socio-cultural structures that challenge national boundaries and shift the balance of power. Lev Manovich talks about “cultural software” (2010), while Edgar Morin recognizes the existence of a global civilization that includes standard shared values. In this perspective, I will also examine the role of free software to see whether it can give rise to new communities and modify one production model of digital writing.

Keywords

Digital literature Authoring tool Imaginary Globalization 

References

  1. “Manifesto of the European Network for Post Development (READ)”, L’Écologiste (winter 2001–2002). Défaire le développement, refaire le monde, No.6, volume 2.Google Scholar
  2. Chatonsky, G. (2011). Du libre et de la liberté. http://chatonsky.net/flux/libre. Accessed 09 March 2017.
  3. Dauphin, F. (2008). Les logiciels libres: généalogie et ‘idéologies’ d’un mouvement social. Logos, 15(2), 71–85.Google Scholar
  4. Hagège, C. (2011). Contre la pensée unique. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, M. (1958). Essais et conférences. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  6. Illich, I. (1973). La convivialité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  7. Jeanneret, Y., & Souchier, E. (1999). Pour une poétique de l’écrit d’écran. Xoana, 6, 97–107.Google Scholar
  8. Jullien, F. (2012). L’écart et l’entre. Ou comment penser l’altérité. Working Papers Series No.03. Paris: Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
  9. Laïdi, Z. (2005). La mondialisation est aussi un imaginaire. Ceras-revue Projet (No.287).Google Scholar
  10. Manovich, L. (2010). Software takes command. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marcuse, H. (1968). L’homme unidimensionnel. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  12. McLuhan, M. (1962; 1967). La galaxie Gutenberg. La genèse de l’homme typographique. Montréal: Éditions Hurtubise MHM.Google Scholar
  13. McLuhan, M. (1964; 1968). Pour comprendre les médias. Paris: Seuil Éditions. Collection Points Essais.Google Scholar
  14. Nancy, J.-L. (2002). La création du monde ou la mondialisation. Paris: Éditions Galilée.Google Scholar
  15. Semprini, A. (2001). Objets sans frontières. Protée, 29(1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Valéry, P. (1931). Regards sur le monde actuel. Paris: Librairie Stock, Delamain et Boutelleau.Google Scholar
  17. Virilio, P. (2008). Penser la vitesse. Documentary film, 90 min. La Générale de Production/ARTE France.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNESCO ITEN Chair (Innovation, Transmission and Digital Publication)The Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme/University of Paris 8ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations