Abstract
This study will focus on how psychic pain is externalized in two short texts from Marguerite Duras’s La douleur. I will first argue that the collection’s opening work, “La douleur,” may be viewed as a trauma testimony, as a sub-genre of autobiography. Duras the narrator shows us how her psychic pain generates physiological symptoms. In the course of the narrative, we come to understand that her symptoms are the same as the ones she images her husband, Robert L., suffering from in Dachau. Duras also projects her pain onto her surroundings, transforming the Paris of her mind’s eye into the bleak landscape where she believes her husband has perished. In “Albert des Capitales,” we find what amounts to an externalization of psychological suffering through behavior as the protagonist, Thérèse, transforms herself from victim to victimizer during the interrogation of a “donneur,” a suspected collaborator. Her ordering the torture of the donneur is the result of the psychic pain caused by the uncertainty of her husband’s fate. “La douleur” and “Albert des Capitales,” I will argue, are two sides of the same coin, two different women—both Duras’s avatars—who find themselves in equally stressful circumstances but who unconsciously process their stress in divergent ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As I mentioned above, in an interview with Marianne Alphant, Duras contradicts what she says in her preface to La douleur.
At the same time, there is a subtle, ironic nod to the quote often attributed to Flaubert, “Madame Bovary, c’est moi”.
References
Alphant, M. (1985). Avril 45: nuit et Duras. Libération 17 avril, 37.
Antelme, R. (1947). L’Espèce humaine. Paris: Gallimard.
Buss, H. M. (2002). Repossessing the world: Reading memoirs by contemporary women. Toronto: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Chapouthier, G. (2012). Du stress à l’anxiété. Cerveau et psycho: l’essentiel, 10, 4–6.
D’Astier, E. (1945). Avant que le rideau ne tombe. Paris: Sagittaire.
Duras, M. (1985). La douleur. Paris: Folio.
Garcia, R. (2012). La Mécanique du traumatisme psychique. Cerveau et psycho: l’essentiel, 10, 22–27.
Gilmore, L. (1994). Autobiographics: A feminist theory of women’s self-representation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Green, M. J. (1993). Writing war in the feminine: De Beauvoir and Duras. Journal of European Studies, 23, 223–237.
Hartmann, G. (2003). Trauma within the limits of literature. Journal of English Studies, 7, 257–274.
Higgins, L. A. (1996). New novel, new wave, new politics: Fiction and the representation of history in postwar France. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Jacobs, G. (1997). Spectres of remorse: Duras’s war-time autobiography. Romance Studies: A Journal of the University of Wales, 30, 47–57.
Kelly, D. (2009). The appeal to memory: Marguerite Duras and Assia Djebar: From the urgent narratives to the “monumental”. Journal of Romance Studies, 9(3), 60–72.
Palazzolo, J. (2012). Les Troubles anxieux. Cerveau et psycho: L’essentiel, 10, 8–11.
Rémy, C. (1983). Mémoires d’un agent secret de la France libre, juin 1940–juin 1942. Paris: Editions France-Empire.
Sartre, J.-P. (1982). La nausée. Paris: Folio.
Schwab, G. (2006). Writing against memory and forgetting. Literature and Medicine, 25(1), 95–121.
Simonin, A. (2002). The right to innocence: Literary discourse and the postwar purges (1944–1953). Trans. J. F. Austin. Yale French Studies, 98, 5–28.
Suleiman, S. R. (2006). Crises of memory in the Second World War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Willging, J. (2007). Telling anxiety. Anxious narration in the work of Marguerite Duras, Annie Ernaux, Nathalie Sarraute, and Anne Hébert. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Wilson, E. (1999). La douleur: Duras, amnesia and desire. In H. Peitsch, et al. (Eds.), European memories of the Second World War (pp. 141–148). New York: Berghahn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comfort, K. Relieving pain in Marguerite Duras’s ‘La douleur’ and ‘Albert des Capitales’. Neohelicon 42, 551–569 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-015-0305-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-015-0305-x