Abstract
Promoting nature-based carbon sinks may contribute to minimise global warming. Different forest types may have different carbon sink capacity. Many areas of central Spain are covered by coexisting patches of monospecific plantations of Pinus halepensis, established since the 1960’s, and native Quercus forest coppiced up to the 1960´s. We aimed to compare the carbon stock between both types of forests, considering both above and belowground compartments. In each plot, we measured the dimensions of every adult tree, the shrub cover, and we collected samples of litter and soil. The carbon pool of trees and shrubs was calculated using allometric equations, and for roots, litter, and soil, using the carbon content analysed in a laboratory or obtained from the literature. Carbon pools were analysed separately for three independent variables: plot type (Quercus/Pinus), tree basal area and slope. Overall, Quercus forests stored more carbon than Pinus plantations, thanks to a larger carbon stock in roots and shrubs in the former, which compensated for the larger aboveground carbon stock in tree biomass of Pinus plots. The carbon stock increased with basal area in all compartments except the soil. The carbon allocation pattern across compartments greatly varied between the two forest types, Pinus plots storing more than half (55%) of its carbon in the aboveground biomass of trees, while Quercus storing more carbon belowground (60%) in roots and soil. Given that belowground carbon stock is more resistant against disturbances, we conclude that native Quercus forests are more suitable for a long-term carbon storage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code Availability
The R code is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aalde H, Gonzales P, Gytarsky M, Krug TA, Kurz W, Ogle S, Raison J, Schoene D, Ravindranath NH (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/
Allen D, Pringle M, Page K, Dalal R (2010) A review of sampling designs for the measurement of soil organic carbon in Australian grazing lands. Rangel J 32:227–246. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ09043
Arévalo JR, García-Fariña G, Oca Y, Fernández-Lugo S (2013) Differences in Carbon Sequestration in Native vs. exotic Pine species (Tenerife, Canary Islands). Bull UASMV Serie Agric 70:299–303
Baldantoni D, Fagnano M, Alfani A (2011) Tropospheric ozone effects on chemical composition and decomposition rate of Quercus ilex L. leaves. Sci Total Environ 409:979–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.022
Barbero M, Bonin G, Loisel R (1990) Changes and disturbances of forest ecosystems caused by human activities in the western part of the Mediterranean basin. Vegetatio 87:151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042952
Bazgir M, Omidipour R, Heydari M, Zeynali N, Hamidi M, Dey D (2020) Prioritizing woody species for the rehabilitation of arid lands in western Iran based on soil properties and carbon sequestration. J Arid Land 12:640–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-020-0013-x
Bellot J, Maestre FT, Chirino E, Hernández N, Urbina JO (2004) Afforestation with Pinus halepensis reduces native shrub performance in a Mediterranean semiarid area. Acta Oecol 25:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2003.10.001
Broncano MJ, Riba M, Retana J (1998) Seed germination and seedling performance of two Mediterranean tree species, holm oak (shape Quercus ilex L.) and Aleppo pine (shape Pinus halepensis Mill.): a multifactor experimental approach. Plant Ecol 138:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009784215900
Broncano MJ, Retana J, Rodrigo A (2005) Predicting the recovery of Pinus halepensis and Quercus ilex forests after a large wildfire in Northeastern Spain. Plant Ecol 180:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-0974-z
Bueis T, Bravo F, Pando V, Turrión MB (2018) Local basal area affects needle litterfall, nutrient concentration, and nutrient release during decomposition in Pinus halepensis Mill. Plantations in Spain. Ann for Sci 75:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0699-5
Canadell J, Raupach M (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–1457. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458
Canadell J, Rodà F (1991) Root biomass of Quercus ilex in a montane Mediterranean forest. Can J for Res 21:1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1139/x91-245
Cañellas I, Montero G, Gea-Izquierdo G (2008) Site index in agroforestry systems: age-dependent and age-independent dynamic diameter growth models for Quercus ilex in Iberian open oak woodlands. Can J for Res 38:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-142
Castro-Díez P, Alonso Á, Saldaña-López A, Granda E (2021) Effects of widespread non-native trees on regulating ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 778:146141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146141
Certini G, Nocentini C, Knicker H, Arfaioli P, Rumpel C (2011) Wildfire effects on soil organic matter quantity and quality in two fire-prone Mediterranean pine forests. Geoderma 167–168:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.09.005
Cotillas M, Espelta JM, Sánchez-Costa E (2016) Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation patterns in two Mediterranean oaks with contrasting leaf habit: an insight into carbon stock in young oak coppices. Eur J Forest Res 135:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0932-9
Didier C (2010) The impacts of repeated drought on the aboveground primary growth of Pinus halepensis Mill. and Quercus ilex L. in Mediterranean France. Environmental Sciences. https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02594187
Doelman JC, Stehfest E, van Vuuren DP, Tabeau A, Hof AF, Braakhekke MC, Gernaat DEHJ, van den Berg M, van Zeist W-J, Daioglou V, van Meijl H, Lucas PL (2020) Afforestation for climate change mitigation: potentials, risks and trade-offs. Glob Change Biol 26:1576–1591. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14887
Fernandez C, Voiriot S, Mévy J-P, Vila B, Ormeño E, Dupouyet S, Bousquet-Mélou A (2008) Regeneration failure of Pinus halepensis Mill.: the role of autotoxicity and some abiotic environmental parameters. For Ecol Manag 255:2928–2936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.072
Ferrio JP, Florit A, Vega A, Serrano L, Voltas J (2003) ∆13 C and tree-ring width reflect different drought responses in Quercus ilex and Pinus halepensis. Oecologia 137:512–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1372-7
Fioretto A, Di Nardo C, Papa S, Fuggi A (2005) Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three leaf litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.007
Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R, Jonsson M, Gustafsson L, Kjellander P, Ruiz-Jaen MC, Fröberg M, Stendahl J, Philipson CD, Mikusiński G, Andersson E, Westerlund, Andrén H, Moberg F, Moen J, Bengtsson J (2013) Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun 4:1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2328
Garcia-Franco N, Wiesmeier M, Goberna M, Martínez-Mena M, Albaladejo J (2014) Carbon dynamics after afforestation of semiarid shrublands: implications of site preparation techniques. For Ecol Manag 319:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.043
Gertrudix RR-P, Montero G, Rio M (2012) Biomass models to estimate carbon stocks for hardwood tree species. For Syst 21:1. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2112211-02193
González-Pérez JA, González-Vila FJ, Almendros G, Knicker H (2004) The effect of Fire on soil organic matter–A review. Environ Int 30:855–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.02.003
He Y, Qin L, Li Z, Liang X, Shao M, Tan L (2013) Carbon storage capacity of monoculture and mixed-species plantations in subtropical China. For Ecol Manag 295:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.020
Hevia A, Campelo F, Chambel R, Vieira J, Alía R, Majada J, Sánchez-Salguero R (2020) Which matters more for wood traits in Pinus halepensis Mill., provenance or climate? Ann for Sci 77:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00956-y
Houghton R (2007) Balancing the Global Carbon Budget. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 35:313–347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057
IGN (2006) Mapa De Suelos De España. Escala 1:1.000.000. Instituto Geográfico Nacional, Vicente Gómez-Miguel (UPM) and Área De Banco De Datos De La Naturaleza. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente), Madrid
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
Jackson RB, Lajtha K, Crow SE, Hugelius G, Kramer MG, Piñeiro G (2017) The ecology of soil carbon: pools, vulnerabilities, and biotic and abiotic controls. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 48:419–445. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054234
Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, Bauwens B, Baritz R, Hagedorn F, Johnson DW, Minkkinen K, Byrne KA (2007) How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137:253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003
Jiménez-González M, De la Rosa J, Jiménez-Morillo N, Almendros G, González-Pérez J, Knicker H (2016) Post-fire recovery of soil organic matter in a Cambisol from typical Mediterranean forest in Southwestern Spain. Sci Total Environ 572:1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.134
Kimble JM, Follett RF, Stewart BA (2000) Assessment methods for Soil Carbon. CRC Press
Kimble JM, Lal R, Birdsey R, Heath LS (eds) (2002) The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032277
Kurz WA, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Dymond CC, Neilson ET (2008) Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1551–1555. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708133105
Langley J, Drake B, Hungate B (2002) Extensive belowground carbon storage supports roots and mycorrhizae in regenerating scrub oaks. Oecologia 131:542–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0932-6
Leuschner C, Förster A, Diers M, Culmsee H (2022) Are northern German scots pine plantations climate smart? The impact of large-scale conifer planting on climate, soil and the water cycle. For Ecol Manag 507:120013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120013
Lukac M (2012) Fine root turnover. In: Mancuso S (ed) Measuring roots: an updated Approach. Springer, pp 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22067-8_18
Maestre F, Cortina J (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas. For Ecol Manag 198:303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2004.05.040
Martínez T (2000) Vegetación de ribera del río henares en la Comunidad De Madrid. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Comunidad de Madrid
Mauri A, Di Leo M, de Rigo D, Caudullo G (2016) Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds) European Atlas of Forest Tree species. Publication Office of the European Union, pp 122–123
Meunpong P, Wachrinrat C, Thaiutsa B, Kanzaki M, Meekaew K (2010) Carbon pools of indigenous and exotic trees species in a forest plantation, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand. Kasetsart J - Nat Sci 44:1044–1057
Molina-Navarro E, Sastre-Merlín A, Vicente R, Martínez-Pérez S (2014) Hydrogeology and hydrogeochemistry in a site of strategic importance: the pareja limno-reservoir drainage basin (Guadalajara, central Spain). Hydrogeol J 22:1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1113-5
Montero G, Cañellas I, Ruíz-Peinado R (2002) Growth and yield models for Pinus halepensis Mill. For Syst 10:179–201. https://doi.org/10.5424/720
Montero G, Ruiz-Peinado R, Muñoz M (2005) Producción De biomasa y fijación de CO2 por Los bosques españoles. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia
Montero G, Lopez-Leiva C, Ruiz-Peinado R, Lopez-Senespleda E, Onrubia R, Pasalodos-Tato M (2020) Producción De biomasa y fijación de carbono por Los matorrales españoles y por El Horizonte orgánico superficial de Los suelos forestales. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación
Naqash M, Hussain A, Ul Haq I, Shah S, Usama HM (2021) Comparative assessment of carbon stock in chir pine natural forest Shinkiari and man-made plantation Parachinar, Pakistan. Int J Conserv Sci 12:1441–1454
Navarro-Cano JA, Barberá GG, Castillo VM (2010) Pine litter from afforestations hinders the establishment of endemic plants in semiarid scrubby habitats of natura 2000 network. Restor Ecol 18:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00606.x
Nazari M, Eteghadipour M, Zarebanadkouki M, Ghorbani M, Dippold MA, Bilyera N, Zamanian K (2021) Impacts of logging-associated compaction on forest soils: a meta-analysis. Front for Glob Change 4:780074. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.780074
Pausas JG, Bladé C, Valdecantos A, Seva JP, Fuentes D, Alloza JA, Vilagrosa A, Bautista S, Cortina J, Vallejo R (2004) Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain: new perspectives for an old practice: a review. Plant Ecol 171:209–220
Pawson SM, Brin A, Brockerhoff EG, Lamb D, Payn TW, Paquette A, Parrotta JA (2013) Plantation forests, climate change and biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 22:1203–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0458-8
Poorter L, Lianes E, Moreno-de las Heras M, Zavala MA (2012) Architecture of Iberian canopy tree species in relation to wood density, shade tolerance and climate. Plant Ecology 213:707–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0032-6R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rodríguez-Loinaz G, Amezaga I, Onaindia M (2013) Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. J Environ Manage 120:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.032
Ruiz-Peinado R, Rio M, Montero G (2011) New models for estimating the carbon sink capacity of Spanish softwood species. For Syst 20:1. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2011201-11643
Ruiz-Peinado R, Bravo-Oviedo A, Lopez-Senespleda E, Bravo F, Rio M (2017) Forest management and carbon sequestration in the Mediterranean region: a review. For Syst 26:eR04S. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2017262-11205
Schelhaas MJ, Hengeveld G, Moriondo M, Reinds GJ, Kundzewicz ZW, Maat HW, Bindi M (2010) Assessing risk and adaptation options to Fires and windstorms in European forestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 15:681–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9243-0
Serrada R, Gómez-Sanz V, Aroca MJ, Otero J, Bravo-Fernández JA, Roig S (2017) Decline in holm oak coppices (Quercus ilex L. subsp. ballota (Desf.) Samp.): biometric and physiological interpretations. For Syst 26(2). https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2017262-10583
Shukla RP, Ramakrishnan PS (1984) Biomass allocation strategies and productivity of tropical trees related to successional status. For Ecol Manag 9:315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(84)90016-1
Silva JS, Tomé M (2016) Tasmanian blue gum in Portugal – opportunities and risks of a widely cultivated species. In: Krumm F, Vítková L (eds) Introduced tree species in European forests: opportunities and challenges. European Forest Institute, pp 352–361
Silva JS, Moreira F, Vaz P, Catry F, Godinho-Ferreira P (2009) Assessing the relative Fire proneness of different forest types in Portugal. Plant Biosystems 143:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500903233250
Soil Survey Staff (2003) Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 9th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service
Sousa V, Silva ME, Louzada JL, Pereira H (2021) Wood density and ring width in Quercus rotundifolia trees in Southern Portugal. Forests 12:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111499
Vadell Guiral E, de Miguel Magaña S, Pemán García J (2019) Tree species used in the reforestation of Spain since 1877 based on national forest maps. Historia Agrar 77:1–30. https://doi.org/10.26882/histagrar.077e05v
Valbuena-Carabaña M, López de Heredia U, Fuentes-Utrilla P, González-Doncel I, Gil L (2010) Historical and recent changes in the Spanish forests: a socio-economic process. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 162:492–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.11.003
Vayreda J, Martinez-Vilalta J, Gracia M, Retana J (2012) Recent climate changes interact with stand structure and management to determine changes in tree carbon stocks in Spanish forests. Glob Change Biol 18:1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02606.x
Verdú M (2000) Ecological and evolutionary differences between Mediterranean seeders and resprouters. J Veg Sci 11:265–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236806
Villaescusa R, Díaz R (1998) Segundo Inventario Forestal Nacional. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, ICONA, Madrid
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38
Waller LP, Allen WJ, Barratt BIP, Condron LM, França FM, Hunt JE, Koele N, Orwin KH, Steel GS, Tylianakis JM, Wakelin SA, Dickie IA (2020) Biotic interactions drive ecosystem responses to exotic plant invaders. Science 368:967–972. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba2225
Wang J, Wang H, Fu X, Xu M, Wang Y (2016) Effects of site preparation treatments before afforestation on soil carbon release. For Ecol Manag 361:277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.022
Yan W, Wang W, Peng Y, Chen X (2022) Evaluation of biomass and carbon stocks in three pine forest types in Karst area of southwestern China. J Sustainable Forestry 41:18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2020.1830803
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain, the Spanish Research Agency, the European Regional Development Fund [EXARBIN (RTI2018-093504-B-I00) and InvaNET (RED2018-102571-T) projects], by the REMEDINAL project of the Community of Madrid (TE-CM S2018/EMT-4338), by the UAH-GP2022-3 project of the Alcalá University, and by an Erasmus + grant which supported a five month stay of Bram van den Bor in Spain. We acknowledge Adrián Lázaro Lobo, Paula Cruces and Adrián Bocero Guerrero for their help with the fieldwork, and Asun Saldaña for her help with soil cartography.
Funding
This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain, the Spanish Research Agency, the European Regional Development Fund [EXARBIN (RTI2018-093504-B-I00) and InvaNET (RED2018-102571-T) projects], by the REMEDINAL project of the Community of Madrid (TE-CM S2018/EMT-4338), by the UAH-GP2022-3 project of the Alcalá University, and by an Erasmus + grant which supported a five month stay of Bram van den Bor in Spain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The study conception was performed by Pilar Castro-Díez and Álvaro Alonso. All authors contributed to the design, and field sampling. Processing of field samples was performed by Bram van den Bor. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Bram van den Bor and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
van den Bor, B., Castro-Díez, P. & Alonso, Á. Above and belowground carbon stock of pine plantations and native oak forests coexisting in central Spain. New Forests (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-023-10011-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-023-10011-z