Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the Cerebral Cortex after Dosed Craniocerebral Trauma in Rats of Different Ages

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Dosed lateral fluid percussion was used to model craniocerebral trauma (CCT) of moderate to severe intensity in one- and two-year-old rats. Brain sections were stained with cresyl violet by the Nissl method and with an immunochemical reaction for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) – a marker for astrocytes. The results provide evidence that zones of direct and remote injury formed in the side ipsilateral to the blow. The direct injury zone corresponded to the area of direct contact of the column of liquid with the dura mater, while the remote injury zone was positioned lateral and caudal to the direct injury zone. Morphological detection of trauma depended on the strength of the blow and was seen in both age groups as astrocytic gliosis, with thinning of layer I of the cortex due to death of neurons. Signs of ischemic changes to neurons were probably associated with local impairment to blood supply. Brain damage in one-year-old rats was local in nature but was more diffuse in two-year-olds, while gliosis was characterized by inhomogeneity. The reproducibility and appropriateness of the model allow it to be used for investigation of the molecular genetic mechanisms of the sequelae of CCT in humans and for identifying common mechanisms in the sequelae of CCT and the pathogenesis of major diseases comorbid with CCT, particularly depression and epilepsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. B. Gekht, N. V. Gulyaeva, V. V. Krylov, et al., “Epilepsy in stroke and craniocerebral trauma patients,” in: Current Epileptology, APKIPPRO, Moscow (2011), pp. 243–251.

  2. L. V. Krushinskii, Evolutionary Genetic Aspects of Because eh, Nauka, Moscow (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. E. Snesarev, General Histopathology of Cerebral Trauma, Medgiz, Moscow (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. S. Carbonell and M. S. Grady, “Regional and temporal characterization of neuronal, glial, and axonal response after traumatic brain injury in the mouse,” Acta Neuropathol., 98, No. 4, 396–406 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S. C. Cortez, T. K. Macintosh, and L. J. Noble, “Experimental fluid percussion brain injury: vascular disruption and neuronal and glial alterations,” Brain Res., 482, No. 2, 271–282 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R. D’Ambrosio, J. S. Fender, J. P. Fairbanks, et al., “Progression from frontal-parietal to mesial-temporal epilepsy after fluid percussion injury in the rat,” Brain, 128, No. 1, 174–188 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S. L. Dawson, C. S. Hirsch, F. V. Lucas, and B. A. Sebek, “The contrecoup phenomenon. Reappraisal of a classic problem,” Hum. Pathol., 11, No. 2, 155–166 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. S. V. Kabadi, G. D. Hilton, D. A. Stoica, et al., “Fluid-percussioninduced traumatic brain injury model in rats,” Nat. Protoc., 5, No. 6, 1552–1563 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. M. C. LaPlaca, C. M. Simon, F. R. Prado, and D. K. Cullen, “CNS injury biomechanics and experimental models,” Prog. Brain Res., 16, 13–26 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. K. McIntosh, R. Vink, L. Noble, et al., “Traumatic brain injury in the rat: characterization of a lateral fluid-percussion model,” Neuroscience, 28, No. 1, 233–244 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Oakley and B. Tharakan, “Vascular hyperpermeability and aging,” Aging Dis., 5, No. 2, 114–125 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. W. T. O’Connor, A. Smyth, and M. D. Gilchrist, “Animal models of traumatic brain injury: a critical evaluation,” Pharmacol. Ther., 130, No. 2, 106–113 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Reilly, “The impact of neurotrauma on society: an international perspective,” Prog. Brain Res., 161, 3–9 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Tesla, J. F. Malec, A. M. Boessner, and A. W. Brown, “Outcome after traumatic brain injury: effects of aging on recovery,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 86, No. 9, 1815–1823 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. J. Thompson, J. Lifschitz, N. Marklund, et al., “Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: a 15-year review and evaluation,” J. Neurotrauma, 22, No. 1, 42–75 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. P. Levshina.

Additional information

Translated from Morfologiya, Vol. 148, No. 5, pp. 14–20, September–October, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komol’tsev, I.G., Levshina, I.P., Novikova, M.R. et al. Changes in the Cerebral Cortex after Dosed Craniocerebral Trauma in Rats of Different Ages. Neurosci Behav Physi 46, 826–832 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-016-0317-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-016-0317-7

Keywords

Navigation