Abstract
With increasing years of mining in the Panxi mine, coal seam pressure is increasing and safety hazards are becoming greater. In this paper, experimental and modeling studies were conducted on molecular-scale pores in Panxi bituminous coal. Reconstructing the pores of coal from a molecular perspective was realized, providing a methodological basis for the study of the microscopic properties of Panxi coal. The molecular model of the Panxi coal was established by ultimate analysis, solid-state CP/MAS 13C nuclear magnetic resonance, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Based on the Monte Carlo method, a pore structure model of the Panxi coal sample was constructed with 100 coal molecules. Visual and quantitative characterizations of molecular-scale pores of different sizes in the model were achieved using Avizo software. The characterization results of the model were in good agreement with the experimental results of CO2 adsorption. The structural parameters of the molecular-scale pores were calculated and analyzed. The average coordination number of the pores was 2.31, indicating good pore connectivity. The pore-throat radius ratios (ratio of pore radius to average radius of throat connected to pore) were mainly in the range of 1.25–2.25, indicating that the molecular-scale pore space of the coal sample was relatively uniform. The proposed method of molecular-scale pores reconstruction and characterization can be applied to the study of coal microscopic properties such as adsorption, permeation, and mechanics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clarkson, C. R., & Bustin, R. M. (1999). The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: A laboratory and modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling. Fuel, 78(11), 1345–1362.
Clarkson, C. R., Wood, J., Burgis, S., Aquino, S., & Freeman, M. (2012). Nanopore-structure analysis and permeability predictions for a tight gas siltstone reservoir by use of low-pressure adsorption and mercury-intrusion techniques. Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 15(06), 648–661.
Dong, H., & Blunt, M. J. (2009). Pore-network extraction from micro-computerized-tomography images. Physical review. E Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 80(3 Pt 2), 36307.
Du, H., Song, J., Yang, J., Peng, Y., & Zhai, W. (2020). Study on gas occurrence law and porosity characteristics of low-permeability outburst coal seam. China Coal, 46(07), 58–64.
Gan, H., Nandi, S. P., & Walker, P. L. (1972). Nature of the porosity in American coals. Fuel, 51(4), 272–277.
Green, U., Aizenstat, Z., Gieldmeister, F., & Cohen, H. (2011). CO2 adsorption inside the pore structure of different rank coals during low temperature oxidation of open air coal stockpiles. Energy & Fuels, 25(9), 4211–4215.
Gürdal, G., & Yalçın, M. N. (2001). Pore volume and surface area of the Carboniferous coals from the Zonguldak basin (NW Turkey) and their variations with rank and maceral composition. International Journal of Coal Geology, 48(1), 133–144.
Hodot, B. B., Song, S. Z., & Wang, Y. A. (1966). Outburst of coal and coalbed gas. China Industry Press.
Hou, J., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2017). Evolution characteristics of micropore and mesopore of different rank coal and cause of their formation. Coal Geology & Exploration, 45(05), 75–81.
Hu, H., Li, X., Fang, Z., Wei, N., & Li, Q. (2010). Small-molecule gas sorption and diffusion in coal: Molecular simulation. Energy, 35(7), 2939–2944.
Jing, D., Meng, X., Ge, S., Zhang, T., Ma, M., & Tong, L. (2021). Reconstruction and seepage simulation of a coal pore-fracture network based on CT technology. PLoS ONE, 16(6), 252277.
Ju, Y., Huang, Y., Gong, W., Zheng, J., Xie, H., Wang, L., et al. (2019). 3-D reconstruction method for complex pore structures of rocks using a small number of 2-D X-ray computed tomography images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(4), 1873–1882.
Ju, Y., Zheng, J., Epstein, M., Sudak, L., Wang, J., & Zhao, X. (2014). 3D numerical reconstruction of well-connected porous structure of rock using fractal algorithms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 279, 212–226.
Klaver, J., Desbois, G., Urai, J. L., & Littke, R. (2012). BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia Shale from the Hils area, Germany. International Journal of Coal Geology, 103, 12–25.
Kozłowski, M. (2003). XPS study of reductively and non-reductively modified coals. Fuel, 83(3), 259–265.
Li, X., Kang, Y., & Haghighi, M. (2018). Investigation of pore size distributions of coals with different structures by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Measurement, 116, 122–128.
Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., & Hou, J. (2019). Characterization on pore structure of tectonic coals based on the method of mercury intrusion, carbon dioxide adsorption and nitrogen adsorption. Journal of China Coal Society, 44(04), 1188–1196.
Li, Z., Ward, C. R., & Gurba, L. W. (2009). Occurrence of non-mineral inorganic elements in macerals of low-rank coals. International Journal of Coal Geology, 81(4), 242–250.
Liu, H., & Yu, J. (2006). Determination of rock porosity by electron microscope image. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society(S1), 373–374.
Masoud, A., Sepideh, A., Golzar, K., Sadeghi, G. M. M., & Modarress, H. (2014). Study of nanostructure characterizations and gas separation properties of poly(urethane–urea)s membranes by molecular dynamics simulation. Journal of Membrane Science, 462, 28–41.
Mastalerz, M., He, L., Melnichenko, Y. B., Rupp, J. A., Oak Ridge National Lab. ORNL, O. R. T. U., & High, F. I. R. (2012). Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques. Energy & Fuels, 26(8), 5109–5120.
Meng, J., Niu, J., Meng, H., Xia, J., & Zhong, R. (2019). Insight on adsorption mechanism of coal molecules at different ranks. Fuel, 267, 117234.
Meng, J., Zhong, R., Li, S., Yin, F., & Nie, B. (2018). Molecular model construction and study of gas adsorption of Zhaozhuang coal. Energy & Fuels, 32(9), 9727–9737.
Ni, H., Liu, J., Huang, B., Pu, H., Meng, Q., Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Quantitative analysis of pore structure and permeability characteristics of sandstone using SEM and CT images. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 88, 103861.
Nie, B., Wang, K., Fan, Y., Zhang, L., Lun, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). The comparative study on calculation of coal pore characteristics of different pore shapes based SAXS. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 5(03), 284–290.
Pietrzak, R. (2009). XPS study and physico-chemical properties of nitrogen-enriched microporous activated carbon from high volatile bituminous coal. Fuel, 88(10), 1871–1877.
Ravikovitch, P. I., Vishnyakov, A., & Neimark, A. I. (2001). Density functional theories and molecular simulations of adsorption and phase transitions in nanopores. Physical Review E, 64(1), 11602.
Roslin, A., Pokrajac, D., Wu, K., & Zhou, Y. (2020). 3D pore system reconstruction using nano-scale 2D SEM images and pore size distribution analysis for intermediate rank coal matrix. Fuel, 275, 117934.
Shi, J., & Durucan, S. (2005). Gas storage and flow in coalbed reservoirs: implementation of a bidisperse pore model for gas diffusion in coal matrix. Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 8(02), 169–175.
Shinn, J. H. (1996). Visualization of complex hydrocarbon reaction systems. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 37(6), 418.
Sun, H. (1998). COMPASS: An ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 102(38), 7338–7364.
Takanohashi, T., Nakamura, K., Terao, Y., & Lino, M. (2000). Computer simulation of solvent swelling of coal molecules: Effect of different solvents. Energy & Fuels, 14(2), 393–399.
Trewhella, M. J., Poplett, I. J. F., & Grint, A. (1986). Structure of green river oil shale kerogen: Determination using solid state 13C n.m.r. spectroscopy. Fuel, 65(4), 541–546.
Vandenbroucke, M., & Largeau, C. (2007). Kerogen origin, evolution and structure. Organic Geochemistry, 38(5), 719–833.
Wang, G., Han, D., Qin, X., Liu, Z., & Liu, J. (2020). A comprehensive method for studying pore structure and seepage characteristics of coal mass based on 3D CT reconstruction and NMR. Fuel, 281, 118735.
Wang, J., He, Y., Li, H., Yu, J., Xie, W., & Wei, H. (2017a). The molecular structure of Inner Mongolia lignite utilizing XRD, solid state 13 C NMR, HRTEM and XPS techniques. Fuel, 203, 764–773.
Wang, L., Zhang, P., & Zheng, M. (1996). Study on structural characterization of three Chinese coals of high organic sulphur content using XPS and solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 24(6), 539–543.
Wang, Q., Hou, Y., Wu, W., Yu, Z., Ren, S., Liu, Q., et al. (2017b). A study on the structure of Yilan oil shale kerogen based on its alkali-oxygen oxidation yields of benzene carboxylic acids, 13C NMR and XPS. Fuel Processing Technology, 166, 30–40.
Wang, Z., Cheng, Y., Zhang, K., Hao, C., Wang, L., Li, W., et al. (2018). Characteristics of microscopic pore structure and fractal dimension of bituminous coal by cyclic gas adsorption/desorption: An experimental study. Fuel, 232, 495–505.
Wu, J., Yuan, Y., Niu, S., Wei, X., & Yang, J. (2020). Multiscale characterization of pore structure and connectivity of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin, China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 120, 104514.
Wu, X., Peng, Y., Yan, Q., Zhao, H., & Wang, X. (2019). Reconstruction of coal pore network based on improved watershed algorithm and seepage simulation. China Safety Science Journal, 29(09), 144–149.
Xiang, J., Zeng, F., Li, B., Zhang, L., Li, M., & Liang, H. (2013). Construction of macromolecular structural model of anthracite from Chengzhuang coal mine and its molecular simulation. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 41(04), 391–399.
Yang, Q., Xue, J., Li, W., Du, X., Ma, Q., Zhan, K., et al. (2021). Comprehensive evaluation and interpretation of mercury intrusion porosimetry data of coals based on fractal theory, Tait equation and matrix compressibility. Fuel, 298, 120823.
Zhao, Y., Liu, S., Elsworth, D., Jiang, Y., & Zhu, J. (2014). Pore structure characterization of coal by synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy. Energy & Fuels, 28(6), 3704–3711.
Zhao, Y., Sun, Y., Liu, S., Chen, Z., & Yuan, L. (2018). Pore structure characterization of coal by synchrotron radiation nano-CT. Fuel, 215, 102–110.
Zheng, M., Pan, Y., Wang, Z., Li, X., & Guo, L. (2019). Capturing the dynamic profiles of products in Hailaer brown coal pyrolysis with reactive molecular simulations and experiments. Fuel, 268, 117290.
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2022YJSAQ21), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1704242), and the Yue Qi Distinguished Scholar Project, China University of Mining & Technology, Beijing; the authors are grateful for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Appendix: Detailed Process for Quantitative Analysis and Visualization of Model
Appendix: Detailed Process for Quantitative Analysis and Visualization of Model
The specific process of quantitative analysis and visualization of pores using Avizo software is shown in Figure
15.
The “Generate Molecular Surfaces” command was selected to generate the pore surface of the model. Surface Type was set to SES; Quality was set to correct; Number of Points per A2 was set to 2. For this model, the probe radius is set in the range of 0.05–0.5 nm, and both too large and too small are out of the model pore size range. In this paper, we analyzed the two cases of probe radius setting 0.14 nm and 0.16 nm.
The “Scan Surface to Volume” command was selected to convert the pore surface into a solid model. Dimensions were set to 451. Solid slices of the model were obtained in this step.
The slice file was imported into Avizo and the “Auto Thresholding” command was selected to perform threshold segmentation to identify the pores. Type was set to Auto Threshold Low; Interpretation was set to 3D; Mode was selected as min–max; Criterion was set to factorization.
The “Axis Connectivity” command was selected to detect the connectivity of the pores. Neighborhood was set to 26; Orientation was selected to Z-axis.
The “Separate Objects” command was selected to separate the pore space for the subsequent generation of the pore network model. Method was set to Chamfer-Conservative; Marker Extent was selected as 2; Out Type was selected as connected object; Algorithm Mode was set to repeatable. The results of the segmented pores were obtained in this step. This result can be used to generate a pore network model.
The “Generate Pore Network Model” command was selected to generate the pore network model. The “Pore Network Model View” command can be selected to display the pore network model. The parameters of this command are set according to the needs of the display, and the adjustment of the parameters only affects the appearance of the display, not the pore parameters. While generating the pore network model, the pore parameters are automatically calculated and can be viewed in the Avizo browser. These parameters include pore size, number of pores, pore coordination number, pore coordinates, etc. The data can be imported into Excel for statistical purposes to obtain a pore parameter distribution.
The “Distribution Analysis” command was selected to analyze the pore network model. Property in X was set to EqRadius; Property in Y was set to Area and Volume; Number of Bins was set to 50. The data were imported into Excel and processed to obtain the pore size distribution, cumulative specific surface area, and cumulative pore volume maps.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, J., Zhang, S., Cao, Z. et al. Pore Structure Characterization Based on the Panxi Coal Molecular Model. Nat Resour Res 31, 2731–2747 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-022-10085-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-022-10085-0