Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of the Price of High-Tech Metals: An Event Study

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growing demand for high-tech products has resulted in strong growth in demand for certain minor metals. In combination with production concentrated in China, this caused strong and unpredicted price movements in recent years. As a result, manufacturing companies have to cope with additional risks. However, the detailed reasons for the price development are only partially understood. Therefore, we analyzed empirically which determinants can be assigned to price movements and performed an event study on the high-tech metals neodymium, indium, and gallium. Based on our dataset of news items, we were able to find coinciding events to almost 90% of all price jumps (recall). We showed that if any information about these events occurred with a probability of over 50% there would also be a price jump within 10 days (precision). However, the classical set of price determinants has to be extended for these specific markets, as we found unorthodox factors like holidays or weather that may be indicators for price movements. Therefore, we hope that our study supports industry for instance in performing more informed short-term planning of metals purchasing based on information about specific events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Details of the Metal-Pages pricing methodology can be found at: http://www.metal-pages.com/metalprices/our-pricing-methodology.

  2. Joulin et al. (2008) added an additional modulating factor s, multiplied with the moving average m. Thus, it is possible, by modulating s, to define smaller and higher jumps. For details and usage, we refer the reader to Joulin et al. (2008).

References

  • Ait-Sahalia, Y. (2004). Disentangling diffusion from jumps. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(3), 487–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angerer, G., Erdmann, L., Marscheider-Weidemann, F., Scharp, M., Lüllmann, A., Handke, V., et al. (2009). Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien. Einfluss des branchenspezifischen Rohstoffbedarfs in rohstoffintensiven Zukunftstechnologien auf die zukünftige Rohstoffnachfrage. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U. (1997). Metals recycling: Economic and environmental implications. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 21(3), 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. N., & Feenstra, R. C. (1982). Tariff seeking and the efficient tariff. In J. N. Bhagwati (Ed.), Import competition and response (pp. 245–262). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. N., & Johnson, H. G. (1961). A generalized theory of the effects of tariffs on the terms of trade. Oxford Economic Papers, 13(3), 225–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg News. (2010). China Cuts Export Quotas for Rare Earths by 35%. Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-28/china-cuts-first-round-rare-earth-export-quotas-by-11-correct-.html. Accessed 01 June 2012.

  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2002). Investments (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradsher, K. (2010). China to tighten limits on rare earth exports. New York: New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, R. A., & Bhagwati, J. N. (1981). Foreign ownership and the theory of trade and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 89(3), 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, C., & Gilbert, C. L. (1995). Metals price volatility, 1972–1995. Resources Policy, 21(4), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, R. D. (1990). The economics of exploration for non-renewable resources. Journal of Economic Surveys, 4(4), 361–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1996). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. (2010). Understanding world metals prices—Returns, volatility and diversification. Resources Policy, 35(3), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuddington, J. T. (2008). An analogy between secondary and primary metals production. Resources Policy, 33(1), 48–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Heal, G. (1974). The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirer, R., & Kutan, A. M. (2010). The behavior of crude oil spot and futures prices around OPEC and SPR announcements: An event study perspective. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1467–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshmukh, S. D., & Pliska, S. R. (1980). Optimal consumption and exploration of nonrenewable resources under uncertainty. Econometrica, 48(1), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devarajan, S., & Fisher, A. C. (1982). Exploration and scarcity. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1279–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC. (2010). Critical raw materials for the EU: Report of the Ad hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materials. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/raw-materials/files/docs/report-b_en.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2014.

  • Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1987). Commodity futures prices: Some evidence on forecast power, premiums, and the theory of storage. Journal of Business, 60(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C., & Laxminarayan, R. (2004). Monopoly extraction of an exhaustible resource with two markets. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(1), 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudet, G., & Lasserre, P. (1988). On comparing monopoly and competition in exhaustible resource exploitation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(4), 412–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. L. (2010). Speculative influences on commodity futures prices 2006–2008. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). https://password.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/documents/seminars/senior/christopher-gilbert-04-11-09.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2014.

  • Gray, L. C. (1914). Rent under the assumption of exhaustibility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 28(3), 466–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, D. A. (1980). Increasing extraction costs and resource prices: Some further results. The Bell Journal of Economics, 11(1), 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H. L., & Mutmansky, J. M. (2002). Introductory mining engineering (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick, J. M. (1978). Substitution among exhaustible resources and intergenerational equity. The Review of Economic Studies, 45(2), 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (1976). The relationship between price and extraction cost for a resource with a backstop technology. The Bell Journal of Economics, 7(2), 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, M. (1983). Monopoly resource extractions under the presence of predetermined substitute production. Journal of Economic Theory, 30(1), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1931). The economics of exhaustible resources. The Journal of Political Economy, 39, 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing, L. (2004). Germany’s WEEE recycling system and resource reusing technology. Technology of Electric Machine and Appliance, 5, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joulin, A., Lefevre, A., Grunberg, D., & Bouchaud, J. (2008). Stock price jumps: News and volume play a minor role. Science & Finance, Capital Fund Management. http://arxiv.org/pdf/0803.1769.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2012.

  • Kaplinskiy, R. (2006). Revisiting the revisited terms of trade: Will China make a difference? World Development, 34(6), 981–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, L., & Newbery, D. M. (1991). Optimal tariffs on exhaustible resources. Journal of International Economics, 30(3–4), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer, J. A. (1988). The cut-off grade and the theory of extraction. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 21(1), 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer, J. A. (1989). Price expectations, ore quality selection, and the supply of a nonrenewable resource. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 16(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer, J. A. (1990). Taxation, ore quality selection, and the depletion of a heterogeneous deposit of a nonrenewable resource. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(2), 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krautkraemer, J. A. (1998). Nonrenewable resource scarcity. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 2065–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. R., Matthews, S. A., & Burness, H. S. (1979). Monopoly and the rate of extraction of exhaustible resources: Note. American Economic Review, 69(1), 227–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhija, M. V. (1993). Government Intervention in the Venezuelan Petroleum Industry: An empirical investigation of political risk. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3), 531–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. L. (1972). The limits to growth (2nd ed.). New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1–2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metal-Pages. (2011). www.metal-pages.com. Accessed 01 June 2012.

  • Moss, R. L., Tzimas, E., Kara, H., Willis, P., & Kooroshy, J. (2011). Critical metals in strategic energy technologies. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Institute for Energy and Transport. http://setis.ec.europa.eu/system/files/CriticalMetalsinStrategicEnergyTechnologies-def.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2013.

  • Neal, H. (2007). Oil and gas technology development. The University of Texas. http://downloadcenter.connectlive.com/events/npc071807/pdf-downloads/Study_Topic_Papers/26-TTG-OGTechDevelopment.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2012.

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1978). The optimal exploration and production of nonrenewable resources. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 841–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1989). Microeconomics (1st ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, S. J. (1967). A compound events model for security prices. The Journal of Business, 40(3), 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radetzki, M. (2008). A handbook of primary commodities in the global economy (1st ed.). Camebridge: Camebridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reller, A., Bublies, T., Staudinger, T., Oswald, I., Meißner, S., & Allen, M. (2009). The mobile phone: Powerful communicator and potential metal dissipator. GAIA, 18, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. D. (1974). The optimal use of non-renewable resources: The theory of extraction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M. E. (1982). Trends in natural-resource commodity prices: An analysis of the time domain. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 9(2), 122–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M. E. (1986). Taxation of non-renewable resources at various stages of production. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 19(2), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M., & Wan, F. Y. (1976). Extraction costs in the theory of exhaustible resources. The Bell Journal of Economics, 7(2), 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). Monopoly and the rate of extraction of exhaustible resources. The American Economic Review, 66(4), 655–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1993). Economics (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., & Dasgupta, P. (1981). Market structure and resource extraction under uncertainty. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 83(2), 318–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swierzbinski, J. E., & Mendelsohn, R. (1989). Exploration and exhaustible resources: The microfoundations of aggregate models. International Economic Review, 30(1), 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telser, L. G. (1958). Futures trading and the storage of cotton and wheat. Journal of Political Economy, 66(3), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2003). DIRECTIVE 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE).

  • Tilton, J. E. (1999). The future of recycling. Resources Policy, 25(3), 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. L. (1952). Order tests for the two-sample problem and their power. Indagationes Mathematicae, 14, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. L. (1953). Order tests for the two-sample problem. II, III. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series A, 465, 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants of the GeoHannover 2012 conference for the helpful discussion of our paper. We further thank the two anonymous journal reviewers for their valuable comments on our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Wanner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wanner, M., Gaugler, T., Gleich, B. et al. Determinants of the Price of High-Tech Metals: An Event Study. Nat Resour Res 24, 139–159 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9244-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-014-9244-x

Keywords

Navigation