Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic phases at the molecular scale: the case of cylindrical Co nanoparticles

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnetic phases of cobalt nanocylinders at the molecular scale have been studied by means of density functional theory together with micromagnetism. Diameters of the objects are under 1 nm. The magnetic phases resulting from first-principle calculations are far from obvious and quite different from both semiclassical results and extrapolations from what is measured for larger objects. These differences reinforce the importance of the quantum mechanical approach for small nanoscopic particles. One of the main results reported here is precisely the unexpected order in the last filled orbitals, which produce objects with alternating magnetic properties as the length of the cylinder increases. The resulting anisotropy is not obvious. The vortex phase is washed out due to the aspect ratio of the systems and the strength of the exchange constants for Co. Nevertheless, we do a pedagogical experiment by turning gradually down the exchange constants to investigate the kind of vortex states which are hidden underneath the ferromagnetic phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera-Granja F, Montejano-Carrizales JM, Vogel EE (2014) Structural and electronic properties of magnetic cylinders at the atomic scale. Eur Phys J D 68(2):38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera-Granja F, Montejano-Carrizales JM, Vogel EE (2016) Structural and oxidation properties of coni nanowires. Eur Phys J D 70(6):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonel PS, Oliveira CLP, Jorge GA, Perez OE, Leyva AG, Negri RM (2015) Synthesis and characterization of cofe2o4 magnetic nanotubes, nanorods and nanowires. formation of magnetic structured elastomers by magnetic field-induced alignment of cofe2o4 nanorods. J Nanoparticle Res 17(7):294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan MT, Bance S, Dean J, Schrefl T, Allwood DA (2012) Transverse and vortex domain wall structure in magnetic nanowires with uniaxial in-plane anisotropy. J Phys Condens Matter 24(2):024205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Albuquerque e Castro J, Altbir D, Retamal JC, Vargas P (2002) Scaling approach to the magnetic phase diagram of nanosized systems. Phys Rev Lett 88:237202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorantes-Davila J, Pastor GM (2005) Magnetic reorientation transitions along the crossover from one-dimensional to two-dimensional transition-metal nanostructures. Phys Rev B 72:085427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douvalis AP, Bourlinos AB, Tucek J, Čépe K, Bakas T, Zboril R (2016) Development of novel fept/nanodiamond hybrid nanostructures: L10 phase size-growth suppression and magnetic properties. J Nanoparticle Res 18(5):115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambardella P, Dallmeyer A, Maiti K, Malagoli M, Eberhardt W, Kern K, Carbone C (2002) Ferromagnetism in one-dimensional monatomic metal chains. Nature 416(6878):301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert TL (2004) A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials. IEEE Trans Magn 40(6):3443–3449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Polo C, Larumbe S, Barquín LF, Fernández LR (2016) Magnetic induction heating as a new tool for the synthesis of fe3o4–tio2 nanoparticle systems. J Nanoparticle Res 18(5):118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs D, Kresse G, Hafner J (2000) Fully unconstrained noncollinear magnetism within the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 62(17):11556–11570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong J, Wu RQ (2003) First principles calculations of magnetic anisotropy energy of co monatomic wires. Phys Rev B 67:020406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996a) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mat Sci 6:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996b) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresse G, Hafner J (1994) Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys Rev B 49:14251–14269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau LP, Lifshitz EM (1935) On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys Z Sowjetunion 8:153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Landeros P, Escrig J, Altbir D, Bahiana M, e Castro J (2006) Stability of magnetic configurations in nanorings. J Appl Phys 100(4):044311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Wang T, Ren L, Sun J (2004) Structure and magnetic properties of co nanowires in self-assembled arrays. J Phys Condens Matter 16(45):8053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz F, Romero AH, Mejia-Lopez J, Moran-Lopez JL (2013) Finite size effects on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy in fe magnetic nanowires from first principles. J Nanopart Res 15(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsch K, Castano FJ, Matthias S, Lee W, Ross CA (2005) Synthesis of cobalt/polymer multilayer nanotubes. Adv Eng Mater 7(4):217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Generalized gradient approximation made simple [phys. rev. lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys Rev Lett 78:1396–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael MP, Christodoulides JA, Qadri SN, Simpkins BS, Byers JM (2010) Magnetic moment degradation of nanowires in biological media: real-time monitoring with squid magnetometry. Nanotechnology 21(28):285101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed F, Labaye Y, Sayed Hassan R, El Haj Hassan F, Yaacoub N, Greneche J-M (2016) Size and thickness effect on magnetic structures of maghemite hollow magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 18(9):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velázquez-Galván Y, Martínez-Huerta JM, Medina JDLT, Danlée Y, Piraux L, Encinas A (2014) Dipolar interaction in arrays of magnetic. J Phys Condens Matter 26(2):026001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel EE, Vargas P, Altbir D, Escrig J (2010) Handbook of nanophysics, vol 4. CRC press,

  • Xie J, Chen L, Varadan VK, Yancey J, Srivatsan M (2008) The effects of functional magnetic nanotubes with incorporated nerve growth factor in neuronal differentiation of pc12 cells. Nanotechnology 19(10):105101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Singh R, Bray-Ali N, Haas S (2008) Scaling analysis and application: Phase diagram of magnetic nanorings and elliptical nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 77:144428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Díaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Universidad de La Frontera DIUFRO project under grant DI14-0067. Partial support from the following Chilean sources is acknowledged: Fondecyt (Chile) under contracts 1150019, 1150806 and Financiamiento Basal para Centros Científicos y Tecnológicos de Excelencia (Chile) through the Center for Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (CEDENNA, Contract FB0807).

Appendix: Nomenclature

Appendix: Nomenclature

Pentagonal tubes

The basic unit is a pentagonal ring of Co atoms. The tube grows by adding these pentagons in an intercalated way thus minimizing energy. A projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1b. They are denoted by T5-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R, with R representing the number of rings conforming the tube. We will consider from T5-10 to T5-35.

Pentagonal wires

The basic units are a pentagonal ring of Co atoms and a single Co atom over the center of such pentagon. The wires grow intercalating the axial atom in between consecutive rings; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1c. These wires are denoted by W5-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R + (R −1), with R representing the number of rings conforming the wire. At the ends of the cylinder only pentagons are allowed. We will consider from W5-11 to W5-41.

Hexagonal wires

The basic units are hexagonal rings of Co atoms and a single Co atom over the center of such hexagon. The wires grow intercalating the axial atom in between consecutive rings; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1d. These wires are denoted by W6-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 6 ×R + (R −1), with R representing the number of rings conforming the wire. At the ends of the cylinders only hexagons are allowed. We will consider from W6-13 to W6-48.

Decagonal tubes

The basic units are a pentagonal rings and decagonal rings of Co atoms. These tubes are grown alternating pentagons and decagons along the cylindrical axis; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1e. These tubes are denoted by T10-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R + 10 ×(R −1), with R representing the number of pentagons conforming the tube. We will consider from T10-35 to T10-65. Figure 1a shows a lateral view of T10-50.

Decagonal wires

The basic units are single axial atoms, pentagonal rings and decagonal rings of Co atoms. These tubes are grown similarly to the decagonal tubes but in addition they also have a single atom on the axis at approximately the same height as the external decagon; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1f. These wires are denoted by W10-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R + 10 ×(R −1) + (R −1), with R representing the number of pentagons conforming the tube. We will consider from W10-21 to W10-69.

We should mention that the family of hexagonal tubes (T6-N) is not included here because we failed to find stable structures for this theoretical conception. When initiations with this symmetry were started from several possible configurations they all collapsed into non cylindrical particles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz, P., Vogel, E.E. & Munoz, F. Magnetic phases at the molecular scale: the case of cylindrical Co nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 19, 188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3879-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3879-6

Keywords

Navigation