Abstract
The magnetic phases of cobalt nanocylinders at the molecular scale have been studied by means of density functional theory together with micromagnetism. Diameters of the objects are under 1 nm. The magnetic phases resulting from first-principle calculations are far from obvious and quite different from both semiclassical results and extrapolations from what is measured for larger objects. These differences reinforce the importance of the quantum mechanical approach for small nanoscopic particles. One of the main results reported here is precisely the unexpected order in the last filled orbitals, which produce objects with alternating magnetic properties as the length of the cylinder increases. The resulting anisotropy is not obvious. The vortex phase is washed out due to the aspect ratio of the systems and the strength of the exchange constants for Co. Nevertheless, we do a pedagogical experiment by turning gradually down the exchange constants to investigate the kind of vortex states which are hidden underneath the ferromagnetic phases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilera-Granja F, Montejano-Carrizales JM, Vogel EE (2014) Structural and electronic properties of magnetic cylinders at the atomic scale. Eur Phys J D 68(2):38
Aguilera-Granja F, Montejano-Carrizales JM, Vogel EE (2016) Structural and oxidation properties of coni nanowires. Eur Phys J D 70(6):137
Antonel PS, Oliveira CLP, Jorge GA, Perez OE, Leyva AG, Negri RM (2015) Synthesis and characterization of cofe2o4 magnetic nanotubes, nanorods and nanowires. formation of magnetic structured elastomers by magnetic field-induced alignment of cofe2o4 nanorods. J Nanoparticle Res 17(7):294
Blöchl PE (1994) Projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 50:17953–17979
Bryan MT, Bance S, Dean J, Schrefl T, Allwood DA (2012) Transverse and vortex domain wall structure in magnetic nanowires with uniaxial in-plane anisotropy. J Phys Condens Matter 24(2):024205
D’Albuquerque e Castro J, Altbir D, Retamal JC, Vargas P (2002) Scaling approach to the magnetic phase diagram of nanosized systems. Phys Rev Lett 88:237202
Dorantes-Davila J, Pastor GM (2005) Magnetic reorientation transitions along the crossover from one-dimensional to two-dimensional transition-metal nanostructures. Phys Rev B 72:085427
Douvalis AP, Bourlinos AB, Tucek J, Čépe K, Bakas T, Zboril R (2016) Development of novel fept/nanodiamond hybrid nanostructures: L10 phase size-growth suppression and magnetic properties. J Nanoparticle Res 18(5):115
Gambardella P, Dallmeyer A, Maiti K, Malagoli M, Eberhardt W, Kern K, Carbone C (2002) Ferromagnetism in one-dimensional monatomic metal chains. Nature 416(6878):301–304
Gilbert TL (2004) A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials. IEEE Trans Magn 40(6):3443–3449
Gómez-Polo C, Larumbe S, Barquín LF, Fernández LR (2016) Magnetic induction heating as a new tool for the synthesis of fe3o4–tio2 nanoparticle systems. J Nanoparticle Res 18(5):118
Hobbs D, Kresse G, Hafner J (2000) Fully unconstrained noncollinear magnetism within the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 62(17):11556–11570
Hong J, Wu RQ (2003) First principles calculations of magnetic anisotropy energy of co monatomic wires. Phys Rev B 67:020406
Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996a) Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mat Sci 6:15
Kresse G, Furthmüller J (1996b) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186
Kresse G, Hafner J (1993) Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys Rev B 47:558–561
Kresse G, Hafner J (1994) Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys Rev B 49:14251–14269
Kresse G, Joubert D (1999) From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys Rev B 59:1758–1775
Landau LP, Lifshitz EM (1935) On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys Z Sowjetunion 8:153–169
Landeros P, Escrig J, Altbir D, Bahiana M, e Castro J (2006) Stability of magnetic configurations in nanorings. J Appl Phys 100(4):044311
Li F, Wang T, Ren L, Sun J (2004) Structure and magnetic properties of co nanowires in self-assembled arrays. J Phys Condens Matter 16(45):8053
Munoz F, Romero AH, Mejia-Lopez J, Moran-Lopez JL (2013) Finite size effects on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy in fe magnetic nanowires from first principles. J Nanopart Res 15(4):1–11
Nielsch K, Castano FJ, Matthias S, Lee W, Ross CA (2005) Synthesis of cobalt/polymer multilayer nanotubes. Adv Eng Mater 7(4):217–221
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865–3868
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1997) Generalized gradient approximation made simple [phys. rev. lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys Rev Lett 78:1396–1396
Raphael MP, Christodoulides JA, Qadri SN, Simpkins BS, Byers JM (2010) Magnetic moment degradation of nanowires in biological media: real-time monitoring with squid magnetometry. Nanotechnology 21(28):285101
Sayed F, Labaye Y, Sayed Hassan R, El Haj Hassan F, Yaacoub N, Greneche J-M (2016) Size and thickness effect on magnetic structures of maghemite hollow magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 18(9):1–11
Velázquez-Galván Y, Martínez-Huerta JM, Medina JDLT, Danlée Y, Piraux L, Encinas A (2014) Dipolar interaction in arrays of magnetic. J Phys Condens Matter 26(2):026001
Vogel EE, Vargas P, Altbir D, Escrig J (2010) Handbook of nanophysics, vol 4. CRC press,
Xie J, Chen L, Varadan VK, Yancey J, Srivatsan M (2008) The effects of functional magnetic nanotubes with incorporated nerve growth factor in neuronal differentiation of pc12 cells. Nanotechnology 19(10):105101
Zhang W, Singh R, Bray-Ali N, Haas S (2008) Scaling analysis and application: Phase diagram of magnetic nanorings and elliptical nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 77:144428
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This work was partially supported by the Universidad de La Frontera DIUFRO project under grant DI14-0067. Partial support from the following Chilean sources is acknowledged: Fondecyt (Chile) under contracts 1150019, 1150806 and Financiamiento Basal para Centros Científicos y Tecnológicos de Excelencia (Chile) through the Center for Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (CEDENNA, Contract FB0807).
Appendix: Nomenclature
Appendix: Nomenclature
Pentagonal tubes
The basic unit is a pentagonal ring of Co atoms. The tube grows by adding these pentagons in an intercalated way thus minimizing energy. A projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1b. They are denoted by T5-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R, with R representing the number of rings conforming the tube. We will consider from T5-10 to T5-35.
Pentagonal wires
The basic units are a pentagonal ring of Co atoms and a single Co atom over the center of such pentagon. The wires grow intercalating the axial atom in between consecutive rings; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1c. These wires are denoted by W5-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R + (R −1), with R representing the number of rings conforming the wire. At the ends of the cylinder only pentagons are allowed. We will consider from W5-11 to W5-41.
Hexagonal wires
The basic units are hexagonal rings of Co atoms and a single Co atom over the center of such hexagon. The wires grow intercalating the axial atom in between consecutive rings; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1d. These wires are denoted by W6-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 6 ×R + (R −1), with R representing the number of rings conforming the wire. At the ends of the cylinders only hexagons are allowed. We will consider from W6-13 to W6-48.
Decagonal tubes
The basic units are a pentagonal rings and decagonal rings of Co atoms. These tubes are grown alternating pentagons and decagons along the cylindrical axis; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1e. These tubes are denoted by T10-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R + 10 ×(R −1), with R representing the number of pentagons conforming the tube. We will consider from T10-35 to T10-65. Figure 1a shows a lateral view of T10-50.
Decagonal wires
The basic units are single axial atoms, pentagonal rings and decagonal rings of Co atoms. These tubes are grown similarly to the decagonal tubes but in addition they also have a single atom on the axis at approximately the same height as the external decagon; a projection of the atoms on any end of the cylinder is presented in Fig. 1f. These wires are denoted by W10-N, where N is the total number of atoms in the particle: N = 5 ×R + 10 ×(R −1) + (R −1), with R representing the number of pentagons conforming the tube. We will consider from W10-21 to W10-69.
We should mention that the family of hexagonal tubes (T6-N) is not included here because we failed to find stable structures for this theoretical conception. When initiations with this symmetry were started from several possible configurations they all collapsed into non cylindrical particles.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Díaz, P., Vogel, E.E. & Munoz, F. Magnetic phases at the molecular scale: the case of cylindrical Co nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 19, 188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3879-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3879-6