Advertisement

Charge effect of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles on their surface functionalization by photo-initiated chemical vapour deposition

  • Taraneh Javanbakht
  • Sophie Laurent
  • Dimitri Stanicki
  • Wendell Raphael
  • Jason Robert TavaresEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Diverse applications of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) in the chemical and biomedical industry depend on their surface properties. In this paper, we investigate the effect of initial surface charge (bare, positively and negatively charged SPIONs) on the resulting physicochemical properties of the particles following treatment through photo-initiated chemical vapour deposition (PICVD). Transmission electron microscopy shows a nanometric polymer coating on the SPIONs and contact angle measurements with water demonstrate that their surface became non-polar following functionalization using PICVD. FTIR and XPS data confirm the change in the chemical composition of the treated SPIONs. Indeed, XPS data reveal an initial charge-dependent increase in the surface oxygen content in the case of treated SPIONs. The O/C percentage ratios of the bare SPIONs increase from 1.7 to 1.9 after PICVD treatment, and decrease from 1.7 to 0.7 in the case of negatively charged SPIONs. The ratio remains unchanged for positively charged SPIONs (1.7). This indicates that bare and negatively charged SPIONs showed opposite preference for the oxygen or carbon attachment to their surface during their surface treatment. These results reveal that both the surface charge and stereochemical effects have determinant roles in the polymeric coating of SPIONs with PICVD. Our findings suggest that this technique is appropriate for the treatment of nanoparticles.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles PICVD Contact angle FTIR TEM XPS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Nick Virgilio from École Polytechnique de Montréal for access to the tensiometer. We also acknowledge the (CM)2 laboratory at École Polytechnique de Montréal for the TEM imaging of the samples. Finally, the authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The ARC (Research Contract AUWB-2010—10/15-UMONS-5), the FNRS, the Walloon Region, the COST TD1004 and TD1402, the UIAP VII program and the Center for Microscopy and Molecular Imaging (CMMI, supported by the European Regional Development Fund and the Walloon Region) are thanked for their support.

References

  1. Bloemen M, Stappen TV, Willot P et al (2014) Heterobifunctional PEG ligands for bioconjugation reactions on iron oxide nanoparticles. PLoS One 9:e109475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang SY, Zheng N-Y, Chen C-S, Chen C-D, Chen Y-Y, Wang CRC (2007) Analysis of peptides and proteins affinity-bound to iron oxide nanoparticles by MALDI MS. J Am Soc Mass Spectr 18:910–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen FF, Gerion D, Gray JW, Budinger TF (2009) Multimodal imaging probes for in vivo targeted and non-targeted imaging and therapeutics. US Patent WO2009045579 A2Google Scholar
  4. Chen CL, Zhang H, Ye Q, Hsieh WY, Hitchens TK, Shen HH, Liu L, Wu YJ, Foley LM, Wang SJ, Ho C (2011) A new nano-sized iron oxide particle with high sensitivity for cellular magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Imaging Biol 13:825–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Das M, Mishra D, Maiti TK, Basak A, Pramanik P (2008) Bio-functionalization of magnetite nanoparticles using an aminophosphonic acid coupling agent: new, ultradispersed, iron-oxide folate nanoconjugates for cancer-specific targeting. Nanotechnology 19(41):415101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Palma R, Peeters S, Van Bael MJ, Van den Rul H, Bonroy K, Laureyn W, Mullens J, Borghs G, Maes G (2007) Silane ligand exchange to make hydrophobic superparamagnetic nanoparticles water-dispersible. Chem Mater 19:1821–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dion CAD, Raphael W, Tong E, Tavares JR (2014) Photo-initiated chemical vapor deposition of thin films using syngas for the functionalization of surfaces at room temperature and near-atmospheric pressure. Surf Coat Technol 244:98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eigler DM, Heinrich AJ, Loth S, Lutz CP (2014) Antiferromagnetic storage device. US Patent US8,724,376 B2Google Scholar
  9. Fan C, Gao W, Chen Z, Fan H, Li M, Deng F, Chen Z (2011) Tumor selectivity of stealth multi-functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 404:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gawande MB, Branco PS, Varma RS (2013) Nano-magnetite (Fe3O4) as a support for recyclable catalysts in the development of sustainable methodologies. Chem Soc Rev 42:3371–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Georgelin T, Moreau B, Bar N, Villemin D, Cabuil V, Horner O (2008) Functionalization of Fe2O3 nanoparticles through the grafting of an organophosphorous ligand. Sens Actuator B 134:451–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanini A, Schmitt A, Kacem K, Chau F, Ammar S, Gavard J (2011) Evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticle biocompatibility. Int J Nanomed 6:787–794Google Scholar
  13. Hu X, Yu JC, Gong J (2007) Fast production of self-assembled hierarchical α-Fe2O3 nanoarchitectures. J Phys Chem C 111:11180–11185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin H, Hong B, Kakar SS, Kang KA (2008) Tumor-specific nano-entities for optical detection and hyperthermic treatment of breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 614:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson L-S, Campbell JM (2004) Reproducible XPS on biopolymers: cellulose studies. Surf Interface Anal 36:1018–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kazemzadeh H, Ataei A, Rashchi F (2012) Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles by reverse co-precipitation. Int J Mod Phys Conf Ser 5:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latham AH, Williams ME (2008) Controlling transport and chemical functionality of magnetic nanoparticles. Acc chem res 41(3):411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsuno R, Yamamoto K, Otsuka H, Takahara A (2004) Polystyrene-and poly (3-vinylpyridine)-grafted magnetite nanoparticles prepared through surface-initiated nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization. Macromolecules 37(6):2203–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Misra D, Wörhoff K, Mascher P (2003) Dielectrics in emerging technologies. In: Proceedings of the international symposium, Electrochem Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Namanga J, Foba J, Ndinteh DT, Yufanyi DM, Krause RWM (2013) Synthesis and magnetic properties of a superparamagnetic nanocomposite pectin-magnetite nanocomposite. J Nanomater 2013:87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Namvari M, Namazi H (2014) Clicking graphene oxide and Fe3O4 nanoparticles together: an efficient adsorbent to remove dyes from aqueous solutions. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:1527–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neouze MA, Schubert U (2008) Surface modification and functionalization of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles by organic ligands. Monatsh Chem 139:183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nethaji S, Sivasamy A, Mandal AB (2013) Preparation and characterization of corn cob activated carbon coated with nano-sized magnetite particles for the removal of Cr(VI). Bioresour Technol 134:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Obermayer D, Balu AM, Romero AA, Goessler W, Luque R, Kappe CO (2013) Nanocatalysis in continuous flow: supported iron oxide nanoparticles for the heterogeneous aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Green Chem 15:1530–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson I, Tung LD, Maenosono S, Wälti C, Thanh NTK (2010) Synthesis of core-shell gold coated magnetic nanoparticles and their interaction with thiolated DNA. Nanoscale 2:2624–2630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Solans C, Izquierdo P, Nolla J, Azemar N, Garcia-Celma MJ (2005) Nano-emulsions. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 10:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stanicki D, Boutry S, Laurent S, Wacheul L, Nicolas E, Crombez D, Elst LV, Lafontaine DLJ, Muller RN (2014) Carboxy-silane coated iron oxide nanoparticles: a convenient platform for cellular and small animal imaging. J Mater Chem B 2(4):387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuart BH (2004) Infrared spectroscopy: fundamentals and applications. Wiley Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun S, Zeng H (2002) Size-controlled synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:8204–8205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uzun K, Çevik O, Şenel M, Sözeri H, Baykal A, Abasiyani MF, Toprak MS (2010) Covalent immobilization of invertase on PAMAM-dendrimer modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 12:3057–3067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Veiseh O, Gunn J, Zhang M (2010) Design and fabrication of magnetic nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery and imaging. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62(3):284–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vijayakumar R, Koltypin Y, Felner I, Gedanken A (2000) Sonochemical synthesis and characterization of pure nanometer-sized Fe3O4 particles. Mater Sci Eng A 286:101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang X, Liu L-H, Ramström O, Yan M (2009) Engineering nanomaterial surfaces for biomedical applications. Exp Biol Med 234:1128–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu W, He Q, Jiang C (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res Lett 3:397–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taraneh Javanbakht
    • 1
  • Sophie Laurent
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dimitri Stanicki
    • 2
  • Wendell Raphael
    • 1
  • Jason Robert Tavares
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringEcole Polytechnique of MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Laboratory of NMR and Molecular ImagingUniversity of MonsMonsBelgium
  3. 3.Center for Microscopy and Molecular Imaging (CMMI)GosseliesBelgium

Personalised recommendations