Abstract
The multidimensional bibliometric analysis of publications on nanoscience and nanotechnology (NS&NT) produced by the researchers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS) in 2007–2012 has shown their growing publication activity and international visibility in the field and the main objects of research such as nanoparticles, nanostructures (nanostructured materials), nanotubes (especially carbon ones), nanocomposites, nanocrystals, nanotechnology, and nanoelectronics and identified the most productive authors and institutes, as well as the most cited publications. It was made using the data from multidisciplinary (Web of Science, Scopus, and Russian Index of Scientific Citation) and specialized (Chemical Abstracts Plus and Inspec) information resources, that is from international (WoS, Scopus, CAPlus, and Inspec) and national (RISC) data bases. The analysis has shown that most of the SB RAS research works on NS&NT are concentrated in Novosibirsk Scientific Centre.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11051-015-2900-1/MediaObjects/11051_2015_2900_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrievski RA, Klyuchareva SV (2011) Journal information flow in nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 13(12):6221–6230
Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2013) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95(1):351–370
Braun T, Glänzel W, Grupp H (1995a) The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part I. All fields combined mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics 33(3):263–293
Braun T, Glänzel W, Grupp H (1995b) The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part II. Life sciences. Scientometrics 34(2):207–237
Braun T, Schubert A, Zsindely S (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38(2):321–325
Busygina TV (2009) Bibliometric analysis of information flow on nanobiotechnologies based on Scopus. Bibliosphere 4:31–42
Busygina TV, Elepov BS, Zibareva IV, Lavrik OL, Shaburova NN (2013) Investigations carried out at the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the area of nanoscience and nanotechnology: bibliometric analysis. Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya (Chem Sustain Dev) 21(4):463–473
Busygina TV, Lavrik OL, Mandrinina LA, Balutkina NA (2010) Database “SB RAS Researchers’ publications on nanostructures, nanomaterials and nanotechnology”: structure and possibilities for scientometric research on its base. Bibliosphere 4:53–61
Grieneisen ML, Zhang M (2011) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: evolving definitions and growing footprint on the scientific landscape. Small 7(20):2836–2839
Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2011) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transfer 36(2):145–172
Maghrebi M, Abbasi A, Amiri S, Monsefi R, Harati A (2011) A collective and abridged lexical query for delineation of nanotechnology publications. Scientometrics 86(1):15–25
Markusova VA, Libkind AN, Varshavsky AE, Jansz CNM (2012) Research performance and collaboration in the Novosibirsk region. Scientometrics 91(2):513–526
Markusova VA (2009) Industrial-developed countries and China in the struggle for leadership in nanotechnology development: Review of scientific literature on bibliometric analysis of publications in Web of Science and Scopus databases, 1997–2003. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya (Sociology of Scientific Research). Institute for Scientific Information on Social Sciences of RAS, Moscow, pp 40–64
Milojevic S (2012) Multidisciplinary cognitive content of nanoscience and nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 14(1):1–28
Mogoutov A, Kahane B (2007) Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: a scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Res Policy 36:893–903
Porter AL, Youtie J (2009) How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? J Nanopart Res 11(5):1023–1041
Reiss T, Thielmann A (2010) Nanotechnology research in Russia—an analysis of scientific publications and patent applications. Nanotechnol Law Bus 7(4):387–404
Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: The National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 2(13):427–445
Shaburova NN (2012) Directions of Russian physical nanothematic investigations in the beginning of the XXI century: Bibliometric indices. Chigisheva OP (ed) Brand New Research Aspects in the Beginning of the XXI Century. Collection of Scientific Proceedings, Part I. Rostov-on-Don, IRC Scientific Collaboration, pp 9–21
Shaburova NN, Golod SV, Gavrilova SN (2012) Some results of studying the documentation flow on nanotematics in the Siberian Branch of the RAS (based on the database Inspec). Bibliosphere 4:67–74
Shevchenko LB (2012) Information resources on nanotechnology. Bibliosphere, Special Issue, 46–50
Zibareva IV, Elepov BS (2012) Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis based on Russian Index of Scientific Citation. Bibliosphere 4:39–48
Zibareva IV, Soloshenko NS (2011) Russian scientific publications 2005–2009 in the Science Citation Index, Scopus and Chemical Abstracts databases. Sci Tech Inf Process 38(3):212–223
Zibareva IV, Zibarev AV, Bouznik VM (2010) Russian nanoscience: bibliometric analysis relying on the STN International databases. Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya (Chem Sustain Dev) 18(2):201–219
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Prof. Boris S. Elepov for valuable discussions and to the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences for financial support of this work as Interdisciplinary Project No. 37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lavrik, O.L., Busygina, T.V., Shaburova, N.N. et al. Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis and evaluation. J Nanopart Res 17, 90 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2900-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2900-1